Watch Now
Where To Watch
Critic Reviews
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The Newsroom is timely, well acted, and big-hearted, but offers few surprises.
-
The Newsroom characters grow a bit over the show's first four episodes and begin to seem less like types and more like fully-defined people, but they never feel altogether real, the unintended consequence of inhabiting an idealistic fantasy land.
-
The Newsroom essentially presents viewers with two options: Lament how the series doesn't match the lofty crests of Sorkin's finest work, or admire the show's ambitions and embrace of serious ideas, and grudgingly roll with its uneven tides.
-
The extremes of smart and wacky writing styles have never been so much at odds.
-
Daniels is great, biting clean through clotted dialogue that's twinkly yet sanctimonious. [2 Jul 2012, p.40]
-
The series is kind of a mess, but one you can't really look away from.
-
At its best, and that doesn't come into full view until the third and fourth episodes, The Newsroom has a wit, sophistication and manic energy that recalls James L. Brooks's classic movie "Broadcast News." But at its worst, the show chokes on its own sanctimony.
-
The Newsroom is both wonderful and terrible.
-
The Newsroom is convincing as a faux newscast. It's less convincing as good television.
-
The Newsroom's focus is on putting on a show, and because its weak points are howlers and it will be a hoot to laugh not with but at them.
-
That transcendent mixture of confidence and fear, of humility and clear-eyed self-assessment, evident in so much of Sorkin's other work, is what turns a sermon into a work of art. And that is precisely what is missing here.
-
The results are a captivating, riveting, rousing, condescending, smug, infuriating mixture, a potent potion that advertises itself as intelligence-enhancing but is actually just crazy-making.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 446 out of 541
-
Mixed: 54 out of 541
-
Negative: 41 out of 541
-
Jun 24, 2012
-
Jul 3, 2012
-
Jun 26, 2012