Dancing With the Stars

:

Season 1
Season #: 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
5.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 17
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 17
  3. Negative: 7 out of 17
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. RogerSmith97
    Feb 20, 2011
    9
    Love This Show! Although It Seems Like Sometimes The "Stars" Are Not Really "Stars" I Think They Could Get Better Celb's On The Show... But Still A Good Show
  2. jeff_reviews
    Jul 5, 2013
    9
    Fun to watch, new challenges, and celebrities, bring this reality TV show to work well. "Dancing with the Stars" won't disappoint if you enjoy celebrities taking on new challenges.

Awards & Rankings

31
#31 Best TV Season of 2005
56
#56 Most Discussed TV Season of 2005
16
#16 Most Shared TV Season of 2005

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
61

Generally favorable reviews - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 9
  3. Negative: 0 out of 9
  1. San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa Times
    Reviewed by: Chuck Barney
    Jul 9, 2013
    40
    The stars (Trista Sutter, John O'Hurley and Joey McIntyre, et al.) are strictly marginal. The host (Tom Bergeron) is excruciatingly lame. And the dancing is only sporadically scintillating. [26 Jun 2005]
  2. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Gail Pennington
    Jul 9, 2013
    80
    It's just what TV viewers want in summer -- fun. [23 Jun 2005]
  3. The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
    Reviewed by: Andrew Ryan
    Jul 9, 2013
    80
    Maybe it's the heat, but it's difficult to imagine anyone disliking Dancing With the Stars, so far the most entertaining new series of TV's off-season. [22 Jun 2005]
See all critic reviews »