• Network: HULU
  • Series Premiere Date: Dec 7, 2016
Season #: 2, 1
Metascore
50

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 14
  2. Negative: 1 out of 14
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Alex McCown
    Dec 7, 2016
    75
    There’s nothing innovative about this project, but its commitment to fleet storytelling and a game cast take it far.
  2. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Dec 6, 2016
    67
    We’ll be curious to see what the second half of the season delivers, but its uneven presentation thus far, torn between grounded and outlandish, fails to give a proper platform to its stars (even if they manage to squeeze in moments on their own).
  3. Entertainment Weekly
    Reviewed by: Shirley Li
    Dec 5, 2016
    67
    If Shut Eye had the foresight to focus on Linda (KaDee Strickland), it might have avoided turning into a meandering muddle of subplots. [9 Dec 2016, p.57]
  4. Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Dec 7, 2016
    60
    If you used to be a “Burn Notice” devotee, and have re-watched every “Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul” episode to the point that the episodes have lost their sheen, you may find something enjoy here. That something may be Donovan’s performance. The actor lends a remarkable sensitivity to what could be an entirely odious character.
  5. Reviewed by: Sophie Gilbert
    Dec 7, 2016
    50
    At its best, the show mimics the stylized visuals, outlandish violence, and comic cynicism of early episodes of Breaking Bad--though, so far, it lacks the clarity and the focus to make its story half as thoughtful.
  6. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Dec 6, 2016
    50
    The show runs hot and cold, loose and stiff from scene to scene, sometimes pulling back a curtain on a hidden world but just as often running down tracks that nearly two decades worth of TV anti-heroism have worn thin.
  7. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Dec 6, 2016
    50
    Over its next three episodes, Shut Eye, created by Les Bohem (“Extant”), loses most of its momentum as the story grows overcomplicated and undercharacterized. It’s like watching a trick in which the dove fails to fly out of the magician’s hat.
  8. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Dec 6, 2016
    50
    There are a lot of moving parts, some of which work quite well (Mel Harris as a wealthy but naive client who thinks the Haverfords are saving her from a short con when they’re really setting her up for a long one), others of which grind the show to a halt (Dylan Schmid as the inevitable troublemaking teenage son).
  9. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Dec 6, 2016
    50
    When Shut Eye focuses on the often separate-but-equal storylines of Linda and Charlie, it’s intriguing; the more it peels off into a tedious storyline about their son’s high school life or the illegal doings of Rossellini’s gangster empire or the strong-arm tactics of the gangster (you’ll wince at a death-by-boiling-oil in a doughnut shop), the more diffuse the series becomes.
  10. Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    Dec 6, 2016
    50
    Despite a magnetic performance from its lead actor, it’s not difficult to see Shut Eye’s rather predictable trajectory.
  11. Reviewed by: Chris Cabin
    Dec 7, 2016
    40
    The just-sufficient fascination of the entire operation is owed almost exclusively to the cast, with special nods to Donovan, Strickland, and the indomitable Rossellini. The rest of Shut Eye is engaging only at the most base level, and fails to conjure the menace, magic, or all-around strangeness of a life made passing messages along from beyond this plain of existence, whether genuine or not.
  12. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Dec 6, 2016
    40
    Through four episodes it's still struggling to establish a consistent tone or to settle on the hook of its premise.
  13. TV Guide Magazine
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Dec 1, 2016
    40
    As the tone careens from kinky sex to caper to unearned tragedy, one might consider actual shut-eye a relief. [5-18 Dec 2016, p.23]
  14. Reviewed by: David Wiegand
    Dec 2, 2016
    25
    Donovan, Schmid and, intermittently, Strickland manage moments of credibility, but Sampson and Rossellini sink beneath the waves of bad writing at every turn. They are weighed down by painfully bad performances.
User Score
6.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 25 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 25
  2. Negative: 5 out of 25
  1. Jun 6, 2017
    6
    Interesting show. Up until the end of the season, that is. The usual drawbacks lesser shows fall to: lazy writing, silly twists, unrealisticInteresting show. Up until the end of the season, that is. The usual drawbacks lesser shows fall to: lazy writing, silly twists, unrealistic schemes, and unfathomable interventions (deus ex machina). Before the final episode, would have been a 7 or 8. Sad. Full Review »
  2. Feb 23, 2017
    8
    I don't know what show all the critics have been watching but don't pass by on giving this ORIGiONAL gem a turn! Does it have its flaws?I don't know what show all the critics have been watching but don't pass by on giving this ORIGiONAL gem a turn! Does it have its flaws? Sure! But boring is not one of them! Walking dead has plenty and so did shows like True Blood and Banshee! They had plenty, but they are not formulaic and predictable like so many others. Neither is Shut Eye. I think if you liked Weeds then you should give this a whirl? It's pulpy, fun and most of all not boring! But what do I know. Full Review »
  3. Jan 1, 2017
    8
    Again surprised by the reaction from critics. This show is so much fun! There are some issues, but I think they will be cleared up in time, ifAgain surprised by the reaction from critics. This show is so much fun! There are some issues, but I think they will be cleared up in time, if it receives a second season. There are obvious comparisons to Breaking Bad, which also took some time to get into it's groove, but I absolutely see this as binge candy! Full Review »