Scorpion

:

Season 1
  • Network: CBS
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 22, 2014
Season #: 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 268 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 144 out of 268
  2. Mixed: 38 out of 268
  3. Negative: 86 out of 268
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. akhil141197
    Nov 22, 2015
    10
    The show brings all the experiences a genius must face in this world and the show has shown it with excellence. I would love to have the show renewed for a third season.
  2. dhett1214
    Nov 23, 2015
    10
    I am reading these reviews and cannot believe 1/2 of them. Did you actually get into the show or just watch one episode and decide this s**ks? If so - give it another chance. The characters/actors are amazing. The story lines are awesome - this is definitely a unique show with a cast of characters like no other. If you are those type of people that say - ok - watch the pilot- ok itI am reading these reviews and cannot believe 1/2 of them. Did you actually get into the show or just watch one episode and decide this s**ks? If so - give it another chance. The characters/actors are amazing. The story lines are awesome - this is definitely a unique show with a cast of characters like no other. If you are those type of people that say - ok - watch the pilot- ok it stinks..then don't give a review. Your idiots. And BTW - season 2 is the BEST. Get over yourselves - open your minds and really give this a try...if not - your loss....but this show is awesome.… Expand
  3. moviecube
    Dec 4, 2015
    8
    I have read somewhere about the real Walter O'Brien and in my opinion he is a total fake. But I'm not gonna go there, instead I'm going to praise the series and tell you that they are entertaining. I mean yeah, everybody would like to see a genius with a high level IQ that hacks his way out of every situation. Oh yeah, and I absolutely loved the scene where he drives the car at top speedI have read somewhere about the real Walter O'Brien and in my opinion he is a total fake. But I'm not gonna go there, instead I'm going to praise the series and tell you that they are entertaining. I mean yeah, everybody would like to see a genius with a high level IQ that hacks his way out of every situation. Oh yeah, and I absolutely loved the scene where he drives the car at top speed and hacks the laptop - absolutely genius. If there was a thing called hack-fu (parallel to gun-fu), the series would be full with it.… Expand
  4. TienDucNham
    Jan 8, 2016
    10
    am shocked by the ratings

    In fact, I love this show. it's pretty funny and interesting. Seems like not many people like this series but this is my best.
  5. pastorkevin
    Jan 8, 2016
    8
    This is simply fun entertainment... love reading the naysayers who really want to stop the rest of us having some fun.. Is this show supposed to be taken seriously? They seem to think so - the rest of us just relax and enjoy each new adventure.
  6. DarlingNikki
    Jan 14, 2016
    10
    It's different from other shows, more science and math related content. THey use it to solve their problems, and I love the characters. I have enjoyed watching every episode so far. Hopefully it stays on the air for a few seasons !
  7. Broyax
    Jan 14, 2017
    0
    Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce truc ? une série pour "teenagers" attardés et "geeks" coincés sur un écran bleu avec ce bon vieux T1000 retraité Robert Patrick qui a la lourde tâche de superviser une petite équipe de taches, de pauvres mongoliens de golios de **** retards auxquels il incombe de sauver l'Amérique de la menace terroriste, rien que ça !

    Pour te dire que dès le premier épisode,    Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce truc ? une série pour "teenagers" attardés et "geeks" coincés sur un écran bleu avec ce bon vieux T1000 retraité Robert Patrick qui a la lourde tâche de superviser une petite équipe de taches, de pauvres mongoliens de golios de **** retards auxquels il incombe de sauver l'Amérique de la menace terroriste, rien que ça !

    Pour te dire que dès le premier épisode, super tronche de cake, il est trop intelligent : il pète son 197 de cul-hi dans ta face ! yo, cassé, comment il t'a caaaassséééé... trop bien en vérité, MacGyver dans les cordes ! Franchement et très honnêtement, regarder en entier le premier épisode tient de la gageure et imaginer ou tenter de concevoir qu'il reste une vingtaine d'épisodes après ce supplice est purement inconcevable. Vade retro cono satanas !    … Expand
  8. ARGO
    Nov 22, 2017
    3
    It's BAD or OK depending what you're looking for. definately has no realistic involvement anymore. Sort of sci-fi slice of life comedy with some drama. I guess you're either a fan or you trash it. Not a fan. But then again lots of people watching the kardashians so.. any show has a chance LOL
  9. DJMix
    Sep 11, 2016
    2
    For a movie that's supposed to picture a genius people, this movie has a dumb writer and it's meant to be enjoyed by 'low-IQ' people. There are so many facts that are wrong in this movie, while it's about someone who excels at science and tech, made it unbearable to watch for me; even though the plot might be enjoyable. I can't stand a writer that made a script where it says they couldn'tFor a movie that's supposed to picture a genius people, this movie has a dumb writer and it's meant to be enjoyed by 'low-IQ' people. There are so many facts that are wrong in this movie, while it's about someone who excels at science and tech, made it unbearable to watch for me; even though the plot might be enjoyable. I can't stand a writer that made a script where it says they couldn't get pass someone's firewall, but had his physical laptop already. Or invent something called 'router-hub' as their plot device. Why wouldn't they just stick with the real thing, it's not more complicated.… Expand
  10. RichardGonci
    Feb 7, 2017
    1
    Oh why have I wasted so much time watching this show? Maybe because other episodes dealt with subject matter more foreign to me? Hence, I was gullible? This time the episode peripherally dealt with working boats, something about which I am familiar. Few sample nonsense points: 40' working boats are not powered by gas engines since dinosaurs walked the earth: diesel only. Diesel enginesOh why have I wasted so much time watching this show? Maybe because other episodes dealt with subject matter more foreign to me? Hence, I was gullible? This time the episode peripherally dealt with working boats, something about which I am familiar. Few sample nonsense points: 40' working boats are not powered by gas engines since dinosaurs walked the earth: diesel only. Diesel engines don't explode, though they will catch fire; Working boats have SOLUS self-inflating life rafts for the crew, complete with food and water; You don't walk the decks of a working boat 60NM at sea in elevated heels; submersibles (especially homemade ones do not progress at 20 knots; It took me years to qualify to run my 53" boat, now I'm no Walter O'Brien, but you still need time at sea. I guess in the next episode he will fly a Beech King Air (something I also know how to do after 700 hours) by reading the manual for 20 minutes. I think it's the same thing that pisses me off about the new MacGyver show. Who would believe that little limp-dick could do anything?… Expand
  11. Boongabongava
    Mar 29, 2015
    10
    It's a shame to see such low reviews. No, not everyone likes the same shows. Many people say they don't like the "nerd talk" or "geek speak" and that they don't understand it. So what do they do? They come to the Internet of course, where people insecure about their intelligence resort back to high school days where they pick on the smart kids. People are afraid of things they don't knowIt's a shame to see such low reviews. No, not everyone likes the same shows. Many people say they don't like the "nerd talk" or "geek speak" and that they don't understand it. So what do they do? They come to the Internet of course, where people insecure about their intelligence resort back to high school days where they pick on the smart kids. People are afraid of things they don't know so they try to hide from it by making fun of it and shaming other people that like it. People need to give things a chance. If you don't like something then you can move along quietly and try not to ruin it for everyone else. Contrary to popular belief, you don't need to make fun of everything you don't like. You may dislike it, you may feel an utmost hatred against it, you can just walk away. For others, the smart and the socially awkward, things like this show give us a sense of belonging, a feeling of hope and joy, a home away from stupidity, and most importantly something we can relate to that makes us realize that we aren't alone, we aren't outcasts, we aren't trash, we.. are people, we.. have feelings, we.. are better than you but don't constantly remind you of your stupidity, we.. are the people that build the things that allow you to say how stupid we are, so stop acting like you're 12 and learn to respect the people that make your lives great even though you may not see it, and even though you may not like us, a little bit of kindness and lack of stupidity can go a long way in someone 's life and make the world a better place. Have a nice day to those who make a difference, including everyone involved in Scorpion.
    - One scorpion may be weak but a cyclone is strong.    … Expand
  12. melbiker
    Nov 28, 2014
    6
    I do like this show a lot and appreciate the genius of the characters, although most of their "fixes" seem a bit far-fetched and miraculous.
    I do have one problem with the writing...This sister character of Walters is poorly developed. No one with MS thinks of this disease as a death sentence nor would go around saying "I'm dying." MS is a manageable disease for most people. My father    I do like this show a lot and appreciate the genius of the characters, although most of their "fixes" seem a bit far-fetched and miraculous.
    I do have one problem with the writing...This sister character of Walters is poorly developed. No one with MS thinks of this disease as a death sentence nor would go around saying "I'm dying." MS is a manageable disease for most people. My father lived for 20 years after having to go into a wheelchair. My sister's disease progressed more quickly, but still, she always held on for hope that there would be medical interventions to help her.
    I have 4 other friends and family who have MS and NONE of them would be as resigned to dying as she is, nor would they ever live in an assisted facility while ambulatory and having ANY ability to care for themselves. She should have been afflicted with something more grave than MS!    … Expand
  13. Abby1885
    Dec 4, 2014
    6
    It's so bad it's good!
    Corny, predictable, and insult your intelligent every chance they get.
    If it's created and based on a real life genius why not show off that, make me watch the episode twice or more to get it don't put it so plainly that my 3 year old would get it the first time. Audience nowadays are smarter than they think. Take advantage of the social media and make them    It's so bad it's good!
    Corny, predictable, and insult your intelligent every chance they get.

    If it's created and based on a real life genius why not show off that, make me watch the episode twice or more to get it don't put it so plainly that my 3 year old would get it the first time. Audience nowadays are smarter than they think.

    Take advantage of the social media and make them figure out the genius move the characters made, there's no need to dumb it down. It may be based on a life of a genius but certainly feels like it's written by a 5th grader.    … Expand
  14. Ray-M
    Dec 5, 2014
    6
    The show is entertaining, easy to watch, and I believe the characters are getting better. Who cares if the actors are not well know. It is fun don't take it to seriously.
  15. YorkMan
    Nov 10, 2015
    6
    Interesting premise to a show. However, as interesting it is as a premise, the execution isn't brilliant.
    The plot revolves around a team of highly intelligent 20-somethings, along with their 'Homeland Security' handler, and an 'average' (yet gorgeous, of course) ex-waitress who is joins the team to act as the 'what's happening?' character to keep the audience attuned.
    The main problem    Interesting premise to a show. However, as interesting it is as a premise, the execution isn't brilliant.
    The plot revolves around a team of highly intelligent 20-somethings, along with their 'Homeland Security' handler, and an 'average' (yet gorgeous, of course) ex-waitress who is joins the team to act as the 'what's happening?' character to keep the audience attuned.
    The main problem with the show is that in order for these uber-nerds to be faced with a representable 'challenge', the scriptwriters have to conjur up blatantly implausible schemes for them to overcome. Unfortunately this renders the show completely unbelievable, and as such (even as escapist entertainment) you sit watching and thinking 'oh, please....' at every macgyver-esque method someone in the team comes up with.
    The suspense is maintained by a near constant barrage of new problems as the episode unfolds, but regardless of the inherent 'threat' to the characters' safety, the good old 'nick of time' escape trope saves the day.
    The overarching story elements, that pervade the series as a whole, are bland and uninspired too.
    Put all this together, and you'd normally get a show which I'd rate 2, or possibly 3 (at a pinch), but...
    The show is held together by very good acting performances from the core cast, which elevates it somewhat. Despite the silliness and 'will they/won't they' nature to not 1, but 2 potential romances, the sincerity of the characters is worth investing in.
    Now we're well into Series 2, we're beginning to see more internal conflicts show up, which is good...
    But the relegation of the 'Ralph' character (the waitress' 9 year old, genius son) from being an integral part of the overall narrative, to a mere 'we'll write him into a script in order to facilitate a specific plot' recurring character has disappointed me immensely.    … Expand
  16. Emily3
    Nov 22, 2015
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Their needs to be a second series!! I love this show! They may say they are really smart but they seem to kinda getting dumber every time! Please bring it back!!… Expand
  17. ShiArch
    Jul 20, 2016
    0
    Walter O'Brien does NOT have an high IQ. His IQ claim is self reported.
    And he says he lost the test paper....
    Yeah. Right........ I have an IQ of 230 and I lost the test paper too! The acting is terrible and script is laughably predictable every single episode. Its like they looked at the hit show 'Big Bang Theory' and 'A-Team' but failed miserably to copy them. They have    Walter O'Brien does NOT have an high IQ. His IQ claim is self reported.
    And he says he lost the test paper....
    Yeah. Right........
    I have an IQ of 230 and I lost the test paper too!

    The acting is terrible and script is laughably predictable every single episode.
    Its like they looked at the hit show 'Big Bang Theory' and 'A-Team' but failed miserably to copy them. They have copy/pasted Penny from Big Bang Theory as the sidekick of geniuses is a gal waitress...

    All in all, boring, predictable and not worth watching.    … Expand
  18. Slmanson301
    Jan 18, 2016
    6
    I came into this show in Season 2. Initially, I was very smitten with the concept of young geniuses solving problems with science, math and engineering. (For the viewer who couldn't understand the point of Katherine McPhee's presence, she's there to balance out the brains with emotional content, and she serves to ground the geeks.) Watched a few episodes and....sad to say, the show isI came into this show in Season 2. Initially, I was very smitten with the concept of young geniuses solving problems with science, math and engineering. (For the viewer who couldn't understand the point of Katherine McPhee's presence, she's there to balance out the brains with emotional content, and she serves to ground the geeks.) Watched a few episodes and....sad to say, the show is more about fantasy than it is about science, math and engineering. That is, it's like a bunch of little MacGyver's who solve serious world problems in completely improbable ways, science, math and engineering notwithstanding. They are, nonetheless, engaging characters, and the show can be fun to watch in small doses.… Expand
  19. jozzams
    Mar 30, 2016
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Firstly I'll say it's an entertaining show if you can overlook all the parts that don't make sense (or dont' know they don't make sense). The premise for the show is very good, but the execution is terrible. Surely to write about geniuses and highly complex problems the writers should have hired some sort of consultant. Maybe a psychologist who works with gifted individuals, or someone who is a genius hacker themselves, etc. If Bones and Big Bang Theory can do it, I'm sure this show can too.
    The condescension of the main character, Walter, is completely over the top. Yes, he's meant to be incredibly smart, but too much condescension just alienates the audience. He doesn't need to remind the audience regularly that he has a 197 IQ. Also there's the assumption that all geniuses are socially inept. Actually, I'm most of the way through season 1 and I haven't seen him do anything yet that is actually representative of an extremely high IQ and not possible from someone merely with good computer/hacking skills.
    And don't even get me started on the kid, Ralph. A mentally gifted kid belonging to a mother who is completely clueless. By the age of 10, there would have been glaring signs that there was something unusual about this child. Even if he is withdrawn, a teacher would probably have recommended to have him checked for autism spectrum, or an IQ test. I've heard of cases of children teaching themselves to read at much younger ages that alerted their parents. And then there's the fact that apparently a socially inept genius is the best person to help her understand her son, rather than seeking professional help or programs to support the development of a gifted child.
    The next thing, and this really made me laugh, was watching one of the computers in an episode loading Windows 8. If you know anything about computers and programming (even in theory), you'll know this is laughable. Firstly, Windows 8 was **** Secondly, anyone serious about computers/programming/hacking would not be using Windows at all (more likely Linux or other open source operating system).
    There's plenty of other inconsistencies, but these are some of the stupid ones that have stuck with me, and prevent me from being able to enjoy the show fully.
    Basically, if you don't know enough about what they're talking about to know it's wrong, then you might find it plausible.    … Expand
  20. Daniel58
    Oct 17, 2016
    0
    This has to be the dumbest show on TV. The plot is so stupid this should be a children's show! Blow up a torpedo to save someone falling from 20,000 feet into the ocean, really...
  21. Peacen
    Dec 12, 2016
    4
    Written-for-screen geniuses are becoming textbook archetypes: Never a balance of smart, successful and good looking, no, these characters require conflict, with the opportunity for underdog wins and showing the bullies up from high school. Thus, they require social problems. Big ones, with impressive (but not obscure) names, and walls to keep the well-meaners out, built up through roughWritten-for-screen geniuses are becoming textbook archetypes: Never a balance of smart, successful and good looking, no, these characters require conflict, with the opportunity for underdog wins and showing the bullies up from high school. Thus, they require social problems. Big ones, with impressive (but not obscure) names, and walls to keep the well-meaners out, built up through rough childhoods and curve ball, ptsd-inducing moments in their lives. You don't get to be smart unless you faint trying to order coffee, it seems.

    Out of this mold drops the characters of Scorpion, the ballad of massive intellect standing as America's last line of defense against ridiculous problems involving, most often, the wrong install files, old technology and those foolish enough to attempt using email.

    Elyes Gabel plays Walter O'Brein, boasting an IQ of 197 and social interaction problems which vanish after the first episode, heads up Scorpion, a company of smart people that solve problems too complex for 'normals' (that's you and me).

    He's joined by Happy Quinn (Jadyn Wong, who is listed first because she'd be angry otherwise), the teams resident "mechanical genius" who talks about tools a lot with a gab that makes her sound like she's got a mouth full of gum, Toby Curtis (Eddie Kaye Thomas), behaviorist and mouthy wannabe front man, Sylvester Dodd (Ari Stidham), the funny fat guy that makes childlike noises and talks endlessly... I think he was good at math too... Agent Cabe Gallo (Robert Patrick), their gravelly government handler and father figure, and Paige Dineen (Katherine McPhee), the Penny of the group. That's a Big Bang reference, and is somewhat unfair. McPhee actually plays 'professionally insecure Penny', the person Penny would be if her job depending on not telling the not-dumb people how ridiculous their issues are.

    It's best to go no further before stating I'm a Big Bang fan (Nowadays this seems to be something you have to lead with when discussing this sort of thing. Massive polarization exists). But this is important, because Scorpion is too. Huge fan! Its actually hard not to be because, despite what your smarter big brother says, the science in Big Bang is sound, the stories easy to follow and the concept quite natural. Their social interaction shortcomings are also very well realized. Yes, this dropped off later on because, as characters were introduced and their lives evolved, they too grew. Howard is no longer a perv because he has someone that sees the best in him. But remnants remain: Despite his louder nature, Leonard still wrings his hands in a worrisome manner. Sheldon is, and will always be, a tremendously well written and well played character, with parts of him seemingly misaligned that are, in all truthfulness, defective aspects of him that will never be fixed. This evolution is also a key aspect of why it's still enjoyable to watch. Big Bang is not the original if you look hard enough, but is broadly appreciated for a number of very valid reasons. And the writers of Scorpion struggle with their feelings, because they can do smart people better, dammit!

    My biggest problem with Scorpion is a weak one, even I'm prepared to admit, but it's the truth: I don't know anyone like these people. This is important because I do know intelligent people. An assessment of my immediate acquaintance circle reveals that I know a great deal more smart people, statistically, than I should: Aeronautical engineers, Bio-mechs, Doctors, Actuarial Science graduates. This is a product of my territory endeavours, so it's not surprising, but the truth is that smart people, like 'normals', come in every flavour you can imagine. Almost including the characters in Scorpion. Almost. They're broken, and it's got everything to do with the intentional way they've been written. Their issues do not prevent them from functioning, and functioning well, yet we are constantly reminded they are broken, in need of protecting by Super-Walter. You can't have it both ways.

    Scorpion also feels resoundingly racist. In the figurative sense, mind, but nevertheless, not on episode goes by without the reminder that these four (four and half if you count the kid. Name escapes me. Hardly important) are an entirely separate species to the rest of us 'normals'. This backfired, because it comes across as a supremacist attitude, and that's poor.

    The science in Scorpion is concise if a little too textbook, for what it's worth. But none of it is massively clever, which makes the continual 'normal' talk unfounded. What they accomplish with a bit of math is not inconceivable and what Happy occasionally builds is hardly genius. The key word here for improvement would be "spectrum", and appreciating that, even when you have problems interacting with people, being intelligent doesn't make you obnoxious. Thinking you are does.    … Expand
  22. mouseypoo13
    Jun 14, 2017
    3
    Smart people, stupid scriptwriters. Just generic BLURGH formula that splurges out the occasional car chase or moment of 'intrigue'. Not worth watching.
  23. Bench
    Feb 20, 2018
    10
    It's great. It includes a lot of math, physics and science content, and a lot of people enjoy that. Their adventures are unique and entertaining. Every episode brings something new for you to watch and relax. It's an amazing show and I hope it stays on for as long as possible. The characters are fun and cool, they make some good jokes. They're also geniuses, which makes it even better to watch.
  24. SteveCampsOut
    Mar 21, 2018
    4
    As much as I like this show, it's suffering from severe plot predictability and an over reliance on the whatever can go wrong will trope. For a show about a bunch of geniuses, the writing and characterizations certainly aren't very smart.
  25. chrysbenedictus
    Jun 4, 2018
    10
    To my opinion, this tv show lacks popularity !
    If I'm not mistaken, only 8% of the US population watched this.
    And only 5% in France ! The episodes are well done, we don't get bored watching any of them. The characters truly evolve from the beginning until the end of the show. This tv show has lots of funny moments and funny replies : We can't have both else where. What a pity !    To my opinion, this tv show lacks popularity !
    If I'm not mistaken, only 8% of the US population watched this.
    And only 5% in France !

    The episodes are well done, we don't get bored watching any of them.
    The characters truly evolve from the beginning until the end of the show.

    This tv show has lots of funny moments and funny replies : We can't have both else where. What a pity ! For instance, the characters disguise themselves so that they solve an issue. The jokes are always teasing another character and are appropriate. In most cases, a character's statement is going to be disproved right after it's been stated; i.e. "I can assure you that nothing's going to explode !" and "kaboom", right after the sentence, sthg goes off !

    It was very pleasant to get to know several actors and actresses we didn't know existed; all of them are very talented. Of course, one might have heard the name Robert Patrick before? Sure I did since I simply love Doggett's part in the X files (I deeply miss him in the last 2 seasons of the XF, btw).

    What's striking in this tv show is that it's action-centered, still it's still (somewhat) realistic or coherent. May I remind you that everything we can see on screen is based on the real Walter O'Brien's company and experiences (of course, details have been changed) like names, dates, locations, but the fact did happen).

    What appealed to me most, I guess, was the fact that this tv show didn't stage any violence. On the contrary, we focus on problem-solving, problematic issues, as well as character's progress.

    One of the scarcest tv shows which is actually family-friendly.

    On top of that, the show has lots of good intentions.

    Ever since I watched the 1st episode on tv, I've been a fanboy (xd).
    Of course, as one can easily understand, I deeply and bitterly regret CBS brutally stopped the show (so no season 5 even though the real Walter O'Brien had 25 years of stories, adventures etc to inject in the show... What a pity, what a waste... 25 years of team , I'd definitely say "SO SAY WE ALL !", it's another tv show)
    And by the way, the real Walter O'Brien got involved in the show's creation process.
    I'm so disappointed that I even decided to boycott CBS from now on !

    Indeed, this tv show focuses on a group of geniuses,
    but, don't worry, the character's chattings are neither too specialised nor too long.

    Unlike many other shows, all main characters are interesting, and one doesn't outshine the other. All the 6 characters are compatible.

    I don't even know if this tv show claims it but it's also a wonderful ode to diversity :
    On the 6 main charactes, 1 / 3rd are females.
    1 recurring character is quite old,
    1 second role is a child,
    in this 1 / 3rd female casting, we have 1 Asian woman (let's keep things at a simple level).
    And, eventually, 1 of the 4 recurring males is obese.
    The main message conveyed by this show, I think, is : Don't judge a book on its cover, but judge the others on their intellectual skills (nice warning and reminder so that we accept the others, eventually !!).

    A very friendly and easy-to-talk-to fanbase on social medias.
    There are also tons of fan fictions on the net too.

    I quite like the staff roll music, which is remixed several times throughout the seasons.

    It's a one-of-a-kind tv show I've been honored and pleased to watch, from the beginning until the prematured end of it !
    Thank you all for doing such a great work and show !!
    And thank you, for reading such a big review !!    … Expand
  26. hornysoul
    Sep 21, 2018
    8
    A primeira temporada é muito boa. Inclui muito conteúdo de matemática, física e ciência, e muitas pessoas gostam disso. Eu, pessoalmente, não gosto, mas diverti-me imenso. As aventuras destes génios são únicas e inesperadas. Cada episódio traz algo novo e os personagens são divertidos e entretêm, até porque eles fazem algumas boas piadas.
  27. Frankzen
    Mar 12, 2019
    10
    Despite of bending various facts quite to an extreme, it is a pleasant watch, as the feelings between uncommon type of people is the real center of attraction here. Really good acting and plot.
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Most Discussed TV Season of 2014
24
#24 Most Shared TV Season of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 24
  2. Mixed: 15 out of 24
  3. Negative: 5 out of 24
  1. Newark Star-Ledger
    Reviewed by: Vicki Hyman
    Sep 22, 2014
    50
    Eddie Kaye Thomas is fun as the occasionally felonious brainiac psychologist, but the rest of the characters are pretty one-dimensional, that one dimension being their social awkwardness.
    Read full review
  2. The Hollywood Reporter
    Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    Sep 22, 2014
    50
    A very good idea but executed in the pilot with too much sap and manipulation.
    Read full review
  3. New York Magazine (Vulture)
    Reviewed by: Margaret Lyons
    Sep 22, 2014
    30
    Scorpion tries to get action-heavy in its final act, with the brain trust preventing an aviation disaster at LAX, and for a brief interlude, the show has a glimmer of momentum--but it's undercut by how ludicrous the whole setup is, how unnatural the dialogue is, and how impossible it feels to care what happens to any of these people.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »