• Network: SyFy
  • Series Premiere Date: Jan 25, 2016
Season #: 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1
Metascore
60

Mixed or average reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 24
  2. Negative: 2 out of 24
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    Jan 25, 2016
    80
    It’s a mere two episodes, but The Magicians provided enough evidence that it has enough talent and ambition to keep the surprises coming.
  2. Reviewed by: Mary McNamara
    Jan 25, 2016
    80
    "Harry Potter" meets "Gossip Girl" in "The Magicians," Syfy's new adaptation of a Lev Grossman trilogy, and it's a good match.... The Magicians holds its own by making the students a bit older and complicated.
  3. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Jan 25, 2016
    80
    Overall, this seems as though it will be one of Syfy’s most engaging new series as the channel continues to get back into the hardcore sci-fi and fantasy genres.
  4. Reviewed by: Michael Slezak
    Apr 6, 2016
    75
    The Magicians may not have perfected every incantation in its spellbook, but it’s worth a look for viewers intrigued by the idea of a Harry Potter-esque weekly fantasy series.
  5. Reviewed by: Diane Werts
    Jan 25, 2016
    75
    Monday’s busy pilot (crammed with setting reveals and visual effects) leads to a sluggish second hour trading the thrill of discovery for downbeat foreboding. Yet the purpose-seeking characters emerge so starkly--Jason Ralph’s disturbed new student, Hale Appleman as his sardonic guide, Arjun Gupta as his itchy roommate, Stella Maeve as his left-behind soul mate. They feel worth following.
  6. Reviewed by: Sara Stewart
    Jan 25, 2016
    75
    The book’s fans may not be completely satisfied--dialogue often doesn’t do justice to Grossman’s withering prose--but the spirit of this dark-natured series is intact.
  7. Reviewed by: Jeff Jensen
    Dec 16, 2015
    75
    The pilot is an effective introductory chapter to a story that speaks to a moment cluttered with both escapist fantasy and neo-gothic gloominess. It’s Harry Potter, distressed with a Heavy Metal acid bath.... The world and perspective of The Magicians is more immediately interesting than the characters.
  8. TV Guide Magazine
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Jan 28, 2016
    70
    It promises to be a wild ride. [1-14 Feb 2016, p.19]
  9. Reviewed by: Isaac Feldberg
    Jan 25, 2016
    70
    Like its protagonist, The Magicians demonstrates lots of clear potential to both follow and subvert that storytelling device, as well of flashes of poetic beauty, buried beneath a grim, world-weary exterior. You could call it an anti-escapist fantasy.
  10. Reviewed by: Rob Lowman
    Jan 25, 2016
    70
    The students of Brakebills have never fit in and aren’t part of a hierarchy, and, like a lot of young people, can be their own worst enemy. So far The Magicians played off those reverse expectations fairly well, and has a more hip Gothic atmosphere to it. It will be interesting to see if it can keep all the balls flying in the air.
  11. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Jan 25, 2016
    70
    The series works well enough as a straightforward coming-of-age tale that the stock scenes of magic--a windblown sheet of paper leading Quentin to the proper doorway, a deck of cards forming castles in the air--can feel like cheesy intrusions.
  12. Reviewed by: Allison Shoemaker
    Jan 25, 2016
    67
    It’ll take more than an episode or two to see what The Magicians becomes when it stops trying so hard to be the dark, sexy, thoughtful, sexy, and also sexy series it so clearly wants to be. There’s a lot to like here, and plenty of potential to make the show as engrossing and sometimes devastating as the books on which it’s based.
User Score
7.1

Generally favorable reviews- based on 225 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 38 out of 225
  1. Mar 1, 2016
    1
    Having read the books I greatly looked forward to this show. The first episode was not too bad. There were changes to be sure, but noneHaving read the books I greatly looked forward to this show. The first episode was not too bad. There were changes to be sure, but none unforgivable. I found it perfectly allowable to change a few things to get the action going faster than it did in the book. Then I watched the second episode. Things started to get bad. Every deviation from the original book had me wondering why. Every time they changed course from the original source material it got cheesier. By the third episode I completely understood: There was no intention of following the books at all. Obviously the idea was to just use the books as inspiration and create a series that could be continued for as long as the show continued to make money.

    The dialogue and plot quickly became ridiculous and unforgivable.
    Full Review »
  2. Jan 26, 2016
    3
    Wow. I can't believe how dumbed down this is from the books. I really hope this doesn't discourage potential readers of this excellent seriesWow. I can't believe how dumbed down this is from the books. I really hope this doesn't discourage potential readers of this excellent series of books. So much is lost in making everyone older (even the kids in Fillory--presumably to set the stage for sex scenes with them in the future as there is no other plausible reason), better looking, and compressing the storyline to the point where you can't imagine what they're going to do if the series gets renewed. I was really looking forward to this and am very disappointed. If you haven't read the books, you might like it better than I did. Full Review »
  3. Mar 15, 2016
    1
    Not only are the character descriptions from the novels ignored completely, the magic system isn't even explained rendering the viewer mostlyNot only are the character descriptions from the novels ignored completely, the magic system isn't even explained rendering the viewer mostly confused. The pacing of the story is terrible, the Chatwin kids aren't actually kids. The show is completely butchering the source material. They couldn't even get a tall Quentin, just the height is incorrect. Nothing to redeem this drab affair. Full Review »