Season #: 2, 1
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 39 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 26 out of 39
  2. Negative: 3 out of 39
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Feb 1, 2019
    4
    After watching the first 4 episodes I am not sure what to expect... except that I now know that each episode begins with a nice premise and then leaves me disappointed by the time the episode ends. Could Laura Mennell's character be any more clueless? Can her new Russian Agent Friend get access to secure areas of an airbase that easily? There are so many groups to keep track of yet none ofAfter watching the first 4 episodes I am not sure what to expect... except that I now know that each episode begins with a nice premise and then leaves me disappointed by the time the episode ends. Could Laura Mennell's character be any more clueless? Can her new Russian Agent Friend get access to secure areas of an airbase that easily? There are so many groups to keep track of yet none of them seem to be doing anything other than just being in the background of each episode. The two generals are unrealistic, Neal McDonough's character gave them the project assignment and then gets furious when they do their work, which isn't much of any accomplishment... why? I gave it a score of 4 hoping it will improve as it gets more into the season and evolves. Expand
  2. Jan 20, 2019
    5
    Too little imagination, suspense, and talent to be compared to the X-Files and too much imagination to be taken at all seriously as an examination of Project Blue Book. Production values are decent enough.
  3. Jan 20, 2019
    4
    This second episode really has taken the show off the rails. The useless introduction of men kissing and the seduction of the wife by another woman is just that useless. There is enough UFO material from the 50's to keep this show afloat but the main story lines are not about UFO's. They seem to be an aside for the Men in Black intrigue running through the show.
    Come on! Give us some real
    This second episode really has taken the show off the rails. The useless introduction of men kissing and the seduction of the wife by another woman is just that useless. There is enough UFO material from the 50's to keep this show afloat but the main story lines are not about UFO's. They seem to be an aside for the Men in Black intrigue running through the show.
    Come on! Give us some real writing like the X-files had.
    Expand
  4. Jan 9, 2019
    6
    Project Blue Book is History Channel’s latest offering; its first premiere of 2019, dealing with UFOs and other unexplained reports that prevailed during the 1950s, and the Air Force’s attempt to deal with those reports. The show stars Aiden Gillan of HBO’s Game of Thrones fame, Michael Malarkey (Vampire Diaries), and Neal McDonough, who played the excellent Robert Quarles in FX’sProject Blue Book is History Channel’s latest offering; its first premiere of 2019, dealing with UFOs and other unexplained reports that prevailed during the 1950s, and the Air Force’s attempt to deal with those reports. The show stars Aiden Gillan of HBO’s Game of Thrones fame, Michael Malarkey (Vampire Diaries), and Neal McDonough, who played the excellent Robert Quarles in FX’s Justified, amongst other roles.
    When a pilot breaks down after a mid-air altercation with a strange flying light, the duo is sent to Fargo, North Dakota, to explore the claim. Of course, before that, Captain Quinn needs to convince Dr. Hynek to be a part of this tag-team, and he does so in the quickest manner possible: by bruising the man’s ego. Not a bad way to start things off, if you ask me. Dr. Hynek still gets to keep his job, choosing to moonlight as a secret operative, hoping the extra cash can help with his work, and hoping to get recognition for the work he does with UFOs.
    The show manages to be engaging, even if it does follow the same, well-beaten path of other shows that have come before it. The dialogue and characterisation needs improvement, with the lines bordering on corny and the characters not doing much to stand out;something that needs to change over the next couple episodes. The women of the episode are neglected as well, with one being a predictable element from the moment of her appearance, and the other reduced to a dull housewife of a character. Now, to be fair, it is set in the 50s, and the women then weren’t allowed to do much more than that, but I do hope to see real depth to these women, which has been lacking so far.My main issue with the episode is with the audio and how badly it has been balanced. The ambient and special effects are far louder than they should be, and are not accommodating towards the dialogue, making for a poor aural experience that I, once again, hope improves in the coming episodes.
    In terms of content, I’m glad to see the show actually exploring the supernatural, rather than serving as a true-to-history debunking series. This allows for more entertaining stories, even if it does stretch, bend, and warp the truth.
    All in all, Project Blue Book shows some promise, if not a lot, and could make for interesting viewing, if for no reason other than to watch Aiden Gillan on screen again.
    Expand
  5. Jan 16, 2019
    6
    I like PBB but have real concerns it can sustain itself despite hundreds of unsolved UFO cases to choose from. The structural flaw is somewhat like the X-Files. We ALL wanted to believe but there could never be a definitive episode of the series would effectively be over.
  6. Jan 13, 2019
    4
    I was looking forward to this one, but boy, does it feel like a re-treat of much better, much more interesting, and funnier fare. Even the woman who is tracking the scientists's wife (from Lost Girl) is a tired trope. But the scientist's wife (from Alphas) is a winner. It's almost worth watching another episode or two to see what she does. She was great in Haven, too.
  7. Mar 12, 2019
    5
    So X-Files meets Mad Men? That's the vibe I got. Lots of good talent and it looks great, but it's a boring slog. I'm a sci-fi guy, but I'm just not keen on the whole UFO thing. Loved X-files, but I liked the stand-alone, weird episodes over this overarching alien story, which the movies addressed. This just looks and feels like they're trying to do that alien conspiracy along with a periodSo X-Files meets Mad Men? That's the vibe I got. Lots of good talent and it looks great, but it's a boring slog. I'm a sci-fi guy, but I'm just not keen on the whole UFO thing. Loved X-files, but I liked the stand-alone, weird episodes over this overarching alien story, which the movies addressed. This just looks and feels like they're trying to do that alien conspiracy along with a period drama like Mad Men as I mentioned and failing on both. Great cast, looks awesome, not much depth. Expand
Metascore
56

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 10
  2. Negative: 0 out of 10
  1. Reviewed by: Nick Schager
    Jan 8, 2019
    70
    Even if it’s less nuanced than The Americans and a bit cornier than The X-Files, Project Blue Book has a pulpy energy that carries it over its rougher patches. Whether it has legitimately grand truths to uncover remains to be seen, but for now, it recognizes that concrete answers aren’t nearly as entertaining as mankind’s enduring (and tantalizing) quest to comprehend the great unknown.
  2. Reviewed by: Caroline Framke
    Jan 8, 2019
    60
    Even if the show has trouble finding its sea legs, it’s a perfectly fun bit of distraction that could find an admirable groove if it proves willing to take a step back and make some calculated adjustments.
  3. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Jan 8, 2019
    50
    Project Blue Book feels like “X-Files” Lite, only with a whole lot of indistinguishable men--and all the women are stuck on the sideline.