• Network: PBS
  • Series Premiere Date: Jan 17, 2016
Season #: 2, 1
Metascore
61

Generally favorable reviews - based on 19 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 19
  2. Negative: 0 out of 19
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Ellen Gray
    Jan 21, 2016
    60
    Trying to do justice to the stories of abolitionists, freed slaves, Confederate sympathizers, wounded warriors, their harried healers, and history itself is probably a too-tall order for the six episodes PBS envisions as a first season. The series, though, isn't afraid to be entertaining, and it shouldn't have to be.
  2. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Jan 15, 2016
    58
    It’s fairly sturdy and convincingly gruesome in terms of showing a variety of battle wounds. It’s also predictable and oftentimes stilted, with the dialogue regularly preachy.
  3. Reviewed by: Joanne Ostrow
    Jan 27, 2016
    50
    Unfortunately the storytelling lacks subtlety. The good and evil characters are too starkly one or the other. The camera tends to flag ideas or objects in advance and make points too obviously.
  4. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Jan 15, 2016
    50
    Its writers aren’t working at the same level [as Downton Abbey] when it comes to turning a phrase or developing a more than one-dimensional character. And the tone, a kind of perky gravity that sits well on the early-20th-century British gentry, is a more awkward fit in a story set in the midst of a war over slavery.
  5. Reviewed by: Elisabeth Vincentelli
    Jan 15, 2016
    50
    Mercy Street hugs the middle of the road so steadfastly, it makes “Call the Midwife” look like something by David Lynch.
  6. Reviewed by: Noel Murray
    Jan 14, 2016
    50
    Mercy Street is mostly just mediocre, not awful. It’s busy enough--and has an unusual enough premise--not to be boring.... [But] The costumes get bloody; the characters stay bloodless.
  7. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Jan 13, 2016
    50
    The cast in fact is terrific. (It also includes Norbert Leo Butz, Peter Gerety and AnnaSophia Robb.) A cramped, airless setting is the critical flaw here. Nothing comes to life--words, drama or most of all, characters.
  8. TV Guide Magazine
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Jan 14, 2016
    40
    It's stubbornly bland, except in moments of primitive triage so graphic you may beg for mercy. [18-31 Jan 2016, p.15]
  9. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Jan 14, 2016
    40
    Mercy Street’s problem is an ineffable lack of cohesion and oomph. The blood is spilling, but the heart’s not pumping.
  10. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Jan 14, 2016
    40
    The characters are one-dimensional, so that you essentially know who they are within a minute or less, not least of all the spoiled-belle Confederate volunteer Emma Green (Hannah James), who’s straight outta “Gone With the Wind.” And the story lines about patients are didactic, there simply to provide the writers with EZ-to-read lessons about race, war, and medical progress.
User Score
6.1

Generally favorable reviews- based on 43 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 43
  2. Negative: 13 out of 43
  1. Jan 24, 2016
    2
    I couldn't have been more disappointed. As stunned as I was by the egregiously bad acting and unremitting use of every Civil War cliché theyI couldn't have been more disappointed. As stunned as I was by the egregiously bad acting and unremitting use of every Civil War cliché they could pack into the first episode, even more surprised am I that other reviewers think Mercy Street was any good. Costumes and photography are the only reason I didn't give this a 1. Question: Why did one sister have a southern belle accent and the other did not? Full Review »
  2. Jan 18, 2016
    3
    What a disappointment. Watching "Mercy Street" I felt as though I had fallen into a history/medical/social course 101. The acting is justWhat a disappointment. Watching "Mercy Street" I felt as though I had fallen into a history/medical/social course 101. The acting is just pedestrian as is the writing. Sadly disappointingly boring as I had looked forward to this period drama produced by PBS. I found nothing interesting in the premiere that would get me to watch episode 2. Full Review »
  3. Jan 19, 2016
    1
    My wife and I second shellview's review. This has to be the worst pbs series we have seen in years. Its like they had checklist to goMy wife and I second shellview's review. This has to be the worst pbs series we have seen in years. Its like they had checklist to go through with speeches perfectly placed at each strategic point. Wooden acting and dialogue. Hey my wife has been a nurse of 35 years and she was the first to give it a thumbs down. Full Review »