Paterno
  • Network: HBO
  • Series Premiere Date: Apr 7, 2018
User Score
4.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 24 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 24
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 24
  3. Negative: 10 out of 24

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. mikemacdad
    Apr 10, 2018
    10
    This is an absolutely horrible story, but a story that has to be told. Joe Paterno was a great man, a great coach, a great husband...........but at the end of the day he had the ability to stop a child rapist and he chose to protect his kingdom over the moral and ethical easy choice. PSU cult members will always blindly defend him and that is disgusting.
  2. calhounite
    May 16, 2018
    10
    Powerful, exonerative portrayal of Paterno. Transformative. Depicts the heroic Paterno, not the excoriated Freeh Report one. The key is the redress of Paterno's lawyer son when asks if he didn't hear about rumors. Supernal rebuke warning of the devastating damage that can be incurred by judging people in that manner. Pure anguish in realizing that this forbearance resulted in its ownPowerful, exonerative portrayal of Paterno. Transformative. Depicts the heroic Paterno, not the excoriated Freeh Report one. The key is the redress of Paterno's lawyer son when asks if he didn't hear about rumors. Supernal rebuke warning of the devastating damage that can be incurred by judging people in that manner. Pure anguish in realizing that this forbearance resulted in its own devastation. And makes clear that Paterno believed Sandusky had concocted his own image orbit through the Second Mile and wasn't a product of Paterno's. His remark that Sandusky had duped him along with scores of others, powerful figures, child professionals, exploiting that orbit resonates as ruefully sincere.

    Curley's email stated that Paterno wanted Sandusky to be confronted with the charge. What's wrong with that? That's basic to give a man a chance to explain. That would be a thought arising from the heroic Paterno.

    The question has never been whether or not Paterno believed McQueary. It is this. Did Paterno believe he did enough to set the judicial/police/social services investigative process in motion in order to arrive at the appropriate determination regarding Sandusky. It would be perfectly ok for Paterno to take a stance of utter detachment as long as HE BELIEVED HE DID THIS.

    Don't know. Won't never be known. The movie's inherent premise is that the answer is yes. Pacino's artistic portrayal weighs ever so slightly toward a self-recriminating guilt rather than a guilt arising from conscious knowledge of deliberate subterfuge. However, the outrage of society against Paterno is understandable as the answer appears on the surface to be no. Never asked again about the status of the presumably ongoing/completed investigation. Did in 1998. Didn't in 2001. Is the fact that Sandusky was a direct subordinate in 1998 but not in 2001 a sufficient reason?

    The movie's closing scene balances out its driving viewpoint. But this movie gives Paterno's life a chance to be defined by Paterno, not Sandusky. It uplifts Paterno, his family, Penn State, and the admirers of Paterno. Pacino's acting makes it possible. It is a masterpiece in the portrayal of different perspectives.    … Expand

Awards & Rankings

80
#80 Best TV Season of 2018
71
#71 Most Shared TV Season of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
69

Generally favorable reviews - based on 19 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 19
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 19
  3. Negative: 0 out of 19
  1. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Richard Roeper
    Dec 14, 2018
    88
    Unsettling and riveting and scathing.
    Read full review
  2. Los Angeles Times
    Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Apr 9, 2018
    50
    The film is watchable, certainly, but also wayward. Its effects feel scattered, its points lost as the story looks here, looks there; Paterno has many things to show you, but less to say.
    Read full review
  3. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Apr 9, 2018
    78
    It’s an engaging (and, perhaps to some defenders of Joe Paterno, it will be an enraging) film that explores character, the politics of college athletics and the value of local journalism in a style that’s more process piece thriller than it is anything like a biopic given how “Paterno” concentrates on a short period in the coach’s life.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »