- Network: ABC
- Series Premiere Date: Mar 22, 2006
Critic Reviews
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
It demonstrates how a show can be a run-of-the-mill cop drama despite a talented cast and a few interesting twists.
-
Showing the evidence really adds nothing as the story twists, turns and contorts itself in an attempt to keep viewers from tuning out before the hour is up.
-
In the end, it's just a case of pouring old crime into new bottles.
-
It all feels inessential.
-
Has little to offer but formula storytelling and conventional crime-drama techniques.
-
It isn't a bad gimmick, establishing a certain tension, but the premise is about the only thing that recommends "The Evidence," a show that otherwise seems to be moving you -- rather than moving -- through its procedural paces.
-
Let's present some evidence for you to analyze: A tired premise. Overly familiar characters. Dull writing. An unclear tone. A series that pales in comparison to any of the "CSI" shows and pretty much every new crime and punishment procedural in the last five years.
-
Just another tediously cliched crime procedural. Whodunit? Who cares.
-
The drama has more false frights than a student horror film, and such an uneven and incompatible tone that it's tough to tell which is funnier, the scenes of alleged humor or the scenes of alleged drama.
-
This basically feels like the fifth best cop drama of the 1978 TV season.
-
I'm not sure which is worse, that tired back story or Martin Landau besmirching his career by appearing in this as a wizened forensics guy.
-
If there exists a device called a Procedural-O-Matic, then it created this show.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 29 out of 35
-
Mixed: 2 out of 35
-
Negative: 4 out of 35
-
NicoleKApr 3, 2007
-
cheyennewOct 2, 2006I loved this show and i don't understand why it was cancelled so quickly. they didn't even give it a chance!
-
britneytSep 4, 2006i love it!!