• Network: Peacock
  • Series Premiere Date: Apr 22, 2021
Season #: 2, 1
Metascore
67

Generally favorable reviews - based on 19 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 19
  2. Negative: 0 out of 19
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Apr 21, 2021
    60
    Rutherford Falls feels like it’s still figuring itself out in these early episodes provided to critics. But until it gets there, Reagan’s best friend may try your patience as much as he does hers.
  2. Reviewed by: Kristen Lopez
    Apr 22, 2021
    50
    It’s unclear just where “Rutherford Falls” is going to go, whether it will play things safe with a “both sides now” mentality or not. For now, enjoy it as a showcase for why Schmieding and Greyeyes should be bigger stars.
  3. Reviewed by: Judy Berman
    Apr 22, 2021
    50
    The equally promising and frustrating result, which debuts on Peacock April 22, bears evidence of some significant growing pains, combining ambitious, intriguing ideas and slow, overly delicate storytelling. ... The show is at its best when it stops apologizing for Nathan’s ignorance and starts spending more time with other characters.
  4. Reviewed by: Caroline Framke
    Apr 21, 2021
    50
    In the first four episodes screened for critics, the show bobs and weaves between wacky shenanigans and grounded sincerity, never quite finding a way to settle on a happy medium as the increasingly complicated plot takes over.
  5. Reviewed by: Inkoo Kang
    Apr 21, 2021
    50
    Rutherford Falls’ biggest pitfall is its saggy pacing — the pilot, which runs a (rather unfunny) half-hour, feels twice as long. There’s also both too much and not enough table-setting in these early installments. ... The bond between Nathan and Reagan is supposed to be the show’s heart, but the tenuous alliance between Reagan and Terry is easily its most engaging.
  6. Reviewed by: Nick Allen
    Apr 21, 2021
    50
    In its first four episodes, "Rutherford Falls" can be underwhelming with the comedy that usually takes a saga like this over the top. The series doesn’t have much of its own comedic signature, even though it has plenty of compelling ideas.
  7. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    Apr 22, 2021
    40
    There’s a caustically funny show buried somewhere beneath “Rutherford Falls.” ... But by playing both sides of a very hot topic, “Rutherford Falls” fails to hum, roar or even sputter to any satisfying degree. You can feel the brakes being applied, and the consequent lurch. The one truly sympathetic character in the show is Nathan’s best friend and pariah-of-the-reservation Reagan Wells (Jana Schmieding).
User Score
5.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 8 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 8
  2. Negative: 2 out of 8
  1. Sep 22, 2022
    5
    A rather mundane and dull affair that has a few funny moments, but for the whole most of the gags seemed rather forced and predictable.
  2. Jun 29, 2021
    8
    Really enjoyed it. Funny characters well played without the meanness order awkwardness of some "comedies".
  3. May 17, 2021
    1
    The representation is excellent but literally everything else is some combination of underwritten, emotionally unintelligent, andThe representation is excellent but literally everything else is some combination of underwritten, emotionally unintelligent, and faux-progressive. Almost every dialogue exchange and nearly every plot development seems to have been written by someone who is not just writing their first episode of television but their very first full sentence. If this was a show about nothing, this would be a nothing problem. But Rutherford Falls is a show that wants to be about America's troubled history, Native American erasure, and a number of other big subjects. It's then disappointing and galling that the show amounts to little more than "A White Man's Journey Towards Being Less Terrible Thanks to Less Narratively-Important People of Color." Full Review »