Season #: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 357 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 60 out of 357
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Apr 7, 2014
    10
    Vikings keeps getting better, every main character is compelling and likable for what their role is. My favorite shows have a majority of actors that fit in that category, in Vikings I really like them all. What separates Vikings from something like Game of Thrones; which I also enjoy is its rawness. When I watch Viking's I feel like I am there, in that harsh environment, it feels real,Vikings keeps getting better, every main character is compelling and likable for what their role is. My favorite shows have a majority of actors that fit in that category, in Vikings I really like them all. What separates Vikings from something like Game of Thrones; which I also enjoy is its rawness. When I watch Viking's I feel like I am there, in that harsh environment, it feels real, not like a fantasy; which of course it still is. Expand
  2. Mar 14, 2014
    10
    I don't know how this show hasn't developed the insane fan following of Game of Thrones. It's a historical story driven drama, full of blood, sex, deceit, betrayal, politics, and strangely, some history thrown in.

    Vikings drags you back in time to the narrative of the Lothbrok family, yeah, the ones who eventually fought Alfred the Great for domination of both faith and power in Britain
    I don't know how this show hasn't developed the insane fan following of Game of Thrones. It's a historical story driven drama, full of blood, sex, deceit, betrayal, politics, and strangely, some history thrown in.

    Vikings drags you back in time to the narrative of the Lothbrok family, yeah, the ones who eventually fought Alfred the Great for domination of both faith and power in Britain during the Dark Ages. Due to the limited knowledge we have of this period, it is perfect for a History channel show, as it may influence more people to research the period.

    After watching the first season, I was hooked by the inter-family politics in a Dark Ages town, although towards the end of the season things got a bit religious, and thus I personally was bored during parts of the show.

    Season 2 so far has been all action. There are very few parts of the show which follow "politically correct" history, but sometimes there are throwbacks to modern morality and ethics.

    This is a Must Watch. I eagerly anticipate season 2-10
    Expand
  3. Feb 27, 2014
    10
    The acting in this show is great, the story is great, action is great. I started watching this show from when the very first episode premiered, and I have yet to be disappointed.
  4. Mar 29, 2014
    10
    This season is better than first one because it offers more excitement, plot twists, and it all comes with added value to all going on, everything has higher stakes and more people are reliant on their outcome.
  5. Apr 18, 2014
    8
    Is it as ambitious as Game of Thrones? No. Does it posses the emotional depth of Breaking Bad? Absolutely not. Are the plots and story lines on par with the detail ridden script of House of Cards? Not even close. But who cares? This show is just cool man. In the age of masterful television, I like to think of Vikings as the simpler option to all of those aforementioned juggernauts. TravisIs it as ambitious as Game of Thrones? No. Does it posses the emotional depth of Breaking Bad? Absolutely not. Are the plots and story lines on par with the detail ridden script of House of Cards? Not even close. But who cares? This show is just cool man. In the age of masterful television, I like to think of Vikings as the simpler option to all of those aforementioned juggernauts. Travis Fimmel in the lead as Ragnar Lothbrok is great and the rest of the actors are more than competent. Deeply luscious scenery, clear dialog, a concise plot and some badass fight scenes...what's not to like? Expand
  6. May 3, 2014
    10
    The show is simply amazing. The writers managed to write a story that leaves the reader in suspense until the last second, and without clichés. The plot of the show is absolutely engaging, with great historical and religious themes. The Vikings are portrayed reliably. Vikings is an epic, a must have.
  7. Mar 10, 2014
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I love historical series, the story with beautiful cinematography and great accessories! I'm attracted.
    Historic space mentioned that less attention is being very happy
    Expand
  8. hub
    Mar 21, 2014
    10
    They have really stepped it up this series, scenery, characters, production everything. Definitely worth a watch. For those who complain about historical accuracy, go watch a documentary not a series that is trying to compete with the likes of game of thrones and spartacus.
  9. Mar 9, 2014
    10
    This really is the best show on TV - bar now. Better than The Walking Dead, better than Game of Thrones, better than Helix, better than all of them. It transports the viewer like no other show can into another world - with engaging characters and beautiful cinematography. Everything from the quality of the sets and music to the brilliant cast and the excellent writing... I cannot fault it.This really is the best show on TV - bar now. Better than The Walking Dead, better than Game of Thrones, better than Helix, better than all of them. It transports the viewer like no other show can into another world - with engaging characters and beautiful cinematography. Everything from the quality of the sets and music to the brilliant cast and the excellent writing... I cannot fault it. It's wonderful. Expand
  10. Mar 5, 2014
    10
    Really, what's not to love about this series? The actors are perfection.The breathtaking scenery to the period trappings just add to the whole series week to week. True to history it is one of the most magnificent additions to television today. Violence runs rampant, as violent as that time period and people were. I find I must hide my eyes at some of the hacking and stabbing, but truly,Really, what's not to love about this series? The actors are perfection.The breathtaking scenery to the period trappings just add to the whole series week to week. True to history it is one of the most magnificent additions to television today. Violence runs rampant, as violent as that time period and people were. I find I must hide my eyes at some of the hacking and stabbing, but truly, its a blast for me. It is not often we can learn history and say we were not once bored. The casting of this series needs a raise, a masterful job putting these actors together to create a visual and auditory masterpiece. Romance, adultery, death, birth, coniving, egotistical maniacs etc.This show has it all and is continually evolving and shocking us. Kudos to the director and producer. I wait impatiently each week dreading the end of the season, wanting to rail at the chance it might not come back. A glimmer of theatrical brilliance on tv all played by professionals. Thank you Vikings ! Expand
  11. May 5, 2014
    10
    Season 1 was good but Season 2 is on another other level. Prefer this to GOT and this is the best TV since Season 5 of Breaking Bad. Roll on Season 3.
  12. Apr 3, 2014
    8
    Is exciting how you can learn about history and enjoy a good series and good actors, i like how the drama is going deeper and deeper and all the scenarios are from my perspective, the scenario is better than the game of thrones scenarios.
  13. Mar 29, 2014
    7
    While the story takes considerable creative license, it is doubtful the real hyper masculine vikings of the dark ages were champions of gender equality, it is none the less entertaining. The fight scenes are hit or miss; sometimes they look good, and sometimes they seem to suffer from some lazy editing. The performance from Travis Fimmel as Ragnar is mesmerizing, and he is well supportedWhile the story takes considerable creative license, it is doubtful the real hyper masculine vikings of the dark ages were champions of gender equality, it is none the less entertaining. The fight scenes are hit or miss; sometimes they look good, and sometimes they seem to suffer from some lazy editing. The performance from Travis Fimmel as Ragnar is mesmerizing, and he is well supported by the rest of the cast; Gustaf Skarsgård occasionally steals the show with his portrayal of Floki, Ragnars close confident and ship wright. As long as you are not too much of a stickler for historical accuracy you will probably find Vikings to be an enjoyable viewing experience. Expand
  14. Jun 8, 2014
    9
    This series competes on a level with all other series on all other networks. I really enjoy the intertwined stories of the characters while not straying far from Ragnar. The History channel is providing some very good entertainment that shouldn't go unnoticed by the real critics.
  15. Sep 29, 2014
    10
    Finally a series not centered on sex or political,also a great reconstruction of the history.
    wonderful the characters and great the actors,especially Travis Fimmel,Katheryn Winnick,Clive Standen and Gustaf Skarsgard.
    Simply spectacular!
    I love these series,and i wait for the third season!
  16. Dec 1, 2015
    10
    The best show on TV!

    Honestly, it's brilliant. LOVE the characters, the progression, the plots, the acting, the scenery. It's the best show out there.
  17. Mar 30, 2014
    7
    Vikings continues to be an odd mix of elements unlike anything else on TV. The production design is extravagant, but the dialogue is sparse. Intriguing historical elements are presented side by side with inaccuracies and outright fantasies.

    The new season has incorporated multiple odd and unannounced time jumps. Miraculously, Ragnar's son is a grown man while no one else has aged at
    Vikings continues to be an odd mix of elements unlike anything else on TV. The production design is extravagant, but the dialogue is sparse. Intriguing historical elements are presented side by side with inaccuracies and outright fantasies.

    The new season has incorporated multiple odd and unannounced time jumps. Miraculously, Ragnar's son is a grown man while no one else has aged at all. That said, if one possesses the generosity to forgive this sort of thing, the show definitely has something to offer, bringing an overt religious clash (including a crucifiction) to the forefront, along with ample infighting among the Norsemen.

    There continues to be a variety of interesting characters, and they've certainly made an effort to focus on women. However, Travis Fimmel continues to carry the show with a gripping performance that defies stereotypes about warlike leaders seen throughout film and TV. The character's internal struggles with religion and family clearly weigh on him, but his actions are nonetheless restrained and he doesn't have a heroic speech or daring act at every moment, just when it's needed.

    Overall, the high production values, nuanced characters, and several other upsides continue to make the show worth watching, if well short of greatness.
    Expand
  18. Apr 23, 2016
    8
    In season 2, episode 3 there's a scene from Hedeby, surrounded by hills and snow covered mountains.
    However, Hedeby was in Southern Jutland, Denmark - which is as flat as the Netherlands (!) I should know, since I'm a Dane myself.
    The series is made as if events are taking place in Norway; however, Ragnar Lodbrog was Danish - and Hedeby as well, as mentioned. I think they should
    In season 2, episode 3 there's a scene from Hedeby, surrounded by hills and snow covered mountains.
    However, Hedeby was in Southern Jutland, Denmark - which is as flat as the Netherlands (!) I should know, since I'm a Dane myself.
    The series is made as if events are taking place in Norway; however, Ragnar Lodbrog was Danish - and Hedeby as well, as mentioned.
    I think they should consider such important details before making such a series....

    Except for that, it's a very good series! c",)
    Expand
  19. Feb 17, 2018
    8
    More interesting than the first season, more ambitious, better directed, better driven, better acted, more action, more drama, more emotion. This is how the shows should improve each season.
    Let's see what awaits me with the third season.
  20. Feb 18, 2018
    8
    The second season of Vikings was very good. I do feel like it suffered from a little bit of repetition, with the same power struggle themes going on but I do recognize that this is a historical show so they have to be true to history. Good fight scenes, well done suspense, decent story.
  21. Aug 9, 2019
    10
    Epic season of Vikings 10/10 Must watch! It might be the best season of Vikings in my opinion.
  22. Jan 5, 2019
    8
    Continues where it left off with good character arcs and development, still lacks the big budget of GOT. Would be spectacular with it.
  23. Feb 8, 2019
    8
    Another great season which introduces new interesting characters. The action is great again. I did wish they focus a bit less on the relation between Ragnar in its wife's. I also felt like the betrayal of Rollo was justified seeing how Ragnar treated him. Overal I think this was a great second season.
  24. Aug 6, 2019
    7
    Season 2 of Vikings manages to continue the interesting story of Ragnar Lothbrok, but already shows signs of degrading quality compared to season 1.

    Where as season 1 used eight episodes to tell exactly what the writers wanted, this season forces a 10-episodes mandate down the creators throats. Unlike season 1, episodes suddenly use slowed down scenes without much substance or
    Season 2 of Vikings manages to continue the interesting story of Ragnar Lothbrok, but already shows signs of degrading quality compared to season 1.

    Where as season 1 used eight episodes to tell exactly what the writers wanted, this season forces a 10-episodes mandate down the creators throats. Unlike season 1, episodes suddenly use slowed down scenes without much substance or usefulness (King Horik returns to Kattegat, Blood Eagle) and loses track of what made season 1 special.

    Ragnar's story increasingly becomes one of sadness as he clings on to the predictions of the fortuneteller, thus ending the love between him and Lagertha. While heartbraking, it is part of the tale of Ragnar and his sons.

    Not as interesting and entertaining as the first season, but still a good watch. I give it a 7/10.
    Expand
  25. Jan 2, 2021
    10
    Second season of Vikings is one of best that I’ve seen recent in years. The evolution of story and character is absolutely perfect and new actors and relationship introduced increase the necessity to stay focused on the show.
Metascore
77

Generally favorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 11
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 11
  3. Negative: 0 out of 11
  1. Reviewed by: Karen Valby
    Mar 19, 2014
    67
    The best of what Vikings has to offer, besides artfully, horrifically staged sequences of warfare, is fierce Lagertha.
  2. Reviewed by: Curt Wagner
    Feb 28, 2014
    75
    While the storytelling is generally riveting, Hirst and his team occasionally drop a few stinkers in the dialogue. The exceptional cast—which also includes Katheryn Winnick as Ragner's wife, Lagertha—is able to rise above those bombs. It's their distinctive portrayals that, for me, bring this Dark Ages tale to life.
  3. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Feb 28, 2014
    91
    Whatever becomes of Ragnar, Vikings has emerged in its second season as a series of appreciably higher quality. Its characters and storytelling, all within a world quite unlike any other on the TV landscape, have gone far beyond the cardboard stage.