Metascore
83

Universal acclaim - based on 33 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 33 out of 33
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 33
  3. Negative: 0 out of 33
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Gail Pennington
    May 31, 2016
    100
    Throughout, this new Roots is great entertainment, full of action and romance, an engrossing yarn about people who feel very real and relatable. But just as the original “Roots” had a powerful emotional impact on Americans, the new one is likely to do so as well, especially given that questions of race are at the forefront of discussion as much now as ever.
  2. Reviewed by: David Wiegand
    May 25, 2016
    100
    The miniseries may veer into obvious melodrama from time to time, especially in the latter two nights, but the fact that it never loses credibility owes to the care with which the moral bases of the characters are created. ... The performances are staggering throughout the entire miniseries.
  3. Reviewed by: Jeff Jensen
    May 25, 2016
    91
    A propulsive, plot-driven narrative and performances remarkable for their emotional depth and physicality keep you constantly engaged. A strong imagination for the slave experience—their ambivalence about the Revolutionary War; their attitudes about love, family, religion—yields dramatic richness and cultivates great empathy.
  4. Reviewed by: Ray Richmond
    May 31, 2016
    90
    Roots is at once a more intimate and explicit document than was its forerunner and no less compelling, if you can endure the harshness of the spectacle that accompanies it.
  5. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    May 31, 2016
    90
    The new Roots excels in the naturalism of its performances to make the horror of slavery vividly painful--and the resistance to it uplifting--in a way that deepens the tale.
  6. Reviewed by: Ellen Gray
    May 31, 2016
    90
    It's still a gripping story, convincingly performed.
  7. Reviewed by: Isaac Feldberg
    May 31, 2016
    90
    Indispensable, infuriating, and inspiring, Roots masterfully finds the hope and humanity in its heartbreaking, harrowing depiction of slavery, and in doing so provides an update worthy of the original.
  8. Reviewed by: Joanne Ostrow
    May 25, 2016
    90
    The story is as relevant as ever, cinematically more stunning and historically more accurate than the original. The casting is again superlative--Forest Whitaker as “Fiddler,” Jonathan Rhys Meyers as villain Tom Lea, James Purefoy, Anika Noni Rose and Laurence Fishburne are just the start.
  9. Told with style and assurance, this "Roots" revival is packed with credible performances, including Anika Noni Rose's terrific portrayal of Kunta's daughter, Kizzy in her older years, and Rege-Jean Page's charismatic turn as her son, Chicken George.
  10. Reviewed by: Robert Bianco
    May 27, 2016
    88
    There are a few clumsy spills into melodrama, but overall this eight-hour effort is rousing, funny, frightening and heartbreaking--an affirmation of life and a condemnation of racism in all its ancient and surviving forms.
  11. Reviewed by: Jeff Korbelik
    May 31, 2016
    83
    While the first episode lacks development of any of the characters outside of Kunta Kinte, a young man taken from Africa and sold into slavery in the United States, it still resonates. It’s a story that needs to be told again.
  12. Reviewed by: Joshua Alston
    May 27, 2016
    83
    History’s new vision of Roots justifies its existence almost immediately, reinforcing its worthiness through amazing performances and a tweaked narrative that puts more focus on the interior lives of the slaves.
  13. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    May 26, 2016
    83
    The History network, in on-air partnership with Lifetime and A&E, has brought forth a Roots that stands tall on its own, but without surpassing the production that once gripped a nation and should still be seen by viewers of all ages.
  14. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    May 26, 2016
    83
    It’s more urgent and visceral, the blood more copious, the agony more intense. This Roots doesn’t flinch, but you almost certainly will. The cast is first-rate, too. ... But this Roots can’t quite escape the faults of the original. Kunta’s story, the Fiddler’s, and later Chicken George’s, are patterns, and also cycles. They seek dignity, but find only indignity--or abject cruelty--over and over.
  15. Reviewed by: Brian P. Kelly
    May 31, 2016
    80
    This is a more intimate series, with extended looks at the personal relationships of the characters (the connection between Kizzy and her master’s niece, who grew up together, is just one example). It’s also a gorier series—yes, showing all the abuse put to slaves, but also showing many of the perpetrators of that violence getting their comeuppance. Added to flashbacks and spiritually charged dreams, this lends the show an occasional shade of magical realism.
  16. Reviewed by: Bruce Miller
    May 31, 2016
    80
    It’s a magnetic production, one that’s filled with precious performances that sparkle.
  17. Reviewed by: Mary McNamara
    May 31, 2016
    80
    Though sleeker and more graphically brutal than its ancestor, Roots remains a celebration of resistance through survival.
  18. Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    May 31, 2016
    80
    Overall, the remake, whose producers include Mr. Burton and Mark M. Wolper (whose father, David L. Wolper, produced the original “Roots”), ably polishes the story for a new audience that might find the old production dated and slow.
  19. Reviewed by: Glenn Garvin
    May 27, 2016
    80
    Roots' greatest service may be in reminding us that, as we blunder through the ugly turmoil of present-day American race relations, we've survived worse.
  20. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    May 27, 2016
    80
    The new Roots fulfills its primary obligation to be a compelling saga, doing what it can to reflect what the last 40 years have meant to our collective understanding of black history.
  21. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    May 27, 2016
    80
    The new Roots offers a strong dose of drama--too strong, perhaps, for some viewers who will shy away from scenes of brutality--and compelling character stories.
  22. 80
    This Roots isn’t as altogether strongly acted as the 1977 version--though there are still plenty of standouts.... But the unmistakable spiritual dimension, an aspect lacking in the original, compensates, and it comes mainly from the writing and direction.
  23. Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    May 27, 2016
    80
    The miniseries remains difficult to watch, as Kunta Kinte and his descendants keep being victimized by white slave-owners, slave-catchers and land-owners who regard slaves as property, not as men, women and children. But Roots gains in power. Though at times, the story seems to blame the institution of slavery on sadistic white racists, as the miniseries goes on, it makes it clear that slavery remains America's original sin.
  24. Reviewed by: Willa Paskin
    May 27, 2016
    80
    An hour or so into the new version, as we see Mandinka warrior Kunta Kinte (Malachi Kirby), so recently a free man, shackled in the hold of a slave ship, it becomes clear that the current version doesn’t have to best the original to be worthwhile.
  25. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    May 26, 2016
    80
    It’s a technically updated and marvelously acted work for the era of “Black Lives Matter,” a solid dramatic reminder of the complexity and depth of racism in America.
  26. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    May 26, 2016
    80
    The miniseries is filled with superb, lived-in performances, but especially by Kirby, Page, Rose, Whitaker, and Meyers. The cast (which also includes, at various points, Mekhi Phifer, T.I., Chad L. Coleman, Erica Tazel, Anna Paquin, James Purefoy, Matthew Goode, and Sedale Threatt Jr., among many others) and crew had an impossible task in front of them, and they rose to the challenge.
  27. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    May 26, 2016
    80
    On a night-by-night basis, Roots works the tricky balance between misery and uplift. Even if it can't tap into the sui generis newness of the original, the miniseries is often brutal and harrowing.
  28. Reviewed by: Mark Dawidziak
    May 25, 2016
    80
    It is packed with towering performances that boldly and magnificently reinterpret characters who have become part of our national folklore.
  29. Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    May 24, 2016
    80
    The lessons the new Roots teaches over the course of its eight hours, which air on four consecutive nights, are worth revisiting, and a number of outstanding performances enliven this retelling of the story of Kunta Kinte and his descendants.
  30. Reviewed by: Mark A. Perigard
    May 26, 2016
    75
    The original “Roots” exposed and drew on the power of truth for millions of Americans. This Roots is an echo of that. It stands small in the great shadow of the original.
  31. Reviewed by: Terry Terrones
    May 23, 2016
    75
    While a respectable reimagining of the original, this updated version of “Roots” can’t quite match its almost 40 old year predecessor.
  32. Reviewed by: Daniel D'Addario
    May 23, 2016
    70
    It makes a case for its own existence, thanks to its striking cinematography. ... But Roots' narrative, so groundbreaking in its time, feels lacking in an era in which activists are forcefully reminding us that black lives matters.
  33. TV Guide Magazine
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    May 20, 2016
    70
    A slickly streamlined and impeccably cast reinterpretation. [23 May-3 Jun 2016, p.14]
User Score
6.3

Generally favorable reviews- based on 60 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 60
  2. Negative: 18 out of 60
  1. Jun 1, 2016
    10
    Roots is a very well developed remake on the classic series. The opening episode reveals great performances by an inspiring cast. YouRoots is a very well developed remake on the classic series. The opening episode reveals great performances by an inspiring cast. You generally feel very engaged with main character - and the supporting cast does bring some intrigue. The production quality and cinematography were excellent. This could be the show to bring relevance back to the History Channel. Full Review »
  2. Jun 2, 2016
    0
    Historically inaccurate race-baiting liberal propaganda. Complete trash demonizing whitey yet again. We are arming ourselves....MaybeHistorically inaccurate race-baiting liberal propaganda. Complete trash demonizing whitey yet again. We are arming ourselves....Maybe someday what actually happened will be portrayed. Full Review »
  3. Jun 7, 2016
    5
    The first episode of this new Roots is so good, it does not at all prepare you for the drastic plunge in quality level which sets in with theThe first episode of this new Roots is so good, it does not at all prepare you for the drastic plunge in quality level which sets in with the second and subsequent episodes. Once it goes bad, it just gets sillier and sillier and sillier, to the point where you feel guilty for even being in the same room with it. It's like watching the story of slavery, as told by the writers of Dawson's Creek. Full Review »