Watch Now
Where To Watch
Critic Reviews
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The extremes of smart and wacky writing styles have never been so much at odds.
-
The Newsroom is convincing as a faux newscast. It's less convincing as good television.
-
That transcendent mixture of confidence and fear, of humility and clear-eyed self-assessment, evident in so much of Sorkin's other work, is what turns a sermon into a work of art. And that is precisely what is missing here.
-
Daniels is great, biting clean through clotted dialogue that's twinkly yet sanctimonious. [2 Jul 2012, p.40]
-
The Newsroom is both wonderful and terrible.
-
The Newsroom characters grow a bit over the show's first four episodes and begin to seem less like types and more like fully-defined people, but they never feel altogether real, the unintended consequence of inhabiting an idealistic fantasy land.
-
The Newsroom is timely, well acted, and big-hearted, but offers few surprises.
-
The results are a captivating, riveting, rousing, condescending, smug, infuriating mixture, a potent potion that advertises itself as intelligence-enhancing but is actually just crazy-making.
-
The series is kind of a mess, but one you can't really look away from.
-
The Newsroom's focus is on putting on a show, and because its weak points are howlers and it will be a hoot to laugh not with but at them.
-
At its best, and that doesn't come into full view until the third and fourth episodes, The Newsroom has a wit, sophistication and manic energy that recalls James L. Brooks's classic movie "Broadcast News." But at its worst, the show chokes on its own sanctimony.
-
The Newsroom essentially presents viewers with two options: Lament how the series doesn't match the lofty crests of Sorkin's finest work, or admire the show's ambitions and embrace of serious ideas, and grudgingly roll with its uneven tides.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 446 out of 541
-
Mixed: 54 out of 541
-
Negative: 41 out of 541
-
Jun 24, 2012
-
Jul 3, 2012
-
Jun 26, 2012