• Network: AMC
  • Series Premiere Date: Jun 11, 2016
User Score
4.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 5
  2. Negative: 1 out of 5
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Jul 27, 2016
    8
    Totally addicting. I defy you to watch just one episode. My only question is how did we go from a nation who worshiped outlaws, bank robbers and free spirits to a nation that's about to elect Donald Trump?
  2. Dec 23, 2018
    5
    From a historical perspective, this series contains both pluses and minuses. First, any historically accurate item is a plus for audiences that get very little American history. But here I will focus on the minuses.
    1. President Lincoln is hardly mentioned, but it was Lincoln's failure to secure an early peace that caused all of the follow-on problems of Reconstruction, KKK-like groups,
    From a historical perspective, this series contains both pluses and minuses. First, any historically accurate item is a plus for audiences that get very little American history. But here I will focus on the minuses.
    1. President Lincoln is hardly mentioned, but it was Lincoln's failure to secure an early peace that caused all of the follow-on problems of Reconstruction, KKK-like groups, Jim Crow laws, etc. That is, most of our current race issues date back too the Civil War. Lincoln was also responsible for several American Indian atrocities including the Navajo Round-up. But modern historians love to protect Lincoln and blame other characters (e.g. General Sherman) for all the bad behavior.
    2. General Philip H. Sheridan is written out of the narrative, but he was a key character in this entire era.
    Expand
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 3 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 3
  2. Negative: 0 out of 3
  1. Reviewed by: Joanne Ostrow
    Jun 14, 2016
    50
    The cinematography is admirable, and the accounts from historians and academics are sound. But the sight of Burt Reynolds in rose-tinted glasses explaining that George Armstrong Custer “was a hell of a soldier” does little to inform the project.
  2. Reviewed by: Rob Lowman
    Jun 13, 2016
    50
    Most of the dramatizations are functional, although a few border on cheesy.
  3. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Jun 13, 2016
    70
    Some will derive pleasure merely from vetting the authenticity of the clothes and materiel, the accuracy of the action, the appropriateness of the locations. There are many old trains to admire, puffing prettily along mountain riverbeds.