• Network: AMC
  • Series Premiere Date: Oct 4, 2020
Season #: 2, 1
User Score
4.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 31 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 31
  2. Negative: 17 out of 31
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Oct 5, 2020
    4
    A sign of just how much this franchise has jumped its own dead shark. While the actors try hard with what they are given (and one is just a joy to look at) the plot is so uninspired and predictable it feels like it was written via TVTropes.

    Its good that its a short duration spin off but the real question is if it will even be able to make it that long. The characters are unlikable, the
    A sign of just how much this franchise has jumped its own dead shark. While the actors try hard with what they are given (and one is just a joy to look at) the plot is so uninspired and predictable it feels like it was written via TVTropes.

    Its good that its a short duration spin off but the real question is if it will even be able to make it that long. The characters are unlikable, the setting is illogical, and we hit zombie saturation BEFORE The Walking Dead began. What we have now is a franchise that simply will not die.

    They went for the head by announcing the end of TWD, but WB just keeps clawing behind us like a walker crawling on the ground that has no legs.
    Expand
  2. Nov 16, 2020
    6
    Season 1:
    Having watched episode 7, I'm raising my rating from 5 to 6.
    Having watched episode 6, I raised my rating from a 4 to 5. What happened? A better director and better writers. And, of course Ted Sutherland as Percy and Scott Adsit as Tony continued their roles. Michael Cudlitz brings a significant upgrade in directing and overall experience in film. Maya Goldsmith and Eddie
    Season 1:
    Having watched episode 7, I'm raising my rating from 5 to 6.
    Having watched episode 6, I raised my rating from a 4 to 5.
    What happened?
    A better director and better writers.
    And, of course Ted Sutherland as Percy and Scott Adsit as Tony continued their roles.
    Michael Cudlitz brings a significant upgrade in directing and overall experience in film.
    Maya Goldsmith and Eddie Guzelian provided better writing.
    It's very interesting to see a series improve like this.
    Episode 7 was a lot about Annet Mahendru as Jennifer "Huck" Mallick. Some of her scenes I would rate as high as 8 - but, some as low as 4. She is struggling with her interpretation of a female US Marine. When she isn't portraying the tough side of her Marine character, she turns out some very good acting. The showrunner (Matthew Negrete) needs to find some budget to bring in an acting coach to teach Mahendru how to portray a tough Marine vet character.
    As I've said frequently, I've learned not to judge a series too quickly in its first season.
    By the way, Hal Cumpston (playing Silas Plaskett) shows potential as an actor. I'm thinking he might have a good career as an actor. It looks like he will have a bigger role in episode 8 (based on the previews) and it will be interesting to see how that works out.
    ************************************************
    I've watched episode 6 and I'm updating my review.
    In episode 6, two new characters are introduced:
    Ted Sutherland as Percy
    Scott Adsit as Tony
    These are significant improvements over existing actors and could possibly be strong enough to save the series from termination.
    I'll give credit to the writing and the directing for these two new characters also.
    I don't like beating up on aspiring actors - but, Aliyah Royale as Iris Bennett is horribly miscast, badly directed, poorly written and damages the series. Aliyah may be a perfectly fine actor - but, this role in this series is not good for her career.
    Episode 6 demonstrate that this series could be much, much better. I have found often that it takes a new series a while to find its edge.
    I'm going to raise my rating to a 5 in hopes that improvement continues.

    ***************************************************
    A G-rated version of The Walking Dead is boring.

    "The Walking Dead: World Beyond" is a version of the zombie genre Walking Dead franchise oriented to a young teen demographic.

    I'm an adult - so, it's difficult for me to put myself in the place of a 13 year old watching this series - but, I really did not find it very compelling.

    First the acting...
    The four teen character leads are played by accomplished actors to varying degree of success.
    Nicolas Cantu (playing Elton Ortiz) is by far the more interesting of the four lead actors playing one of the 4 teen character roles.
    The next 2, Alexa Mansour (playing Hope Bennet) and Hal Cumpston (playing Silas Plaskett) are just OK.
    Aliyah Royale (playing Iris Bennett) was painfully boring - which was not entirely her fault... a lot of the problem is the writing and directing.

    Part of the problem is that the thinking of a a normal teenager is not particularly compelling. And the idea of putting 4 normal, typical, young, bland teenagers in a zombie environment is kind-of a boring thing to watch. Obviously it can be made interesting - but, these characters are written as a G-rated to PG-rated types - and, that doesn't leave a lot of room for compelling character development. The blood-and-gore of zombie genre in and of itself is not particularly interesting. It is all the other aspects of life that drive a good zombie story. If the producers of this series thing the blood-and-gore of zombies will make this series successful - they are mistaken.

    It's difficult for young adults to play the role of young teenagers. In fact, I sometimes think older, more accomplished actors pull off some of the aspects of young teen roles better.

    It isn't really fair to watch just one episode and make a judgement about a series. It is not uncommon for a new series to take an entire first season to develop into a quality product.

    I think I may try a few more episode and perhaps I'll come back and give a higher rating.

    Who knows... maybe young teenagers may like this series. I may be the wrong demographic.
    Expand
Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 10
  2. Negative: 0 out of 10
  1. Reviewed by: Joel Keller
    Oct 5, 2020
    50
    We’re not sold on The Walking Dead: World Beyond just yet, though we like Royale and the rest of the cast. We’re just not sure we care enough about the zombie apocalypse or these young characters to follow their journey.
  2. Reviewed by: Jeff Stone
    Oct 5, 2020
    42
    Nothing about it is essential, or even that interesting. Diehards might enjoy it, simply because it promises to deliver exactly the same stuff they’ve been watching for the last 10 years. Everyone else can safely give it a pass.
  3. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Oct 2, 2020
    45
    A minor excursion, feeling too much like the Disney Channel version of a zombie show, minus the catchy songs.