Metascore
65

Generally favorable reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 4
  2. Negative: 0 out of 4
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Dan Caffrey
    Jan 22, 2016
    75
    Even the most cerebral series in the genre (which Beowulf certainly is not) should still appeal somewhat to viewers’ collective dragon brain, especially if it’s the kind of show that might have an actual dragon in its future. And after seeing those trolls bound across the sand less than 30 seconds in, Beowulf definitely seems like that kind of show.
  2. Reviewed by: David Wiegand
    Jan 19, 2016
    75
    The 13-episode series may be imitative, but it’s well plotted, acted and directed. Bew is solid in the title role as is Speleers who, despite his odd Ed Grimley haircut, is every bit the petty, envious and devious villain you’d want Beowulf to face.
User Score
6.1

Generally favorable reviews- based on 30 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 30
  2. Negative: 6 out of 30
  1. Jan 27, 2016
    10
    Great, entertaining show. Should not even be compared to game of thrones. This is a fun series with great action sequences and monsters. AlsoGreat, entertaining show. Should not even be compared to game of thrones. This is a fun series with great action sequences and monsters. Also awesome sound design and acting is very good. Much better than the Shannara Chronicles. Full Review »
  2. Jan 24, 2016
    6
    This series should be called Game of Clones, not Beowulf. As a version of the Anglo-Saxon poem, it fails in too many ways to list, though I’mThis series should be called Game of Clones, not Beowulf. As a version of the Anglo-Saxon poem, it fails in too many ways to list, though I’m sure some reviewers will try. The question is whether it succeeds as a mash-up of GoT, Vikings, LOTR, and other medieval-inflected fantasy franchises, which, from the opening strains of the Djawadi-derived title music, it obviously wants to be.

    I don’t think there’s a clear answer. For me, watching the series is a little like drinking NA beer or eating “spaghetti” that’s really spiral-cut zucchini. It’s not really what I want, but I can psych myself into thinking it’s all right. So instead of Ned Stark, here’s Beowulf, another long-haired, scruffy, slightly-past-it warrior with a Northern accent, and he’s okay, if you don’t think too hard about the original. Instead of widow-turned-earl Lagertha, here’s widow-turned-earl Rheda, who’s no badass shield maiden, to be sure, but can still defend herself with violence. Okay, with the threat of violence. Pretty decent, right?

    My verdict? Well, I watched three episodes, even though it took me two tries to get through the first one. (I had to work on forgetting the poem Beowulf before I could resume watching.) And I wasn’t hate-watching the episodes. What kept me going were the monsters, not because they were all that great visually, but because they started to reveal some interesting relationships (past and present) with human beings. I also rather liked the the over-the-top costumes and sets. And I’m quite spellbound by Gísli Örn Garðarsson. So I’m game, I guess.
    Full Review »
  3. Mar 25, 2016
    6
    Some of the acting is laughable, but Kieran Bew does a solid performance as Beowulf. The same can be said of many of the plot lines andSome of the acting is laughable, but Kieran Bew does a solid performance as Beowulf. The same can be said of many of the plot lines and action scenes, but there is enough solid here to draw you back in for another episode. Sure, Last Kingdom has much better writing and acting but Beowulf is unique enough and has potential to hold its own. Full Review »