Star Trek: Discovery

:

Season 1
Season #: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
4.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1324 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 527 out of 1324
  2. Mixed: 158 out of 1324
  3. Negative: 639 out of 1324
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. ScienceAdvisor
    Feb 13, 2018
    5
    (Based on seeing all 15 episodes instead of just 3)
    A curious mix of good, bad, and downright ugly. Too much development in areas that are to be later discarded, convenience as a major story elements, and shaky handicam moments, albeit with the same UHD quality, drags this down to sub-par town. A near total disregard for continuity, where the writers/director/showrunner cannot    (Based on seeing all 15 episodes instead of just 3)
    A curious mix of good, bad, and downright ugly. Too much development in areas that are to be later discarded, convenience as a major story elements, and shaky handicam moments, albeit with the same UHD quality, drags this down to sub-par town. A near total disregard for continuity, where the writers/director/showrunner cannot understand that a destination only one light year away takes about 1 second at max. warp, is never going to please those weaned on Star Trek. CBS is committed, so here is hoping season two sees significant improvements.    … Expand
  2. DoctorZack
    Oct 1, 2017
    4
    Congratulations. Even if you don't delve into this with a political mind, this is by far the most disappointing inclusion into the Star Trek franchise. While visually stunning (because money), the series lacks any of the heart or resemblance to the franchise's previous entries. My advice, go watch The Orville if you want to see a true Star Trek heir.
  3. ppstudent
    Sep 29, 2017
    4
    As a Trek fan, I'm quite disappointed in the way the first episode went. Maybe that is me but there is so many things wrong with the characters. The cast was kind of weak and maybe that will improve as they gets through the first few episodes. One of the problems is that Star Trek wasn't made to be both stiff and dark. On the other hand, Star Trek Orville has a strong cast, a strong storyAs a Trek fan, I'm quite disappointed in the way the first episode went. Maybe that is me but there is so many things wrong with the characters. The cast was kind of weak and maybe that will improve as they gets through the first few episodes. One of the problems is that Star Trek wasn't made to be both stiff and dark. On the other hand, Star Trek Orville has a strong cast, a strong story line, and a lot of humor (both flat and funny).… Expand
  4. Mathias01
    Mar 2, 2019
    1
    This is not Star Trek. This is Social Justice Trek through and through. I liked them all. TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager (who had a female captain I admired) and Enterprise. Those were Star Trek series. Those were the visions of Gene Roddenberry. This show? God almighty the political undertones are enough to make a person sick. Has every tv show and movie been corrupted by toxic SJW nonsense? STDThis is not Star Trek. This is Social Justice Trek through and through. I liked them all. TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager (who had a female captain I admired) and Enterprise. Those were Star Trek series. Those were the visions of Gene Roddenberry. This show? God almighty the political undertones are enough to make a person sick. Has every tv show and movie been corrupted by toxic SJW nonsense? STD certainly lives up to its abbreviation. Hard pass.… Expand
  5. peregrin5
    Mar 24, 2019
    10
    If you are a gate-keeping Star Trek fan, there's no doubt you'll hate this show because it's not the same exact show that you grew up with.

    That said, that's what makes this show so brilliant. Too many Star Trek reboots have tried to play on ToS or TNG success and created cookie-cutter series with almost identical plot lines and characters. Thank GOD Discovery changed the way it did.    If you are a gate-keeping Star Trek fan, there's no doubt you'll hate this show because it's not the same exact show that you grew up with.

    That said, that's what makes this show so brilliant. Too many Star Trek reboots have tried to play on ToS or TNG success and created cookie-cutter series with almost identical plot lines and characters. Thank GOD Discovery changed the way it did.

    While some of the pseudo-science sounds hokey, in the larger Star Trek canon, it's really not that bad.

    The characters are deep, flawed, vulnerable, well-developed, and evolve throughout the series. The writing is incredible, and every time you think you've got one up on the writers and that they might be going in a predictable route, they turn the entire thing on its head and disrupt your expectations entirely!

    The show doesn't shy away from its dark plots, but it also doesn't paint a dreary depressing galaxy like many of the semi-recent sci-fi successes (i.e. Battlestar Galactica, Stargate Atlantis). Hope and adventure are always right around the corner and every episode you're left at the edge of your seat eagerly waiting to find out what happens next.

    Again, if what you like is the shallow, feel-good, low energy writing of past Star Trek series, you're going to hate this. If you hate the fact that the only straight white male character on this show is essentially a side character even though he's the captain because you HATE representation and diversity, you will hate this show (and you're a piece of crap human being). If you feel like no one has any right to EVER change or update any media from your childhood memories (OMG MAH KLINGONS!) you'll hate this show. But if you're actually open to what is a BRILLIANTLY written show with amazing characters, writing, and acting, you will NOT be disappointed. This is one of the best sci-fi shows out there right now, right along with The Expanse.    … Expand
  6. blatalinak
    Apr 7, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I honestly don't know how they could have messed up this show any worse and I am heart broken about it. I watch Star Trek when I've had a bad day and need to chill. This isn't Star Trek. It's the Michael Burnham super hero hour. Michael knows everything and can solve everything. She is Wesley Crusher to the 10th power. She's even much smarter than Spock. She is the most unlikable, uninteresting hero I've ever seen. I know nothing about the rest of the crew. I barely know their names. It's all Michael all the time. . She mutinies against her captain, causes a war, gets a bunch of people killed, is raised a Vulcan but cannot control her emotions and at the end of the day she comes out smelling like a rose? Also everyone is madly in love with her or interested in her. Why are they pushing this so hard? It doesn't work! I don't blame the actress I blame the writers.

    Klingons are not blue or clear. There are so many races they had to work with. There are races on Stark Trek that were only shown once over the years and never again. These stories on TNG, DS9 and Voyager were so compelling and profound. I wondered why they were never mentioned again. They could have easily picked up one of them and continued with their story. Why did they have to mess up the Klingons?

    I don't think this show can be saved. This show should cease immediately. They should act like it's the Wolverine Origins movie or the Ryan Reynolds Green Lantern movie. It never happened. Forget about it. Make a new story with new actors and new characters. Here's an idea. Let's go FORWARD in the story. No more prequels for a long time. Please stop with the identify politics. No one wants to be preached at. As a woman I can say I love Captain Janeway, Dr. Crusher, Officer Uhura, Kira Nerys, 7 of 9 and Guinan. Jazdea Dax is my favorite character in all of Star Trek. Please get rid of the Michael Bernham show and review your prior successful female characters going forward.    … Expand
  7. flowbeus
    Sep 26, 2017
    5
    I have to give this a low score. It's just not the Star Trek I want it to be. I don't want to watch space explosions and amazing CGI and nothing else interesting for a whole season.

    It's not all bad, but I'm not sure why I'm watching it, what's this show going to be about? There's nothing to care about and no one to identify with. I want Star Trek to make me think and show us an    I have to give this a low score. It's just not the Star Trek I want it to be. I don't want to watch space explosions and amazing CGI and nothing else interesting for a whole season.

    It's not all bad, but I'm not sure why I'm watching it, what's this show going to be about? There's nothing to care about and no one to identify with. I want Star Trek to make me think and show us an optimisitc vision of humanity. I don't want generic space conflict. I just didn't see anything interesting or thought provoking here.

    Nevertheless, I want to see more, I'm willing to give a show some time to gain it's footing. But CBS please don't put this behind a pay wall. Just make the paywall early access. If it is really Star Trek, and has a real message for humanity, Gene Roddenberry would want it to be over the airwaves.    … Expand
  8. waahaa
    Jan 15, 2018
    10
    star trek discovery.. this show is great, although you have to stick with it as the first 4 episodes kinda feel like nothing new. but i'm now on episode 11 and they are getting into dark territory. id say its the most enjoyable series of any star trek so far. i get the feeling they will kill off a host of characters. there are a few back round characters that will probably step forward instar trek discovery.. this show is great, although you have to stick with it as the first 4 episodes kinda feel like nothing new. but i'm now on episode 11 and they are getting into dark territory. id say its the most enjoyable series of any star trek so far. i get the feeling they will kill off a host of characters. there are a few back round characters that will probably step forward in season 2 i'm guessing. but please stick with this show don't give up too soon. VERY MUCH THE DARKEST TREK SERIES TO DATE.… Expand
  9. AdamKingry
    Jan 11, 2018
    3
    I feel terrible for giving the show a bad review because I really like some of the characters. Rainne Wison was funny and interesting in his role - perfect casting. Also perfect casting is Jason Isaacs as Lorca - completely believable as an experienced, embattled maverick with exceptional leadership skills, dispassionate resolve and cunning, and a moral compass that is a little in the greyI feel terrible for giving the show a bad review because I really like some of the characters. Rainne Wison was funny and interesting in his role - perfect casting. Also perfect casting is Jason Isaacs as Lorca - completely believable as an experienced, embattled maverick with exceptional leadership skills, dispassionate resolve and cunning, and a moral compass that is a little in the grey area.

    The Ash Tyler character is well-acted and well written, but for some reason I'm not buying the chemistry between Ash and Michael yet.

    Sonequa Martin Green does an excellent job as Michael, oscillating between heartfelt emotions and Vulcan reserve. Remember that she hasn't rejected her humanity, and isn't half Vulcan like Spock. She's fully human with all that entails, but can be remarkably focused and calm in a crisis. She has a snappy mathematics ability and has above average combat prowess - evidenced by the fact that she can take down a Klingon who is twice her weight. But she's not a Vulcan and doesn't need to eschew emotion.

    I actually really love her character. She seems like a genuine person and her emotions feel very real to me. Excellent acting. Ash just isn't swashbuckling enough, or stable enough, for me to believe she'd take an interest in him. And I think it's unlikely she'd kiss him with that greasy, scraggly beard.

    Tilly's character is okay. She's quirky and irritatingly upbeat, but she is growing on me. I think her character has potential. She's sort of a Neelix-like character - upbeat, optimistic, overly talkative, and more savvy than she appears.

    I don't like Lt. Saru partially because he's sniveling and irritating, but mostly due to the fact that he's hard to look at. Those tendrals on the back of his skull that pop up and writhe  like little worms when he senses danger actually make me cringe with revulsion.

    I don't like the homosexual couple at all. One is a mean albino and the other is a flat-acting Prince clone with a distracting overbite; but that isn't why I don't like them. I don't like them because their relationship is a propaganda move that was presented to and approved by GLAAD ("a media monitoring organization founded by LGBT people") .

    There has been a systematic and aggressive campaign to pressure production companies to represent the tiny contemporary subculture in numerous, positive, substantive, prolonged, central roles in the media - particularly aimed at markets for families and children, with the central aim of mainstream normalization. I'm not a supporter of propaganda in any form, but I really don't like the idea of special interest groups pressuring production companies, especially when massive overrepresentation is taking place already.

    The matching red pajamas, brushing teeth scene caused me to stop watching for weeks. When I gave the show another shot due to the memorable acting of Sonequa Martin Green, I stopped watching entirely​ at the homosexual kissing scene. I found it to be contrived to the degree that I utterly lost my suspension of disbelief. All I saw was aggressive special interest activism intruding upon a beloved television franchise.

    In typical militant fashion, Wilson Cruz, the overbite doctor, said "We aren't here for [the fan's and viewer's] comfort" and essentially said, if you don't like it, don't watch the show. That's not very business-like, but it may prove to be prophetic if the 200 Metacritic negative  user reviews to 100 positive reviews is any indication of the show's longevity - or the nation's polarization over the issue.

    My suspicion is that the primary fan base just wants to watch the show with their family without any f-bombs or ham-fisted propaganda. I suppose they may need to decide if they want to make a show fans enjoy (and buy) or bow subserviently to the watchful diligence of the GLAAD Gestapo.

    I probably won't watch Season 2 despite the many great performances, interesting storylines and good special effects. Great disappointment from an avid Star Trek fan who has seen every movie and every episode in each incarnation of the franchise.    … Expand
  10. high90
    Jan 18, 2018
    10
    Just watched episode 11 and this show has really hit its stride. Strong performances by the leads a diverse cast and high production values make this one of the only programs on tv worth tuning in to see what happens next. How about everyone who gave this a bad review after one episode shut the f up and give it a chance to breath. Well worth your time if your a sci fi fan.
  11. Grizwald
    Sep 25, 2017
    6
    Pretty good, but not as good as I expected! Writing was generally poor, and the character development patchy as best. Even the special effects were disappointing! BobSmash
  12. prider90
    Jan 31, 2018
    8
    + for the effects
    + for the setting
    - didn't gave me that star trek feeling.
    - plot needs to be more complex
    Overall OK to watch
  13. Byronotron
    Feb 6, 2018
    9
    Star Trek: Discovery is absolutely Star Trek. Every new show has been derided by fans, only to later find their footing and bring in new fans, this show is no different. What is different is that unlike every single other Star Trek show besides TOS, season one is great. It has little stumbles, being a bit too dour compared to the lofty ideals it upholds later in the season, but it gives usStar Trek: Discovery is absolutely Star Trek. Every new show has been derided by fans, only to later find their footing and bring in new fans, this show is no different. What is different is that unlike every single other Star Trek show besides TOS, season one is great. It has little stumbles, being a bit too dour compared to the lofty ideals it upholds later in the season, but it gives us something that few Star Trek shows have, a season long narrative with themes that permeate and surround the show, giving each individual episode more context and meaning to the larger story, which actually works very well for this franchise. Aside from that the acting, special effects, VFX, costumes, sound design, music, direction are all incredible. The writing takes a noticeable and dramatic climb in quality at the end of the first half of the season, and continues into some truly epic and must see sci-fi in the second half. This show WILL go down as another classic sci-if and Star Trek shows, while bringing in a lot of new and younger fans. Long Live the Discovery.… Expand
  14. RMillward
    Feb 6, 2018
    10
    Star Trek Discovery is a bold new vision in the Star Trek Universe, one that has unsettled and even disappointed older fans. Younger, more imaginative viewers, whose experience includes liking Star Trek Enterprise on TV, with its non-episodic story arcs, and the up-to-date trilogy of Star Trek films starring Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, will appreciate Star Trek Discovery's incredibleStar Trek Discovery is a bold new vision in the Star Trek Universe, one that has unsettled and even disappointed older fans. Younger, more imaginative viewers, whose experience includes liking Star Trek Enterprise on TV, with its non-episodic story arcs, and the up-to-date trilogy of Star Trek films starring Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, will appreciate Star Trek Discovery's incredible production values and out-of-the-box storytelling. Yes, a lot of very vocal people seem not to care for Star Trek Discovery, but as a lifelong fan of Star Trek (52 years and still counting!), I can tell you this show is among the best the Star Trek franchise has to offer and you owe yourself a look.… Expand
  15. Rissois
    Oct 18, 2017
    7
    I take back my earlier positive review. This show is full of unlikable characters, nonsensical plot devices, and plot holes so vast you could fly a starship through. Great acting and special effects though.
  16. the_nephilim71
    Oct 22, 2017
    10
    I love this show. I've been a fan of Trek for around 40 years and was thrilled when I heard they were making a new show because I've been waiting for a new show for a long time. The actors and characters are great and the stories are interesting. Star Trek: Discovery is like a mixture of Next Generation, Battlestar Galactica and Star Trek (2009) I highly recommend it! 10/10
  17. GodOne
    Oct 6, 2017
    10
    I've never been so happy since TNG, this is the first series with a different atmosphere, more realistic, with a lot of blood, good acting and cinematographic post production levels.
    I have never given 10 to something, this is the first time in my life, there are only 3 episodes for now but they are great.
    People unhappy about this series must have serious mental problems or maybe just    I've never been so happy since TNG, this is the first series with a different atmosphere, more realistic, with a lot of blood, good acting and cinematographic post production levels.
    I have never given 10 to something, this is the first time in my life, there are only 3 episodes for now but they are great.
    People unhappy about this series must have serious mental problems or maybe just trolls trying to sabotate this show.    … Expand
  18. Tallrothen
    Oct 6, 2017
    10
    The next step in the natural evolution of Star Trek.
    A few shady performances from a couple of characters but nothing that takes away from the overall experience. Don't miss it!
  19. kralizeh
    Jan 22, 2018
    10
    Best Star Trek since TNG, different but refreshing plot takes time to develop but does so nicely, I was a bit circumspect about the characters but good character building gets you hooked after a couple of episodes.
  20. Alphastrike
    Feb 7, 2018
    10
    Story and characters are well thought out and progressing well. Engaging and can't wait for more, an amazing addition to the Star Trek series.
  21. NeilDunford
    Jan 29, 2018
    9
    I am not a very sophisticated viewer--of anything. After many, many years, for me, "good" or "not good" comes down to whether I think about a movie or a show the next day. Ninety nine percent of what I watch, on TV or in a movie theatre, goes in one ear and out the other.

    Discovery got off to a slow start for me and I don't strongly disagree with many of the negative reviews. Its    I am not a very sophisticated viewer--of anything. After many, many years, for me, "good" or "not good" comes down to whether I think about a movie or a show the next day. Ninety nine percent of what I watch, on TV or in a movie theatre, goes in one ear and out the other.

    Discovery got off to a slow start for me and I don't strongly disagree with many of the negative reviews. Its format and pace are very different from past versions of Trek--I have mostly enjoyed the different series but I wouldn't qualify as a Trekkie. However, after about the 3rd episode of Discovery, I can't wait for the following week's episode. The last couple of episodes have left me at the edge of my chair counting down the days until the next installment. I wouldn't have said Bravo in months, but, I will now. Take it or leave it. But if you are considering diving in...prepare yourself to persevere through the first few episode, then, get ready for a fun ride.    … Expand
  22. slimshadi
    Feb 7, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great show, times have moved on and this is great modern trek. Hope Lorca comes back.… Expand
  23. Dont4get2wipe77
    Feb 1, 2018
    7
    I actually liked this show. Nothing special and a bit rough around the edges but I personally enjoyed it. I see mine isn’t a popular opinion and I’m seeing a pattern. This show, and several other recent remakes, revamps or belated sequels would have probably been a lot better received by audiences if they hadn’t cashed in on an existing, beloved franchise. Let’s face it most plot points,I actually liked this show. Nothing special and a bit rough around the edges but I personally enjoyed it. I see mine isn’t a popular opinion and I’m seeing a pattern. This show, and several other recent remakes, revamps or belated sequels would have probably been a lot better received by audiences if they hadn’t cashed in on an existing, beloved franchise. Let’s face it most plot points, set pieces etc etc are pretty much interchangeable within a genre. My point is that if the producers had let the creative team actually come up with their own premises, ideas and characters instead of relentlessly rehashing old ideas then a new and exciting franchise could have been born. Or crashed, burned and fizzled our after one season but you know what? That’s the nature of the beast. That’s what keeps people interested. While I definitely didn’t hate Star Trek discovery personally, I can understand why people feel let down. I honestly think that if the exact same team that made STD (wow unfortunate acronym) had made a new, original sci-fi series it would have been great. Sadly it seems that creative and innovative ideas are growing rarer every year. By the time I die I’ll probably have watched Star Wars episode 87b. And **** hated that one too.… Expand
  24. xortim
    Feb 20, 2019
    10
    A lot of users are rating it poorly after just one episode or by the fact that CBS is charging money for a clearly high budget show.

    This is a different Star Trek because this is a different decade than when the others aired. The way we tell stories now is entirely different than how we told stories in the early aughts, 90s and 60s. Some common critiques: The Klingons looks    A lot of users are rating it poorly after just one episode or by the fact that CBS is charging money for a clearly high budget show.

    This is a different Star Trek because this is a different decade than when the others aired. The way we tell stories now is entirely different than how we told stories in the early aughts, 90s and 60s.

    Some common critiques:
    The Klingons looks different - yup, they also didn't have any prosthetics in TOS
    The technology looks too advanced for it to take place before TOS - I really don't want to watch actors push radio shack buttons glued onto cardboard in a show produced this side of of the millennium.
    Not everyone is an altruistic blowhard, Gene Roddenberry would not approve! - meh, the main character is annoyingly moral and so is the first Captain we encounter.
    It's too politically charged- have you watched any Star Trek, ever? People lost their **** over Dax having the first broadcast "lesbian" kiss, or how about a black bridge officer, let alone a woman Captain. The show has always pushed progressive politics in one way or another, and there's always been someone to object and fold their arms saying "that just ain't right"

    Some genuine criticism are things like:
    Too much or inconsistent camera movement
    Some characters can be annoying at times (true of any show)

    Plus, Tilly is amazing and everyone should watch it for that reason alone.    … Expand
  25. jimjohnson3311
    Feb 24, 2019
    0
    I waited until it came out on Blu Ray. I have been a Star Trek fan for decades... that died with discovery
  26. PGTips5nz
    Mar 7, 2019
    0
    Star Trek: Diversity. Absolutely terrible. Watched the first few episodes, but had to switch it off after that. SJW nonsense.
  27. ScottNAtlanta1
    Mar 8, 2019
    10
    This season is miles ahead better than the first season and I am really enjoying how they are paying homage to the original series.
  28. BarbaraS
    Nov 29, 2017
    6
    My husband and I very much looked forward to this new series and we really wanted to like it. So we tried to focus on the positive sides, like some of the interesting characters. But After 7 episodes we must conclude that it is a big disappointment.

    The storylines are very bad. The technology is inconsistent with all the previous shows. The speed of the episodes is tiring. It is too    My husband and I very much looked forward to this new series and we really wanted to like it. So we tried to focus on the positive sides, like some of the interesting characters. But After 7 episodes we must conclude that it is a big disappointment.

    The storylines are very bad. The technology is inconsistent with all the previous shows. The speed of the episodes is tiring. It is too dark and violent: countless tortures and killings in each episode. The Klingons are no Klingons in both appearance and behaviour. Klingons are honourable warriors, but in this series they resemble underhand Cardassians. Very disappointing. I hate the unfriendly sarcasm in the dialogues. This doesn't fit with the harmonious integrity among the crew of Star Trek ships, which is one of the things why I am a fan.

    I keep watching because I hope that it will improve. I would love to enjoy a good new Star Trek series with intelligent stories about interesting ethical problems, in the ideal world of the Federation. That is what we like about Star Trek and that is what's missing in this series.

    --addition--
    It gets much better after episode 7. Therefore I changed my score from 4 to 6. I recommend to skip the first seven episodes. In episodes 8 and 9 it finally starts feeling more like Star Trek again. It's still badly written, each episode still has actions that don't make any sense, we still miss depth in the stories, we miss Federation ethics, and the inconsistent technology and weird Klingons remain a shame. But we did enjoy these last two episodes better. We absolutely love main character Michael, she is great. Saru as well. And Tilly and other characters are growing on me. I have good hopes that it will keep improving.

    To the writers, director and producers of the show, please listen to the criticisms! Please involve Trekkies with the writing!    … Expand
  29. pissedtrekky
    Feb 21, 2019
    5
    I'm a long time trek fan and Discovery had my attention up to the last three episodes. the last episode i shut off after that science geek guy said how he was going to miss his bf's sexy scar! I'm not sure who there target audience is supposed to be but I've seen daytime soaps that were less gay. The first season was pretty good and the start of this season then they started to over actI'm a long time trek fan and Discovery had my attention up to the last three episodes. the last episode i shut off after that science geek guy said how he was going to miss his bf's sexy scar! I'm not sure who there target audience is supposed to be but I've seen daytime soaps that were less gay. The first season was pretty good and the start of this season then they started to over act everything and turned up the homosexual volume and tried to push the humor where it feels labored at best. did they change the director or something? what's with all the looking at each other all the time the dramatic pause like in soaps. and why all the man love bull/ is this the brokeback mountain star trek? and who else is sick of looking at the first officer's face? it looks like a vjj! I guess i'm going to go finish watching it but i'm hoping vjj face gets killed on this episode and if the science geek and the doc that came back from the dead kiss again i'm done! I can't believe they're ruining this.… Expand
  30. shoulderoforion
    Sep 25, 2017
    6
    the show was better than i expected it to be, the klingons were awful, but the space battles were mint. i'm in, i'll be adding this to my weekly schedule. boldly.
  31. Brian_Brodrick
    Nov 26, 2017
    10
    Star Trek is back! Finally after 12 long years we get a new series, not movies that we have to wait years in between for each one. The pilot episodes were rocky, and you had to watch the rest behind a paywall, but that is trivial compared to the overall quality of Discovery's 1st season which delivers movie-quality SPFX, costumes, props, and sets, but also quality acting and direction asStar Trek is back! Finally after 12 long years we get a new series, not movies that we have to wait years in between for each one. The pilot episodes were rocky, and you had to watch the rest behind a paywall, but that is trivial compared to the overall quality of Discovery's 1st season which delivers movie-quality SPFX, costumes, props, and sets, but also quality acting and direction as well as storytelling. A totally new thing for Trek is the serial instead of episodic format, and the story so far, with small exceptions, is well put together.… Expand
  32. Roagie
    Sep 25, 2017
    10
    First, let it be known that I am a "true" Trek fan. I grew up with re-runs in the 70s as a kid. I was into TNG, DS9, and yes, even Voyager. I can appreciate thoughtful scifi. And this new show IS thoughtful sci-fi. Yes it is more along the lines of the Trek reboot movies, but that's not a bad thing at all. I loved the reboots, so this show sits well with me. So far, this show is definitelyFirst, let it be known that I am a "true" Trek fan. I grew up with re-runs in the 70s as a kid. I was into TNG, DS9, and yes, even Voyager. I can appreciate thoughtful scifi. And this new show IS thoughtful sci-fi. Yes it is more along the lines of the Trek reboot movies, but that's not a bad thing at all. I loved the reboots, so this show sits well with me. So far, this show is definitely more action-centric, but it also has some interesting character development with the lead, as well as a distinct Klingon character I believe they are going to develop/follow in parallel as the show continues. The story also appears it will take a twist after the first two eps. I can see where they're going with it, and I'm intrigued. This show is a vast departure from previous Trek formulas, and that's a good thing!
    The series has angered so-called "true" Trek fans because it does not appear to be ship-centric, and the main character is not a captain. Well people, it's time to BOLDLY GO WHERE NO ONE HAS GONE BEFORE. Grow up and give the show a chance... jeez.
    As for the show itself, it's great. Production costs must be off the chart... sets, characters, makeup, costumes, etc are all absolute top-notch & movie quality. Pretty amazing for a TV show. The episodes had me gripped on the edge of my seat all the way through, never a dull moment. I found the writing to be excellent, on par with newer more mature shows like The Expanse and Battlestar Galactica. Same holds true for the acting. If you like Trek, or scifi, or action, or just good shows... you should check this one out.    … Expand
  33. vilthean
    Sep 25, 2017
    8
    A promising start, despite all the hate from people who apparently forgot how much TNG changed trek compared to TOS (and how much hate it received back then as well). A modern-looking, intriguing show with much star trek in it, as well as many things of its own. Remains to be seen which way will it go from here.
  34. Mooncalfian
    Sep 25, 2017
    6
    Beat by beat reaction:

    They saw their footprints, but not the two figures walking? From space? New opening sequence doesn't feel very Trek at all. Not really feeling it. Banter feels forced. The comment about sarcasm for example. It didn't really flow, and just felt a bit fake. Bernham's character seems to know way more about science than the science officer. Wonder if she'd    Beat by beat reaction:

    They saw their footprints, but not the two figures walking? From space?

    New opening sequence doesn't feel very Trek at all. Not really feeling it.

    Banter feels forced. The comment about sarcasm for example. It didn't really flow, and just felt a bit fake.

    Bernham's character seems to know way more about science than the science officer. Wonder if she'd know more than him if their genders were reversed? In fact, all of the men seem snivelling and idiotic. Even the Klingons are depicted as an all male ship crew. What does that say about men? Even the admiral is idiotic and bull-headed. And then the Klingons show up, and guess who actually listens to reason? The one single female Klingon in the entire show so far. She even stands at the head of all 24 houses, leading them. Which would be fine, if by this point they hadn't painted all men to be idiots or weak or cowardly.

    There's so much focus on the one character, that you lose a chance to get to know everyone else as much. It ends up just being 4 or 5 central characters, with one single main one. Other minor characters get lines but there's no depth to them, and that doesn't feel very Trek at all. Trek was always about the characters, and not just one character, and not even just the Captain. It was always about all of the characters, and there were usually a lot of them.

    'Oh hey! A ship couldn't navigate that asteroid field! Let's send in a person on a jetpack instead!' What?!

    The main character is smart, capable, brave, strong, and her only weakness appears to be that she feels emotion. In what way does that make her an interesting character? She has nothing about her that's captivating or makes her unique as a protagonist. She's basically the same as every other heroin from the past 20 years; emotional yet capable. Where's the extra depth that all the other Trek characters had?

    Despite the failings so far, I'm enjoying the Klingons and the tension. Those parts are well done.

    "We are your livestock of old," was a great line. It harkens back to The Next Generation where they say they no longer enslave animals for food purposes, and that shows a respect for canon in regards to the canon's heart, if little else. I found that to be a subtle and welcome nod to true lifelong fans.

    Speaking of canon, however, the holograms are truly canon destroying. In the future they talk to people on screens, and in the past they talk to people on screens. Moreover, holograms are impractical and require much more power than a screen. It seems illogical that they'd use them for simply talking to a commanding officer. Plus, the Klingons use holographic communication technology also? Why? Why would both cultures use it and give it up at the same time?

    The camera tilt and lens flares and dark sets are trying too hard to emulate JJ Abrams' Trek. Why you'd want to do such a thing, I'll never understand. Moreover, it's an overdone, trite aesthetic, which has been used in just about every space sci fi show and movie for the past 20 years, except for the Trek shows.

    The pacing and atmosphere so far is close to excellent. It builds slowly but surely, rather than jumping headlong into it like the more recent movies did. There's still perhaps too much action, but it at least takes its time in making you care.

    The moment where she starts demanding they fire first is ludicrous. Of course they can't, this is Starfleet. And then the neck pinch on her captain is an extreme over reaction, and not believable. It absolutely does not endear us to her character. She's also extremely rude and condescending, as is seen in the second episode.

    More canon breaking with the vulcan neck pinch from a human. It feels more like JJ Abrams has brushed them up on their canon, rather than actual former writers of Trek (who are now mostly working on The Orville anyway).

    Why are they sending two small people against a crew of super strong Klingons, in a close quarters environment where they are likely to have to go hand-to-hand? And the two highest ranking officers? They have security members, so send them. It's the little details like this that are ruining a show which was on the right track.

    Why are the judgement council all sitting the dark, like some X-files villains? What's all that about?

    Overall, I enjoyed these first two episodes. A fair amount, in fact. But there's just too many plot holes and tropes and a pretty unlikeable, uninteresting protagonist to make it something that is sure to last. It's a good show, but it's not Trek.    … Expand
  35. Fred12
    Sep 26, 2017
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. For my part, I'm a big fan since the TOS series, and I think this is the best franchise since ST Voyager. The visual effects are on cinema movie level, and they present the ST Universe with refreshing characters in their own (new) way.
    I simply cannot understand some critics from users that pointed out here that TOS played in a universe with CRT monitors and it was after this series... Would you prefer old fashioned CRT monitors, and staff behind the screen who are pulling the doors and technicals / visuals from 30 years ago? that would be ridiculous. Updated technology is the key here as well as the overall fitting of the Star Trek Philosophy into the action. The klingons play their cultural aggressive stereotype that you love and the action is cinema movie level. Series start was really furious and I hope they can maintain that level.    … Expand
  36. Esterling
    Sep 25, 2017
    9
    Strongly character driven, which much to be revealed. Makes you want to keep watching. It is a good starting point for a new series even if I hate the timeframe. If nothing else it keeps people interested and continues to boldly go forward. He's hoping it spawns a future series after Voyager. Give it a chance people!
  37. corky_
    Sep 25, 2017
    10
    great show and far better than the old boring star trek. If you want a show that resembles previous star trek go watch the hot pile Orville; Discovery is a show adapted to modern television and is actually entertaining.
  38. jamestran84
    Nov 13, 2017
    10
    To be honest I was hoping this show would fail miserably but holy cow I was blown away. After the first two prologue episodes you are taken for a ride! The CGI and tech are great and its very realistic while keeping to the star trek theme. I LOVE IT. I got it on Netflix so it's a big win. It's quite obvious they have not kept the tech strictly to canon but seriously I would be sooo boredTo be honest I was hoping this show would fail miserably but holy cow I was blown away. After the first two prologue episodes you are taken for a ride! The CGI and tech are great and its very realistic while keeping to the star trek theme. I LOVE IT. I got it on Netflix so it's a big win. It's quite obvious they have not kept the tech strictly to canon but seriously I would be sooo bored if they did!!!… Expand
  39. yiannis23
    Oct 5, 2017
    9
    To be honest, I don't understand all the negative user reviews. Probably they come from Star Wars fans who are just jealous :-) I've been a Star Trek fan all my life, I've also been to a couple of conventions In Vegas so I think I am entitled to have an opinion on to whether Discovery is Star trek material or not. The answer is simple, YES IT IS. It focuses on the character, it adheresTo be honest, I don't understand all the negative user reviews. Probably they come from Star Wars fans who are just jealous :-) I've been a Star Trek fan all my life, I've also been to a couple of conventions In Vegas so I think I am entitled to have an opinion on to whether Discovery is Star trek material or not. The answer is simple, YES IT IS. It focuses on the character, it adheres with the Federation Directives, it brings out the Star Trek culture as we the fans know it. If I could compare it with one of the oder series, I would say that it is a mix between TOS and ENT. Actually I find it much more Star Trek than the recent Chris Pine movies. We need to give DIS a chance to reveal its true potential. Don't forget how awful the first season of DS9 was; at least in DIS we see a lot of action and story. Let's hope it will bring CBS the numbers otherwise I don't think we will be around for the next Star Trek TV series :-)… Expand
  40. MrPositive
    Mar 18, 2018
    10
    I think it's extremely well done, especially after the first couple of episodes which honestly are a bit slow. It's sad people giving this bad reviews and saying they quit after 1 episode. You are lame and don't deserve something this well done. I seriously feel people are trashing this because they can't handle a woman lead in their precious Star Trek. Total sadness.
  41. AlbinoAlligator
    Feb 7, 2018
    9
    Disco polarized many at first because it seemed to discard many of the principles that made people love Star Trek. Part of this was a move toward a more narrative based format rather than the very episodic nature of classic Star Trek, which had a side effect; it took quite some time for the true foundations of the show to emerge. You might find yourself questioning the show a lot in theDisco polarized many at first because it seemed to discard many of the principles that made people love Star Trek. Part of this was a move toward a more narrative based format rather than the very episodic nature of classic Star Trek, which had a side effect; it took quite some time for the true foundations of the show to emerge. You might find yourself questioning the show a lot in the first half of the first season, but as it unwravels and twists and turns then all of a sudden you begin to believe and find yourself both shocked and impressed in equal measure at the detail and direction the show has taken. The production qualities are fantastic, and it is really worth sticking with. Don't judge it on just the first 4-5 episodes. All good stories have to spend time establishing themselves.… Expand
  42. Cometer
    Sep 26, 2017
    10
    I'm an old time fan of Star Trek. When people think of Star Trek they think about exploration. Going into space and finding new life forms, new challenges. And you know what? Star Trek Discovery is no different from past Star Trek series. Those giving this show a low score only after the first two episodes have short memories and are grabbing to a 10 year old nostalgic view of the oldI'm an old time fan of Star Trek. When people think of Star Trek they think about exploration. Going into space and finding new life forms, new challenges. And you know what? Star Trek Discovery is no different from past Star Trek series. Those giving this show a low score only after the first two episodes have short memories and are grabbing to a 10 year old nostalgic view of the old series. But all those old series had a common trait. They all add antagonists.
    Go ahead and watch some of the first episodes of the older series. Khan, the Q, the Borg queen, Klingons and so on. The very first episode of the TNG introduced the Q.
    I'm giving Discovery a 10 because it is the best start of a Star Trek series. The main characters are strong. Discovery gives the best introduction to Klingons. Their tribal nature. The new look reflects it. And the use of Klingon language makes it more credible when compared to previous series where Klingons for some reason always spoke perfect English.
    If you want to stick to the past keep this in mind. The original series was created in the 60's. The computer consoles had buttons instead of touch displays because that's the best they could do
    at the time. We now have iPads and **** and what we expect from the future is not a star ship with buttons. If Star Trek does not evolve visually it will die along side a generation. I dont't want that. I want Star Trek to continue to inspire future generations.
    No Star Trek Discovery is not like TOS. But it is Star Trek. Fans praised the fan created Axanar. That focused on the battle of Axanar. Star Trek Discovery is truly leaps ahead what was possible in older shows. I'm looking forward to see what will happen.    … Expand
  43. Hausner85
    Sep 25, 2017
    8
    I like it. Off to a good start. I like the characters i don't have problem with lead woman. We will see where it will go from here. And to all "Trekkies" complaining that it isn't "pure enough", "doesn't stick to the canon", "they change the designs""it's to dark" and all those complains stop whining... This is a FICTION and we are allowed to change it. If you want to watch Start TrekI like it. Off to a good start. I like the characters i don't have problem with lead woman. We will see where it will go from here. And to all "Trekkies" complaining that it isn't "pure enough", "doesn't stick to the canon", "they change the designs""it's to dark" and all those complains stop whining... This is a FICTION and we are allowed to change it. If you want to watch Start Trek like the Originals go watch the Originals. What the point of making something that is exactly like the thing that already exist? It like with book adaptations. If they don't present at least a little different approach what the point of doing exactly the same thing. Want to relive it read it once more. I want to see new adaption and ideas, i already know the old. And let's be honest you think that in old series they had all races looking the same what an intended idea or result of technical limitations? The fact that most races are humanoid is already annoying, all of them looking like humans in makes is plain stupid and could be only tolerated when we couldn't do better.… Expand
  44. sanitariusz
    Sep 26, 2017
    9
    Really good start. As a ST fan from more then 30 years I can say that new show is unexpectedly good. Anyway I'm not able understand all these bad comments because new trek is different then treks before. New Klingons are excellent!
  45. nanokiwi
    Sep 25, 2017
    10
    I'm probably not the biggest Star Trek fan since my wife is watching all the old stuff and I give most of it a miss. But to me this is a big step up with thrilling writing and stunning set and costume design. As for the haters they have The Orville as an alternative but in my opinion that show is shockingly bad. Depends what you are after but modern TV has evolved to be more cinematic, andI'm probably not the biggest Star Trek fan since my wife is watching all the old stuff and I give most of it a miss. But to me this is a big step up with thrilling writing and stunning set and costume design. As for the haters they have The Orville as an alternative but in my opinion that show is shockingly bad. Depends what you are after but modern TV has evolved to be more cinematic, and yes, darker on average - I prefer it this way.… Expand
  46. ernie76
    Oct 1, 2017
    10
    This is Trek at its best. Greates Problem for most haters seems to be that the "Massage" isent delivert on a silver plater like in TNG where Picard hold a long Monolog at the end of many episodes.
    The look of the Klingons and thair Ships is a bit strange but it isent the 90s anymore and so i can live with that.
    As the Trek Creed say i am open for "New and Strange" things and so i git    This is Trek at its best. Greates Problem for most haters seems to be that the "Massage" isent delivert on a silver plater like in TNG where Picard hold a long Monolog at the end of many episodes.
    The look of the Klingons and thair Ships is a bit strange but it isent the 90s anymore and so i can live with that.
    As the Trek Creed say i am open for "New and Strange" things and so i git this a chance!    … Expand
  47. Malthazor
    Feb 7, 2018
    10
    I suppose hard-core Star Trek fans are going to bemoan the fast pacing and the moral complexity, as well as the absence of tedious sermonising about the greater good and the Prime Directive. The rest of us can find plenty to enjoy in the first season's well structured story arc and the fine performances by the likes of Michelle Yeoh and Jason Isaacs.
  48. EasternCanuck
    Oct 16, 2017
    6
    I like this show for what it is - a Star Trek 'themed' show. Characters are not very interesting, though the captain is growing on me as we learn more about him. The Klingons are a small disaster. I don't know why they were re-invented but they haven't got that correct. I appreciate that there is Klingon language but there are so many Klingon scenes that I get tired of reading subtitles.I like this show for what it is - a Star Trek 'themed' show. Characters are not very interesting, though the captain is growing on me as we learn more about him. The Klingons are a small disaster. I don't know why they were re-invented but they haven't got that correct. I appreciate that there is Klingon language but there are so many Klingon scenes that I get tired of reading subtitles. It's like I'm watching a foreign film at times.… Expand
  49. DavidDaniel
    Dec 22, 2017
    7
    I am not a sucker for space dramas. However, Star Trek: Discovery is a good one. It is often great. If you manage to get passed the first three episodes which are the weakest, you are in for a treat. Things start to get moving from that point on. It's also to be appreciated that the creators opted for a serialized format.
  50. Smolenski7
    Sep 24, 2017
    7
    There are several things that make the Star Trek "enterprise" fantastic. Among those is the witty family like banter between crew members, cool futuristic tech, action, depth of characters, and of course plot lines. Although I've only seen the first episode of Star Trek: Discovery, which means I'm still holding out hope, so far this current incarnation of Gene Roddenberry's baby has itsThere are several things that make the Star Trek "enterprise" fantastic. Among those is the witty family like banter between crew members, cool futuristic tech, action, depth of characters, and of course plot lines. Although I've only seen the first episode of Star Trek: Discovery, which means I'm still holding out hope, so far this current incarnation of Gene Roddenberry's baby has its phaser set to stun. And boy, am I stunned.

    There is one alien science officer who is more afraid and cautious than anything else. He describes himself as being bread to sense oncoming danger and death, which he would like to avoid at all costs. How could he possibly be 3rd in command of a star ship? It doesn't fit.

    The current captain is a small, middle aged Asian women who appears to be more frail than my grandmother....sorry grandma. I can't possibly imagine her in hand-to-hand combat with a chiwawa let alone a Klingon. This is just poor casting, especially when taking into consideration that at this point in the Star Trek universe hand-to-hand combat was much more common than later series like Generations.

    I did like the first officer, Michael Burnham. She is clearly a strong black woman who has been cast to a perfect role. She apparently was raised by Vulcans after her parents were killed by Klingons and still maintains a close relationship with a young Seric. That's cool and connects various other series to this one. Good touch.

    The only technology that kind of stood out to me were several interstellar holographic conversations that took place between the ship and other locations around the Star Trek universe. I did like the classic design of the phase pistols and the sound of the doors opening and closing, both connected well to the original series in my opinion. There was also a space walk, which included some wonderful CGI, to a sleeping Klingon ship. The production value is super.

    The Klingons' look has been directly taken from the most recent movies. Personally, I prefer the look of Klingons from Generations, but there is at least a clear connection between this series and the movies. I can appreciate that effort, i just don't like it.

    So, in short, there are definitely things I didn't like about this one episode, however, i did like the cliff hanger at the end so there is hope. I can also clearly remember the first episodes of Generations 30 years ago, and they were awful. However, changes were made and the series has become a classic. So, please add some depth to the characters, some banter between crew mates, and plot lines that keep us interested and coming back. Don't try to be political, just entertain.    … Expand
  51. Chrisma55
    Nov 11, 2017
    10
    Calm down people of earth. Star Trek can evolve, it's not religion... Just joined the metacritics to set things strait vs professional critics and The Orville and now it's Discovery's turn but vs. Trekkers and Trekkies. Keep calm and appreciate. Filming is beautiful, high quality. The sound and soundtrack, the ambiance, colours, the casting and dialogues it's all good and I´m noCalm down people of earth. Star Trek can evolve, it's not religion... Just joined the metacritics to set things strait vs professional critics and The Orville and now it's Discovery's turn but vs. Trekkers and Trekkies. Keep calm and appreciate. Filming is beautiful, high quality. The sound and soundtrack, the ambiance, colours, the casting and dialogues it's all good and I´m no fanboy. I understand all the fuss is about in regards to Star Trek lore, about what should or shouldn't be, about the respect of the cannon stuff... And those of you who bring up front the Klingon appearance as a major bug well switch channel you are not worthy (and those who bring up the "Michael is not a ladies name" I don't want those waste good typing time on you) . Enjoy what CBS took a chance on, put in the hands of very competent people who do a great creative job and put on your old dvd's of S-T, next g, voyager, enterprise and even deep 9 and be joyful to have big corps putting money in good sci-fi shows we can all enjoy with a light hearted reconnaissance and honesty. All hands, brace for impact...… Expand
  52. nysplendor
    Sep 24, 2017
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is based on the first 2 episodes. I don't like being forced into a subscription service, but I don't fault the show for that. It will hopefully last far longer than this inconvenience. As a Trek show, I am pleasantly surprised. I wanted a new episodic TNG and I am still disappointed this show is a character driven narrative, but so far, I find the main character and the Klingons remarkably deep. Vulcan adoption has been long a feature of the universe, but this background story so far seems fresh. I also found the Klingon/Federation conflict pretty spot on. There's a rich appreciation of Klingon honor and brutality, and a legitimate understanding that the Federation presents a real threat to their group identity. The Federation is a little more one-note--the leaders are naïve and want to negotiate and no one properly understands the Klingons' motivations. So, all in all, I'm looking forward to where it goes.… Expand
  53. Darkrayne
    Sep 26, 2017
    10
    This show is clearly getting review bombed on two fronts. First, by the people upset about the viewing method in the US. Second, by hardcore Star Trek fans who refuse to accept change. I wouldn't be surprised if Star Trek fan groups have posted to their forums requesting that all members help with review bombing. They are even hanging around here to up vote all the negative reviews andThis show is clearly getting review bombed on two fronts. First, by the people upset about the viewing method in the US. Second, by hardcore Star Trek fans who refuse to accept change. I wouldn't be surprised if Star Trek fan groups have posted to their forums requesting that all members help with review bombing. They are even hanging around here to up vote all the negative reviews and down vote the positive ones.

    Here's the deal: Star Trek, all the older series, are OLD. We love them, but they are old. Not just chronologically old, but also old fashioned. New things need to be NEW.

    Star Trek Discovery is an excellent example of how to modernise an old franchise. It gets rid of the occasional cheesyness and frequent geekyness the series is known for and replaces it with narrative, extremely high production values and more action. So far, every episode will make you believe you're watching a high budget movie. It follows a single character closely, instead of focusing on the entire officer crew.

    If Battlestar and Star Trek had a baby and that baby was raised by Mass Effect, this is what you would get. I'm personally enjoying it a lot more than the rebooted movies, which are still pretty good in thier own way.

    The Klingons look different, fans don't like that because they aren't used to the look and find it distracting, I understand that. However, the new design is far superior, aesthetically. They look more warrior-like and more imposing. If this had been the only version of what a Klingon looked like from the start of Star Trek, the fans would love it. The complaints have nothing to do with the way they look, it's purely because they look different.

    Fans also don't like that the technology looks way more advanced than the Original Series, even though Discovery is set before it. It's not the 60's anymore, we don't make things look old and rubbish just to follow suit. If they could have made ST:TOS look better, they would have. This problem stems from the archaic limitations of the time period the original was made, not in the design of the new series.

    Normal viewers: Dive in and enjoy some high quality Star Trek. There's a lot to like here, especially for newcomers.

    Hardcore Star Trek Fans: Keep going the way you're going and you're going to completely destroy this franchise. I get it, you don't want change.. but lets admit that this is better than nothing, even for you. If this series isn't a success it's not likely anyone will ever make a Star Trek series again.    … Expand
  54. MrShmoove
    Sep 25, 2017
    9
    Saw both episodes off the CBS All Access app on the PS4. I've noticed some people complaining due to continuity issues in other review. Don't they realize that THIS series is OBVIOUSLY done in the JJ Abrams style so the continuity would be from THAT timeline?!?!! O.o

    Anyways to the show itself **some spoilers**. The title sequence sucks. I much prefer the outer space scenes of    Saw both episodes off the CBS All Access app on the PS4. I've noticed some people complaining due to continuity issues in other review. Don't they realize that THIS series is OBVIOUSLY done in the JJ Abrams style so the continuity would be from THAT timeline?!?!! O.o

    Anyways to the show itself **some spoilers**.

    The title sequence sucks. I much prefer the outer space scenes of previous series that have come before it. The set design is like the JJ Abrams movies style. Even has the lens flare! The cast seemed really small at first with only really 3 characters standing out, BUT we found out why in the second episode why they didn't focus on the different characters of the bridge crew.

    Michelle Yeoh was good as the Captain and Sonequa Martin Greene was great as her #1. The green eyed alien was a little hard to get to like cause he's such a wuss but he may grow on you as the series progresses. I LOVE the fact that we are finally getting to see the war between the Federation and the Klingons that has been talked about on previous shows like TNG. BUT the Klingons didn't look right. Their skin color was off (too dark) and they looked more reptilian than any of the previous shows. Wish they would have stuck to the old makeups.

    First episode was the setup while episode two brought the action...and OHHH did they bring it! Two fleets in a massive battle with well over 10,000 combined casualties between the two sides (8100+ just for the Federation). I am sad to see that Michelle Yeoh was killed off in episode two though. Would have liked to have seen her stay as Captain. Will see how the new guy does that they showed is coming up next week.

    Overall great start. Not perfect but beats the HELL out of The Orville!    … Expand
  55. Bibliographer
    Sep 25, 2017
    8
    Off to a good, if slightly uneven, start, the new Trek holds a lot of promise. Good character and a good story, along with a lot of care or the visuals, will keep me coming back -- at least for a while.
  56. MMBosch
    Sep 25, 2017
    10
    A Star Trek story for a new generation, a generation open to change. Critics are right, its a solid entrance in the dying franchise, brought to life with incredible atention to details.
  57. bigbro29
    Sep 25, 2017
    7
    though I will not pay to continue watching this show I will admit I liked the episode I watched of it I had fun watching the action and just having a good time in general I really enjoyed the female lead as well she was fantastic and a good example for young girls and also young boys when looking for a girlfriend her qualities and values are excellent this is a must watch believe me
  58. Korkenzieher
    Sep 26, 2017
    10
    WOW - like it. Special effects, music and casting are great! Old Star Trek had more depth but the new show is a good compromise between the old series and the style of the new time line. AND the visuals in this TV series are one of the best you will currently see! If you watch Discovery shortly after STNG you my think THIS IS NEXT GENERATION TELEVISION.
  59. Slavens
    Sep 25, 2017
    7
    There was plenty i didnt like but if i was honest there was a lot i didnt like when i watched farpoint the first time. Hopefully the writing and the story gets smoothed out some and the klingons learn to talk fluently. I like the look of the ship, and the modern bridge doesn't bother me like some on here, but cannon is pretty much broken which i kinda knew going into it. I wish theyThere was plenty i didnt like but if i was honest there was a lot i didnt like when i watched farpoint the first time. Hopefully the writing and the story gets smoothed out some and the klingons learn to talk fluently. I like the look of the ship, and the modern bridge doesn't bother me like some on here, but cannon is pretty much broken which i kinda knew going into it. I wish they would have set the series after STNG been fighting klingons for 60 years now. The actors seemed good and the special effects are movie quality so there is that, but i agree with a lot of people that Orville feels more like trek than this does but so long as the ship battles aren't waged with a beastie boys track playing in the background i will hang on for a little while longer.… Expand
  60. rixmadpor
    Sep 26, 2017
    10
    I've been a trekkie for almost 30 years. My first contact, with the Star Trek universe, was the Motion Picture, Wrath of Khan and then the series ST: The Next Generation. Back then I was impressed how one universe could encompass such a wide variety of subjects. From doing a 2001 Space Odyssey type of movie to an action movie like Wrath Of Khan. And then there was a TV series like TNG,I've been a trekkie for almost 30 years. My first contact, with the Star Trek universe, was the Motion Picture, Wrath of Khan and then the series ST: The Next Generation. Back then I was impressed how one universe could encompass such a wide variety of subjects. From doing a 2001 Space Odyssey type of movie to an action movie like Wrath Of Khan. And then there was a TV series like TNG, which I didn't expect that could be that good. Even the special effects were, for me, even better than the movies back then. And now... They've done it again. They re-invented Star Trek. They took a big risk but it was worth it. It's a whole new level. Not even the rebooted movies were this good. Cast, effects, story. Everything. They've done a great job hiding the story until the premiere. I never saw this coming. It's the best Star Trek TV pilot ever. This could be a movie. Congrats to everyone involved on the show. Thank you so very much. Live long and prosper!… Expand
  61. Santakrooz
    Oct 9, 2017
    9
    Huge ST and TNG fan. I like it - a lot. I also like the theatrical reboots fwiw. I just disagree with the negative reviews on here. We loved it from the pilot and are up to episode 4. I think the acting is good, the characters are interesting, and it's an interesting and action oriented Star Trek story that follows the Star Trek philosophy and general storyline, but not necessarilyHuge ST and TNG fan. I like it - a lot. I also like the theatrical reboots fwiw. I just disagree with the negative reviews on here. We loved it from the pilot and are up to episode 4. I think the acting is good, the characters are interesting, and it's an interesting and action oriented Star Trek story that follows the Star Trek philosophy and general storyline, but not necessarily the canon perfectly, which is fine with me. TNG didn't follow perfectly either, and neither did the original movies. The characters are different, which I think rubs some people the wrong way, they're looking for another Picard or Janeway or Kirk, and these are different characters - and they're interesting, flawed, mysterious. We're digging it. We also like the whole Klingon reboot - and backstory. The FX are amazing, but we're addicted to the storyline and the action. Great series.… Expand
  62. wolffandy3
    Oct 2, 2017
    10
    Loved it! Pitch perfect! Thrilling, mysterious, funny, and bold! Top notch acting, Sonequa Martin-Green is captivating and charming -- a perfect Trek lead. Writing is clever and deep, weaving a tapestry of intrigue, making the most of it's serialized structure. Fantastic direction, SFX, music -- the sets are incredible. I dig the big budget, love seeing Trek this way. Very epic. Star TrekLoved it! Pitch perfect! Thrilling, mysterious, funny, and bold! Top notch acting, Sonequa Martin-Green is captivating and charming -- a perfect Trek lead. Writing is clever and deep, weaving a tapestry of intrigue, making the most of it's serialized structure. Fantastic direction, SFX, music -- the sets are incredible. I dig the big budget, love seeing Trek this way. Very epic. Star Trek meets Game of Thrones, in the best way.
    This is Star Trek at it's finest!    … Expand
  63. damocles1974
    Oct 9, 2017
    10
    The negative reviews just seem to have spoken their verdicts even before the show even really started. The first 2 "real" episodes showed that Discovery is very well written and a really good addition to the universe because it dares to be new.
  64. jmason86
    Oct 30, 2017
    10
    I grew up on Star Trek TNG, DS9, and Voyager. They inspired me, especially TNG, to pursue a career in science and engineering. I'm now writing this review from my office at NASA. Discovery so far is just as good as any of those earlier series.

    It's way too early to crap on Discovery. The first season of TNG was terrible but it became absolutely iconic and, for me, epitomized Star Trek.    I grew up on Star Trek TNG, DS9, and Voyager. They inspired me, especially TNG, to pursue a career in science and engineering. I'm now writing this review from my office at NASA. Discovery so far is just as good as any of those earlier series.

    It's way too early to crap on Discovery. The first season of TNG was terrible but it became absolutely iconic and, for me, epitomized Star Trek.

    While Enterprise was on the air, I boycotted most of the episodes, including the finale, because of the theme song. Years later I watched the series all the way through, and then regretted not supporting the show while it was on. I vocally denounced it with many others. And it got cancelled. Now we've been more than a decade with no Star Trek series. I won't make that mistake again.

    But the paywall is absurd. I'm paying for it to give them support, but they really should broaden the distribution so that it is more accessible. If not broadcasting it, then also let Netflix stream it. If not that, then also make it available for purchase on Amazon like HBO is or the Mars series was. I grew up in the lower middle class and my parents would not have been able to pay for CBS All Access (we didn't even have cable) so I would not have been exposed to and inspired by Star Trek.    … Expand
  65. jcastlouis
    Oct 4, 2017
    10
    After three episodes I have to say this show is amazing. I felt compelled to write this review because so many others here are merely 0s with the same things copied and pasted. Would you honestly believe a rating of 0? Just like you wouldn't believe a 10. -- Overall the show is a modern telling of the classic Star Trek tales. Everything has been updated so the Star Trek franchise canAfter three episodes I have to say this show is amazing. I felt compelled to write this review because so many others here are merely 0s with the same things copied and pasted. Would you honestly believe a rating of 0? Just like you wouldn't believe a 10. -- Overall the show is a modern telling of the classic Star Trek tales. Everything has been updated so the Star Trek franchise can attract a whole new generation of fan. And the classic Trek substance is there too, if viewers will look. The first episode was somewhat stuff. Think of all of the beautiful television we'd miss if the first hour didn't do it for us and we dipped out. Episode 2 was masterful. It laid the foundation for the serialized story to move forward in a brilliant manner. Dialogue was crisp and believable. Effects were amazing. And the overall scope of the production was vast - similar in style and cinematography to a film. ST is a show steeped in canon. And the producers have said this show will adhere to canon if you are patient enough. Which means by the end of the 15 episodes of this season any "canonical conflicts" will have been explained. Many don't seem capable of giving it more than 42 minutes before making up their mind. If you're concerned about canon, I advise you to chillax going in. I have an it has led to an utter enjoyment of the show. And my son, who has never been a fan of any other incarnation, is hooked. Discovery is worth a look and I know you'll find the same jewel of science fiction that has endured for 51 years.… Expand
  66. elyh
    Sep 27, 2017
    8
    I loved the first two episodes! I really don't get why the series is getting so much hate the production values are off the charts. People need to relax and enjoy stuff.
  67. Prosmooth
    Sep 25, 2017
    9
    Based on the first 2 episodes it's very good Trek. Production value is actually higher than usual for a Trek show and the acting was top notch. Haven't met the whole cast yet, because the first 2 eps are kind of a prologue to what the main story will be. The Trump/Nazi crowd hates it because it has a female person of color in the lead role. That is the basis for all these hateful reviews.Based on the first 2 episodes it's very good Trek. Production value is actually higher than usual for a Trek show and the acting was top notch. Haven't met the whole cast yet, because the first 2 eps are kind of a prologue to what the main story will be. The Trump/Nazi crowd hates it because it has a female person of color in the lead role. That is the basis for all these hateful reviews. Sad world we live in.… Expand
  68. cbeckman
    Oct 2, 2017
    10
    I've love Trek since the TOS and love all incarnations, except the JJ Abrams version (which is terrible). But, I do not get the hate for this version. It's great. The characters are great. The story is fun and exciting. It features both believable science and politics.

    This is certainly different than all other incarnations, but true to the heart of trek. This is the only show I'm    I've love Trek since the TOS and love all incarnations, except the JJ Abrams version (which is terrible). But, I do not get the hate for this version. It's great. The characters are great. The story is fun and exciting. It features both believable science and politics.

    This is certainly different than all other incarnations, but true to the heart of trek. This is the only show I'm at all interested in and actually the best thing I've seen in years!    … Expand
  69. ignore78
    Nov 19, 2017
    10
    i hate the star trek series and LOVE the movies. This is even better than the movies. Dont miss this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  70. Brigitte63
    Sep 27, 2017
    10
    LOVED the new series and I've been a fan since TOS! Expected the usual whining from fans who are stuck in the past and can't open their minds! I'm lucky to be able to watch in Canada on SPACE channel. My only criticism is that it is offered only on the CBS ALL Access service which makes it inaccessible to many potential fans and also I found having to read the Klingon subtitles veryLOVED the new series and I've been a fan since TOS! Expected the usual whining from fans who are stuck in the past and can't open their minds! I'm lucky to be able to watch in Canada on SPACE channel. My only criticism is that it is offered only on the CBS ALL Access service which makes it inaccessible to many potential fans and also I found having to read the Klingon subtitles very tedious and I hope they have them speaking in English soon. It always takes a new show a while for character development and I expect this will get better as time goes on. I do love the dark cinematic feel of it. Not everything has to be the light fluffy TNG!… Expand
  71. Discovery
    Sep 28, 2017
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. excellent series, quite good addition in the Universe of Star Trek, As the fan of Star Trek I isn't happy only with design of klingon ( they are awful )… Expand
  72. redspark
    Feb 9, 2018
    10
    Great to see Star Trek back on our screens ,remember time for us in movie production has moved on so much since the first series and remember each episode was a story on its own .Discovery is a on going saga i would say it is different be cause of turns and twists , but i am enjoying watching it,take it as something new ,movies have moved on from simple tales and so must Star Trek to survive!
  73. giovanniremo
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    Escludendo i primi due episodi, posticci e senza capo ne coda, Discovery è una bella serie che reinterpreta e rinnova lo 'stile Star Trek', ma facendo passi avanti, superando il concetto di 'una avventura alla settimana', introducendo personaggi più complessi che si svelano poco a poco, e avendo finalmente a disposizione i soldi necessari per fare ottima fantascienza. Spero che prosegua a lungo.
  74. Gerd76
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    as a long time fan of star trek i can say that this is a fresh start and i love the little nuances that are there from the older series and films. Some may hate that this is not in the same concept of TNG etc, but more of the same is not always good for a series. My mother, me and my brother are all star trek fans, and we all agree that this is a good series
  75. drew314159
    Feb 6, 2018
    10
    I have been a life long fan of Star Trek since the 70s also, and I love this show. It is great and flows lovely from all the series before eit.
  76. eightyfish
    Feb 20, 2018
    10
    You'll notice most of the early reviews for this series are bad, and most of the later ones are good. Ignore anyone who reviews a series of anything after 2 or 3 episodes. Yes, this is different to previous Trek, but if you try to imagine what Trek would look like if it was written in the modern TV universe - a universe with Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, The Wire, Peaky Blinders and allYou'll notice most of the early reviews for this series are bad, and most of the later ones are good. Ignore anyone who reviews a series of anything after 2 or 3 episodes. Yes, this is different to previous Trek, but if you try to imagine what Trek would look like if it was written in the modern TV universe - a universe with Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, The Wire, Peaky Blinders and all the rest - this is it. Yes, it has some issues with pacing at the beginning, and the new Klingons take a little getting used to (I think I would have preferred them as they were in TNG), but this is solid Trek with a moral backbone, good characters and an intriguing story arc. It really comes together by the end. Don't forget TNG took almost three years to find its feet. Can't wait for series 2.… Expand
  77. OldHippy
    Jan 29, 2018
    9
    Every first season of Star Trek, in any of the series, is usually a fairly laughable version of what every series eventually became. Ok, maybe the Enterprise series never really got there, but the rest follow that trend. So far I find Discovery one of the better first seasons, and it seems to be getting better as the season progresses.
  78. Nasher
    Nov 26, 2017
    5
    Gave it a chance. The story is somewhat interesting, but most the characters are just not convincing and don't seem natural. Feels more like an outlet for "diversity" and "special people" issues than Star Trek.
  79. tremault
    Jan 20, 2019
    0
    There's a lot of issues with discovery but this was at least watchable and quite enjoyable at times.
  80. revillo
    Mar 4, 2018
    5
    They put a lot of effort into the production, but the writing and acting are pretty awkward. My main problem is the tone of this show, which comes off as hyper-anxious and obssessed with war and personal shame, as if determined to convince viewers that intergalactic exploration is a no-nonsense affair, full of dead-serious but emotionally petty professionals in high stakes situations.They put a lot of effort into the production, but the writing and acting are pretty awkward. My main problem is the tone of this show, which comes off as hyper-anxious and obssessed with war and personal shame, as if determined to convince viewers that intergalactic exploration is a no-nonsense affair, full of dead-serious but emotionally petty professionals in high stakes situations. Fun? Well that's for children. It does add a lot of action, tension and some cliffhanger filled continuity between episodes to make it a bit more exciting and binge-worthy for streaming, so many will probably appreciate those aspects, but most of what made star trek noteworthy in the first place is gone.… Expand
  81. WhiskeyStories
    May 1, 2018
    6
    Season 1 part 2: While the second part of season one started out pretty strong with a fun premise and probably the most enjoyable episode of the whole show (episode 10), it quickly went downhill. The showrunners pretty much wasted the concept's potential and made it into a schlocky space war, yet again, not really keeping with the spirit of Star Trek. As a whole Discovery is a decent showSeason 1 part 2: While the second part of season one started out pretty strong with a fun premise and probably the most enjoyable episode of the whole show (episode 10), it quickly went downhill. The showrunners pretty much wasted the concept's potential and made it into a schlocky space war, yet again, not really keeping with the spirit of Star Trek. As a whole Discovery is a decent show with fantastic high quality production and some fun characters, but unfortunately it's second half was just as underwhelming as the first, without any kind of improvement really.… Expand
  82. Muzwon
    Mar 19, 2019
    8
    Absolutely loving this show. I don’t really get the excess of negative teviews and suspect they are based on sentimentality and a sense of fandom entitlement. The acting, plot line and visual effects are all high quality and as someone who is not a historical fan of the genre I think this is a great gateway drug to the rest of the franchise.
  83. GunnerMcDagget
    Sep 25, 2017
    8
    10 minutes in I was ready to throw this show in the bin. It was horribly uncomfortable to watch. Awkward dialogue, misdirected attempts at humour, some of the worst acting I've seen. I'd forgive most people for giving up in the first 10 minutes as I almost did and I love Star Trek. But I gave it a chance.

    The rest of the first half of the prologue improved, not a lot though. There was a    10 minutes in I was ready to throw this show in the bin. It was horribly uncomfortable to watch. Awkward dialogue, misdirected attempts at humour, some of the worst acting I've seen. I'd forgive most people for giving up in the first 10 minutes as I almost did and I love Star Trek. But I gave it a chance.

    The rest of the first half of the prologue improved, not a lot though. There was a little injection of back story to help understand the driving force for the decisions of the main character. All in all it was rather boring and felt like a strain to watch. But I fought on.

    The end of the first part raised some interest. I was somewhat curious to see what happened next. Fortunately it didn't take long into the second part to realise that the entire first half of the prologue was a troll. It seems like it is only there to convince you that this will be a terrible show. The ensuing conflicts of allies and enemies turned the show from a total failure to something I genuinely wanted to watch. By the end of the prologue I was charged. I wanted more.

    But at this stage it's hard to judge. Where will the show go from here?

    By the end of the prologue everything has changed and the show is much better for it. If they can build on this formula then this could be a very special show. If it falls back into the style of the start of the prologue then the show won't last a season.    … Expand
  84. arkton
    Sep 25, 2017
    9
    I enjoyed watching the first two episodes of the new show. And yes, I'm grateful and happy that Star Trek lives and received another show after such a long time. You can't expect that the show does the same things in the same way they did 20 years back. It's a modern Star Trek, playing in the prime timeline (what a relief), has stunning visuals and a good feel to it. It's not only actionI enjoyed watching the first two episodes of the new show. And yes, I'm grateful and happy that Star Trek lives and received another show after such a long time. You can't expect that the show does the same things in the same way they did 20 years back. It's a modern Star Trek, playing in the prime timeline (what a relief), has stunning visuals and a good feel to it. It's not only action like the trailer suggests, it is a good mix between action, dialog and exploration.

    I look forward seeing how the story progresses and how the characters evolve. It has been a good setup so far. Klingons are different, but not so much that you can't make a connection to how they are later in the timeline.

    Be flexible in thought, open to new, and enjoy this Star Trek. I sure do and hope this lives long and prospers.    … Expand
  85. Sugarhorse
    Sep 27, 2017
    10
    Really surprised at how good this show is, having followed the news of its troubled development and seeing the new "Klingons" made me expect very little of this show, but iv'e never been so happy to be wrong. Awesome effects and great characters, as well as an interesting story so far, can't wait to see how it shapes up. All the 1/0 star reviews seems to be trek fans of old complainingReally surprised at how good this show is, having followed the news of its troubled development and seeing the new "Klingons" made me expect very little of this show, but iv'e never been so happy to be wrong. Awesome effects and great characters, as well as an interesting story so far, can't wait to see how it shapes up. All the 1/0 star reviews seems to be trek fans of old complaining about how its all action and doesn't "feel like star trek" and other vague complaints without any specific criticism, the show is great and you should defiantly have a watch if your a trek fan or not.… Expand
  86. GiantWomanOpal
    Oct 21, 2017
    10
    This show is AMAZING! It breathes new life into a franchise that was long growing stale. The recent movies were boring, and few new fans were being created. This is a Star Trek that shows that values are hard to stand by, and it takes struggle to do so. Don't listen to the haters who are just mad that the universe doesn't revolve around White dudes. This is Trek worth watching.
  87. Yco
    Oct 30, 2017
    10
    Interesting, flashy and well made show that I'm looking forward to getting in to.

    Sad that it's being review-bombed by trolls that don't know how to be open minded.
  88. gozu
    Oct 2, 2017
    10
    I was hooked right away and I'm loving all the plot twists. I am enjoying this much more than TNG, which is the only other Star Trek series I've watched in its entirety.

    I have we get 6 or 7 more seasons!

    Making the show streaming-only and 10 dollars a month the only way to watch it is terrible news for the show and its cast and crew.
  89. Chickensun
    Feb 27, 2018
    10
    Literally every negative review is about how the show is not like old Star Trek. Ignore them it's a good show. Starts slowly and gets better.
  90. Fluffybutt
    Nov 13, 2017
    7
    If you're expecting TNG2, it's not. If you want some Sci-Fi entertainment you're on.
    It's certainly not old school star trek. But that being said, it was more enjoyable than i anticipated. So far (ep09). It is more action orientated, much darker.
    Fans of TOS, TNG, VOY or DS9 surely don't get what they want, but reliving the past respectively to pick up where TNG ended - that was 1994 -    If you're expecting TNG2, it's not. If you want some Sci-Fi entertainment you're on.
    It's certainly not old school star trek. But that being said, it was more enjoyable than i anticipated. So far (ep09). It is more action orientated, much darker.
    Fans of TOS, TNG, VOY or DS9 surely don't get what they want, but reliving the past respectively to pick up where TNG ended - that was 1994 - doesn't guarantee CBS a success more than two decades later. Times have chanced, so did TV. While fans being fond of their memories of past great shows, actual re-watching them not so much. Like Xena, X-Files or Hill Street Blues (and many others) it's GoT, Stranger Things and Breaking Bad now. Not that i am saying that ST:D (horrible shortcut by the way) is living up to that standard, it is a fresh take on ST. It got even some of the old feeling in ep07 and ep08.
    It has its flaws, but also potential.    … Expand
  91. woollyshaft
    Oct 30, 2017
    10
    This series exceeded my expectations. It brings Star Trek into the 21st century, where we realize that even in the 24th century, humans are still going to have human emotions, desires, and flaws. The characters have more than one dimension (don't always do what's right), the special effects are 10x better than previous star trek series, and most importantly, the writing isn't campy starThis series exceeded my expectations. It brings Star Trek into the 21st century, where we realize that even in the 24th century, humans are still going to have human emotions, desires, and flaws. The characters have more than one dimension (don't always do what's right), the special effects are 10x better than previous star trek series, and most importantly, the writing isn't campy star trek of old. This is definitely alternative Star Trek, which is why so many Trekkies are giving it negative scores...well that and the dumb CBS app.… Expand
  92. KILLyrIDOLS1
    Oct 2, 2017
    9
    So many other reviews have completely missed the point or applied a standard that every other Star Trek series would also fail to meet. The first several episodes were great and a real return to form for the franchise after several movies that really seemed to, like so many users on this site, miss the whole point of what star trek is supposed to be about.
  93. Shaka_Igloo
    Oct 1, 2017
    10
    Loved it. A show where the action and plot comes first instead of jumping straight into being yet another sci-fi soap opera. So sick of these crews full of self doubting whining babies and their personal problems that end up taking center stage instead of adventures in space.
  94. RosstheBoss0
    Sep 27, 2017
    8
    (Episode 1 & 2)

    Star Trek Discovery sets a much more dramatic viewing than any series before, while not having much in common with earlier series' of which I'm fond, I still found things to like. So far, this season appears to be a more gritty and conflict filled series than previous series' which I can get behind, though I admit I do miss the old style. One thing I've noticed to be    (Episode 1 & 2)

    Star Trek Discovery sets a much more dramatic viewing than any series before, while not having much in common with earlier series' of which I'm fond, I still found things to like.
    So far, this season appears to be a more gritty and conflict filled series than previous series' which I can get behind, though I admit I do miss the old style.

    One thing I've noticed to be cautious about within the critic reviews and in contrast, the
    user reviews are the reasons for their respective high and low scores. Critics are giving the series high praise for its depiction of women in authority positions and women of colour, while this is not a bad thing by any means I feel the praising of such things to be counter-active. The point of Star Trek and in general, is things like Race/Orientation should not matter, highlighting things like race only provides reason to question why they are praising it, rather than just taking it as is. In contrast many reviews from users are more like protest scores, this series is unusual for Star Trek, far higher budget and is more story driven, be careful when considering the score of this series as so far, it is promising.

    Overall however the first two episodes have been very interesting and look forward to know what comes next with cautious-optimism.    … Expand
  95. Strykenine
    Sep 28, 2017
    8
    I picked up CBS all access just for Star Trek, and while I am not sure weather this was the right purchase, it feels like a promising beginning. I have been a Star Trek fan since the release of TNG back in '87 (I was 6) and I remember the first time I watched The Best of Both Worlds. That was a little taste of what Star Trek could be, and I have watched just about anything 'Star Trek'I picked up CBS all access just for Star Trek, and while I am not sure weather this was the right purchase, it feels like a promising beginning. I have been a Star Trek fan since the release of TNG back in '87 (I was 6) and I remember the first time I watched The Best of Both Worlds. That was a little taste of what Star Trek could be, and I have watched just about anything 'Star Trek' related since then. I even like the Abramsverse-Trek, but I feel like those movies will eventually be a side-note in Trek history. Television is where this franchise belongs, due to the ability to tell long-form stories and explore themes and topics both political and scientific that don't necessarily need to have 100-million dollar budgets to be interesting.

    'The Vulcan Hello' isn't quite 'The Best of Both Worlds' and due to the chaotic nature of the first few episodes, it's hard to tell if there will be strong, memorable characters like Picard, Q or Data. That being said, I like the main character thus far and I think that depending on where they take her, this could be a really good series. I thought that shoehorning in Sarek was a bit of a stretch, and it added almost nothing plot-wise, but I will reserve judgement for how that choice plays out. If they wanted to have her be a human-raised-by-Vulcans, they didn't have to include him. That feels forced.

    Luckily, almost nothing else does. The Klingons are far more distinct than they were in TNG, and I like them. They are certainly different, but one of my favorite TOS films was 'The Undiscovered Country' where General Chang was essentially Christopher Plummer with no makeup. I guess my point is that the looks don't spoil anything, but I hope they decide to develop the Klingons into something distinct. It looks like this season will focus on the Klingons, and I'm okay with that.

    One other thing - Star Trek has always needed conflict. It's going to be interesting to see how an organization like the Federation responds to provocation by an enemy that is afraid of them, and with good reason. The Federation usually looks good, but we sometimes forget to think that what looks good from our side of the fence isn't necessarily what looks good to everyone. The Klingon war can be that kind of conflict, I think, where not only is there combat (glorious combat!) but there can be a philosophical presentation of multi-cultural representative nations vs monocultural systems. Sound relevant?

    Long story short, I liked these episodes. I don't watch much television, despite having Netflix and Amazon Prime as well as this CBS all-access. None of the other shows on CBS look that appealing, and quite a few of them actually look bad outright (Seal Team? Really?) but here is hoping that Star Trek makes it worthwhile. If it isn't, I won't be renewing for Season 2.    … Expand
  96. HarryNuggets
    Oct 9, 2017
    8
    Well done lads, looks good, and so far, that being the first three episodes, so good. It looks a bit grittier than the previous series and a bit darker in terms of storyline.
  97. JLC
    Sep 30, 2017
    8
    The only problem was the visual (Lens Flares and the battle scenes).
    The characters were amazing, and the script was fine and well written
    If you consider the visual as canon, you wont like it.
    If you consider only the history, well...you'll be rewarded.

    3/4
  98. edejong
    Sep 27, 2017
    7
    I'm rather surprised by all the negative reviews. It's easy to see TOS and TNG through a lens of humanist perfection and compared with the few top episodes of these series, Discovery falls bleak. However, these two episodes are promising. Interesting characters and good actors, an antagonist that needs to develop. Diplomatic feuds. Possibilities of storylines. Please, give this series aI'm rather surprised by all the negative reviews. It's easy to see TOS and TNG through a lens of humanist perfection and compared with the few top episodes of these series, Discovery falls bleak. However, these two episodes are promising. Interesting characters and good actors, an antagonist that needs to develop. Diplomatic feuds. Possibilities of storylines. Please, give this series a chance. It's definitely better than the last couple of movies. 7/10… Expand
  99. YuryVidal
    Sep 27, 2017
    9
    Gostei muito da serie possui a protagonista possui o espirito dos verdadeiros capitães anteriores, muito bem feita com episódios dignos de um filme.
  100. cinemabon
    Apr 8, 2018
    10
    Fan Clubs have flooded this website with "bad" reviews in the hopes it will bring down the favorable rating. However, anyone with a brain and some Sci-Fi background knows good science fiction when they see it. Star Trek Discovery is made up of great fans, devoted to the series. They've accomplished what few could - take a dying series and breathe new life into it. So many sour grapes whenFan Clubs have flooded this website with "bad" reviews in the hopes it will bring down the favorable rating. However, anyone with a brain and some Sci-Fi background knows good science fiction when they see it. Star Trek Discovery is made up of great fans, devoted to the series. They've accomplished what few could - take a dying series and breathe new life into it. So many sour grapes when those who have tried to trash this show and say how "brilliant" the Orville is must disappointed to see their ratings are the exact opposite of what they hoped. The true Star Trek fan LOVES this show and the post show, both well done.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

80
#80 Best TV Season of 2017
1
#1 Most Discussed TV Season of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared TV Season of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Generally favorable reviews - based on 20 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 20
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 20
  3. Negative: 0 out of 20
  1. The New York Times
    Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    Oct 19, 2017
    50
    Discovery feels like it’s adrift between the adventure-of-the-week format of its network-TV predecessors and the kind of complex serial favored by cable and streaming.
    Read full review
  2. The Oregonian
    Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Sep 26, 2017
    60
    Star Trek: Discovery feels like it's just finding its footing. On the promising side, Doug Jones is already a standout as Science Officer Lt. Saru, who's from an alien race called Kelpiens. And James Frain is perfectly cast as Sarek, the Vulcan who veteran "Trek" fans know as the father of Spock. The relationship between Burnham and Sarek is one of the more intriguing aspects of Star Trek: Discovery.
    Read full review
  3. Salon
    Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Sep 26, 2017
    80
    Happily Star Trek: Discovery strikes a balance between what diehard Trekkies love about Roddenberry’s universe and what J.J. Abrams injected into its theatrical resurrection. Ethical dilemmas and a clash between cultures and traditions comprise the fore of the narrative, but the hours don’t skimp on phaser blasts and broadcast-appropriate carnage.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »