• Network: HBO
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 11, 1993
Metascore
69

Generally favorable reviews - based on 15 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 15
  2. Negative: 2 out of 15

Critic Reviews

  1. Seattle Post-Intelligencer
    Reviewed by: John Engstrom
    Jun 18, 2015
    100
    Stunning. [9 Sept 1993, p.C1]
  2. Reviewed by: Greg Dawson
    Jun 17, 2015
    100
    Both an engrossing medical whatdunit and a modern American tragedy...It hurtles forward with the urgency of a murder mystery and ends with the suddenness of a nightmare.
  3. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Ginny Holbert
    Jun 16, 2015
    100
    The film is certainly a virtuous, star-studded message movie. It's also a docudrama, with all the attendant questions about the fictionalization of facts. But it transcends that by being complicated, intelligent and vibrant. Without a trace of sentimentality, it is very moving. [8 Sept 1993, p.49]
  4. Newsday
    Reviewed by: Marvin Kitman
    Jun 18, 2015
    90
    Hip deep in all the chicken droppings about the movie, you would hardly know that it's a damn good movie. [9 Sept 1993, p.109]
  5. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Gail Pennington
    Jun 18, 2015
    90
    Enthralling, must-see television. [10 Sept 1993, p.6EV]
  6. Miami Herald
    Reviewed by: Hal Boedeker
    Jun 17, 2015
    90
    Swift pacing energizes the movie, and Schulman writes compelling scenes for the large cast. Many actors, who have only one scene to make an impression, meet the challenge splendidly. [11 Sept 1993, p.G1]
  7. Reviewed by: John J. O'Connor
    Jun 18, 2015
    80
    Even a hobbled rendering of And the Band Plays On adds up to tough and uncommonly courageous television. Excessive tinkering has left the pacing of the film sluggish in spots, but the story is never less than compelling.
  8. Cleveland Plain Dealer
    Reviewed by: Tom Feran
    Jun 17, 2015
    80
    It's an ambitious and engrossing combination of mystery story and medical drama - and a powerful reminder that docudramas can be more than true-crime sleaze. [11 Sept 1993, p.1E]
  9. San Diego Union-Tribune
    Reviewed by: Robert P. Laurence
    Jun 18, 2015
    75
    Suffers from excessive ambition, but only through the best of intentions. [10 Sept 1993, p.E-1]
  10. Chicago Tribune
    Reviewed by: Rick Kogan
    Jun 17, 2015
    70
    A fine film but one lacking an emotional punch commensurate with its subject. [10 Sept 1993, p.N-1]
User Score
8.3

Universal acclaim- based on 4 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. Oct 31, 2018
    8
    This may be a TV movie, sure. But don't let the format fool you -- as far as exhaustive, blow-by-blow docudramas are concerned, this isThis may be a TV movie, sure. But don't let the format fool you -- as far as exhaustive, blow-by-blow docudramas are concerned, this is amongst the better margin. And as far as docudramas concerning the origin, discovery, and discussion surrounding AIDS are concerned, there really isn't any other that comes to mind that's as emotionally resonant as it is journalistically adept. It's simply a must-watch for anyone with questions or skepticism regarding any element of the AIDS epidemic, and a compelling film altogether. Full Review »
  2. May 15, 2017
    8
    A great docudrama, especially because of the year it was made, soon after the period in which the AIDS epidemic stroke. The accurate portraitA great docudrama, especially because of the year it was made, soon after the period in which the AIDS epidemic stroke. The accurate portrait of the scientific diatribe between French and Gallo are shameful to watch. The political and social contests are well represented and arise questions and observations I haven't thought about before, and I'm a med student. So much of all of this isn't known to the general audience but it should be, because the shame that accompanied the HIV crisis is still affecting us today in our daily life. Full Review »