Metascore
64

Generally favorable reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 14
  2. Negative: 0 out of 14

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Jan 22, 2016
    83
    The repetitive nature of the guys' dilemma--it's essentially "Gilligan's Island" as serialized cable drama--becomes even harder to ignore when watched all in a row.... Yet for all this, it's never boring. The four leads have terrific chemistry, and play the roles with energy that belie their characters' suburban complacency. And the show continually throws interesting guest actors at them.
  2. Reviewed by: Vicki Hyman
    Jan 22, 2016
    83
    [Mad Dogs] is perfect escapist fare--by turns funny, frank, and frightening, with terrific, color-saturated cinematography and a central foursome whose long history feels immediately palpable.
  3. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Jan 21, 2016
    80
    It moves along at a thriller’s pace, as the men’s troubles accumulate, and there are a lot of satisfying plot turns, blackly comic moments, and guest appearances along the way.
  4. Reviewed by: Brian Tallerico
    Jan 19, 2016
    80
    Ryan’s writing, collaborating with Cris Cole, is typically razor-sharp, but the real draw here is the cast, all of whom find ways to stand out in a show that’s very plot-driven. Neither do they blend together into one character nor feel like they’re trying too hard when they get their chance in the spotlight. And that subtle dynamic is really why the show work.
  5. Reviewed by: Sam Woolf
    Jan 18, 2016
    80
    It’s easy to think of Mad Dogs as of a piece with the blackly comic first seasons of Breaking Bad and Fargo, just with 9,000 square miles of tropical jungle on display instead of the Albuquerque desert or Minnesota ice. ... While Mad Dogs doesn’t quite have the precision plotting or bravado of the above-mentioned shows, what helps separate it from the pack is its willingness to be the first to laugh at its characters.
  6. Reviewed by: Emily VanDerWerff
    Jan 25, 2016
    70
    Mad Dogs, in other words, is trying something that's really complicated and ambitious and failing as often as it's succeeding. But in my book, you get at least a few points for effort. It might not be great television, but at least it's not content to do the same thing everybody else is.
  7. Reviewed by: Jonathan Dornbush
    Jan 19, 2016
    67
    Pacing issues abound, and the treatment of native Belizeans, particularly the women, can feel jarring. Yet the gorgeous landscapes, strong central performances and twists could make Dogs worth a binge. [22 Jan 2016, p.66]
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 62 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 46 out of 62
  2. Negative: 11 out of 62
  1. Jan 27, 2016
    10
    EXCELLENT show. I stumbled upon it, and I am so glad I did. The writing, the characterization, all of it came together in a really wellEXCELLENT show. I stumbled upon it, and I am so glad I did. The writing, the characterization, all of it came together in a really well written story. Twists and turns. Expect the unexpected with this one. A total ten!!! Full Review »
  2. Apr 15, 2016
    0
    At first I thought this series was going to be funny because of all the cast members and I was sort of hooked, but then, as the episodesAt first I thought this series was going to be funny because of all the cast members and I was sort of hooked, but then, as the episodes continued, to me, it got really stupid! Full Review »
  3. May 27, 2016
    0
    What a waste of talent and location. Suspense in episode 1 descends into repetitive and frankly boring farce.An utterly risible plot or lackWhat a waste of talent and location. Suspense in episode 1 descends into repetitive and frankly boring farce.An utterly risible plot or lack of it. A real disappointment after Netflix other triumphs like House of Cards Full Review »