User Score
3.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 35 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 35
  2. Negative: 19 out of 35
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Dec 22, 2020
    0
    Nada fiel al material original, parece mas un reality show y lo peor es que sale Amber Heard.
  2. Dec 19, 2020
    2
    El primer capítulo veo una más un Reality Show con el propósito de lanzar actores sin experiencia, sin reconocimiento, para salvar una actriz polémica, nada más, se perdió al esencia del original
  3. Dec 25, 2020
    0
    I just watched the 1st episode and I literally got nothing out of the story. It jumps back and forth, then the story starts, but we don't know the characters yet. Great mistakes some indie filmmaker would not have done. I highly recommend reading the book first, then watching the 94' one, then try on this. Because right now I can't recommend this.
  4. Jan 7, 2021
    0
    Muy aburrida y la presencia de Amber Heard me arruina la vista...
    Que horror
  5. Jan 8, 2021
    0
    Why would anyone think it a good idea to start this story in the middle? I know the book so I can follow what's going on, but my husband never read the book and is hopelessly confused. The 1994 miniseries is 100 times better!
  6. Jan 16, 2021
    0
    I think the overall impression here is 'lazy' - lazy story adaption, lazy storyline development, lazy and minimal character development.
    There is a solid cast here, woefully under-utilised. Great production values. So a lot of missed potential, along with a clear lack of comprehension of what the core themes of the origin story actually were in the minds of those developing and writing
    I think the overall impression here is 'lazy' - lazy story adaption, lazy storyline development, lazy and minimal character development.
    There is a solid cast here, woefully under-utilised. Great production values. So a lot of missed potential, along with a clear lack of comprehension of what the core themes of the origin story actually were in the minds of those developing and writing the series.
    The mindblowing editorial decision to chop back and forth in time makes little sense and badly damages the narrative, removes any sense of drama and prevents any sense of the stakes in the story. It is impossible to see what the purpose of this timeshifting is - it alienates those familiar with the original story and miniseries, while preventing new/casual viewers from engaging with the new series.
    Also unfortunately, too many audience 'critics' are getting bogged down in their own personal and childish 'we hate Amber Heard' tantrums online instead of considering the actual faults of the series itself.
    Expand
  7. Jan 15, 2021
    1
    They ass-raped this wonderful book. Just godawful. The only good I saw:

    Harold. They got him right and Owen Teague should be commended. Stu was adequate. That's it. Everything else was garbage. From the nonsensical changes, to the terrible casting. Even the better soundtrack was unearned (how dare they play Court of the Crimson King in this folly). Most egregious, and boy the fight for
    They ass-raped this wonderful book. Just godawful. The only good I saw:

    Harold. They got him right and Owen Teague should be commended. Stu was adequate. That's it. Everything else was garbage. From the nonsensical changes, to the terrible casting. Even the better soundtrack was unearned (how dare they play Court of the Crimson King in this folly).

    Most egregious, and boy the fight for this title was fierce, was Ezra Miller as Trashcan Man. He turned him into a drooling idiot. He got nothing right here. He should tear up his SAG card.

    Amber Turd was a close second. Can't act and not a charismatic bone in her body. Forget her criminal behavior with Depp, she is terrible, but especially so here.

    They even managed to ruin Tom Cullen. Hats off to Bill **** for doing Tom justice. M-O-O-N, that spells acting.

    Everyone else was just paint drying. Frannie and Nick also pointed out how.much better the previous attempt was.

    Rey replacing Ralph was a huge waste as well. What a horrible, **** character compared to Ralph. Overall just no. This was a huge disappointment on every level. I cant believe Steven King let his name be attached to this.
    Expand
  8. Jan 14, 2021
    3
    Unable to watch TV series with Amber Heart. One could look, but hatred for Amber Heart does not give any desire to continue.
  9. Jan 4, 2021
    0
    "They wont believe you cuz your a man"
    She Is NOT a victim!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  10. Jan 4, 2021
    0
    Actress Amber Heart is really fake and disgusting / makes a bad impression and totally ruined the timing / definitely the worst actress the series can have / will end in failure / my score should be double zero / thanks for reading
  11. Feb 11, 2021
    3
    As a big Stephen King fan and reader, I have watched The Stand (of 90s) many times. This modern version... just couldn't convince me. Great production and actors and everything, but as someone mentioned before me, it lacks soul. Forget remakes, they rarely catch up with the original.
  12. Dec 17, 2020
    2
    I've only seen the 1st episode but so far so good. Production quality is high and acting is pretty decent. We shall see going forward how good it really is.
    I went from a 9 after episode 1 down to a rating of 2 after completing the show. Wow. Every episode after the first one is so bad which affirms my fear that CBS was doing the Stand. Why can’t HBO or Netflix get the rights to this great
    I've only seen the 1st episode but so far so good. Production quality is high and acting is pretty decent. We shall see going forward how good it really is.
    I went from a 9 after episode 1 down to a rating of 2 after completing the show. Wow. Every episode after the first one is so bad which affirms my fear that CBS was doing the Stand. Why can’t HBO or Netflix get the rights to this great material. Oh well
    Expand
Metascore
56

Mixed or average reviews - based on 25 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 25
  2. Negative: 1 out of 25
  1. Reviewed by: Ian Freer
    Sep 20, 2021
    60
    Stephen King’s magnum opus is possibly too big in narrative scope and thematic aspirations to find a proper home in visual storytelling. But it is a perfect fit for the times, and this current adaptation gets off to a solid, if not spectacular, start.
  2. Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Jan 4, 2021
    50
    Handsomely and dutifully produced. ... Ponderous and bloated parable of good vs. evil. [4 - 17 Jan 2021, p.7]
  3. Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Dec 18, 2020
    40
    This plays out as a bunch of survivors played by a raft of talented people taking a long time to get to the point of it all and making unnecessarily dunderheaded mistakes as they flail about.