• Network: HULU
  • Series Premiere Date: Oct 13, 2021
Metascore
68

Generally favorable reviews - based on 25 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 25
  2. Negative: 0 out of 25
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Ed Cumming
    Nov 12, 2021
    100
    Given the size of its canvas, Dopesick is a remarkable achievement, which clearly lays out the facts of the slow-burning tragedy, with lots of helpful date reminders, without losing track of the human stories behind it.
  2. Reviewed by: Chris Vognar
    Oct 7, 2021
    100
    First-rate, often heroic television. ... When it stays true to its course, the series is urgent, even vital. Flaws of ambition are much preferable to pulling up short, and “Dopesick” never pulls up short.
  3. Reviewed by: Kristen Baldwin
    Oct 6, 2021
    91
    Dopesick (premiering October 13) deftly corrals the vast addiction epidemic through intimate, deeply engrossing stories of human devastation. Keaton is phenomenally poignant as Dr. Finnix. ... Dever adds another remarkable performance to her growing résumé as Betsy, whose descent into desperate addiction is almost too painful to watch.
  4. Reviewed by: Allison Keene
    Oct 6, 2021
    84
    For all its faults and lulls, I wanted to keep watching. Every reveal is damning and essential.
  5. Reviewed by: Benji Wilson
    Nov 12, 2021
    80
    At times Dopesick can feel similarly overwhelming. But it also feels important that these stories be told.
  6. Reviewed by: Boyd Hilton
    Nov 2, 2021
    80
    Based on early episodes, Dopesick is a (mostly) sober, compelling and clear dramatisation of one of the most shameful examples of big pharma wrongdoing in recent history, which will have you recoiling in fury.
  7. Reviewed by: Nick Allen
    Oct 13, 2021
    80
    It's a large credit to the show's writing, and its excellent performances, that "Dopesick" breaks away from its initial “and then this happened” type of plotting. These characters may have a part to play in the mechanics of this story, but they have more dimension than simply symbols, especially as the plotting (hour-long episodes) gives space for the story to be about everyone’s psychological pains and problems
  8. Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Oct 6, 2021
    80
    “Dopesick” feels urgent and immediate, and it moves forward with a propulsive energy.
  9. Reviewed by: Kelly Lawler
    Oct 13, 2021
    75
    The cast is excellent and empathetic, helping ground the series.
  10. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Oct 12, 2021
    75
    Scattered in places, in its totality it's an engrossing eight-part series, made more so by Purdue's bankruptcy proceedings and the Sackler family's efforts to avoid additional consequences.
  11. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Oct 14, 2021
    70
    It’s both understated and obvious. Given the subject matter, there will be some frustrating if not unpredictable outcomes, some of which are supplied by history. But there is a welcome lack of pounded tables, clenched jaws, throbbing temples and speechifying.
  12. Reviewed by: Sonia Saraiya
    Oct 14, 2021
    70
    Dopesick would be better if the story did not jump around so much in time. ... But as the characters reveal their struggles, Dopesick gets better and better, emphasizing how dwarfed each individual is by the massive power of Purdue.
  13. Reviewed by: Joel Keller
    Oct 13, 2021
    70
    Dopesick will certainly be a slow burn in spots. But it deals with a subject whose depth most people aren’t aware of, and the performances are so good that it should keep viewers interested.
  14. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Oct 11, 2021
    70
    Even if some elements of “Dopesick” feel too pat, the story as a whole is a worthwhile indictment of a government regulation system that allowed Purdue to operate for years with impunity, ruining the lives of thousands of Americans.
  15. Reviewed by: Danette Chavez
    Oct 18, 2021
    67
    Dopesick is not an easy watch, and despite its subject matter, it sometimes struggles to establish itself as a necessary one. But when it does choose substance over gimmicky style, you won’t be able to look away.
  16. Reviewed by: Richard Roeper
    Oct 11, 2021
    63
    This is an uneven series that is often quite good but feels like a missed opportunity to be something great.
  17. Reviewed by: Aaron Barnhart
    Oct 13, 2021
    61
    It verges at times on hokey melodrama. ... So, yes, I’m disappointed. But I'm recommending Dopesick anyway, because quite honestly I don’t think the show was designed for a viewer like me. ... Hulu has apparently decided that this adaptation of a nonfiction book should resemble a very long movie-of-the-week — but you know, a lot of people like to watch those.
  18. Reviewed by: Lucy Mangan
    Nov 12, 2021
    60
    The result is a series that is far more chaotic than it needs to be; the more familiar you already are with the Sackler story and the opioid crisis, the more you will get out of it, which is not the dramatic ideal. But the main points and the outrage are clear.
  19. Reviewed by: Jen Chaney
    Oct 14, 2021
    60
    While it bites off more than it can reasonably chew and can be a little heavy-handed at times, when the series breaks your heart, it really shatters it.
  20. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Oct 12, 2021
    60
    The story lines Strong and his fellow writers give their Appalachian everypeople are a mixed bag, sometimes skating along on addiction and recovery boiler plate that’s interchangeable with a thousand other dramas. But they’re generally watchable because of the bone-deep credibility of Dever’s and Keaton’s performances.
  21. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Oct 13, 2021
    58
    Committed turns from Keaton (always an excellent everyman) and Dever (who goes through the wringer) only get you so far, as Hulu’s valiant endeavor just keeps hammering home a point it made straight from the jump.
  22. Reviewed by: Tirhakah Love
    Oct 12, 2021
    50
    Dopesick struggles to feel like a persuasive narrative because its cop characters all feel as if they have to justify the chase. ... [Kaitlyn Dever’s] scenes, along with those of Stuhlbarg’s merciless Sackler, do showcase the show’s potential electricity, but the false narratives and overwrought justifications of the cop story at its center renders Dopesick a bit bland.
  23. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Oct 6, 2021
    50
    In isolated moments, the miniseries functions exactly as prescribed, offering a devastating portrait of how Purdue helped turn us into, as DEA agent Bridget Meyer (Rosario Dawson) puts it, “a pill-popping zombie nation.” More often, though, the drama’s emotional impact fades too quickly, and chief writer and producer Danny Strong (Empire) attempts to compensate by doubling the dosage.
  24. Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Oct 14, 2021
    40
    None of the characters' tales feel fully realized, or even complete, at the end of the seven episodes made available for review. Since Strong's script leans heavily on humanizing the toll this emergency is taking on every aspect of American life — save for the people profiting off it — that lack of substance ultimately defeats the story.
  25. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Oct 6, 2021
    40
    Despite powerful performances from Michael Keaton and several of his top-tier co-stars, Dopesick is a frustrating selection of questionable narrative choices and bizarrely bad performances from typically unimpeachable actors. It’s a muddled telling of an urgent story.
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 20 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 20
  2. Negative: 1 out of 20
  1. May 17, 2022
    9
    A fantastic limited series on the opiod epidemic in the US and the driving force behind it, Purdue Pharma. Lead by strong performances fromA fantastic limited series on the opiod epidemic in the US and the driving force behind it, Purdue Pharma. Lead by strong performances from it's lead actors this is well worth the time to watch. Full Review »
  2. Feb 17, 2022
    6
    (Mauro Lanari)
    Why a non-linear narrative? Perhaps to distinguish it from "Traffic" (Soderbergh 2000), from the 4th and final excellent season
    (Mauro Lanari)
    Why a non-linear narrative? Perhaps to distinguish it from "Traffic" (Soderbergh 2000), from the 4th and final excellent season of "Goliath", from the extraordinary "Kill the Messenger" directed in 2014 by the same Michael Cuesta who signed the 3rd and 4th episode of this "Dopesick"? Just to say that on the subject there were already illustrious precedents, but all affected by the similar flaw: the apology of quixoticism, the idea that it is better to win battles by losing the war rather than the opposite. A television miniseries that therefore exalts the "beautiful losers": better than nothing or not? If humans survive only by taking some kind of drug, there must be an explanation.
    Full Review »
  3. Nov 11, 2021
    9
    The two comments about wanting a documentary are lousy -- obviously there's a documentary on it. Feel free to read Empire of Pain for an evenThe two comments about wanting a documentary are lousy -- obviously there's a documentary on it. Feel free to read Empire of Pain for an even deeper dive.

    This is really well done. The only thing I would really argue with it is that it jumps in time a bit too much, and the voice on Richard Sackler is the most annoying voice I've heard. Like Dark Knight Bruce Wayne but 100x worse.

    Otherwise, great series, very engaging.
    Full Review »