Outlander (2014)

:

Season 1
  • Network: Starz
  • Series Premiere Date: Aug 9, 2014
Season #: 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
8.3

Universal acclaim- based on 317 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 261 out of 317
  2. Mixed: 28 out of 317
  3. Negative: 28 out of 317
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. BogKid
    Aug 9, 2014
    10
    The Starz Channel has not been notable for very high production values in its televised series shows. Things have taken a major turn for the better. Extremely high production values, good writing, and excellent actors makes this "must see" TV. A touch of science fiction, lots of Scottish history, and lots and lots of romance makes this a women's show that men will enjoy too.

    My wife    The Starz Channel has not been notable for very high production values in its televised series shows. Things have taken a major turn for the better. Extremely high production values, good writing, and excellent actors makes this "must see" TV. A touch of science fiction, lots of Scottish history, and lots and lots of romance makes this a women's show that men will enjoy too.

    My wife has read every one of the "Outlander" books and she approached this show with an extraordinary degree of suspicion, expecting a cheesy cartoon of the books she so enjoys. She is now a believer in this show and recommends it to all of Gabaldon's fans and to everyone else too.    … Expand
  2. MBPH
    Sep 20, 2014
    9
    I think this series is well done. It can not be compared to other programs. I read the books years ago when they were first published and key events have been represented well and do justice to the story while bringing in artistic changes to move the story along. I like the voice over. The nudity
    Is not needed to convey the story. I like some historic event that have been added and    I think this series is well done. It can not be compared to other programs. I read the books years ago when they were first published and key events have been represented well and do justice to the story while bringing in artistic changes to move the story along. I like the voice over. The nudity
    Is not needed to convey the story. I like some historic event that have been added and not part of the original story. Over all well done    … Expand
  3. IneSilano
    Sep 24, 2014
    9
    This show has all the components that any viewer could want in a series, the production is spectacular, the location is excellent, the photography is stunning, the story is absorbing, from various angles, historical, fantasy, romance. The performance is intriguing, perhaps hereinafter greater complementarity is achieved, the chemistry between the characters is believable, the viewer justThis show has all the components that any viewer could want in a series, the production is spectacular, the location is excellent, the photography is stunning, the story is absorbing, from various angles, historical, fantasy, romance. The performance is intriguing, perhaps hereinafter greater complementarity is achieved, the chemistry between the characters is believable, the viewer just wants to know what will happen ...… Expand
  4. dme36ny
    Sep 25, 2014
    10
    I read the books and fell in love with Scotland, Jamie and Claire and their whole adventure. What I love about how they've adapted the book to the screen is that they aren't rushing the story. I love the costumes, the actors (although Claire seemed a bit stiff in the first episode, she is definitely getting better) the accents, the authenticity to the story AND whatever adaptations thatI read the books and fell in love with Scotland, Jamie and Claire and their whole adventure. What I love about how they've adapted the book to the screen is that they aren't rushing the story. I love the costumes, the actors (although Claire seemed a bit stiff in the first episode, she is definitely getting better) the accents, the authenticity to the story AND whatever adaptations that they have made to make it good TV. I love what the director did with "The Wedding." It captured the anticipation and the intimacy that I felt in the book but did it in a different way and it worked beautifully! I love this show. I love Sam Heughan- he is different as the Jamie I imagined while reading but he has definitely stepped in as "my Jamie." He is strong, loyal and very sexy. I have also fell in love with Graham McTavish as Dougal. I love the pace of the show and I look forward to savoring each chapter of the show. I think they are doing a wonderful job and recommend to all readers and non readers alike!… Expand
  5. nikkiloohoo23
    Sep 25, 2014
    10
    Let me be honest. I watched the first episode of this show because it was something my husband was interested in. It slightly captured my attention and then I think I fell asleep. The second episode was so unmemorable to me that I honestly can't even say for certain I watched it. Then I got bored. Really bored if I was willing to watch a show that put me to sleep. I found the second timeLet me be honest. I watched the first episode of this show because it was something my husband was interested in. It slightly captured my attention and then I think I fell asleep. The second episode was so unmemorable to me that I honestly can't even say for certain I watched it. Then I got bored. Really bored if I was willing to watch a show that put me to sleep. I found the second time around, watching it for myself and no one else (add to that, the fact my husband has a tendency to talk throughout the entire episode) I really enjoyed, even more so when I got to the fourth episode. If you ever watched this and thought, ehh not for me, I BEG you to reconsider...the story is amazing, the sets/scenery is amazing, the actors are amazing, the writers are amazing and you're missing out if you're not watching.… Expand
  6. Therack2007
    Sep 25, 2014
    10
    Escapism at its best! After enjoying the books so much I'm delighted that the series has done them justice. Excellent cast with fantastic costume/production value. Completely obsessed with this show! I thought game of thrones was addictive and now I have another fantasy/historical drama in which to absorb myself.
  7. SweeneyT
    Oct 7, 2014
    10
    Loved the books, love this tv series. Beautiful cinematography, amazing sets and costume design, great details of daily life in Scotland in the 1740s. Had a difficult time at first with the casting of both Jaimie and Claire, but by the second episode, I was in love with both of the actors playing these roles ( even though Claire should have amber colored eyes). Completely hooked now on theLoved the books, love this tv series. Beautiful cinematography, amazing sets and costume design, great details of daily life in Scotland in the 1740s. Had a difficult time at first with the casting of both Jaimie and Claire, but by the second episode, I was in love with both of the actors playing these roles ( even though Claire should have amber colored eyes). Completely hooked now on the series, in a way that was totally unexpected. Suffering withdrawal now as the show is on hiatus for 6 months.… Expand
  8. 2expressmyview
    Nov 4, 2014
    8
    This is an excellent show. The acting is very good and the storyline is interesting and, I believe, reflective of the relationship between England and Scotland during this period in history.

    I hope this show will continue for several seasons but am not sure it can continue past the battle between the British and the Scots.
  9. Drakan
    Sep 21, 2015
    8
    Brilliant mini-series. Great acting. Kudos to leading actress (she's Irish, would have never guessed) and the actor that plays as Dougal. Great music score. Despite being a series that , in my opinion, is focused more to women I've got to say I love it. Looking forward to season 2.
  10. Kse17outfan
    Aug 24, 2014
    9
    In episode 3 you left out the tender part of Claire showing Jamie the extent of his scars on his back. Her touch was loving and a hint of what was to be between them. Where was the heartwarming connection between them. When I read the book I had a warm feeling, but the episode left me feeling nothing in this scene.
  11. funkeedeeva
    Aug 27, 2014
    9
    This series is starting to warm up to me. After 3 episodes, I can say I am hooked to know what hold for Claire's future. As a sci-fi fan, I was expecting fast build up but it was a bit slow but tastefully done. I have never read the book so I am expecting the element of surprises along the way.
  12. tmikaeld
    Sep 4, 2014
    10
    Everything in this series is of very high quality, especially the writing, the characters, settings and actors. It's like literally watching a book rather than reading it. Sure, it is slow paced but after watching two episodes, you just crave to know and see more about this epic story.
  13. wornoutspines
    Jun 2, 2015
    9
    I am impressed with this show. The premise desn’t sound like much but it’s a good show. Thank goodness I was bored enough one day to check it out. The theme song is just wonderful and intoxicating, a great choice for the show that it is. The pilot set everything up nicely, at least the first part of things, we got to know Claire's life in 1945 before diving deep in 1743's Scotland.

    The    I am impressed with this show. The premise desn’t sound like much but it’s a good show. Thank goodness I was bored enough one day to check it out. The theme song is just wonderful and intoxicating, a great choice for the show that it is. The pilot set everything up nicely, at least the first part of things, we got to know Claire's life in 1945 before diving deep in 1743's Scotland.

    The characters and the plots are slowly introduced and developed that they quickly feel real. The slow pace the show took created a solid base to amp up the drama, relate to the characters, and set up the era. I felt like with each episodes I learned a little bit more about Scottish culture. The voice over stayed throughout the season but I didn't mind it. It was on point, adding to the information that the images and/or the great performances were giving. It also made boring shots (people walking around, landscape shots - however beautiful they were) more interesting.

    The show is full of little references, I did not expect to find e.g. "When you eliminate the impossible whatever remain, however improbable, must be the truth." a quote that many of you have heard in Sherlock.

    The pilot's development on Claire's life in 1945 made even more sense once they started to use flashbacks. I don't know if the flashbacks would have made any sense if they hadn't spent a good portion of the pilot in 45. Claire strong, pigheaded AND annoying at times. Jack Randall is amazing, powerful, which is even more impressive when you compare the actor’s performance as Clair’s husband in 1945.

    The further we went with the show, the more riveting, and beautiful Outlander was. I was giddy and excited to watch the show. Outlander was a little bit all over the place when it came to categorize it, it was a bit sappy, cheesy but it also got dark, I mean really DARK, which was a direction I didn’t exactly expect. Not having any spoilers from the books I thought I was imaging Jack Randall's proclivities but I wasn’t! It made the show all the more sweater because the creative team was not afraid to get into the sadism, get gritty, and graphic. It got so disturbing but the way it was edited made it bearable.

    Outlander is an emotionally charged and riveting new show, arguably one of the best that came out this year. @wornoutspines    … Expand
  14. dansLady
    May 19, 2015
    10
    Ron Moore, the writers, the cast produce magic when blended with Diana Gabaldon's detailed historical romance series. The care taken with detail brings the story to life with the amazing acting skills of Sam, Cait and Tobias. I couldn't be happier! While I have been a dedicated reader of this series for almost 20 years with visions in my head of the settings and characters, I've beenRon Moore, the writers, the cast produce magic when blended with Diana Gabaldon's detailed historical romance series. The care taken with detail brings the story to life with the amazing acting skills of Sam, Cait and Tobias. I couldn't be happier! While I have been a dedicated reader of this series for almost 20 years with visions in my head of the settings and characters, I've been excited to see everyone come to life in the adaptation. I'll never re-read the books now without seeing Sam as Jamie, Cait as Claire and the stunning portrail of Black Jack Randall by Tobias.… Expand
  15. BillJustBill
    Aug 12, 2014
    9
    I read the book this is based on, so I can say that the first episode follows the book faithfully. Gabaldon writes a good strong narrative, pushes the story forward. It's designed for a female audience (in my humble opinion), but I liked it well enough to allow myself to get into it, even though I knew what would happen, etc. Lots of good production values and a highly professional job.I read the book this is based on, so I can say that the first episode follows the book faithfully. Gabaldon writes a good strong narrative, pushes the story forward. It's designed for a female audience (in my humble opinion), but I liked it well enough to allow myself to get into it, even though I knew what would happen, etc. Lots of good production values and a highly professional job. Gabaldon has written enough books so that the show can run forever.… Expand
  16. AutumnJan
    Sep 8, 2014
    10
    FANTASTIC!!!! I have not loved a series in years like this one. This has got to be by far one of the most accurate (by the book) series in the history of TV series, movies, mini-series etc. It's romance, sci-fi, history and SCOTTISH MEN in kilts and it's so very realistic. I can't get enough of it. Wish it was a two hour series...or on every single night.
  17. h2gold
    Oct 2, 2014
    10
    A hidden gem of a show. Great chemistry between the leads, neither of whom I had heard of before but after watching them here I couldn't believe I hadn't because they just shine. With Battlestar Alumnus Ronald D Moore at the helm I shouldn't have been surprised at the attention to characterisation, including the smallest of parts. This show may have one of the best getting to know youA hidden gem of a show. Great chemistry between the leads, neither of whom I had heard of before but after watching them here I couldn't believe I hadn't because they just shine. With Battlestar Alumnus Ronald D Moore at the helm I shouldn't have been surprised at the attention to characterisation, including the smallest of parts. This show may have one of the best getting to know you wedding nights ever.… Expand
  18. Profe7
    Aug 18, 2014
    10
    Having read all of Diana Gabaldon's books in the Outlander series, I have been waiting for 20 years for someone to take on the challenge of adapting them for TV. To say that I am "thrilled" with the result is an understatement--long-time fans are being rewarded with a series that is remaining very true to the source texts. While some may find the pace slow and cumbersome, I find itHaving read all of Diana Gabaldon's books in the Outlander series, I have been waiting for 20 years for someone to take on the challenge of adapting them for TV. To say that I am "thrilled" with the result is an understatement--long-time fans are being rewarded with a series that is remaining very true to the source texts. While some may find the pace slow and cumbersome, I find it refreshing: producer Ron Moore has turned away from the pitfall of trying to cram every episode full of action. Those unfamiliar with the books may not like the use of voice-over narration by Claire in some places, but since the entire story is told from her point of view, it is absolutely essential that we understand what is going through her mind.

    I am very pleased with the casting: Sam Heughan (Jamie) and Caitriona Balfe (Claire) have such terrific chemistry on the screen that the viewer can practically see the sparks fly. I was initially skeptical of casting Tobias Menzies as both Frank and Black Jack Randall, but he makes it work. And Graham McTavish as Dougal is phenomenal--one look at his eyes and you know to step carefully around him.

    One feature of the production that intrigues me is the use of the Gaelic language without subtitles. It is used just enough to make the viewer feel the disorientation of Claire as she tries to navigate this new reality in which she finds herself. The Gaelic conversations are short enough that the viewer can follow the meaning of what is being said without being so long as to cause the viewer to 'tune out'.

    Fans of Gabaldon's books will be hooked on the show as they see the story brought to life (even if their vision of the characters was different from what is portrayed); those who have never read the books should prepare for their newest addiction!    … Expand
  19. SusanBerkoff
    Aug 20, 2014
    10
    The OUTLANDER series of books has sold over 26 million copies world wide. This series has been widely anticipated for nearly 25 years. Ron Moore, Maril, and the whole casting crew did an incredible job. The entire occupation of acting is to become the person one is pretending to be and this amazing group of men and women DO THAT JOB TO PERFECTION! Books can be difficult to translate to theThe OUTLANDER series of books has sold over 26 million copies world wide. This series has been widely anticipated for nearly 25 years. Ron Moore, Maril, and the whole casting crew did an incredible job. The entire occupation of acting is to become the person one is pretending to be and this amazing group of men and women DO THAT JOB TO PERFECTION! Books can be difficult to translate to the screen because description in a book depends on a talented writer while on the screen 100 pages can translate to two shots. In the first two Episodes this has been handled perfectly with both flash backs and a small bit of narration by Claire - it is her story after all. Scotland is a major character in the story as well and is used to its beautiful advantage. Diana, I am sure, is very proud that her 26 million books have translated so well to the screen in the very capable hands of Ron D. Moore at the helm of some Very talented people who take charge of sets, dressing, the horses (who are actors in their own right also and must be directed), lighting, and research for accuracy in the historical realms as well as an expert in the Gaelic Language. This series is one of the best performed and directed and expressed from the original material that has ever hit the air. STARZ and Sony Productions along with Tall Ships Productions have worked in perfect synchronicity to come as close to the original books as is possible. Gary Lewis, Graham McTavish, Sam Heughan, Caitriona Balfe, and Tobias Menzies amongst the rest of the cast all bring to life the characters who over 26 million people around the world fell in love with. Treat yourselves Every Saturday night to STARZ at 9 PM. Read the entire series of EIGHT books in print thus far also. You will be thrilled that you did!… Expand
  20. new-things
    Sep 10, 2014
    10
    Great job adapting a compelling series into a very watchable TV genre. Scenery is beautiful, characters very believable. I'll be looking forward to Saturday evenings for many seasons to come.
  21. tigger77
    Sep 26, 2014
    10
    i have to admit, as a long-time fan of the books and audio, i was afraid to hope - and watched with trepidation. All my fears were unfounded and the dream cast of all time has been assembled - if the cast, director, script writers remain solid, this will be an amazing multi-year worthy of standing ovation saga - These people are not mere frosting, the depth of the talent and obviousi have to admit, as a long-time fan of the books and audio, i was afraid to hope - and watched with trepidation. All my fears were unfounded and the dream cast of all time has been assembled - if the cast, director, script writers remain solid, this will be an amazing multi-year worthy of standing ovation saga - These people are not mere frosting, the depth of the talent and obvious respect they have for these characters shines in every scene, every nuance and we Outlanders will accept nothing less. Jamie and Claire are people we would all aspire to be - and watching Cait and Sam transcend these amazing books and make Outlander "more" exceeded my wildest expectations. Every cast member resonates authenticity. Watching this little bit of history unfold is enthralling - and if I were Scots - I would be prouder still to know my voice is being heard… Expand
  22. maridanilidou
    Aug 11, 2014
    10
    One of the best pilots of the summer!!! It creates a beautiful atmosphere that feels magical. Stunning makeup, production design, etc. The actors do a great job to create a strong and believable chemistry between each other. The story instantly lured me in and had me begging for more.
  23. ahnehnois
    Sep 13, 2014
    9
    Where Outlander succeeds is where many other shows, from Starz and elsewhere, have failed.

    First, authenticity. The show is set in Scotland, and it's shot in Scotland, and many of the cast are Scottish. Gallic is spoken regularly, and the production values are high. It feels Scottish, in stark contrast to shows that try to fake these things. Second, restraint. The show is okay with    Where Outlander succeeds is where many other shows, from Starz and elsewhere, have failed.

    First, authenticity. The show is set in Scotland, and it's shot in Scotland, and many of the cast are Scottish. Gallic is spoken regularly, and the production values are high. It feels Scottish, in stark contrast to shows that try to fake these things.

    Second, restraint. The show is okay with having characters' motivations be unclear, or having unsubtitled conversations. Things take time to happen. It doesn't have to be in your face every week.

    Where it struggles are in some eye-rolling decisions by the main character, who seems to vacillate and complain endlessly. I don't know the source material, so I can only say it irks me. But given the creative staff behind the show and the substance of most of the narrative thusfar, I'm willing to believe it goes somewhere good.    … Expand
  24. wrkingrndma
    Aug 18, 2014
    10
    The books were amazing and for the Starz Family to produce and air the series is fantastic, They have done an amazing job of bringing it to life for me, I love it!
  25. N2books
    Aug 20, 2014
    10
    I have loved the adaptation of Outlander so far. The scripts, sets and casts are meticulous in following a much loved story. Some things must be tweaked to translate to screen but overall the spirit of the story is faithful to the book. Well done!
  26. LauraCarmichael
    Aug 23, 2014
    10
    Outlander is a riveting ride, a stunning production - this is intelligent drama, with high-stakes choices for the central characters. Historical, political, social dilemmas, with family and personal relationships at stake. My husband and I are loving this! Best thing on the screen today, by a wide margin.
  27. Mayratd
    Sep 17, 2014
    10
    I absolutely love this outlander show. I' m only sad that only 2 more episodes are left. I never eat the books outlander is based on but now that I love this show I am earring the first book. Just a note. This us the only show I am watching on tv of paid channels. Everything else is too violent.
  28. SAMSUNG2653
    Sep 28, 2014
    9
    The cast is impeccable,the writing as well .A perfect mix of Romance and Adventure with a little bit of SF.One of the best this year and a must see of this genre.
  29. Gio86
    Aug 11, 2014
    10
    Epic new show! Think Game of Thrones with a bit of Downton Abby and a hint of Alice in Wonderland. One of the best new pilots of the year. The story is captivating from minute one and only gets better by the end.
  30. nilsy
    May 1, 2015
    3
    To much romance focus to do it for me.
    Big fan of time travel escapism but this just couldnt hold my attention from the get go. Tried my best to give it a couple of episodes to get going but it was painful to say the lest.
    Didnt have a problem with any of the actors they are "ok" to me not brilliant but not bad enough i mind. The visuals are good, the music is bad, clothes and setting    To much romance focus to do it for me.
    Big fan of time travel escapism but this just couldnt hold my attention from the get go. Tried my best to give it a couple of episodes to get going but it was painful to say the lest.

    Didnt have a problem with any of the actors they are "ok" to me not brilliant but not bad enough i mind.
    The visuals are good, the music is bad, clothes and setting are good.
    Its the story that sinks the ship to me    … Expand
  31. gemtwist
    Sep 13, 2014
    6
    I am trying so hard to like this series. I loved the books. While I think she is an excellent actress, Caitriona Balfe simply isn't Claire Beauchamp to me. She lacks a warmth that the Claire character has and Ms Balfe gives the impression of Claire being hard rather than tough. Physically she is completely wrong being willowy and tall while Claire is average height tending toward theI am trying so hard to like this series. I loved the books. While I think she is an excellent actress, Caitriona Balfe simply isn't Claire Beauchamp to me. She lacks a warmth that the Claire character has and Ms Balfe gives the impression of Claire being hard rather than tough. Physically she is completely wrong being willowy and tall while Claire is average height tending toward the plump. The scenery is beautiful. The plot is a bit plodding, but I think people who have not read the series might find it less so than those of us who have. Overall, I am hopeful that the series will improve once Claire and Jaime get married and the relationship between the two develops.… Expand
  32. scartwright49
    Sep 8, 2014
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As one of the few men who have read the book or will admit to. Its really good the scenery is beautiful the casting is spot on. While it is a little slow towards the beginning I trust that the show will pick up the pace like the book does after the (spoiler Marriage of Claire and Jamie) Having read the book I know it is about to get very good very quickly but I will then have to wait until 2015.
    Still it is the best show STARZ has done since Boss and Party Down.

    There a couple of very interesting scenes coming up which will be very interesting to see how they do it. The pace is slow but maybe necessary in order build the world of Outlander.
    I presume the many female fans were attracted to the books and now the show because of Jamie. For me one of the reasons I like watching the show is Claire played by the very attractive Caitriona Balfe. People were worried that only women would tune in but women have been watching male shows for years and men enjoy watching female lead shows. One of my favourite tv shows is Orange is the New Black and almost entirely female cast.
    Very good show those put off by the slow pace I urge to stick with it just a little longer it will pay off I promise.    … Expand
  33. enridem
    Sep 28, 2014
    9
    "Captivating" - that's the best way to describe this show in a single word.

    Unlike so many others I never had the privilege of reading the books and in all honesty I don't really consider that a loss. The story is so well told and the atmosphere so palpable that it draws you in and captures the imagination. While the show had a strong first episode it was really the second episode that    "Captivating" - that's the best way to describe this show in a single word.

    Unlike so many others I never had the privilege of reading the books and in all honesty I don't really consider that a loss. The story is so well told and the atmosphere so palpable that it draws you in and captures the imagination. While the show had a strong first episode it was really the second episode that sealed the deal. The depiction of life in the Scottish highlands feels authentic and the actors, whom are mostly unknown, completely inhabit their characters.

    From reading the comments I understand that some of the characters are not aesthetically identical to their novel counterparts. This was enough to warrant lower scores for some reviewers. I find this puzzling as the show stands so well on it's own. Who cares if someones hair was longer in the book? Does it really detract from the experience?

    I would have given the show a 10 if not for the somewhat cynical side of me believing that nothing is ever perfect. I also have a personal gripe with the fair amount of nudity. While the nudity itself doesn't offend me, I felt it was forced in a bid to compete with shows like Game of Thrones and the like. It's unnecessary to have nudity only for the sake of nudity. Claire's expletive of choice also feels forced and rarely comes across as a natural reaction to a given situation. In the end these concerns are minimal in the bigger scheme of things and should not deter anyone from enjoying this masterpiece.    … Expand
  34. wifflepoof
    Sep 7, 2014
    10
    I have read, reread & fell in love with DG's series of books many years ago & I'd always hoped for a screen version one day. But - as so often happens for me - at first - it's hard to wrap my head around the casting choices - until - if I'm lucky - the actors win me over - and they have!!

    Outlander is really,really great! So far I love it all - the cast, the set & art dec,    I have read, reread & fell in love with DG's series of books many years ago & I'd always hoped for a screen version one day. But - as so often happens for me - at first - it's hard to wrap my head around the casting choices - until - if I'm lucky - the actors win me over - and they have!!

    Outlander is really,really great!

    So far I love it all - the cast, the set & art dec, historical accuracy, costume design, direction, the pace and most of all we can really feel the chemistry building between Claire & Jamie so I expect the screen to get a little steamy this fall!

    The only curiosity I have is how/why/when the change of Claire's costume - post henge took place? I guess I missed the part when Jack removed her belt, skirt and blouse leaving her in nothing but her 'slip'/'shift'? I'm a continuity and period costume design buff.

    She came through the henge with her 40's ensemble but I didn't notice the belt and change of neck line until she stood up following a roll through the leaves down a hill. If anyone can clarify this for me I'd be most appreciative otherwise I will just wait for a repeat as I expect the entire series with be worth watching a second or third time!!

    I'm just so happy to have a TV series that appeals to my demographic. The CSI types and Vampire shows that are so popular right now are completely lost on me so I am really grateful to have something to watch this season.    … Expand
  35. manhands
    Sep 13, 2014
    8
    The Starzs series could have done without the graphic violence in this episode. Jamie's whipping was handled well in the previous episodes. It was pivotal to the novel, but to subject the viewers to the prolonged violence again, just took away from a brilliant story. Diana Gabaldon should be more insistent over how the producers interpret her books.
  36. dyrtyredd
    Sep 15, 2014
    0
    Wow! This show is horrible. There is nothing here worth watching for the average person. The whole thing is nothing more than a cheap dime store romance novel in video format. I'm sure there are literally gaggles of 12 year old girls that absolutely love this, but it falls waaaaay short of being a watchable show based on the merits of the story. They spend almost no time at all ON theWow! This show is horrible. There is nothing here worth watching for the average person. The whole thing is nothing more than a cheap dime store romance novel in video format. I'm sure there are literally gaggles of 12 year old girls that absolutely love this, but it falls waaaaay short of being a watchable show based on the merits of the story. They spend almost no time at all ON the story, opting instead to delve into the minutiae of the lives of the characters, with an emphasis on their romantic entanglements. They could have concentrated on the time travel aspect, or on some historical accounts but chose instead to make it a soap opera about nothing but romance. I wish there were a way to give a -10 for this drivel. I couldn't make it past episode 5.… Expand
  37. Justanopinion
    Nov 13, 2014
    3
    Starts out slow and goes downhill. It does provide beautiful scenery of Scotland and that is why I scored it as high as I did. Authentic but unintelligible Scot accents. No subtitles on the Gaelic. Two lead actor roles are poorly cast but supporting cast does a credible job. Claire comes across as whining and shrew like. Heughan as Jamie will be flexing his biceps and butt cheeks as hisStarts out slow and goes downhill. It does provide beautiful scenery of Scotland and that is why I scored it as high as I did. Authentic but unintelligible Scot accents. No subtitles on the Gaelic. Two lead actor roles are poorly cast but supporting cast does a credible job. Claire comes across as whining and shrew like. Heughan as Jamie will be flexing his biceps and butt cheeks as his primary contribution. Of course the legions of rabid Outlander fans will love everything about this series. Eight episodes was more than enough for me. I won't be back when it returns in 2015.… Expand
  38. DianaPK
    Sep 28, 2014
    0
    I have been a fan of this series for many years, so when I heard they were making a series I got really excited. I don't usually have opinions about casting unless the choices made are utterly vile. That being said I feel as if I have to put my two cents in. Sam Heughan, Graham McTavish (along with the assemble) give the only believable performances, although I believe Dougal is only 45I have been a fan of this series for many years, so when I heard they were making a series I got really excited. I don't usually have opinions about casting unless the choices made are utterly vile. That being said I feel as if I have to put my two cents in. Sam Heughan, Graham McTavish (along with the assemble) give the only believable performances, although I believe Dougal is only 45 years old in the book and he looks much older on screen. What has gotten me in a froth is the casting of Caitriona Balfe as Claire. In the book Claire is 5"6, buxom with golden eyes and whiskey hair. Caitronia Balfe is 5"10, emaciated with two sticks for legs and unattractive breasts. Every time she says "Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ," I cringe. I feel like she is playing Cate Blancett playing Claire. I've heard she doesn't have much acting experience which really sounds crazy given that that she has the lead. Lastly, those voiceovers are so flat it makes me want to turn the sound and just watch the pretty scenery.
    Tobias Menzies is a fine actor. I saw him in "Rome" and thought he was fabulous. That being said he doesn't fit what Frank is supposed to look like but he is good enough actor to get past the physical miscast. Just to recap and close, I understand casting a new comer if she really looks the part but, Caitronia Balfe neither looks the part or can act. I suggest she try a few more lessons    … Expand
  39. RudiV
    Sep 27, 2014
    0
    My wife is a big fan of the Outlander series of books so when the series aired she wanted to get Startz. I decided to watch it with her and we both were disapointed. I found the series extremely formulatic just like to the other Starz shows, a bit of history, some nice locations, some sex all strewn together. The characters were one dimensional and that leading lady was reallyMy wife is a big fan of the Outlander series of books so when the series aired she wanted to get Startz. I decided to watch it with her and we both were disapointed. I found the series extremely formulatic just like to the other Starz shows, a bit of history, some nice locations, some sex all strewn together. The characters were one dimensional and that leading lady was really dreadful. Not sure what she is supposed to be - Is she English or Irish, couldn't tell from that strange accent. My wife said the character (Claire) is supposed to be beautiful and a bit buxom. Sorry, but that gal looked like she hasn't had a square meal in a while. I don't think I will be watching anymore episodes… Expand
  40. lvlogan
    Aug 24, 2014
    9
    As someone who just recently discovered the book series, I was reticent at the prospect of Starz picking up the rights to Outlander. In my experience, Starz just doesn't have the ability to avoid their usual ingredients of cheesy and gratuitous sex scenes.
    Allow me to happily announce, I was very wrong. Starz turned a corner with this show and raised their game. This production is    As someone who just recently discovered the book series, I was reticent at the prospect of Starz picking up the rights to Outlander. In my experience, Starz just doesn't have the ability to avoid their usual ingredients of cheesy and gratuitous sex scenes.
    Allow me to happily announce, I was very wrong. Starz turned a corner with this show and raised their game. This production is on-par with quality, production and script as their competitors. The only reason I didn't give this show a 10 is that I think it will take a bit more time to see the cast truly gel together. These are big roles for leads without significant acting credentials. I believe they are coming along nicely and we will see them nominated along side of some of our greats.    … Expand
  41. gailolivieri
    Sep 22, 2014
    1
    I have read many of the Outlander book series and was very excited to hear that it was being made into a tv series. That being said I am truly disapointed after watching several episodes. You can not have a series of this magnitude with a weak leading lady. Caitriona Balfe is not a strong enough lead for the show and she does not get the essence of the Claire character. I cringe everytimeI have read many of the Outlander book series and was very excited to hear that it was being made into a tv series. That being said I am truly disapointed after watching several episodes. You can not have a series of this magnitude with a weak leading lady. Caitriona Balfe is not a strong enough lead for the show and she does not get the essence of the Claire character. I cringe everytime she uses the expletive "Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ" and really find her unbelievable. There are so many talented actresses out there who would perhaps even look a little more like the book version of Claire that I am truly shocked that she was cast.… Expand
  42. thisismyview
    Apr 17, 2015
    0
    Casting Caitriona Balfe as Claire was a ghastly choice. She is the opposite from the book description Balfe is not 5'6, buxom, or anything as described in the book. In the nude scenes, Balfe is so skinny that she looks like one of those kids from the USA for Africa videos so much so that I expected flies to start circling her... her bones protrude out her back and her boney legs are upCasting Caitriona Balfe as Claire was a ghastly choice. She is the opposite from the book description Balfe is not 5'6, buxom, or anything as described in the book. In the nude scenes, Balfe is so skinny that she looks like one of those kids from the USA for Africa videos so much so that I expected flies to start circling her... her bones protrude out her back and her boney legs are up in the air for a good part of each episode. While having the body of a tall 12 year old boy works for the runway, it looks like **** for this story. There is no depth to her portrayal of Claire I actually found myself rooting against her hoping the redcoats would just throw her irritating ass in a dungeon. I would hope they recast that character because I think the show would be better off if Balfe was replaced.
    Fitz was great casting as is Jamie.
    The costumes...ehhh you can tell the wife of the shows 'runner' was at the helm of those nothing especially noteworthy or that a first year art student couldn't come up. But lets all just **** over ourselves because it's Ron's behemoth wife doing them.
    The scenery is stunning...Scotland is truly one of the most stunning places on earth so they are doing a great job there.
    Not sure I am going to stick with this as Balfe's portrayal of Claire makes me not care about the story...recast!!!!    … Expand
  43. forthebest
    May 6, 2015
    0
    Nice woman fantasy, but it´s ridiculous to called that show historical drama. Acting is good from most actors, but I have to mute the main actress because of her stilted accent. Costumes are nice to look at, but are not typical for this time period nor for the Highlands culture. But the worse is the depiction of that time with stereotyps and the typical black/white image of the scots vs.Nice woman fantasy, but it´s ridiculous to called that show historical drama. Acting is good from most actors, but I have to mute the main actress because of her stilted accent. Costumes are nice to look at, but are not typical for this time period nor for the Highlands culture. But the worse is the depiction of that time with stereotyps and the typical black/white image of the scots vs. the english. Outlander is Braveheart of the 18th century. The Gaelic was a promising start, but not to use subtitles was a big mistake, but was probably made so that the extras and secondary actors didnt have to speak it, since most Highlanders spoke Gaelic and not English. The cinematography is beautiful, but the storytelling is mediocre full of holes and the directing looks sometimes very amateurish.… Expand
  44. hvail
    Sep 24, 2014
    0
    I just recently got Starz and thought I would check out some of the shows. I started to watch Outlander and was very disapointed. I just about got through one show and didn't want to watch anymore. The voiceover was really annoying as was the leading lady. I googled the cast and found out the the lead is an Irish supermodel with very little acting experience. Believe me it shows.
  45. Willemina
    Aug 30, 2014
    5
    As an ardent fan of these books I had been clinging to the Starz FB page for months leading up to Episode 1. I had several reservations about the casting, but put my faith in Diana and Ron not to let bad acting ruin all of their hard work and passion! I hate to say that my intuition was right. Furthermore I'm sad to realize that for as talented as Ron Moore is, there has definitely beenAs an ardent fan of these books I had been clinging to the Starz FB page for months leading up to Episode 1. I had several reservations about the casting, but put my faith in Diana and Ron not to let bad acting ruin all of their hard work and passion! I hate to say that my intuition was right. Furthermore I'm sad to realize that for as talented as Ron Moore is, there has definitely been something lost in translation between the book (which is extremely compelling) and the show (which truly is not)! I never wanted to put the book down! The show leaves no hook at the end, nothing to grab me in to see what will happen next. I will continue to watch the show and have my fingers crossed that it will continue on, because there is something wonderful about seeing the books I have loved for so many years come to life. And there is absolutely no denying that the scenery and sets are extraordinary, better than any full-budget Hollywood movie! They are a big part of what has pulled me back each week. But the truth is I'm no longer excited about the show, I am merely watching for the vague amusement of it. I had my husband and older female roommate excited to watch the pilot with me, and both have trailed off. Neither one of them wanted to watch beyond the second episode that I forced them to sit through! As far as specific feedback: 1) The pacing of the show is PAINFULLY slow. I fully understand this book could not be fit into a 2 hour movie. But 16 episodes is too, too many! As critic Tim Goodman said, "In many ways, this is a story well and thoroughly told but with almost none of the smart pacing of similarly dense fictions like Game of Thrones." SO TRUE. 2) Cat as Claire: First off, she is way too soft. When she gets particularly upset, she breaks into a whiney, cracking voice. Not cunning, not quick on her toes, not convincingly witty. Just… not. And yes, her waifish figure DOES matter!! A lot! She should have gained some weight for the show. Why not? Lots of actors do. All it does is add to her overall flimsiness. She looks like a strong breeze would knock her over. I want so badly to like her, but she is not my beloved Claire! And yeah, as others have said, her J.H.R. Christ's are painful to witness. She doesn't understand the phrase or its application whatsoever. 3) Sam as Jamie: Overall, he's doing an EXCELLENT job, way beyond my expectations! He is very charming and definitely holding his own in the role. However, I feel he is a bit too flirty with Claire. I don't believe for ONE SECOND that he is a virgin!! They didn't get that right. He lacks the innocence needed to be truly as endearing as Jamie. 4) Tobias as Frank: Major blah factor. I like his look, but had I not read the books, I wouldn't understand a word he said!!! SO mumbly, and SO monotone especially when talking history (supposedly, his greatest PASSION). As for the "chemistry" between him and Claire, there was none. She clearly loves him, but he seems to merely be tolerating her. I get that there is a disconnect between them due to distance and war. But there still needed to be passion tying them together! Boo. 5) Tobias as Jack Randall: Completely laughable!! Sorry to say it but it's true! That guy wouldn't hurt a fly. Between Randall and all of the clansmen, I have NOT ONCE, since the season began, honestly feared for Claire's safety or well-being. And that is really sad. 6) Lotte as Geillis: She has the potential, and the look, and the general idea. But holy OVER-ACTING, Batman!!!! I can barely stomach her performance. We are not supposed to know so much about her, so early on! Her evil is supposed to sneak up on us, like in the book. She is trying WAY too hard to be mysterious, and the directors aren't catching it which is especially concerning/disappointing! Also, 7) Laura as Jenny: WTH?!? Jenny is a FIGHTER, even as a young girl she wouldn't have taken crap from anyone! Yes, she would have been forced into subservience as a woman in those times. But she would not have been so doe-eyed and wimpy about it. She would have had her chin out and had a very willful demeanor. How could the directors have possibly gotten that wrong? I'm just a little confused how certain things could have been SO misinterpreted, especially when it has such a negative effect on the overall feeling of the story. :( So yeah… lots of good things I could say about the show as well, including many other actors cast well and doing great work. But it's nice to leave some honest and anonymous feedback. I'd be skinned alive for saying any of this on FB! Love you Diana!… Expand
  46. PJPJ
    Aug 19, 2014
    6
    I've read most of the first book, and I do find the first two hours not dramatically compelling. There doesn't seem to be reason to have put this on screen if this is the way it unfolds. It's just better to read the book. I think everyone but Claire fits. There is not enough conflict per scene to make the plot compelling as the article notes. The lead actress needs a little more energyI've read most of the first book, and I do find the first two hours not dramatically compelling. There doesn't seem to be reason to have put this on screen if this is the way it unfolds. It's just better to read the book. I think everyone but Claire fits. There is not enough conflict per scene to make the plot compelling as the article notes. The lead actress needs a little more energy to bring to the slowly unfolding scenes. I found myself wanting to go back to reading the book. The actor who plays Jamie does play just right and will probably the only reason I watch the rest of the series. Not to mention he's easy on the eyes. I just came back from Scotland and I'm not seeing enough of the great scenery in this show yet, either. It would be an improvement if they added subtitles during the Gaelic exchanges. Even most people in Scotland wouldn’t understand.
    If you haven't read the book, read it. It's definitely better, but also slow, but you get more of the travelog aspect of Gabaldon's work. If you want shows with Scottish scenery watch the TV series Monarch of the Glen.    … Expand
  47. jasperverfailli
    Sep 28, 2014
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What a tedious show! This is supposed to be a sci-fi/historical drama, but this far the only drama that happend ... actually, really nothing dramatic has happened apart form Claire being blasted back to the 1700's. Yes, there was the wedding and the midseason finale, but those aren't the big plot twists I was hoping for. The story seems to be going nowhere and after the 8th episode I really don't care what will happen.
    I have seen a good amount of tv series, but this is by far the most boring and tedious show I've seen in a long time. I could rant on and on and point out everything that I think is bad about Outlander, but I'll get to the point immediately and just list them. (Obviously beware of spoilers!!)

    Bad things about Outlander:
    - the annoying voice overs that ruin the fun of figuring things out yourself
    - Claire is a strong woman and the show has every intention of pointing that out at every given chance
    - it has taken this show 8!! episodes to show us what Frank has been up to since Claire has gone missing
    - the opening song, but why has everything about this show got to be so literal and obnoxious (including the theme song)
    - nothing happens!!! (there's an episode where Claire and the Scottish gang go out to collect taxes, literally)
    - Claire's constant outrage about the medical treatment in the 1700's (what did she expect really?)
    - Outlander doesn't play all its cards quickly, but there's such a thing as too much foreplay (see: sexual tension between Claire and Jamie). Also the payoff is not really rewarding.

    Good things about Outlander
    - good music by Bear McReary (except for the opening song)
    - great scenery
    - I haven't read the books so I don't know where the story's headed. This might be the only thing that motivated me to stick with Outlander till the midseason finale.    … Expand
  48. Fastpoose
    May 16, 2016
    1
    Overrated rubbish, awful acting, slow boring script, out of place sex scenes...no wonder only 60+ year old grannys like it. Oh wait my sister does like it, but that is with much much wine...
  49. podaddy
    Jan 29, 2015
    9
    I started watching Outlander when it first came out (about a year ago or so), and although I liked it, I was hooked on shows like Fargo, The Honorable Woman and Rectify and just never made time to stay with it. At that time, it would have been worthy of a 7 rating to me, but I have watched episodes 4 thru 7 very recently and the show has really found its footing. The writing, casting, aI started watching Outlander when it first came out (about a year ago or so), and although I liked it, I was hooked on shows like Fargo, The Honorable Woman and Rectify and just never made time to stay with it. At that time, it would have been worthy of a 7 rating to me, but I have watched episodes 4 thru 7 very recently and the show has really found its footing. The writing, casting, a cinematography were always top notch, but the show really has hit stride mid-season and reached another level. I'd highly recommend this show, very much a slow burn at the outset, but well worth the wait.… Expand
  50. vampirelady64
    Aug 12, 2014
    9
    I didn't think it would be any good, but I loved it. If I were to be whiney and criticize, ok. I will,
    1--Claire's hair isn't curly & her J.H.R.Christ's were totally lame.
    2--Frank/Jack Randall is totally wrong.
    3--Where's Jamie's short RED spikey hair?
  51. Becks88
    Apr 25, 2015
    4
    Seeing the promos for this show lead me to read the book and for that a I am thankful, because they are wonderful. The tv series however leaves much to be desired.

    My biggest issue is with the casting of Claire. In the books she is a buxom, spirited, youthful, 26ish year old woman. Catriona, is about 10 years too old, about 25 lbs underweight, and comes off more bitter and whiney. I    Seeing the promos for this show lead me to read the book and for that a I am thankful, because they are wonderful. The tv series however leaves much to be desired.

    My biggest issue is with the casting of Claire. In the books she is a buxom, spirited, youthful, 26ish year old woman. Catriona, is about 10 years too old, about 25 lbs underweight, and comes off more bitter and whiney. I cringe every time she utters JH Roosevelt Christ (wasn't a fan in the books either) I'll need to ask a man from the grandma's retirement center to say it properly to wrap my head around it. Because the Claire character is so hard to love the relationship with Jamie is just flat and is just about having sex to just get off, no passion.

    I do appreciate the decision to not add subtitles for the Gaelic within the show, as it puts the viewer in the same position as Claire who doesn't speak Gaelic. The acting from Sam Heughan really carries the show, and the rest of the main assemble does a fine job. The overall production quality is good. If there was a different Claire the show would probably get a 9.    … Expand
  52. mac5
    Aug 26, 2014
    2
    Its starts at the end of the second world war when a married nurse and teacher visit the Scottish Highlands for a vacation and therein setting the scene for the debacle that is about to unfold. With mystical stories, eulogies of historical factual excerpts, solicited sexual encounters and a fortune teller/druid spewing tales of a world of wonderment and adventure and an ensuing disjointedIts starts at the end of the second world war when a married nurse and teacher visit the Scottish Highlands for a vacation and therein setting the scene for the debacle that is about to unfold. With mystical stories, eulogies of historical factual excerpts, solicited sexual encounters and a fortune teller/druid spewing tales of a world of wonderment and adventure and an ensuing disjointed lifeline is awaiting for the nurse.

    What follows is a blandest foray of circumstances that catapults the nurse into a different century and the story unfolds as she touches one of the ancient stone circles and suddenly all isn’t as it seems.

    It is just not as interesting as Sleepy Hollow as the lead actress wavering accent and combined vulnerability and stroppiness masks her lack of commanding status. Maybe an older actress would have been more compelling in handling her hostile environment that she is now aligned. I feel it would have been better as a radio play although we would miss out on the gorgeous visuals of the Scottish countryside.

    Overall it’s cheap and tacky similar to Salem and developing into Catherine Cookson/Mills & Boon romantic bile. If you watch it without expectation and you may like it.    … Expand
  53. DakotaFred
    Jun 1, 2015
    1
    Oh god... this really went downhill with the introduction of the gay capt. Randall. Hey! Lets show some nudity and gay sex to be edgy, cause we can! Why why why.. they've totally ruined the show with this move. NEXT!
  54. DanniBoi
    Aug 9, 2014
    10
    Greetings: (I AM STOKED)

    This show is and have an incredible, outstanding and well made over the top screen play of a high production value. You can see that from the get go, but it does not stop there, the main actors along side the extras (the ones that have more than words in some scenes) are doing a great job of perpetrating a good acting, making the whole experience more immerse.    Greetings: (I AM STOKED)

    This show is and have an incredible, outstanding and well made over the top screen play of a high production value. You can see that from the get go, but it does not stop there, the main actors along side the extras (the ones that have more than words in some scenes) are doing a great job of perpetrating a good acting, making the whole experience more immerse.

    The exquisite and intriguing drama that is being unwrap and being developed along the way for the up coming episodes, are just the pure taste of a great entertaining story telling show that is already beginning with an awesome and well made pilot start.

    P.s. I was asking my self the whole time "I am watching a show or a movie? "    … Expand
  55. Rattazustra
    Sep 2, 2014
    3
    This series has one of the most horrid narratives I have seen in a long time. Pretty much every dramatical device that gets used is applied in the most amateur way. Foreshadowing is not foreshadowing, if it is slapped in the viewers face in chronological order and then, within the very same episode, it is actually revisited to make sure that nobody could possibly overlook anything. ItThis series has one of the most horrid narratives I have seen in a long time. Pretty much every dramatical device that gets used is applied in the most amateur way. Foreshadowing is not foreshadowing, if it is slapped in the viewers face in chronological order and then, within the very same episode, it is actually revisited to make sure that nobody could possibly overlook anything. It implies that the viewers are utterly stupid, which is demeaning. On top of that, the way the main character acts and allegedly thinks is anachronistic towards and in direct conflict with her own background.
    Choice of location is very nice on the other hand, as is costume design. Unfortunately that does not make up for all the flaws this series is seriously burdened with.    … Expand
  56. gwheaties
    Apr 19, 2015
    0
    This series is really dreadful. I really enjoyed the book series but sometimes a book does not transfer well to another medium. That being said I think the real problem is the casting. Catrionia Balfe is not a good actress, nor does she fit the image of Claire in the book. I don't why anyone in their right might would cast her. She doesn't even look appealing in the nude scenes. DoesThis series is really dreadful. I really enjoyed the book series but sometimes a book does not transfer well to another medium. That being said I think the real problem is the casting. Catrionia Balfe is not a good actress, nor does she fit the image of Claire in the book. I don't why anyone in their right might would cast her. She doesn't even look appealing in the nude scenes. Does she have any acting experience what so ever or is the case of her just knowing the right people. That being said, I ordered Startz for the purpose of seeing this series and now I plan on canceling it. Do us all a favor and replace her.… Expand
  57. Pier
    Sep 1, 2014
    5
    The constant voice over is annoying, the tone is bland, and the conflict became boring quickly. We lost interest after the second chapter. Nevertheless the acting and the production values are good.
  58. KenyanCritic
    May 11, 2016
    0
    Any TV show that requires a sex scene within the first 25 minutes to draw in viewers is probably a bad TV show. The only way this show made it to a second season is probably because it was ordered in wholesale. Sincerely speaking it's time Scottish accents include subtitles, because I struggled through a few episodes before it became pointless. Oh yes, and there's more horrifying sexAny TV show that requires a sex scene within the first 25 minutes to draw in viewers is probably a bad TV show. The only way this show made it to a second season is probably because it was ordered in wholesale. Sincerely speaking it's time Scottish accents include subtitles, because I struggled through a few episodes before it became pointless. Oh yes, and there's more horrifying sex scenes to spice up the drudgery of sitting through a few episodes of Outlander. Should be renamed Outsider because there's nothing that would save this show from being canceled.… Expand
  59. Rumpleforeskin
    Sep 16, 2014
    4
    The main character is the product of female supremacy writing and I find it extremely off-putting. She possesses no character flaws and is portrayed in the most wooden and difficult to identify with presentation I have ever seen. The 1st person narration sounds like it was read by the actress while she was half asleep and drugged.

    I went in expecting a nice historical fiction series and    The main character is the product of female supremacy writing and I find it extremely off-putting. She possesses no character flaws and is portrayed in the most wooden and difficult to identify with presentation I have ever seen. The 1st person narration sounds like it was read by the actress while she was half asleep and drugged.

    I went in expecting a nice historical fiction series and was inflicted with a trashy romance novel that felt like it was written by a Tumblr fanfic pseudo-intellectual.

    It's a a surprise to see such garbage on Starz! as this feels like it would be more at home on Lifetime.    … Expand
  60. amadeusamadeus
    Sep 14, 2014
    0
    HUGE disappointment they opened series with nakedness, don't know if they were trying to compete with game of thrones....o WHAT??? is a what went wrong on the casting. clair is suppose to have whiskey gold eyes. Jamie long unusally gold red amber hair. They cut it short as well az the height on the actor and put him in really scruffy clothes on the eve of hallows..I think I will justHUGE disappointment they opened series with nakedness, don't know if they were trying to compete with game of thrones....o WHAT??? is a what went wrong on the casting. clair is suppose to have whiskey gold eyes. Jamie long unusally gold red amber hair. They cut it short as well az the height on the actor and put him in really scruffy clothes on the eve of hallows..I think I will just re-read the book...… Expand
  61. JuliaGulia
    Aug 10, 2014
    1
    I have been a fan of this series for years. I've read the books at least three times around, so when I heard they were making a series I got really excited. However, that being said after I found out who had been cast I had very low expectations and was totally right about that instinct. I don't even know where to start. Sam Heughan (who plays Jamie), Graham McTavish (who plays Dougal) andI have been a fan of this series for years. I've read the books at least three times around, so when I heard they were making a series I got really excited. However, that being said after I found out who had been cast I had very low expectations and was totally right about that instinct. I don't even know where to start. Sam Heughan (who plays Jamie), Graham McTavish (who plays Dougal) and the rest of the Scottish rebels from 1743 give the only believable performances thus far, which makes sense because they are all mostly from Scotland. If I was going to be absolutely technical I'd say that Dougal is actually supposed to be a bit younger, with more hair and a handsome face. What is the most atrocious casting by far is Caitriona Balfe as Claire, who is the focal point of the whole story and who is supposed to be the strongest character. In the book Claire is 5"6, buxom, and feisty. She is supposed to have light brown hair and light brown eyes. I thought that because she was so far off from all of that being 5"10, stick thin,dark haired, green eyed and an Irish supermodel that she must be an excellent actress, but sadly that was not the case. Her performance was lackluster and failed to bring the character of Claire to life. Every time she said, "Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ," I cringed not from the use of the expletive, but because it sounded forced and unnatural. You can clearly hear the Irish roots in her voice, which half the time sounds very monotone and almost bored particularly in the narratives. The man chosen to play Frank and Jack Randall, Tobias Menzies was also another complete train wreck. Frank Randall is supposed to be delicately handsome in an almost feminine way, which is supposed to contrast with Jamie's obviously masculine and ruggedly handsome character. Tobias Menzies maybe a decent actor, but I'm sorry he definitely doesn't fit the bill in that way, and also the makeup job they did for his ancestor and counter part Black Jack Randall was so terrible that I laughed the first time I saw it, and every time afterwards. It looked like they just smudged a bunch of dirt on his face, in attempt to make him look more dashing and slightly different. (They did not succeed) And then there's the chemistry or should I say lack of chemistry between Claire and Frank, which they tried to counteract by adding unnecessary sex scenes. What makes the story so great is that the characters are so dimensional and tangible in the book. None of that came across in this first episode, it was unbelievable and felt flat. Despite their large budget the whole production had a cheap look and feel to it. Needless to say I was very disappointed, but will keep watching in the hopes that maybe Balfe will get better and everything else will get better. (I doubt it though)… Expand
  62. Gadoosh
    Sep 22, 2014
    5
    I loved this series of books and was so looking forward to seeing the TV version. The characters are well cast and the settings are authentic and believable. However, I am having a great deal of difficulty understanding the English characters with heavy Scottish accents. Very distracting! I tried watching it with CC but that too distracts me from the screen action. I'm very disappointedI loved this series of books and was so looking forward to seeing the TV version. The characters are well cast and the settings are authentic and believable. However, I am having a great deal of difficulty understanding the English characters with heavy Scottish accents. Very distracting! I tried watching it with CC but that too distracts me from the screen action. I'm very disappointed with the production for this reason and do not think I will continue to watch it.… Expand
  63. jrsgrandma
    Apr 21, 2015
    9
    One of the best adaptations of book source material ever. The first half of the season seemed slowly paced to get to know the characters and historical setting, but the second half has turned into a roller coaster of emotions. Perfect casting (and chemistry), great writing, costuming, and beautiful scenery. Kudos all around!
  64. jocelynflack
    May 19, 2015
    10
    This show is absolutely amazing! They did a fantastic job creating the book into a tv series. I am hooked! The actors and actresses do such a great job bringing the characters to life. I can't wait for season 2!
  65. harryajh
    May 31, 2015
    5
    starts off really good then descends in to episode after boring episode of male gay sex, really disappointing, hopefully episode 17 onwards gets it back on track - a real shame so far!
  66. evaravenwood
    Jun 18, 2016
    3
    The first season was wonderful. I never read the books, so I'm new to it, and probably won't read the books so I can have this one experience. This second season is just too repetitive. Claire does something stupid, unfitting for the times, the deceit goes on and on, Jamie has to save her, and it is getting quite boring. Not enough variety to these adventures anymore. I'm afraid theyThe first season was wonderful. I never read the books, so I'm new to it, and probably won't read the books so I can have this one experience. This second season is just too repetitive. Claire does something stupid, unfitting for the times, the deceit goes on and on, Jamie has to save her, and it is getting quite boring. Not enough variety to these adventures anymore. I'm afraid they are about to lose me. I don't even get excited about seeing it anymore. If I catch it okay, if not, okay. I will say I'm glad they are out of France. That was downright ridiculous! But now they are simply going for more shock factor (decapitations, rapes, silliness and on and on) and not enough solid writing. I don't know how these people had time to fight a war, with all the rapes going on! They are too busy being degenerates! Boring. Ho Hum . . .… Expand
  67. mudslynger
    Jul 4, 2016
    5
    Although I love Diana's writing and devoured the whole outlander series, I cannot watch it on T.V because of who they cast as Jamie. Jamie is EVERYTHING to the story and while I think they cast a fine actor in Sam Heugan, I do not think he comes close to being able to sustain the kind of charisma, strength, gregariousness, intensity and masculinity that the character is imbibed with; thatAlthough I love Diana's writing and devoured the whole outlander series, I cannot watch it on T.V because of who they cast as Jamie. Jamie is EVERYTHING to the story and while I think they cast a fine actor in Sam Heugan, I do not think he comes close to being able to sustain the kind of charisma, strength, gregariousness, intensity and masculinity that the character is imbibed with; that we as the reader have been knocked over the head with!. I'm sure they had a battle in casting but really....the part for Jamie is a total shame. The actor cast does not have exude the 'wise beyond his years' nor the command of a room. The books go on and on and on and on.....about Jamie's character and this actor doesn't have it. That brings me to your site, if Jamie doesn't have the content, surely they could have cast someone with the height and breadth of the man they describe!! Surely they could have invested a bit into colouring his hair!!! I mean if I read ONE more line about the various tones of red and the shocking swatch atop his tall standing crown! The Beauty department has the ability to, at least, give him that to work with since he appears only a bit taller than "Old Claire". I don't really mind "Old Claire" although I find her voice a bit grating....I would watch her but I think you have presented us with SO many better physical options for 'Jamie' that I am totally confused as to WHY on earth Diana Gabaldon would have allowed them to so miscast 'Jamie". So sad because some of the other cast is great and the Production Design is FANTASTIC as if the Wardrobe department. Period Drama is the most difficult and to then live up to this beloved series of books....well it was a tough task and it seems they have really tried by hiring some astute professionals. Too bad the most important element for the show, is for me, a deal breaker and an epic fail.… Expand
  68. bioid
    Jun 8, 2015
    7
    While it hasn't exactly met my expectations in a lot of aspects, it managed to surprise me in others. I never read the books, for the record.

    I didn't like the pacing - it felt as though there were a lot of idle moments and episodes could have been shorter. The abundance of sex scenes came across as unnecessary sometimes or even silly. I also failed to grow attached to most recurring    While it hasn't exactly met my expectations in a lot of aspects, it managed to surprise me in others. I never read the books, for the record.

    I didn't like the pacing - it felt as though there were a lot of idle moments and episodes could have been shorter. The abundance of sex scenes came across as unnecessary sometimes or even silly. I also failed to grow attached to most recurring characters, except for the two regulars Claire and Jamie; and even that took a fairly long time.

    Now on the positive experiences: I think the 3 main actors did a good job, if not consistently. The art direction and the costumes made the series very pleasing to watch, but what really impressed me was the atmospheric and sometimes even catchy soundtrack. I liked the grounded approach of the fantasy side of the story, even though I still want answers for the questions they raised. Additionally, the two final episodes were very powerful in my opinion, however hard it was to watch.

    Finally, I liked it and had a pretty good time watching. Would probably not re-watch anytime soon, though. 7.4/10    … Expand
  69. TheApplegnome
    Aug 2, 2016
    7
    Prepare for an accurate perspective on history. A more romantic & science fiction-ish journey into the earlier Scotland -- a voyage with a brand new take on love, attachment & the past.

    It’s based on the ‘Outlander series’ written by Diana Gabaldon, and strictly follows the books -- and doesn’t take any wild turns from its source material. It’s a beautifully directed show that’s highly    Prepare for an accurate perspective on history. A more romantic & science fiction-ish journey into the earlier Scotland -- a voyage with a brand new take on love, attachment & the past.

    It’s based on the ‘Outlander series’ written by Diana Gabaldon, and strictly follows the books -- and doesn’t take any wild turns from its source material. It’s a beautifully directed show that’s highly realistic due to its big focus on history and location shooting. History comes real and it feels like a totally different world. Characters come alive in this 1700s -- they give you this inside to how it was to live in this, to us -- strange world. Its vast focus on this is a major plus -- but can, for some, be its greatest “meh-factor”. The plot is interesting, got exciting revelations -- but it can be draggy. The plot takes its time to develop, but when it does it’s a great one! The characters do on the other hand not take long to feel attachment to. Just the realistic chemistry, extensive ardor and the splendid character depth. Wow! Add a never seen before antagonist and a love/hate relationship with the protagonist, just wow! Our main character Claire Randall is a wonder. Expositions are told in a fascinating way through her -- and the story firmly follows her, one step at a time. Yes; lack of plot development is a fact -- and on a personal level is this the show's greatest problem. But other than that; well -- it’s almost flawless.

    Overall personal rating for each episode: 72.8/100

    Personal rating: 73/100
    Critical rating: 90/100    … Expand
  70. vanhuizum
    Jul 4, 2016
    10
    I am not usually one for period pieces and yet this series has me captivated. Very intense in every aspect including romance that heats up the screen along with scenery of the beautiful country of Scotland that captivates your heart. The story line is always moving and exciting... truly a gem!
  71. rdoughan1287
    Jul 19, 2015
    9
    Just finished watching the first season of the show and I have to say, I really enjoyed it. At first, it seemed a little forced and the concept seemed a little weird to me, but after watching about 3-4 episodes I was hooked. Give the characters a chance to develop and you will really enjoy it too. I am also a big fan of game of thrones and i dare to compare captain jack randall to theJust finished watching the first season of the show and I have to say, I really enjoyed it. At first, it seemed a little forced and the concept seemed a little weird to me, but after watching about 3-4 episodes I was hooked. Give the characters a chance to develop and you will really enjoy it too. I am also a big fan of game of thrones and i dare to compare captain jack randall to the likes of ramsey bolton. I don't pick up a new show easily, but this one has made it on my list. Great show. Way to go Starz. MIGHT, just might, even pick up the books now!… Expand
  72. rockon
    May 23, 2021
    5
    It's historically ridiculous in many parts. The witchcraft business is nonsense. Because when the English and Scottish Parliaments united in 1707 they outlawed witchcraft trials.

    It's also incredibly redundant. They kept doing far-fetched things to put Claire (Caitriona Balfe) in danger. The "damsel in distress" thing was overdone way past the point of absurdity. I may be done with    It's historically ridiculous in many parts. The witchcraft business is nonsense. Because when the English and Scottish Parliaments united in 1707 they outlawed witchcraft trials.

    It's also incredibly redundant. They kept doing far-fetched things to put Claire (Caitriona Balfe) in danger. The "damsel in distress" thing was overdone way past the point of absurdity. I may be done with this thing after the first season. Because I'm sick of the "oh, she's danger, now she's captured, now she's rescued, rinse and repeat. I was wondering just how many times she was going to be taken prisoner by different people in the first season. I actually lost count. It was like five or six times. She's almost raped constantly, was even almost burned at the stake. It's ridiculous how much they overdo that. And why are they always, always traveling? Her husband probably tells 50 people "i have a price on my head." Why would anybody really with a price on his head keep telling people that? And wouldn't he might think about staying with the protection of his Laird instead of constantly traveling the countryside and dragging his wife along with a price on his head? She was also wanted by the British. There really is no logical or important reason for them to be traveling like that. It was completely insane. They rarely explain why they are always on the move like gypsies and why that is even necessary. But then, unnecessary and completely illogical travel was essential to the overdone "damsel in distress" nonsense.

    Claire's husband Jaime (Sam Heughan) gets some camera time and character development. But rarely does such a big production with a big cast revolve so dominantly around one actor as it does in this production. If I were other actors in this I'd wonder when I was finally going to get a line. Because if you use a stop watch, you might find that in all of Season One you can't go even 90 seconds without seeing Balfe's face close-up on the screen. She is absolutely dominant in scenes and dialog. So much so that it really prevents any other characters from being developed. If it doesn't work in a plot line directly involved with Balfe, they character doesn't get dialog or scenes. I can't remember anything I've ever watched like it. She's a scene hog, a dialog hog, and a camera hog. Was her husband directing or something? It reminds me of the kid in high school on the yearbook staff who was assigned to take candid photos of students for the yearbook. And every photo he submits is one of his girlfriend. She just doesn't put her face on the screen in every scene. She bares it all constantly. I think I saw her breasts twenty times in the first season. There's a ridiculous amount of obligatory sex. An unnecessary and excessive amount. You see Caitriana Balfe naked so much you can practically memorize every contour of her body and count the fine hairs on her behind. I've seen her hard nipples so many times i have their exact shape in my head. It's like they thought they were making soft porn.

    It is remarkable that they give this much face time on camera to a woman with such a limited range of expression. She's got only a couple looks. Her "mona lisa" look which is kind of solemn and mournful. She has that on about 80 per cent of the time. An unhappy scowl is another. You think if she smiles her face might break. Can't the lead character laugh in this thing? I don't remember her laughing once in the first season. She's just so glum. She doesn't even look happy when she's having sex. There's no humor to her, no joy in anything at all. Every time you look at Caitriona Balfe's face in this movie she looks like she's on her way to a funeral. Like she needs to be on anti-depressants or something. It's like they wanted the atmosphere of the thing to be sad and mournful. just as dismal as the Scottish weather. In this production I was relieved to see two actors exchanging dialog on the scene for 60 seconds without one of them being Caitriona Balfe. It's always a rare moment in the production. But refreshing nonetheless.    … Expand
  73. chiodo
    May 20, 2015
    10
    I enjoyed very much this season, dialogs well done, fascinating plot. There are just two "filling" episodes in the all season, which is good. No fantasy, no battles but it's ok for me. Something to watch after Game of Thrones.
  74. Tazcat2011
    Jul 5, 2016
    6
    I wanted to like this as the cast, photography and costuming is very good. I watched the first season and found the incessant "capture/torture/rescue" scenario to be way overused and quite off-putting. I was shocked to find that the source material was penned by a woman given how often rape is used as a plot device, and it happens A LOT. Also for a show/book series that is consideredI wanted to like this as the cast, photography and costuming is very good. I watched the first season and found the incessant "capture/torture/rescue" scenario to be way overused and quite off-putting. I was shocked to find that the source material was penned by a woman given how often rape is used as a plot device, and it happens A LOT. Also for a show/book series that is considered HISTORICAL FICTION it does a terrible job of it, it is really a romance story in a historical setting. The biggest sin was the witch trial which occurred 20 years too late in history and was only include because the author really wanted to have one in her novel. I get that this story is really just a "bodice ripper" romance and is squarely aimed at female audiences.

    I was curious as to how the story unfolded in subsequent novels so I read a detailed synopsis of each of them. I'm not going to spoil anything, but the direction this story takes is so weird and convoluted that I'm glad I have not become invested in it. Also with the big change that happens in book three it will be really odd to see how that is handled in a show where the main appeal is young attractive actors as the leads. I was also shocked to find that the fifth novel is 1300 pages long and fan consensus seemed to agree that not much happens to move the plot forward.

    As I stated prior the big appeal is Caitriona Balfe as Claire, she is very beautiful and quite talented but seeing her constantly being brutalized got to be a bit too much. The character of Jamie doesn't fare much better, every horrible thing that can happen to someone happens and will happen to him. It's a shame that the show writers didn't just take Diana Gabaldon's work and make it their own as there is a good premise underneath all the problems present in her novels.    … Expand
  75. Nicholash6321
    Sep 29, 2016
    10
    I did share many criticisms at first on the seemingly wooden characters and as Claire as just the epitome of feminism within changing environments, however as the series progressed, I was utterly enthralled at how Outlander managed to subvert my expectations and turn into a compelling, provocative, beautiful and sometimes downright dark masterpiece that although does not see to itself toI did share many criticisms at first on the seemingly wooden characters and as Claire as just the epitome of feminism within changing environments, however as the series progressed, I was utterly enthralled at how Outlander managed to subvert my expectations and turn into a compelling, provocative, beautiful and sometimes downright dark masterpiece that although does not see to itself to make a contemporary statement like so many viewers expect, it is damn entertaining.… Expand
  76. writingal
    Jun 21, 2016
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As many have noted, there's no one genre to which this fascinating, often terrifying, romantic and amazing story belongs which may, perhaps, be part of its charm. Who could have better guides for each week's journey than the clear-eyed, level-headed Clare and the brave and strong Jamie?
    Season 201's opening horrified me--the very idea that Clare should ever be with pudding-face (and Black Jack Randall face) Frank again instead of Jamie is too horrifying to bear. (I pray that is a dream or one possible future and Clare goes back through the stones...)
    The actors are so fine, they do justice to the writing and make the words their own--so it is impossible not to think of the actors as real. Wonderful show! And the only reason I subscribe to Starz.    … Expand
  77. Mominchgo
    Jul 16, 2015
    10
    Great adaptation of the great series. Spot on with casting, costumes, music, and settings. For true fans there are small differences in the TV series, but it is like LOR, the adaptation is brilliant. Romance, adventure, history, with a touch of science fiction, time travel. I wish this team of production would also do an adaptation of Connie Willis' Doomsday Book.
  78. imperialcj
    Aug 6, 2015
    10
    This is one of the best shows on TV. The actors, writing, costumes, adaptation, music_ I could go on and on. The chemistry between Jamie and Claire is even greater onscreen than in the book. I binge read the 10 books over a two month period.. I've ruined my eyes but I think it gave me an even greater appreciation for the series. The series provides a succinct portrayal of the bookThis is one of the best shows on TV. The actors, writing, costumes, adaptation, music_ I could go on and on. The chemistry between Jamie and Claire is even greater onscreen than in the book. I binge read the 10 books over a two month period.. I've ruined my eyes but I think it gave me an even greater appreciation for the series. The series provides a succinct portrayal of the book chapter by chapter.

    I am very pleased with the series and hope it continues for many of the books to come. I do take exception to some of the critics of the cast. It is a marvelous cast and pointing out body parts to criticize is ridiculous. I hope Catriona never sees these. She has a real woman's body, not implants and other fake parts. Did you ever see the real tears in her eyes and the realistic crying scenes? She is terrific.

    Sam is a dreamboat. He's beautiful, sexy, hunky, believable and a great actor. He rocks my socks off and I am an old lady. The other cast members are great as well.

    As I read the books I thought if I were going to try and portray the books ion the screen, which parts would I use? I think the writers have done a fantastic job. I can't wait to see Season 2.!!    … Expand
  79. smithy633
    Jan 4, 2016
    9
    I don't usually watch box sets but this one took my eye and I thought I would give it a go and boy was I hooked . I couldn't switch it off , great acting and lovely scenery and a brilliant story all in one series. Cant wait on series two HURRY HURRY HURRY
  80. Beholder1984
    Dec 15, 2017
    10
    I absolutely love Outlander. The story is amazing, the characters are well developed and the cast is fabulous. Outlander always keeps me on the edge of my seat. I can't wait for the next season. Hopefully they will continue to make Outlander after season 4 otherwise I would definitely have to start reading the books.
  81. Sheebs11
    Apr 3, 2016
    10
    I love love this show. I love that it is not rushed so it contains all the details the books do. I cannot wait for the new season to start. It's truly captivating and well produced. Cinematography is incredible. Sam Heughan is also incredible.
  82. grumo89fr
    Apr 7, 2016
    10
    l'intrigue et bien prenante, le casting très bien réussi et les acteur très bon, les décors donne envie de visité l'Ecosse. super série vivement la saison 2
  83. wudgee
    May 22, 2016
    10
    Amazing series. Casting is interesting and perfect and the acting fantastic. The characters are realistic and sometimes surprising. The storyline is really good and grips you. I watched series one on Amazon Prime UK in a marathon of TV viewing as I just had to see the next one, and watching series two week by week is painful. It's so refreshing to see a series like this instead of theAmazing series. Casting is interesting and perfect and the acting fantastic. The characters are realistic and sometimes surprising. The storyline is really good and grips you. I watched series one on Amazon Prime UK in a marathon of TV viewing as I just had to see the next one, and watching series two week by week is painful. It's so refreshing to see a series like this instead of the rubbish often on, I think it's the best thing on TV. The sex is dealt with beautifully, and you really get absorbed into the story. Jamie is gorgeous and other characters are so well-cast that you are fascinated by them, and there are nuances in their movements or acting, just the slightest thing, which really bring them to life and adds to their depth. I love this series and the fact it's based in Scotland. I love seeing the countryside and costumes and hearing the languages. There's something for everyone in these series. What can we say about Randall - ooh the bad, bad man.… Expand
  84. cfrees
    Jun 6, 2016
    10
    it's interesting to read other user reviews, particularly those who get upset because the source material's description of the character doesn't match the actor cast. Don't they know that it's irrelevant? Just because the book character has amber eyes, the fact that the actress doesn't hardly means that was bad casting. It's entirely not important.

    What makes Outlander a great show,    it's interesting to read other user reviews, particularly those who get upset because the source material's description of the character doesn't match the actor cast. Don't they know that it's irrelevant? Just because the book character has amber eyes, the fact that the actress doesn't hardly means that was bad casting. It's entirely not important.

    What makes Outlander a great show, after a full season and a half, is the way it looks at people and relationships and how they change over time. They handle tough issues like rape, and miscarriages with a delicacy not usually found in television. The show is building toward something. If you have patience, you will get a payoff. If you are not, well the show is better off without you.    … Expand
  85. MrsY
    Jan 4, 2017
    10
    I am always a bit scared to watch things based on books because not every adaptation is a good one. But I am in love with the series. They really chose the perfect cast and by that I mean not only the leading roles ( Sam Heughan & Caitriona Balfe) but also the actors and actresses with a smaller part. Another thing that I admire is that they're staying close to the books. No major changesI am always a bit scared to watch things based on books because not every adaptation is a good one. But I am in love with the series. They really chose the perfect cast and by that I mean not only the leading roles ( Sam Heughan & Caitriona Balfe) but also the actors and actresses with a smaller part. Another thing that I admire is that they're staying close to the books. No major changes which is amazing. I would recommend everyone to watch Outlander… Expand
  86. JayJoy
    Jan 14, 2017
    10
    By far one of the best shows I have ever watched. I enjoy this series so much! The books are amazing but this show just adds to it. Thank you Diana for this amazing show!
  87. Felindie
    Jul 15, 2019
    7
    I feel 'Outlander' has too much to offer, however first season came short. It's good though.
  88. All_ButTrU4
    Jan 3, 2022
    10
    Perfect. It takes it's time but is in no way slow. Relationships form realistically and the story is aware of it's time period. Adapted from Diana Gabon time travel romance epic ,brilliant performances all around.
  89. glomman
    May 12, 2020
    6
    I just watched the first season and I must realise that I don't think this is a very good series. I found myself often bored to hell, mainly because the interesting aspects of the series, like the time-travelling, are almost dropped immediately. Also, the characters are often bland and one-dimensional, making them less recognizable and less believable.

Awards & Rankings

56
#56 Best TV Season of 2014
16
#16 Most Discussed TV Season of 2014
20
#20 Most Shared TV Season of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 26 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 34
  3. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. The New Yorker
    Reviewed by: Emily Nussbaum
    Sep 9, 2014
    80
    The show is more than tit for tat: it’s sheer pleasure, no guilt allowed.
    Read full review
  2. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Lori Rackl
    Aug 19, 2014
    75
    Some episodes chug along faster than others, but the stellar production values render even the slower-paced installments worthwhile viewing.
    Read full review
  3. Philadelphia Inquirer
    Reviewed by: David Hiltbrand
    Aug 11, 2014
    80
    The show is wonderfully conceived and executed (if a little pokey pace-wise).
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »