Season #: 3, 2, 1
Metascore
66

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 21
  2. Negative: 0 out of 21
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Amy Glynn
    May 31, 2019
    91
    The script is, unsurprisingly, annunciation-grade, luminously funny and strikingly poignant—and considering the principal characters include angels, demons and witches, (and a tween Antichrist) it’s as human as they come. ... But as good as everything is, as good as everyone is, the locus of this translation’s magic is the to-perish-for chemistry between Michael Sheen’s angel Aziraphale and David Tennant’s demon Crowley.
  2. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    May 31, 2019
    80
    Diverting and mostly pleasurable. ... The BBC Studios production is studded with piquant performances by veteran actors, mostly British.
  3. Reviewed by: Nick Schager
    May 31, 2019
    80
    Gaiman manages the not-inconsiderable feat of capturing his narrative’s race-against-the-clock propulsion, all while making plenty of time for an overstuffed cast of characters and numerous detours, rewinds, asides and demented flights of fancy. Good Omens boasts an assured sense of tone from the very start. ... Good Omens wouldn’t soar without its two leads, who are so perfectly (mis)matched that they immediately elevate the series to must-see status.
  4. Reviewed by: Lorraine Ali
    May 31, 2019
    80
    The story itself falls apart and reassembles several times per each hour-long episode, but when viewed as a collection of clever sketches by master performers it’s a fun frolic — and with a cast of biblical proportions.
  5. Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    May 29, 2019
    80
    The end result is a feel-good romp and creative triumph that is easily digestible and never flags in search of entertainment.
  6. Reviewed by: Danette Chavez
    May 30, 2019
    75
    Good Omens soars when it focuses on the buddy comedy between Aziraphale and Crowley, who are tasked with keeping mortals on the straight and narrow and luring them away from it, respectively, neglect their duties, either by aiding the first couple cast out from Eden, or by partaking of the many wonderful things humans have created. ... It’s when the series looks elsewhere for its drama and humor that it starts to falter.
  7. Reviewed by: Aja Romano
    May 31, 2019
    70
    With Gaiman at the helm, and with an ample amount of time to do the book’s nuances justice, Good Omens succeeds much better than any recent Gaiman (or Pratchett) adaptation in memory. But we’re still ultimately left with a screenplay that faithfully emphasizes Good Omens’ plot rather than its profundities or literary flourishes.
  8. Reviewed by: Sophie Gilbert
    May 31, 2019
    70
    Good Omens is frivolous in tone to the point of being glib, while its recurring jokes recur so often that they run out their welcome (Crowley gets scenes scored to virtually every track in the Queen songbook, while Aziraphale’s story lines frequently feature his obsession with eating). What sets the series apart is the relationship between two polar opposites who end up realizing, as the best antagonists do, that they’re not that different after all.
  9. Reviewed by: Allison Shoemaker
    May 30, 2019
    70
    When Gaiman and Mackinnon return to those actors [Sheen and Tennant], the series becomes the compelling story of an unlikely friendship, a sort of undefined rom-com between two immortals with the end of the world as a quirky backdrop. That’s the “Good Omens” worth watching. The rest of it’s not bad—not world-ending, but not exactly heavenly, either.
  10. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    May 30, 2019
    70
    The Lord really does work in mysterious ways in Good Omens, which -- given the recent abundance of apocalyptic series -- is surprisingly good, and even when it lags, considerable fun.
  11. 70
    Even though the major pieces are there — Aziraphale, Crowley, Satan, God, apocalypse — the minor bits aren’t magical enough on their own. It doesn’t quite pull together as a great, glorious, goofy Almighty plan. But it is still fun, and stylish, and it has enough of the book’s original quirky spark to feel worthwhile.
User Score
7.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 73 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 60 out of 73
  2. Negative: 8 out of 73
  1. May 31, 2019
    10
    It was amazing, I haven't read the book, but after watching it I will! David Tennant was great! I wasn't expecting to hear Queen songs:)
  2. Jun 2, 2019
    5
    I'm disappointed. It comes off more like a cross of The Omen and Little Nicky. It's a bit silly for the topic, which makes sense if it wereI'm disappointed. It comes off more like a cross of The Omen and Little Nicky. It's a bit silly for the topic, which makes sense if it were poking fun at religion, but it's not. Full Review »
  3. Jun 1, 2019
    10
    A disclaimer first: Good Omens is my all time favorite book. The blend of Gaiman's dark lunacy and Pratchett's penchant for fanciful satireA disclaimer first: Good Omens is my all time favorite book. The blend of Gaiman's dark lunacy and Pratchett's penchant for fanciful satire blend into the best take on armageddon I've ever read (certainly better than that mushroom fueled madness of Revelations). So I was nervous about the TV version.

    Fortunately, they made the very wise decision to make this a six hour mini series rather than a two hour movie, which allows for the entire story to play out completely (along with some added framing mechanisms which serve the visual medium well).

    No spoilers here: just to say this is a wild ride, following different characters various narratives, using non linear narrative just as often as not, and allowing itself the liberty to be frivolous as well as profound throughout the journey. Hats off to Gaiman; Terry would be proud of your efforts.
    Full Review »