• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Nov 6, 2015
Season #: 3, 2, 1
User Score
8.3

Universal acclaim- based on 284 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 25 out of 284

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Aug 14, 2017
    6
    I really enjoyed the first season, it was fresh and recognisable. Although the characters are likeable, the show got boring. The Italian scenes are very stereotypical (kid in wifebeater shirt, you don't have to lock your bike, everyone eats pasta all day). The acting of his parents is painful to watch and the jokes aren't that funny. The show turned from awesome to meh.
  2. May 16, 2017
    5
    Season 1 of this series and only the first episode of season 2 were superb. I think season 2 story can be told in at most 2 episodes and it has lots of fillers. The love between beauty and the beast was very unconvincing. As I said earlier if the set was totally in italy, It would have made more sense. Full of emptiness, in summary.
  3. May 16, 2017
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Despite a strong start this season, in my opinion S2 just wasn't as memorable, lovable or endearing as the first season. First of all, it lacked cohesion. Nowhere was this more evident than 'New York, I Love You', a great episode it itself, it just didn't work with the season's arc. For me though, the biggest problem with this season was the relationship between Dev and Francesca. The two had wonderful platonic chemistry, but when things started to get more emotional, it lost me. In fact, it was cringe worthy at time. I just couldn't buy it. Dev and Rachel worked, and I totally bought them as a couple. Dev and Francesca was a stretch of the imagination. Expand
  4. May 13, 2017
    4
    I don't get the critic ratings. The show is dry, and the jokes fall flat. I didn't particularly enjoy season 1 mostly because the acting was absolutely horrible and it seems to plague season 2 as well. Starting off in Italy and showing the sights and foods was brilliant but once again it's undermined by terrible acting from mostly everyone apart from Aziz ( who plays himself). TheI don't get the critic ratings. The show is dry, and the jokes fall flat. I didn't particularly enjoy season 1 mostly because the acting was absolutely horrible and it seems to plague season 2 as well. Starting off in Italy and showing the sights and foods was brilliant but once again it's undermined by terrible acting from mostly everyone apart from Aziz ( who plays himself). The conversations among people feel robotic and it feels like a rehearsal that happened to be filmed. Expand
Metascore
91

Universal acclaim - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 24
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 24
  3. Negative: 0 out of 24
  1. Reviewed by: Emily VanDerWerff
    May 15, 2017
    100
    This might be the show of the year. ... Even the benefits of giving itself space to experiment, or of having those funny jokes, aren’t what makes Master of None’s second season as good as it is. What really makes it work is its endless faith in the idea that people will take care of each other in the end.
  2. Reviewed by: Joseph Hernandez
    May 15, 2017
    100
    A satisfying mix of hilarious characters, a dedication to social relevancy, heartbreaking and heart-mending storylines and a refreshing pursuit of creativity make Master of None season 2 one of the absolute best shows on Netflix or anywhere else for that matter.
  3. Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    May 12, 2017
    90
    Season two of Master of None is expanding its comprehension of what it can be, the depth of its many side characters and, most importantly, continuing to be unpredictable and true to itself.