Bill Nye Saves the World

:

Season 1
  • Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Apr 21, 2017
Season #: 3, 2, 1
User Score
1.7

Overwhelming dislike- based on 215 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 215
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 215
  3. Negative: 177 out of 215

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. rogkaleb
    Apr 27, 2017
    10
    This show is good. While, as other people have mentioned, the tone is a bit confused, I think it will really take off once they make get to know their audience.
  2. cmgriggs
    May 14, 2017
    10
    This series is fantastic. It throws back to when i was growing up learning about random things every day. And Bill Nye the Science Guy will forever be the person that did that for me. Watch it with a light heart and an open mind and you might learn a thing or two. I hope this show keeps running, I think it is important
  3. jackwright07
    May 17, 2017
    10
    The reviews left about this show are disappointing. I am currently in the pre-med field and can tell you that although the show is awkward and misguided in its approaches to present its science related information, the information presented is quite factual. Wether regarding fad diets, or alternative medicines, the man is providing information to all with sound evidence as to why theseThe reviews left about this show are disappointing. I am currently in the pre-med field and can tell you that although the show is awkward and misguided in its approaches to present its science related information, the information presented is quite factual. Wether regarding fad diets, or alternative medicines, the man is providing information to all with sound evidence as to why these alternative ideas are in fact wrong. Peoples own cognitive bias has made them feel attacked by Bill's show which is simply an attempt at debunking the crazy ideas they believed to be true in the first place. We should not be hating this man for telling us what we need to hear, we should be thanking him. Thank you Bill.… Expand
  4. ClariseSamuels
    Apr 25, 2017
    7
    The first episode appears to be the weakest. Although Nye's concerns about climate change are 100% valid and he is passionate about saving the planet, the scriptwriters for Episode 1 were a bit incoherent. Either that or Nye is ad-libbing, which is not recommended because he's not that good at it. It's been almost 20 years since Bill Nye the Science Guy ended, and Nye is still zany,The first episode appears to be the weakest. Although Nye's concerns about climate change are 100% valid and he is passionate about saving the planet, the scriptwriters for Episode 1 were a bit incoherent. Either that or Nye is ad-libbing, which is not recommended because he's not that good at it. It's been almost 20 years since Bill Nye the Science Guy ended, and Nye is still zany, energetic, and over the top with enthusiasm about science and science education. This series is for adults and not children, but for better or worse, when it comes to science education, children are the priority. As a great fan of science museums, I've had to cross a number of favorite museums off my list since my kids grew up. And of those science museums that try to target adults for at least half of their exhibits, the best they can achieve is high-school level. However, if you didn't major in science, high-school level exhibits can be beneficial to many non-scientific adults.

    Nye is apparently aiming for that same high-school level science education that we find in museums. However, his high spirits may be his undoing because sometimes he's all over the set in a manner that is blithely hyperactive. Episode 2 focuses on alternative medicine, and outside of Nye's frenetic demonstration of how clinical trials work, the second episode was more purposeful and elucidative. If this improvement continues, the series shows real promise.    … Expand
  5. thanatopsis
    May 12, 2017
    7
    This is not a great show. The tone and presentation are off. The jokes fall flat. It says it is aimed at adults, but Nye acts as if he is talking to children.
    But this is far from a terrible show. This is not a science show; He is not called "the science guy."
    This is a show about important topics: global warming, gender spectrum, etc. Each show is under 30 minutes. If you are one of the    This is not a great show. The tone and presentation are off. The jokes fall flat. It says it is aimed at adults, but Nye acts as if he is talking to children.
    But this is far from a terrible show. This is not a science show; He is not called "the science guy."
    This is a show about important topics: global warming, gender spectrum, etc. Each show is under 30 minutes. If you are one of the people complaining there is no science or sources, use the Internet. Try doing a search. You watched it on Netflix. Surely you know how to use a search engine.
    I think this show is good for the 11-14 year range. The talking heads might bore some of them, but the information presented might make them better people.
    Again, this is not a great show, but people are giving it 0 or 1 stars for the same reason the United States has Trump for president. This review is going to get a lot of negative reviews for the same reason. Oh well. It is time for the human race to die off anyway.    … Expand
  6. KimSilverman
    Jun 11, 2017
    7
    This series boldly addresses deep and important contemporary issues, from the perspective of science. Already it therefore deserves a high score from me. Unfortunately it doesn't go into enough depth There is some science there, but one segment always disappoints me. For each topic Bill interviews a panel of 3 knowledgeable people with interesting alternative views, but he keepsThis series boldly addresses deep and important contemporary issues, from the perspective of science. Already it therefore deserves a high score from me. Unfortunately it doesn't go into enough depth There is some science there, but one segment always disappoints me. For each topic Bill interviews a panel of 3 knowledgeable people with interesting alternative views, but he keeps interrupting them and never lets them complete a thought or deal with the topic.… Expand
  7. WhiskeyStories
    Jun 8, 2017
    4
    A horribly and awkwardly written show that has some progressive ideas. The whole show really does feel like a commercial or propaganda (even if it is for a good cause), everything feels forced, fabricated and does not have a natural flow. Bill Nye and some of his hosts go from genuinely entertaining and thought-provoking to cringe inducing, condescending and at times patronizing. I can'tA horribly and awkwardly written show that has some progressive ideas. The whole show really does feel like a commercial or propaganda (even if it is for a good cause), everything feels forced, fabricated and does not have a natural flow. Bill Nye and some of his hosts go from genuinely entertaining and thought-provoking to cringe inducing, condescending and at times patronizing. I can't fathom who is this shows audience: it's not for kids, it's not really for adults, my only guess is the aim audience is tweens or teens maybe, because of the way the show desperately tries to be hip and relevant, but in reality it isn't, at all. I'm just puzzled by it. So overall, I think the show has its heart in the right place, but if they plan to continue they seriously need to make some changes and get better writers, or just let Bill do his thing. It's not the worst thing ever, if you don't agree with the shows opinions and stances you shouldn't automatically write it down as a piece of sh!t. There's some good potential in here, but it's just buried deep deep deep down, under the studio execs horribly out of date decisions to the 30-40 year old writers trying to appeal to teen audiences and failing at it and the sad fact that Bill Nye feels like he just doesn't want to be there. I'd give this show an optimistic and very faint 4/10.… Expand
  8. Sveinbjorn
    May 1, 2017
    4
    I found it condescending and uninformative. I'm very science-minded, but I do empathise with the poor souls that are not. You're not gonna get to them with this, and this isn't very entertaining to science minded people except those that need their opinions affirmed in a very self-congratulatory manner. I bowed out after 2 shows, maybe it gets better as the series progresses.
  9. Franky64
    May 4, 2017
    4
    After the first two episodes, the new Bill Nye show has left a bad taste in my mouth.
    It's not because it's some sjw propaganda, it's just simply bad.
    The writing is completely unfunny. Bill feels unnatural, as though they told him he has to tone up his persona up to 11 to keep peoples interest, because they're afraid of a learning show turning people away. They're trying so hard to be    After the first two episodes, the new Bill Nye show has left a bad taste in my mouth.
    It's not because it's some sjw propaganda, it's just simply bad.
    The writing is completely unfunny. Bill feels unnatural, as though they told him he has to tone up his persona up to 11 to keep peoples interest, because they're afraid of a learning show turning people away. They're trying so hard to be loud and colorful with little substance.
    As a millennial, the show feels so pandering to the point of insult.
    The original Bill Nye never felt so fake and contrived, maybe because the educational content made it attractive to schools, while now they're trying to sell to young people, so they think it has to be wacky/over the top.
    And the thing is... we young people already accept science. Echo chambers don't "save the world", they just make Netflix more money.    … Expand
  10. lexgamer
    Apr 24, 2017
    3
    Bill presents scientific fact in this show, not opinions. It's sad to see that many people take it as "opinions", and even sadder that the tone of show is very, "OMG people, these are the facts." The result is a show that feels very cult like, if you are in his same mind set, you just nod in agreement accomplishing nothing of value, and if not, it's just insulting and will make you angryBill presents scientific fact in this show, not opinions. It's sad to see that many people take it as "opinions", and even sadder that the tone of show is very, "OMG people, these are the facts." The result is a show that feels very cult like, if you are in his same mind set, you just nod in agreement accomplishing nothing of value, and if not, it's just insulting and will make you angry and not watch it, so who is this show for? I was afraid when I first heard the title that it would be too preachy, and unfortunately it is. This show is Batman; It's not the show we deserve, but it's the one we need.… Expand
  11. Visko
    May 6, 2017
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Let me start off by saying, I watched the entire series through before coming to say something about it, just in case. It didn't really get much better as an informative show, and continuously remained cringe-worthy through various segments in each episode (What was that song about mars potentially seeding earth all about? Why was it on the show even? Did I miss something there?)

    Each episode had a topic that it focused on, but the format in which it's presented didn't seem to give enough time or information on any of the subjects to make anything he's trying to say convincing. Even to me, someone who's on his side. You can watch an entire episode and wonder if you actually learned anything at all that didn't sound like it was something you could "learn" from a comment in a YouTube video. As in, it was just presented horribly, unconvincing and rather childish or ridiculous sometimes.

    The celebrity guests were completely unnecessary each and every time. For example: In Episode 10 "Save the World... with Space!" They invite a new Clippers (basketball) member onto the show to merely introduce himself as being new to the Clippers team, then proceed to show a kid dunk a ball in a fashion similar to what you might experience on the moon (without even suggesting or stating that's what we're looking at) and then end the show immediately right there by playing the theme song and we just watch them shoot baskets. What the hell was the point of that???? The topic of that episode was about the importance of space exploration by the way... I think? Why did they waste the time on the show to do this? What value is this to science, or anyone?

    The panels were another aspect that under normal circumstances (by which I mean, giving perhaps a full 30 minutes of discussion at least) might spark up some interesting discussion or have time to present something actually worth watching. Instead we get only a few minutes of people trying to have a discussion, but being repeatedly cut off by one another before the segment suddenly ends with little to nothing of value being shared with the audience.

    As far as abuse in the show goes... In Episode 11 "Malarky" (an episode on Pseudoscience and Confirmation Bias) we get a full 9 minutes of 3 different individuals voicing their opinions on the topic. But what was interesting is who was on this panel of "experts" as he always calls it (which I've come to assume is a joke of some kind). We have Professor of Health & Law Policy at the University of Alberta, Timothy Caufield, an Astrologist of Ebony Magazine from New York, Sam Reynolds, and a "Professional Skeptic" (What's that?) and Journalist/Radio Host, Jamila Bey. To put it simply, I wasn't impressed with the way they all attacked the Astrologer and undermined everything he had to say. For the record, once again I'm on Bill's side in thinking Astrology is complete BS, but I would at least have the courtesy to hear him out and attempt to reason or understand his point of view. His point of view was that "It's not Science, it's not Psuedoscience, but that it's instead Art and Entertainment" (which when I tried to consider the "art" side of it, I remained skeptical but curious of what he might try to claim). On the "Entertainment" side of it I could actually agree and say "Okay, we have all types of fiction as entertainment. Fair enough, as long as we can admit that." AS HE JUST DID. Yet they continue to lightly verbally assault him as if everything he does is actually harming the world. I don't see how you can blame a fiction writer for someone who ends up believing it's non-fiction, but okay. Now it could very well be that THIS astrologer is not like every astrologer, and you get that sense when Bill starts making claims of what Astrology is and then Sam responds with "No, that's not really what I do." But then they continue acting and talking about it as if everything Bill was saying was in fact true and nothing of what Sam was trying to claim mattered. There wasn't even a mere mention that maybe different Astrologists are different, and that maybe some are more dangerous than others. That's just **** discussion and debate and something I expect from Politicians, not Scientists. I got the sense that different people have different understandings and interest in Astrology, and instead of trying to understand that, Bill remained Closed-minded and refused to even discuss it. That's anti-science to me, and was very disappointing to watch. (To be fair though, when Sam was talking I had a difficult time understanding what he was trying to say... "Marriage of Math and Myth..." Hm.. what?) That episode was very hypocritical, ironically.

    Overall, the show doesn't seem to understand how to present information intelligently and in a manner to get people interested. Doesn't present any facts, but instead a series of claims and probably does more to hurt science literacy than to help it.    … Expand
  12. connorlukebyrne
    Apr 25, 2017
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Though some of the correspondents reports are informative, and the demonstrations can be fun at time, Bill Nye saves the World comes across as extremely over-simplified and dull. The show lacks any real scientific data or information. I was glad to see when they would bring on panelists who disagree with bill, but these people were always shouted over and insulted. I was very disappointed to see this, even though i always agreed with Bill, as i don't believe that the scientific community should should act so childishly towards opposing opinions (Even if they are most likely wrong). Instead i believe that these opinions should be voiced, considered, and debated with sourced facts to determine who is truly correct.
    I lost interest when one of the writers came on to perform an awkward and unfunny stand-up routine where he spoke down to entire demographics of people, saying that groups of people are gullible and responsible for bad science based on their race.
    For a far superior show with a similar format, i would recommend; Dara O'Briens Science Club, which contains much stronger facts, on more interesting topics, sprinkled with much funnier humor.    … Expand
  13. Rabidprimate
    Apr 24, 2017
    2
    I don't know what i was expecting but it wasn't this. Its not Bill's fault the science parts are fine but man there are some cringe inducing skits, few laughs, and too much political preaching. If your one of the choir you might find enjoyment from this show. If you were looking for something to induce your childhood nostalgia science itch your better off rewatching Beakmans World.
  14. Muramas
    May 4, 2017
    2
    Bill Nye saves the world is so hard to watch...He tries so hard to be "cool" with his laugh track, silly over the top acting, the rap singers, etc. I like what he talks about but he does it in such a painful way.
  15. ooberscooter
    Apr 26, 2017
    2
    This show is just Bill yelling at you... The topics are important but I felt like I was being lectured rather than entertained. The show seems incoherent and thrown together. Watched 2 episodes but can't stand to watch anymore.
  16. CapnConundrum
    May 11, 2017
    2
    Speaking as a social scientist, I really wish people would get their facts straight about gender fluidity. I have no problem with people doing/being whatever the hell they want, but this show is supposed to be about FACTS! This theory is 100% based on the postmodernity of Michel Foucault, who was expressly anti-science, and spoke at length of confirmation biases. The very idea of genderSpeaking as a social scientist, I really wish people would get their facts straight about gender fluidity. I have no problem with people doing/being whatever the hell they want, but this show is supposed to be about FACTS! This theory is 100% based on the postmodernity of Michel Foucault, who was expressly anti-science, and spoke at length of confirmation biases. The very idea of gender fluidity is based on the notion that scientific knowledge (of gender in this case) is inherently wrong because it's derived from a particular society (in the case of this theory, created Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, a self-professed man-hating lesbian--who made a career out of convincing herself she'd found homoerotic subplots in Charles Dickens novels--the "capitalist patriarchy"). This is not only pseudo-science. Postmodern sociological theory is expressly and deliberately ANTI science! And the science guy just jumped on the bandwagon! I was a fan of his. I watched this aghast, marvelling at his ignorance. I'd love for him to come to a debate at the University of London and talk about postmodern gender theory. We'd rip him to shreds. There are actually interesting nuggets he could have shared about physiological and neurological plasticity, not that those would have proved his points, but he didn't even go there. He was just being a shameless ideologue. Well, f*** him.… Expand
  17. SUPERswagLordxD
    Apr 23, 2017
    2
    Even though I agree with many of the opinions Bill Nye imposes on this show, I still find it cringe worthy. Although it seems that they were trying to do something different then the original show, its still noticeable that this new show lacks the charm and charisma the old Bill had. Also, in terms of actual "science", the topics generally seem to be tangently related, and instead seemEven though I agree with many of the opinions Bill Nye imposes on this show, I still find it cringe worthy. Although it seems that they were trying to do something different then the original show, its still noticeable that this new show lacks the charm and charisma the old Bill had. Also, in terms of actual "science", the topics generally seem to be tangently related, and instead seem like political mouthpieces for Bill. Now like I said I agree with many of the things he's saying, I just don't this this is the place for it. On the topics Bill speaks on, there are rarely experts. Also, the presentation of the show is pretty mediocre. Tyler the Creator of Odd Future did the Theme Song, but passed that the presentation lacks any personality. There is almost no reason to watch this show: Any competent adult, which by the way is the target demographic, could do their own research on these topics and formulate their own opinions. The only reason I would watch this show is if I was a Bill Nye fanatic, and even then I would be prepared to be disappointing. 2/10… Expand
  18. science555
    Dec 29, 2017
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Watched the first episode and if this guy called the Frisbee game anything other than garbage entertainment to express his opinion he is a con-artist. Nothing scientific about that garbage. Angers mean when someone says this is "science" to express their opinion. Too angry to write coherently.… Expand
  19. GlenGames
    Apr 27, 2017
    1
    A lot of other reviewers hit this on the head. There's so much wrong with this show it's hard to know where to start. To start with it feels like a bastardized version of Bill Nye. The live/stage format of the show is no good. The guests are vapid b-list instagram celebrities. The show has little to no actual content! There's an episode about how SJW are correct about all the differentA lot of other reviewers hit this on the head. There's so much wrong with this show it's hard to know where to start. To start with it feels like a bastardized version of Bill Nye. The live/stage format of the show is no good. The guests are vapid b-list instagram celebrities. The show has little to no actual content! There's an episode about how SJW are correct about all the different genders; I could have lived without hearing Bill Nye say pansexual in a serious way.… Expand
  20. SandraC3
    Apr 23, 2017
    1
    If you're looking for science, comedy, and some nostalgia, look somewhere else. The comedy is stale and pretty cringey at times, the science is simply not there and it wont remind you at all of Bill Nye you used to know.
  21. pinkirishgoatz
    Apr 24, 2017
    1
    No data. No demonstrations. No science. This show tries so hard to pander to an image of young people as imagined by 60 year old rich men. Bill is just downright mean and bitter, and all of the humor falls incredibly flat. Imagine "Real Time with Bill Maher," except less funny, less in depth, more pandering, and more elitist and mean. As a fan of the original Science Guy, I am so disappointed.
  22. Smokeydefcon
    Apr 25, 2017
    1
    I was very disappointed by this show. As a fan of Bill Nye's "Science Guy" show growing up, I felt that Bill Nye's enthusiasm is good for science, and I had hoped that with his "Saves the World" show he would focus on real, rigorous science. As he is a scientist, I am disappointed that this show seems more to be about spreading his agenda than it does proving it. His science experiments aI was very disappointed by this show. As a fan of Bill Nye's "Science Guy" show growing up, I felt that Bill Nye's enthusiasm is good for science, and I had hoped that with his "Saves the World" show he would focus on real, rigorous science. As he is a scientist, I am disappointed that this show seems more to be about spreading his agenda than it does proving it. His science experiments a very small part of the show and are used to circumstantially provide evidence of his own agenda.

    He often has panelists on his show, some of which have view points supportive of his own, and some of which have view points divisive from his own; the problem is that the panelist segment of his show lasts about 5 minutes, and consists mostly of his supportive panelists mocking and shouting over the ones with differing opinions. It comes off as less of a scientific debate, and more of a deliberate undermining of those panelists beliefs without any scientific facts or arguments made to back it up. Don't tell me he's wrong because "science". Tell me what the science is! It feels almost more like a Bill O'Reilly show than a scientific panel, which is exceptionally disappointing.

    Sadly, the scientists on this show come off as just as clueless as those they're trying to debunk. This show is a dumbed down version of the kids show, with way more vitriol. Those who want to watch a show in order to feel justified in their own beliefs might enjoy this, but only if they don't care about the science behind it. I invite all others to come to their own conclusions, but this negative one is the one I gained.

    I'm giving it a rating of 1/10. It gained that point because there is at least a modicum of science in it. Maybe it'll make someone curious about actual science.    … Expand
  23. TriBear
    Apr 27, 2017
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I Squee'd With Joy...Then Wept With Disappointment

    Pro
    - You will learn things from this show. The Mose Project, greenhouse gasses, etc.
    Con
    - Bill absolutely, totally, and completely squashes, vilifies, and mocks any opinion or argument not aligned with his beliefs.

    I just re-watched the episode about alternative medicine. The gentleman on the show who dared to defend alternative treatments was interrupted mid-sentence, mocked, and dismissed.
    While I don't agree with much of alternative medicines, I found the show's approach to his alternative opinion vile.
    In the middle of trying to explain the basics of the spectrum of sound he was cutoff. When trying to defend the idea of healing crystals Bill himself mocked him in a comic voice.

    Needless to say, I AM REALLY DISAPPOINTED! I really did love Bill Nye. Oh well, at least I still have Neil deGrasse Tyson.    … Expand
  24. necoates
    May 3, 2017
    1
    Couldn't get through the first episode, whatever your stance on "Global Warming" Mr science omits mentioning the small facts that humans exhale CO2 and in turn plants breath it, I would say that is something scientifically interesting. Also in the clip on the tides threatening Venice they conveniently omit mentioning that the city is built on an unstable foundation and this is at leastCouldn't get through the first episode, whatever your stance on "Global Warming" Mr science omits mentioning the small facts that humans exhale CO2 and in turn plants breath it, I would say that is something scientifically interesting. Also in the clip on the tides threatening Venice they conveniently omit mentioning that the city is built on an unstable foundation and this is at least partly to blame for the rising water levels entering the shops.

    This seems far from rigorous science and more about omitting anything that doesn't play 100% with the narrative.    … Expand
  25. critopenmind
    May 5, 2017
    1
    Incredibly disappointing. I love learning, have no problem with cheesiness, and agree with Bill's views. I thought it would be fun and educational. There are some good points but Bill and some panelists and correspondents are dismissive and close minded instead of demonstrating real inquiry. This is why some conservatives consider science-oriented people as smug. They are not going to saveIncredibly disappointing. I love learning, have no problem with cheesiness, and agree with Bill's views. I thought it would be fun and educational. There are some good points but Bill and some panelists and correspondents are dismissive and close minded instead of demonstrating real inquiry. This is why some conservatives consider science-oriented people as smug. They are not going to save anyone by stroking the egos of those that are already informed. Sigh. The gender imbalance was the first thing to bother me, but there are more problems. There are nice segments that almost make it seem worth watching but I just can't anymore.… Expand
  26. CoagulatedMilk
    May 15, 2017
    1
    As many have already stated and as someone who grew up with Bill Nye as the Science Guy, I, too, am very disappointed at the lack of actual science. I was hoping for a clear, rational, systematic presentation of data complete with demonstrations, but there's nothing of the sort. It's painful to watch, really, with terrible jokes and forced laughter from the audience perpetuating even atAs many have already stated and as someone who grew up with Bill Nye as the Science Guy, I, too, am very disappointed at the lack of actual science. I was hoping for a clear, rational, systematic presentation of data complete with demonstrations, but there's nothing of the sort. It's painful to watch, really, with terrible jokes and forced laughter from the audience perpetuating even at the blandest attempts at humor. Ditch the studio audience, ditch the childish, condescending, and hackish presentation, and get back to what drew our generation toward science in the first place: with science itself. Bill Nye Saves the World? How about we give these topics to Adam Ruins Everything, because that show does a better job educating and bettering the viewer despite its opposing title.… Expand
  27. SchroederRock
    May 11, 2017
    0
    If I'm not mistaken, this is the first "0" I've ever given out on Metacritic. I loved Bill Nye The Science Guy, so I thought this would be some continuation of Bill being approachable about science but with some of the modern advances that science has made in the two decades he's been off the air. Instead, it's a bunch of hot-garbage with Bill contradicting himself when compared to hisIf I'm not mistaken, this is the first "0" I've ever given out on Metacritic. I loved Bill Nye The Science Guy, so I thought this would be some continuation of Bill being approachable about science but with some of the modern advances that science has made in the two decades he's been off the air. Instead, it's a bunch of hot-garbage with Bill contradicting himself when compared to his strictly-science standings of the 90s. Social issues are not science and the fact that they appear so early in the show kills a lot of the interest in this show for myself. Bill Nye Saves The World couldn't be more boring, awkward and problematic when it comes to the "science of things", and what's with the live audience? :/… Expand
  28. AMT6400
    May 5, 2017
    0
    A one way street into liberal cringe city. If you wanted a safe space from intellectual discussions and sharp humor, Bill Nye delivers an under-whelming effort to make science cool with liberalism. It's low brow entertainment that thinks its high brow
  29. Chowdah
    Apr 26, 2017
    0
    I can't even fully express what kind horror and disgust I felt when watching this. So I'll try with a few key phrases..

    Political, subversive, fake science, deviant, degenerate, pseudointellectual, dangerous, echochamber. The only people I can see who could defend this monstrosity must be deeply entrenched ideologically and won't criticize "their team." Deeply disappointed in this    I can't even fully express what kind horror and disgust I felt when watching this. So I'll try with a few key phrases..

    Political, subversive, fake science, deviant, degenerate, pseudointellectual, dangerous, echochamber. The only people I can see who could defend this monstrosity must be deeply entrenched ideologically and won't criticize "their team."

    Deeply disappointed in this show as a big Fan of Bill Nye growing up. It looks like he sold his soul for a second chance at fame.    … Expand
  30. DMalenfant1
    Apr 25, 2017
    0
    Needless to say, I am not surprised this came out to be a political show to push the sjw agenda and not really about science.
    This program shows exactly what Bill is all about. If you ever watch any of his interviews with others who do not share his view, instead of debating them in a constructive way, he just calls them names, wishes that the others who do not share his view were not    Needless to say, I am not surprised this came out to be a political show to push the sjw agenda and not really about science.
    This program shows exactly what Bill is all about. If you ever watch any of his interviews with others who do not share his view, instead of debating them in a constructive way, he just calls them names, wishes that the others who do not share his view were not there, wants an echo chamber, and he in fact wants people who do not see climate change as not all man made in prison.

    The man is a cultist to the extreme, and he finally has his own show to express it.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
63

Generally favorable reviews - based on 5 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 5
  3. Negative: 0 out of 5
  1. Salon
    Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Apr 20, 2017
    70
    Bill Nye Saves the World is a convivial series that imports elements from Nye’s old series (mainly those amusing demos with bubbling colorful liquids, Bunsen burners and flasks) into a format that resembles “The Daily Show.”
    Read full review
  2. CNN
    Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Apr 20, 2017
    70
    While Bill Nye Saves the World is a relatively modest enterprise by Netflix's standards, it is, overall, an admirable addition to its lineup. If it's not quite a rescue mission, Nye appears to have taken to heart the concept of trying to provide a small beacon of light rather than just cursing the darkness.
    Read full review
  3. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Apr 19, 2017
    40
    Bill Nye Saves the World is just not that entertaining a show all-around. While the format is geared to adults, the content is too simple to be of interest to them. For kids who might try to watch, all the talking heads will be a bore.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »