• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: May 11, 2016
Season #: 2, 1
Metascore
50

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 14
  2. Negative: 4 out of 14
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Tom Long
    May 27, 2016
    75
    Although this is certainly the most narcissistic talk show in memory, it depends wholly on whether you enjoy Chelsea or not.
  2. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    May 11, 2016
    70
    "I'm finally getting to do the exact kind of show that I've always wanted to do.... What that show is, I have no idea." An unkind commentator might be tempted to second that thought, given "Chelsea's" first-night, new-colt wobbles, but it's pointless to be too hard on any talk show on its premiere, even when the host has a long track record. ... Overall, it was an appealing debut.
  3. Reviewed by: Kevin Fallon
    May 12, 2016
    60
    It was overstuffed with some awkward introductions and anxiety over first impressions, and because of that sometimes a little boring. ... The premiere is often very fun, especially when Handler’s eye-roll-driven plain-talking sense of humor slips in off the cuff. (At one point she laughs directly into Pitbull’s face.) But it didn’t probe in the way we’ve been sold, and still expect from future episodes.
  4. Reviewed by: Melissa Maerz
    May 11, 2016
    58
    Even though she’s been given a get-out-of-jail-free pass from Netflix, Handler still chooses the same conventional structure that everyone else has. There are pre-recorded bits. There are interviews. Handler plays games with guests and stages silly moments meant to create memes.
  5. Reviewed by: Daniel D'Addario
    May 23, 2016
    50
    If Chelsea does anything new, it's the same new thing every show has been forced into, now that stars can skip talk shows and use social media to talk directly to fans.
  6. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    May 17, 2016
    50
    Through its first three episodes, Chelsea is a pretty straight-forward talk show with occasional sparks of interest and needless shadings of self-dismissal.
  7. Reviewed by: David Sims
    May 12, 2016
    50
    Chelsea may be off to a shaky start, but for those who want to wait for the show to find its feet before checking out some episodes, there should be an interesting backlog of segments in a few weeks. It might not exactly overhaul the late-night format, but few shows are in a better position to do so.
  8. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    May 11, 2016
    50
    There was no follow-up. There was no deeper layer. There was just an inexplicable musical guest, on stage talking over a few repeated chords rather than providing a full-out, artistic performance. Why? Well, "Chelsea" is still figuring that out.
  9. Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    May 11, 2016
    50
    Not that there’s anything wrong with talk, even if Chelsea wants to be seen as something different. Ms. Handler seemed more at ease chatting with her guests--and often interrupting them--than reading the show’s protesting-too-much mission statement.
  10. Reviewed by: Willa Paskin
    May 12, 2016
    40
    Based only on the sample size of two episodes, Chelsea is remarkably unviral. The first episodes have a couple of pretaped sketches that are varying degrees of bad. ... Handler has a lot of celebrity friends, but even her interviews with them were flat.
  11. Reviewed by: Robert Bianco
    May 17, 2016
    37
    Rather than humorously highlighting her attempts at education, the pre-taped bits that showed Handler learning about topics such as comic books and telenovelas came across as condescending at best and insulting at worst.
  12. Reviewed by: Michael Slezak
    May 17, 2016
    33
    Perhaps some day Chelsea will inspire a fascinating intellectual discussion about the perils of noisily promising something new on the late-night scene, then delivering the TV equivalent of an ancient burlap grocery sack: a good idea in its infancy, perhaps, but now on the brink of everything imminently falling out of the bottom with a messy splat.
  13. Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    May 12, 2016
    30
    Unless it gets sharper and funnier or begins to offer something more than a puffy celebrity hang, it’s hard to make the case that it’s a necessary addition to the talk-show scene.
  14. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    May 11, 2016
    30
    Handler has said she wanted to move away from the jokes she used to make on E!’s Chelsea Lately about banal celebrity culture, and so on Chelsea she makes banal political jokes about politicians.
User Score
5.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 44 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 22 out of 44
  2. Negative: 17 out of 44
  1. May 16, 2016
    0
    I gave it a try. I tried and i watched the first episode... then the second, thought it might get better and it just got worse. My opinion inI gave it a try. I tried and i watched the first episode... then the second, thought it might get better and it just got worse. My opinion in one word: TERRIBLE. Full Review »
  2. May 12, 2016
    3
    This show fails to live up to its hype. It's a complete mess! It's disappointing that Netflix would produce something with such bad qualityThis show fails to live up to its hype. It's a complete mess! It's disappointing that Netflix would produce something with such bad quality and content. Full Review »
  3. May 13, 2016
    0
    Not funny! I don't need to watch a celebrity shopping network show or a show on Netflix advertising for Netflix! Chelsea abandoned a workingNot funny! I don't need to watch a celebrity shopping network show or a show on Netflix advertising for Netflix! Chelsea abandoned a working platform for being generally ignorant and a sycophant. Guests being interviewed should be coherent and if not the host should be able to tell that it's not going well and adjust. Without smart writers it becomes quickly apparent how dumb Chelsea really is... Full Review »