• Network: PBS
  • Series Premiere Date: Jun 4, 2016
Metascore
67

Generally favorable reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 4
  2. Negative: 0 out of 4
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    May 18, 2016
    83
    Genius can be gimmicky, while those eternal questions about time travel and alien life forms are ultimately beyond the power of TV (or sand piles) to answer. But the value of this series lies in the attempt, which is ambitious and edifying.
  2. Reviewed by: David Wiegand
    May 18, 2016
    75
    The six-part series not only makes science accessible, but it’s also fun to watch.
  3. Reviewed by: Brian P. Kelly
    May 18, 2016
    60
    One wishes that PBS had let the program’s grand ideas stand on their own, with Prof. Hawking as an optimistic guide; those looking to be wowed by the mysteries of the universe should search elsewhere.
  4. Entertainment Weekly
    Reviewed by: Melissa Maerz
    May 18, 2016
    50
    The pilot is a slog. ... Watching them drive around in a Back in the Future-style DeLorean is a cute way to illustrate how space-time works, but the lessons are basic high school physics. [20 May 2016, p.55]
User Score
5.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 5
  2. Negative: 2 out of 5
  1. Jun 17, 2016
    3
    Ithe was sorely disappointed in this series. I had expected that because Stephen Hawking was associated with it, it would be his take on theIthe was sorely disappointed in this series. I had expected that because Stephen Hawking was associated with it, it would be his take on the latest discoveries in physics and cosmology. Instead, it taught very basic information in a patronizing way, leaving me wondering if it was perhaps aimed at elementary school children. And it was patronizing ight from the introduction, where Hawking says he wanted to let "ordinary" people discover important principles of the universe. Excuse me.... "ordinary"? How does he define that?

    When one episode showed the group of "ordinary" people being presented with a racecar on a track, I thought, "Doppler red shift." And indeed, the big "discovery" these people made, the Doppler effect, took quite a bit of time on the show and was something I had learned about back when I took basic astronomy in college in 1967.In fact, I'm hard-pressed to think of one thing this show presented that I haven't already heard elsewhere. If this series was intended to spark a fascination with physics and astronomy, all I can say is Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" did it a LOT better, and without treating adults like idiots.

    I don't often doze off during a science show, but this one is a great fix for insomnia.
    Full Review »
  2. Jul 18, 2016
    10
    Promotes thinking. Fascinating content. Beautiful show.
    Well done and positive series for promoting science, mathematics and astronomy.
    Promotes thinking. Fascinating content. Beautiful show.
    Well done and positive series for promoting science, mathematics and astronomy.
    Stephen Hawking shares his genius.
    Full Review »
  3. Jun 29, 2016
    5
    So trivial - even master of physics like Stephen Hawking is speaking with his oracle like voice (I really love it!), it does not make itSo trivial - even master of physics like Stephen Hawking is speaking with his oracle like voice (I really love it!), it does not make it better. Waste of time mostly. Fun? Yes. Educating? Just a little. Full Review »