WB | The WB | Release Date: October 7, 1998
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
62
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 27 Critic Reviews
Positive:
14
Mixed:
12
Negative:
1
Watch Now
Buy on
60
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJun 18, 2013
Season 1 Review: Doherty and Milano, together with some silly dialogue and plots, promise some good campy fun. The problems come whenever their third sibling, played by Holly Marie Combs ("Picket Fences"), is on screen. You see, Combs can actually act, and whenever she starts to emote, she gives the trashy proceedings a bit more reality than they can handle. [7 Oct 1998, p.39]
60
Orlando SentinelHal BoedekerJun 18, 2013
Season 1 Review: "The power of three will set us free," the sisters chant. They are good witches. They just aren't particularly interesting witches. Yet. [7 Oct 1998, p.E1]
60
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenJun 18, 2013
Season 1 Review: Charmed has none of the wit or intelligence that characterizes The WB's superior supernatural series, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," but "Charmed" is an OK drama for the post-"Sabrina" crowd. [7 Oct 1998, p.E-4]
60
New York Daily NewsDavid BianculliJun 17, 2013
Season 1 Review: As Buster Poindexter once sang, they're hot, hot, hot...If Charmed gets more savvy, scary and sexy as weeks go on and it's a good bet it will falling under its spell will be an easy thing to do. [7 Oct 1998, p.93]
50
USA TodayRobert BiancoJun 18, 2013
Season 1 Review: The combination of witchcraft fantasy with the female empowerment message may be enough to charm the show's target young-girl audience. The rest of us, however, should hold out for something a bit more bewitching. [7 Oct 1998, p.3D]
50
Dallas Morning NewsManuel MendozaJun 17, 2013
Season 1 Review: With the silly, overwrought Charmed, the network of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Dawson's Creek and Felicity is pushing its luck. [7 Oct 1998, p.1C]
50
Deseret NewsScott D. PierceJun 17, 2013
Season 1 Review: None of this will bother viewers who haven't seen "The Witches of Eastwick." And given that the movie was released in 1987 -- and that the WB's programming is aimed directly at teenagers -- chances are that the lack of originality in Charmed won't hurt the show's chances. [7 Oct 1998]
50
Detroit Free PressMike DuffyJun 17, 2013
Season 1 Review: Though Doherty's return to prime time is only occasionally bewitching, Charmed, on first encounter, isn't without promise. [7 Oct 1998, p.5G]
50
Chicago Sun-TimesPhil RosenthalJun 17, 2013
Season 1 Review: Spelling is infamous for launching shows that need at least a half-dozen episodes to find their footing, and this effort has plenty of room for improvement. It's not nearly as bewitching as it needs to be. [7 Oct 1998, p.53]
40
Cleveland Plain DealerTom FeranJun 18, 2013
Season 1 Review: Loaded with bogus-pokus, Charmed is less witty and diverting than "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Its soap and fantasy elements ought to attract some of the same audience, but it's not likely to put many under a spell. [7 Oct 1998, p.1E]
40
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertJun 17, 2013
Season 1 Review: It's "Party of Five" meets "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," but with less angst and pathos than the former and more adult pretension than the latter...As it is, "Charmed" is a pretty bland-tasting brew. [7 Oct 1998, p.C5]