• Network: HBO
  • Series Premiere Date: Jan 27, 2019
Metascore
63

Generally favorable reviews - based on 12 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 12
  2. Negative: 0 out of 12
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Jan 13, 2020
    91
    Sorrentino’s series remains one of the most unique, enigmatic, and exhilarating television experiences that you can watch for depth, for fun, or for a wild combination of both.
  2. Reviewed by: Allison Shoemaker
    Jan 13, 2020
    80
    Even when “The New Pope” stumbles, it’s hard to do anything but gape and marvel in the best way possible. The performances remain excellent. ... “The New Pope” itself has no interest in compromise, and for that, if you’ll pardon the expression, god be praised.
  3. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    Jan 9, 2020
    80
    Outrageous, audacious, seductive, sexy and byzantine, to say nothing of visually voluptuous. ... “The New Pope,” which opens with Lenny Belardo, aka Pius XIII, still on life support, is about the writing—writing that, for most of the series’ nine episodes, is pure mischief.
  4. Reviewed by: Niv M. Sultan
    Jan 10, 2020
    75
    Despite the sordid, festering material that the series explores, what ultimately emerges from The New Pope is sheer beauty. It’s an understated grace, one that director Paolo Sorrentino and cinematographer Luca Bigazzi effect with an eye to intimacy.
  5. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Jan 13, 2020
    70
    The payoffs of “The New Pope,” whether you enjoy them or not, are mostly in the visual flourishes and conceits, often set to pointedly secular pop songs. ... It has strong elements of workplace sitcom, but it even more closely resembles another venerable genre: the Mafia movie. Voiello and his ecclesiastical associates, bickering and maneuvering, are like the members of a crime family, making offers that maybe, with eternity in mind, you shouldn’t refuse.
  6. Reviewed by: Anita Singh
    Jan 13, 2020
    60
    It is all deeply weird. But maybe life inside the Vatican is just that?
  7. Reviewed by: Inkoo Kang
    Jan 13, 2020
    60
    Despite the three-and-a-half-year gap between The Young Pope and The New Pope, the nine-part sequel series feels remarkably contiguous with its predecessor. ... Occasionally, The New Pope flirts with transcendence.
  8. Reviewed by: Jen Chaney
    Jan 10, 2020
    60
    As fun as it is to watch Malkovich inhabit him, he’s not as compelling as Pius, whose presence hovers over the season despite his being unconscious for a lot of it. ... The New Pope would be much more enjoyable if it were streamlined into the five or six episodes necessary to effectively tell the story that needs to be told. Instead, we get nine, at least three of which just tread water.
  9. Reviewed by: Vinnie Mancuso
    Jan 7, 2020
    60
    Malkovich carries the bulk of the show’s episodes and absolutely devours the role. ... But The New Pope often meanders in its excess too long without staying put. It’s less a story than a sermon with too many subjects, taking on greed, and sex, and faith, and corruption but only in general, arms-length terms.
  10. Reviewed by: David Fear
    Jan 13, 2020
    50
    The New Pope retains the formalist beauty and sumptuousness of its predecessor while failing to measure up storytelling-wise.
  11. Reviewed by: Daniel D'Addario
    Jan 6, 2020
    50
    Malkovich’s John Brannox, later Pope John Paul III, is harder to read; his politics are less about power and dominance than a silkier sort of finesse. A viewer’s tolerance will vary, but it is striking to have a show that seems almost to demand a massive central performance suddenly defined by understatement, by refusal. What’s more, the statement the show makes about the Vatican seems more muddled than ever.
  12. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Jan 13, 2020
    40
    Striking but completely unnecessary addendum to his wildly imaginative, provocative (and frankly much better) 2017 series, “The Young Pope.”
User Score
7.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 25 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 25
  2. Negative: 3 out of 25
  1. Jan 15, 2020
    10
    HBOs new shows have been amazing and this is one of them. Rating -93% must see
  2. Feb 11, 2020
    7
    It's good but not great:
    Plus points:
    - Some truly beautifully shot scenes and 2 or 3 great episodes. - Writing is suspensful, coherent and
    It's good but not great:
    Plus points:
    - Some truly beautifully shot scenes and 2 or 3 great episodes.
    - Writing is suspensful, coherent and engrossing
    - Jude Law is mesmerising
    - John Malkovitch is good

    Minus points:
    - The first two episodes are idiotic.
    - The acting of the European actors is very bad. The worst are the two French-speaking actresses (Cecile de France and Ludivine Seignier) (must have been required by Canal + to sell to the French market). Especially when playing in front of Malkovitch and Law.
    - Some of the side story lines are entirely superfluous
    - The badly accented English of some of the aforementioned actors is atrocious. Very grating. Almost ruin the show for me.

    PS: I'm French
    Full Review »
  3. Feb 9, 2020
    3
    Loved The Young Pope and I really regret watching this one... You wouldn't see any conflict of Popes(you will have a looong wait until LennyLoved The Young Pope and I really regret watching this one... You wouldn't see any conflict of Popes(you will have a looong wait until Lenny arrives), just kaleidoscope of perversions and useless story lines which would come and pass without meet their ends. The series looks aimless as whole and in parts.

    Still, old characters give it some relief, especially Voiello.
    Full Review »