Metascore
95

Universal acclaim - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 9
  3. Negative: 0 out of 9
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on

Critic Reviews

  1. Chicago Tribune
    Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    Apr 20, 2018
    100
    The documentary keeps adding layers of complexity to the tale until one is entirely hooked by its ambiguities and twists and turns -- and soon, as with a great novel, one can't wait to see what happens next.
  2. Reviewed by: Staff (Not Credited)
    Apr 20, 2018
    100
    The eight-part feature, which aired on the Sundance Channel in 2005, is absolutely gripping and illustrates just how powerful documentary filmmaking can be.
  3. Reviewed by: Joy Press
    Apr 20, 2018
    100
    Lestrade’s cameras pull us farther into the legal system than Law & Order or Court TV ever could, and the result is chilling.
  4. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Apr 20, 2018
    100
    It's a splendid piece of cinema-verite storytelling, fascinating, thought-provoking and dramatically clear, and no less popcorn-compelling for being leisurely and long.
  5. Reviewed by: Virginia Heffernan
    Apr 20, 2018
    100
    It may seem ludicrous to say that a movie running more than six hours is well edited, but The Staircase, by Jean-Xavier de Lestrade, is. And not only is the editing prize-worthy, but the whole film is also so brilliantly conceived, reported, filmed and paced that you may come to wish it were twice as long.
  6. Reviewed by: Tony Dokoupil
    Apr 20, 2018
    90
    The Staircase is the scariest portrait of criminal justice since the nonfiction film that helped launch the modern innocence movement, Errol Morris’s The Thin Blue Line. It’s scarier, in fact, because The Staircase isn’t based on re-creations but on original footage, a front-row view of legal truth as it’s feathered into existence, manufactured from guesses and conjecture, and sold to a jury as more or less believable fiction.
  7. Reviewed by: Nathan Rabin
    Apr 20, 2018
    90
    There's a surprising amount of humor in the series, as when a sassy male prostitute admits in court that his client base included many professionals, including attorneys and at least one judge, but the series' power, gravity, and urgency come because viewers are never allowed to forget that a man's life and a family's future is at stake.
  8. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Apr 20, 2018
    90
    It’s that rare long documentary about a tabloid crime that becomes a deep exploration of death, the justice system, and the very process of making a documentary film.
  9. Reviewed by: Whet Moser
    Apr 20, 2018
    90
    Makes a compelling companion piece to Netflix’s hit series in its remarkable similarities and considerable differences. On the most basic level, it’s like a proof of concept for the documentary serials that follow.
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 20 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 20
  2. Negative: 3 out of 20
  1. Aug 13, 2020
    10
    Favorite crime documentary ever. It felt like every other episode I was changing my mind about whether or not he did it. Mike Peterson is aFavorite crime documentary ever. It felt like every other episode I was changing my mind about whether or not he did it. Mike Peterson is a fascinating man. A murderer, but still. Full Review »
  2. Feb 27, 2019
    5
    I'd heard so much hype about this series, when it showed up on Netflix with extra episodes, I dove right in. So first I will agree with someI'd heard so much hype about this series, when it showed up on Netflix with extra episodes, I dove right in. So first I will agree with some other criticisms, the pacing is slow, then again, many of us have gotten used to American TV editing which in the 201Xs is very fast and tight. That said, I think it would have been far more gripping if it was half as long. I also noticed that, given how used to high definition video I'm used to, this show probably seemed extra slow and harder to watch.

    Secondly, I will say the closer I got to the verdict episode, the more I was skipping ahead and once I reached the end of the Verdict episode, I had no desire or intention to watch another FIVE 40+ minute long episodes about the aftermath, I just went straight to wikipedia. I really think maybe Netflix should have edited each episode down to maybe only 30 mins each.

    I do think parts of this series were interesting, and it was very intriguing to see how some (most?) of the family was on Michael's side and only a small number were against him. It was also interesting to see how he was apparently portrayed in the news reports, a stark reminder of how the media can help or hurt someone very easily depending on what spin they choose to go with.

    Is this worth watching? I'd say if you are a fan of true crime type stuff, maybe if you're home sick in bed, or bored on a rainy day it would be worth giving a chance. I would likely not have watched past the first episode (or would have just skipped to the verdict after that) if I hadn't heard such raves about the series. I was underwhelmed. I'm giving it a 5 because it was passably interesting, but I don't really recommend it. I'd say just go read about it on wikipedia.
    Full Review »
  3. Oct 30, 2018
    9
    I don't understand people who watch documentaries or Doc-Series and expect it to entertain them them same way that other pure entertainmentI don't understand people who watch documentaries or Doc-Series and expect it to entertain them them same way that other pure entertainment shows do. Whatever. This series is similar to shows like, "The making of a murderer" and to a lesser extent, "I am Innocent". I have a penchant for Forensic based shows and true crime based shows so I know what to expect when I engage in them. I find the entertainment value in the gradual discovery of evidence , revelations on how the evidence may have been mishandled, the discovery of foul play by law enforcement officials, District Attorneys who appear to have hidden agendas (probably the upward mobility of their careers), so called forensic experts and even judges who mysteriously allow or not allow certain objections or prejudicial testimonies permitted in their courtroom.
    On a personal note, I find it fascinating to try and figure out who is lying. I came from a broken home that stayed together where everyone was and still are liars and so that's where the genesis of that fascination was seeded in me. Suffice it to say, I've watched a lot of ," Forensic Files" What I've learned is that when a case gets this convoluted, almost everyone is lying for different reasons with the possible exception of whom I perceive to be the wrongly accused. This show has done an excellent job of documenting what is in my view, a huge miscarriage of justice over many many years. I often wonder why so-called families of victims carry so much weight in the courtroom when in reality, they are almost unfailingly blind to any facts that do not support their carnal rage for revenge regardless of mountains of evidence to the contrary. In this case the two sisters of the victim. One of whom is monstrously crazy, blood thirsty for revenge and an intensely detestable wind bag. One gets the impression that the wind bag somehow has some kind of pull with the politicians or law enforcement officials in that county. Why are they considered the family when the victim left behind 4/5 offspring who support the accused? This show is thought provoking but unfortunately also provokes those who are unreasonable, seemingly numb to other truths but the ones that support their lust for revenge or their opinion which was formed before all of the facts that have and continue to, come to light.
    Full Review »