• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Mar 5, 2026
Metascore
65

Generally favorable reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 23
  2. Negative: 0 out of 23

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Lucy Mangan
    Mar 5, 2026
    100
    The eight-part adaptation of Julia May Jonas’s provocative 2022 debut novel of the same name has not shied away from the properties that made the book great – black comedy, bleak insight, evisceration of accepted pieties – and fitted them perfectly to the new form.
  2. Reviewed by: Judy Berman
    Mar 5, 2026
    80
    It’s the superior of the two shows, in large part because of Weisz’s performance, which seduces the viewer with sensuality and humor, only to shock us with unhinged behavior. But what gives it the thematic resonance Rooster never reaches for is Jonas’ psychological insight into a place steeped in art and ideas that still gets bogged down in bureaucracy and appearances.
  3. Reviewed by: Angie Han
    Mar 5, 2026
    80
    An antiheroine as sharply funny as she is willfully blinkered and as oddly compelling as she is repellent, she has a voice that defines Julia May Jonas’ adaptation of her own novel — elevating it into something knottier than the feminist cancel-culture treatise might appear at first glance, and all the more insightful for it.
  4. Reviewed by: Anita Singh
    Mar 5, 2026
    80
    The style of the series takes a bit of getting used to – it’s fourth-wall breaking, with Weisz addressing the camera throughout and speaking in sometimes quite stilted, stagey language. But before long you fall into the rhythm of it. Think of it as Fleabag for 50-somethings.
  5. Reviewed by: Ben Dowell
    Mar 5, 2026
    80
    It’s such fun. Awash with academic ego and sexual brinkmanship, it leans into the main character’s obsessiveness and makes us almost complicit in ways that feel naughty, grown-up and sophisticated — quite rare for a Netflix show these days but hugely welcome.
  6. Reviewed by: Taylor Gates
    Mar 5, 2026
    80
    Vladimir may not be an obsessive page-turner, but it’s still definitely a book worth reading.
  7. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    May 4, 2026
    76
    Sometimes, Vladimir finds the right balance, while at many others, it feels as lost in the weeds as its main character. Weisz is having a ball playing this dangerous mix of cockiness and cluelessness, but Vladimir as a whole never quite coheres.
  8. Reviewed by: Randy Myers
    Mar 6, 2026
    75
    “Vladimir” works because it is indeed funny and sexy but also because it has fully developed, complicated characters — the too-smart-for-their-own-good sort that are having a hell of a time sorting out their lives.
  9. Reviewed by: Kelly Lawler
    Mar 5, 2026
    75
    "Vladimir" is the kind of TV show that starts at an eight and only revs up from there, fast-paced and heart-racing without any computer-generated imagery explosions or daring deeds.
  10. Reviewed by: Inkoo Kang
    Mar 6, 2026
    70
    Proves strangely compelling. Even when we think we know where the series is going, it remains as slippery as its unreliable narrator, difficult to nail down in both genre and intent.
  11. Reviewed by: Chris Vognar
    Mar 5, 2026
    70
    “Vladimir,” based on Julia May Jonas’ 2022 novel, is ultimately Weisz’s show, and she carries it capably, often by addressing the viewer through the fourth wall.
  12. Reviewed by: Sherin Nicole
    Mar 5, 2026
    63
    The zany, farcical, HOT MESS of the first seven episodes culminates in a satisfying eighth—that’s cheeky and ultimately about reclaiming power. Not everyone will make it past the first seven, though. If you do, a wink and an arched brow will be waiting for you.
  13. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Mar 6, 2026
    60
    Weisz’s abundant star appeal makes the show plenty watchable, however familiar the scenario might be.
  14. Reviewed by: Nick Hilton
    Mar 5, 2026
    60
    Vladimir is brisk, easy to watch, and occasionally droll, but any higher aspirations have been brutally muted.
  15. Reviewed by: Nick Schager
    Mar 5, 2026
    50
    [An] over-long, repetitive, and scattershot affair which takes satiric aim at various targets and, to a tee, misses them all.
  16. Reviewed by: Liz Hersey
    Mar 5, 2026
    50
    The whole thing falls flat, but really, Vladimir was never able to get it up.
  17. Reviewed by: Alison Herman
    Mar 5, 2026
    50
    Weisz aces the slapstick comedy of being hot and bothered in an inappropriate setting. But if “Vladimir” wants to prove erotic fixation can lead to artistic transcendence, it never fully walks the walk.
  18. Reviewed by: Dave Nemetz
    Mar 6, 2026
    42
    Netflix's "Vladimir" promises a steamy forbidden romance, but it fails to deliver, bogged down by curdled cynicism and tired clichés.
  19. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Mar 5, 2026
    42
    Much like M, it gets so caught up in proving its own relevancy, it overlooks the core principles of a good story. Obscurity awaits the show. Luckily, the book is still there, and infinitely better.
  20. Reviewed by: Gregory Lawrence
    Mar 5, 2026
    40
    It flattens the complicated experience of desire into a boring and simple melodrama, sweeping its own leg pervasively over eight half-hour episodes.
  21. Reviewed by: Joel Keller
    Mar 5, 2026
    40
    As good as Weisz and the cast of Vladimir is, they’re trapped in a story that’s smothered in gimmickry instead of character development.
  22. Reviewed by: Rebecca Onion
    Mar 5, 2026
    40
    It comes as a surprising disappointment that the adaptation, a newly released eight-episode miniseries created by the book’s author and starring Rachel Weisz as the narrator (here given the initial “M.”), Leo Woodall (The White Lotus) as the eponymous Vladimir, and John Slattery (Mad Men) as the narrator’s husband John, is a pretty husk of the novel.
  23. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    Mar 5, 2026
    40
    Ms. Weisz is shortchanged by the material, which likely wouldn’t be improved by, say, a snappier delivery. Or a less self-absorbed M. Everyone seems to be trying too hard, with the exception of Mr. Slattery, which is why he’s the best thing here.