• Network: SHOWTIME
  • Series Premiere Date: Jun 30, 2019
Metascore
60

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 30
  2. Negative: 3 out of 30
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Jun 27, 2019
    60
    The seven-episode miniseries, four episodes of which were made available to critics, is steadily entertaining, as it tracks Ailes from 1995 to the end of his life in 2017. ... But “The Loudest Voice” becomes a simplistic and obvious anatomy of Fox News. Too much of the dialogue in the script, whose writers include “Spotlight” director Tom McCarthy, doubles as fuel on the fire, with little dramatic purpose.
  2. Reviewed by: Nick Allen
    Jun 28, 2019
    50
    As someone who is interested in how the xenophobic sausage is made, "The Loudest Voice" held my attention, but its bland approach can be more frustrating than it is fascinating.
  3. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Jun 27, 2019
    50
    Crowe is good to a point, but "The Loudest Voice" can be root canal.
  4. Reviewed by: Sophie Gilbert
    Jun 27, 2019
    50
    The Loudest Voice seems more intent on probing the political and sociological impact of Fox News than the ferociously complicated psychology of the man who created it. It’s a worthy mission, but it leaves the character at the center of the series at something of a distance.
  5. Reviewed by: Jen Chaney
    Jun 27, 2019
    50
    [The Loudest Voice] is so focused on the who, what, when, and where of that story that it neglects to dig sufficiently into the why and how. The Loudest Voice is most interested in the surface of things ... Crowe certainly tackles the part with zeal and shows us sides of the man — including his occasional gentleness and his wiseass sense of humor — that make him something more complicated than a Republican villain. ... He does have to engage in another kind of battle, one between himself and the prosthetics applied to his face to make it appear more jowly.
  6. Reviewed by: David Fear
    Jun 26, 2019
    50
    If the idea is to glean lessons and drama from Ailes’ story, The Loudest Voice is a bust. If the idea is to eventually win Crowe an Emmy, however, consider this a fair and balanced success.
  7. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Jun 18, 2019
    50
    When it's specific and detailed, capturing the depth of Sherman's reporting, it's perceptive and entertaining. ... Less successful are the grandstanding beats where Ailes walks into a situation controlled by some thinly written snowflake duck and makes a big speech dominated by Fox News talking points and then everybody claps at his insight and magnetism. Those are clunky and on-the-nose.
  8. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Jun 13, 2019
    50
    Engrossing but flawed. ...“The Loudest Voice” feels as though it has come way too late or much too soon. As a piece of current contextual storytelling, it struggles to provide the thematic platform that would make it more than a stylized Wikipedia entry. As a hit job, it comes on too strong, given that its subject is dead and gone.
  9. Reviewed by: Charles Bramesco
    Dec 3, 2019
    40
    It cannot reconcile a well-honed expertise on the nuts and bolts of news with its rudimentary understanding of personality and behavior. Sketches of actual people have been inserted into an environment more realistic and detailed than they are, a contrast unflattering to Crowe’s floundering performance.
  10. Reviewed by: Glenn Garvin
    Jul 1, 2019
    40
    View Ailes' life as an exercise in personal and political villainy, if you will; but it's a fascinating one. The Loudest Voice is merely repellent.
  11. Reviewed by: Daniel D'Addario
    Jun 26, 2019
    40
    That the script can’t find an angle in on the “why” of Ailes and thus keeps on stating, more forcefully each time, the “what” holds Crowe back yet more. Small moments — as when, say, he tells his son about a moment of abuse in his childhood — come to feel like they must be “Rosebud” clues to crack the case of this Citizen Kane figure, if only because otherwise, his story has no dramatic energy, with endless indulgence replacing an arc.
User Score
6.3

Generally favorable reviews- based on 20 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 20
  2. Negative: 6 out of 20
  1. Jul 11, 2019
    8
    I'm not sure whether it is an aversion to series that refers to Fox News, despite being highly critical, or something else, but I disagreeI'm not sure whether it is an aversion to series that refers to Fox News, despite being highly critical, or something else, but I disagree with a lot of the negative reviews on this show. I think it is great TV and I certainly am not familiar with a lot of the history depicted here, although a grain of salt is likely required when considering the accuracy of the events depicted, which should be done by anyone watching a biographical based series anyway.... Full Review »
  2. Nov 13, 2020
    8
    A fine overview of a pivotal figure in American socio-political history

    Based on The Loudest Voice in the Room: How the Brilliant, Bombastic
    A fine overview of a pivotal figure in American socio-political history

    Based on The Loudest Voice in the Room: How the Brilliant, Bombastic Roger Ailes Built Fox News – and Divided a Country by Gabriel Sherman (2014), The Loudest Voice takes as its subject the rise and fall of Roger Ailes, and the concomitant rise and ongoing success of Fox News, the "fair and balanced" news network he founded in 1996. And whilst Bombshell (2019) focuses on the women who brought Ailes down, The Loudest Voice is more interested in the man himself. Does it tell us anything new? Not really. Is it biased? Absolutely. Is it subtle? Not even a little. However, it's well-written, brilliantly acted, and extremely well-mounted.

    Rather than providing a straightforward biographical account of Ailes (a superb Russell Crowe), the show focuses on seven key events, looking at one per episode, beginning with the formation of Fox News ("1995"). The following six deal with Ailes and Fox's response to 9/11 ("2001"); the rise of Barack Obama ("2008"); Ailes and his wife Beth (Sienna Miller in a performance every bit as good as Crowe's) purchasing a local newspaper in their home town of Garrison, New York ("2009"); Obama running for a second term ("2012"); the rise of Donald Trump ("2015"); and Ailes being sued by Gretchen Carlson (Naomi Watts) for sexual harassment ("2016").

    The most immediately obvious element of Loudest Voice is the non-linear editing. The most impactful scene in this respect occurs in "2009"; a scene of Ailes compelling employee Laurie Luhn (Anabelle Wallis) to give him oral sex, intercut with her cleaning her mouth out in the bathroom afterwards. It's a horrific moment and a brilliant example of using the mechanics of the medium to comment on the events depicted without resorting to dialogue, showing us how disjointed editing can be thematic, telling us all we need to know about Luhn's attitude towards her relationship with Ailes.

    Indeed, Luhn's storyline is one of the show's most effective. Her discomfit with the relationship is hinted at throughout the first two episodes, but it's only in "2008" that it takes centre stage, culminating in a horror show of mental collapse across two episodes. The early scenes between her and Ailes are really the only ones that speak to his darker characteristics, which go on to be such an important theme in later episodes. Much like John Lithgow in Bombshell, Crowe initially plays Ailes as intelligent, inspiring, funny, charming, even nurturing, and the only real suggestion of the depravity beneath that veneer comes in the form of the increasingly disturbing sex scenes between him and Luhn.

    Thematically, Ailes and Fox's roles in dividing the country is a major focus, especially in "2009". Here, we see Ailes stoking the fires of division in Garrison by interjecting himself into a dispute amongst the locals. This is the microcosm. In the same episode, we see the increasingly volatile clashes between Obama supporters and those who oppose him, fuelled by Fox's anti-Obama vitriol. This is the macrocosm. As visual metaphors go, cutting between a fractious townhall meeting in Garrison and news coverage of street clashes across the country is a little heavy-handed, but it is effective in getting the point across – Ailes was very good at breeding division. And of course, there's the constant theme of Ailes and Fox's crimes against journalism. For example, "2001" features a scene in which he willingly turns Fox into the propagandist arm of the Republican Party, and scenes like this are found throughout the seven episodes.

    In terms of problems, although it improves over time, the prosthetic work in the first couple of episodes is really poor. Ailes's skin is far too smooth and plastic-like, as if he's been run through a Photoshop filter. Another issue is that I'm not entirely convinced that seven hours were necessary. Tied to this is some unusual choices about content – so we get, for example, an episode on the purchasing of a local newspaper, but there's no mention of the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, which was Fox's first big ratings win.

    If Roger Ailes didn't exactly build the Divided States with his own hands, at the very least, those who did were working from his blueprint, and The Loudest Voice is a very fine deconstruction of that blueprint. Certainly, it's more interested in probing the political impact of Fox than examining the psychology of the man, and it's disappointingly silent on the question of why he did what he did – it never really deals, for example, with whether or not Ailes genuinely believed he was fighting the good fight or if he recognised that he was essentially a snake oil salesman. However, for all that, it's very enjoyable – the acting is top-notch, the aesthetic superb, and the events it recounts of great importance in today's cultural climate.
    Full Review »
  3. Jun 30, 2019
    6
    When it sticks to the accounts of the building of Fox News, it's extremely compelling. When it dips into the salacious stuff, it getsWhen it sticks to the accounts of the building of Fox News, it's extremely compelling. When it dips into the salacious stuff, it gets extremely cliched and trite. It's actually a show that can appeal to both sides of the aisle - the Fox folks (half the country) that loved to see the traditional media get its butt kicked by this new station that appeals to the "other half" - but it can also sate those who want to demonize Ailes, which would probably be more effective if the man were still alive - even if you accept that he harassed his employees in the way he was accused. The fact that he's not makes it less effective. Again, as a historical document, it's extremely interesting - tough to believe that this network didn't exist in 1996. Full Review »