• Network: ABC
  • Series Premiere Date: Mar 5, 2017
Metascore
59

Mixed or average reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 24
  2. Negative: 1 out of 24
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Mar 3, 2017
    60
    Yet even with some elaborate new wrinkles, before it's over the launch betrays the inherent challenge in teasing out this sort of murderous cat-and-mouse game.
  2. Reviewed by: Allison Keene
    Mar 3, 2017
    60
    Time After Time has the opportunity to do something worthy of both of their light and dark legacies. Whether or not it does, only time will tell.
  3. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Mar 3, 2017
    58
    Stroma and Rodriguez have some sweet getting-to-know-you moments together while Bowman has presence as a menace run amuck. Still, by the end of Episode 2, a dull-edged redundancy is already starting to set in.
  4. Reviewed by: Mark A. Perigard
    Mar 1, 2017
    58
    Like all time-travel shows, paradoxes can emerge like sinkholes. Still, the cast works so much charm, they must be exhausted by the end of the day.
  5. Reviewed by: Rob Lowman
    Mar 6, 2017
    50
    The original movie worked because Wells was played as a man out of time and Steenburgen’s character longed for a gentleman while still wanting to be a modern woman. The new series doesn’t let that relationship ripen enough; so it ends up diving too quickly into violence and sci-fi fantasy to get its grounding.
  6. Reviewed by: Jeff Korbelik
    Mar 6, 2017
    50
    It’s based on the 1979 novel and movie and is more romantic fluff than thriller.
  7. Reviewed by: Glenn Garvin
    Mar 4, 2017
    50
    ABC's Time After Time is a lock for this year's Emmy in the "Imitation Is the Sincerest Form of Idiocy" category, being not only part of an insanely overworked genre but a remake of the 1979 film of the same name.
  8. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Mar 3, 2017
    50
    The science-fiction and thriller elements are routine, and Mr. Bowman doesn’t have the suave menace David Warner brought to the Ripper in the film. What does work is the cross-century romance between Wells and the woman he befriends.
  9. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Mar 3, 2017
    50
    It’s unclear if the series will rise above a constant cat-and-mouse game between Wells and Jack, something that seems like it could get old quick.
  10. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Mar 3, 2017
    50
    Time After Time is not nearly as compelling or creepy as it aims to be--it could use a smidgen of the fun that “Timeless” came by naturally.
  11. Reviewed by: Mitchel Broussard
    Mar 3, 2017
    50
    It lacks urgency. One episode doesn’t represent an entire series, but as far as hooks go this one likes bite, and a winsome cast and pleasantly silly premise can’t make up for its shortcomings.
  12. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Mar 1, 2017
    50
    Time after Time is timeworn.
  13. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Mar 3, 2017
    40
    Time After Time is less utterly hollow than Williamson's CBS dud Stalker and slightly less literarily pretentious than Fox's The Following, but there remains an excess of uninterrogated slasher carnage.
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 37 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 37
  2. Negative: 13 out of 37
  1. Mar 5, 2017
    8
    Stretched plot, decent cast, interested in seeing where it goes, especially with the family connection and the brooding, creepy stalker. AStretched plot, decent cast, interested in seeing where it goes, especially with the family connection and the brooding, creepy stalker. A little concerned with the H.G./Jane romance. Full Review »
  2. Mar 6, 2017
    3
    Programs dealing with time travel seems to be the "thing" on TV this season, along with super heroes. This show (and I am dating myself)Programs dealing with time travel seems to be the "thing" on TV this season, along with super heroes. This show (and I am dating myself) reminds me a bit of the 1960s program called "The Time Tunnel" and most recently "Timeless". There can be just so many of the same formats on TV before the viewing audience gets bored. Full Review »
  3. Apr 10, 2017
    8
    Whilst it isn't the best time traveling show out there, I think it could be better, going more followed it time along with going more back inWhilst it isn't the best time traveling show out there, I think it could be better, going more followed it time along with going more back in time, it is WAY better than Making History, it has plot and makes more seance. And it doesn't have the awful humour that people think Making History.

    Whilst it needs work, I'll have to say this is worth watching...
    Full Review »