- Network: FOX
- Series Premiere Date: Sep 13, 2005
Watch Now
Where To Watch
Critic Reviews
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Boreanaz and Deschanel stir good chemistry as a crime-fighting duo.
-
Bones isn't the riskiest or most ambitious series coming your way this season. But it may turn out to be one of the most satisfying and entertaining.
-
The show's witty, inventive writing would be fun even in the hands of a less capable cast.
-
You might think you can't possibly fit one more crime-solving procedural onto an overcrowded calendar, but consider giving Bones a break.
-
Besides the nifty, repressed romantic dynamic between Brennan and Booth, "Bones" has some fun with snazzy hologram visualizations of the murder victims in each case.
-
Like CSI and its offshoots, Bones will take viewers to dark and sometimes disgusting places. So, in one sense, Fox may have come up with a format that will reach both men, who love unappetizing scenes, and women, because of the female heroine.
-
Emily Deschanel is well cast as Brennan--she has the right sort of drained, remote presence, as if still working off last night's sleeping pill--and she's also well cast against David Boreanaz. [19 Sep 2005, p.45]
-
Deschanel, who's believable either serious or perplexed -- and adorable in her quirkiness -- immediately becomes this series' most important ingredient.
-
An engaging crime show that borrows plenty from the ''CSI" franchise but adds a layer of light character drama.
-
While "Bones" has too much "X-Files" and "CSI" going in the pilot to feel completely original, it's nonetheless a taut, well-constructed, character-rich procedural with genuine potential.
-
As science and as detection, Bones has a way to go before it's more than a bug in Grissom's Vegas eye. But the screwball romance is promising.
-
If Bones holds up, it'll be because that old Sam-and-Diane, Maddie-and-David, Mulder-and-Scully opposites-attract stuff never feels standard when it's done right.
-
In tonight's premiere of "Bones," for example, super-sleuth Temperance concludes from the young victim's bones that she was probably a tennis player -- a nifty conclusion, but one that has no bearing on the case. It's a factoid that leads nowhere, which is kind of where "Bones" goes in its premiere episode.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 211 out of 294
-
Mixed: 20 out of 294
-
Negative: 63 out of 294
-
ToyBAug 28, 2006The character dynamics hook audiences, the dark humor appeals, the cases are well-thought out, and the acting is superb on all aspects.
-
MargoBAug 28, 2006
-
Feb 14, 2013This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.