• Network: ABC
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 17, 2002
Season #: 3, 2, 1
Metascore
53

Mixed or average reviews - based on 27 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 27
  2. Negative: 5 out of 27

Critic Reviews

  1. Dallas Morning News
    Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Jul 3, 2014
    75
    Ritter is still quite adept at broad, keep-it-simple comedy, and this one plays to his strengths. [17 Sep 2002]
  2. Boston Herald
    Reviewed by: Monica Collins
    Jul 3, 2014
    75
    Who knew the dumbed-down domestic sitcom could be fun again? ... OK. It's not "Seinfeld." But "Eight Simple Rules" does just what it's supposed to - amuse, entertain, disperse a few laughs and warm fuzzies. [17 Sep 2002]
  3. Newsday
    Reviewed by: Noel Holston
    Jul 3, 2014
    70
    Successfully cross-breeding "Three's Company" and "Full House" may be achievement enough to earn the show's creators a Nobel Prize in genetics, but the audience for a family sex farce may be limited. ... Misgivings about the sexual content aside, "8 Simple Rules" is, indeed, one of the better sitcom prospects of the 2002-03 season. The writing is uneven, but Ritter is a rarity, an actor who doesn't need funny things to say because he can say things funny. [17 Sep 2002]
  4. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Jul 3, 2014
    70
    Not flashy, not spectacular, "8 Simple Rules" is a cute show that will appeal to its intended audience.
  5. Washington Post
    Reviewed by: Tom Shales
    Jul 3, 2014
    70
    It's surprisingly sweet and cleverly hilarious. ... The show may not exactly blaze new trails, but it treads some old ones with finesse and veracity -- and even, thanks largely to Ritter, an endearingly rumpled charm. [17 Sep 2002]
  6. The Hollywood Reporter
    Jul 3, 2014
    70
    No one is likely to mistake ABC's "8 Simple Rules for Dating My Teenage Daughter" for the next great comedy, but it is nicely written, decently paced, solidly performed and ably directed. [16 Sep 2002]
  7. Houston Chronicle
    Reviewed by: Ann Hodges
    Jul 3, 2014
    67
    Ritter has a well-honed sense of comedic timing, and some of the lines are clever, for a change. This one could grow on you. [15 Sep 2002]
  8. Reviewed by: Terry Kelleher
    Jun 28, 2013
    67
    A lot of this material may be hackneyed, but Ritter puts it over with energy and a slathering of shtick. It's simple, really: Like him, like the show.
  9. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Jun 14, 2013
    67
    I find Ritter's performance -- as a father besieged by a pop culture he no longer understands -- to be, within the confines of the series' dumb-dad punchlines, rousingly substantial.
  10. New York Daily News
    Reviewed by: David Bianculli
    Jul 3, 2014
    63
    It has a few naughty jokes, lots of good-looking youngsters, and is watchable family-entertainment. [17 Sep 2002]
  11. Reviewed by: Robert Bianco
    Jul 3, 2014
    63
    Ritter ... still has the same deceptively innocent face, the same way with a line, the same gift for a great double take or a bit of physical business. And he's still surrounded by pretty women who invariably get the better of him. Unfortunately, he's also still working with scripts that aren't up to the comic effort he pours into them.
  12. Reviewed by: Hal Boedeker
    Jul 3, 2014
    60
    Ritter remains in top comic form ... But his show ... is a mediocre effort that falls short of such ABC milestones as Roseanne and Home Improvement.
  13. Reviewed by: Michael Speier
    Jul 3, 2014
    60
    Unoriginal but brisk and occasionally poignant, its biggest selling point is Ritter himself, who can still turn minor problems into charm points via stammers and double takes.
  14. Arizona Republic
    Reviewed by: Bill Goodykoontz
    Jul 3, 2014
    60
    Not the best comedy you've ever seen, but the best chance for a new hit. [17 Sep 2002]
  15. Reviewed by: Howard Rosenberg
    Jul 3, 2014
    60
    This is one of those broadly played comedies that needs reining in and writing sharper than having Ritter play super dad in what, essentially, is a single-parent comedy.
  16. Newark Star-Ledger
    Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Jul 3, 2014
    50
    Fortunately, Ritter is such a seasoned pro at this sitcom thing that he makes "8 Simple Rules" vaguely watchable, and at times actually funny, when in lesser hands it would be thoroughly unpleasant. [17 Sep 2002]
  17. Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    Jul 3, 2014
    50
    There are bits of "8 Simple Rules..." that are genuinely funny and hint at better things to come. But the full 22 minutes doesn't stick together well and ends up feeling like a comedy that's been overdone.
  18. Deseret News
    Reviewed by: Scott D. Pierce
    Jul 3, 2014
    50
    Ritter and Segal are better than their material, but this is the sort of show (like "Home Improvement" or "Full House") that ABC used to do so well. [13 Sep 2002]
  19. Reviewed by: Ron Wertheimer
    Jul 3, 2014
    40
    The two episodes of 8 Simple Rules that were available for review contained tantalizing hints of a better show that might have been (or might yet be).
  20. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Gail Pennington
    Jul 3, 2014
    40
    Moments of sweetness, but too few laughs - and way too many sexual references. [8 Sep 2002]
  21. Baltimore Sun
    Reviewed by: David Zurawik
    Jul 3, 2014
    40
    Fairly likable in a bland sort of way - a very, very bland sort of way. [17 Sep 2002]
  22. Boston Globe
    Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Jul 3, 2014
    40
    The most banal family-sitcom setup possible. [17 Sep 2002]
  23. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Phil Rosenthal
    Jul 3, 2014
    37
    Ritter and Sagal are old pros, but they can't salvage material this weak. [17 Sep 2002]
  24. Chicago Tribune
    Reviewed by: Steve Johnson
    Jul 3, 2014
    30
    Nothing in this show has not been seen before. And nothing particularly deserves to be seen again. [17 Sep 2002]
  25. The Detroit News
    Reviewed by: Tom Long
    Jul 3, 2014
    25
    Watching dad fend off guys while the girls strut around in thongs is going to get old fast. [17 Sep 2002]
  26. The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
    Reviewed by: Scott Colbourne
    Jul 3, 2014
    25
    Ritter, in his Three's Company days, played a career womanizer and there are a few laughs watching him on the other side of the door. A few laughs as in three, but not company enough. [14 Sep 2002]
  27. Christian Science Monitor
    Reviewed by: M.S. Mason
    Jul 3, 2014
    20
    It is just offensive to hear a middle-aged man ask his daughter about her bodily functions. [13 Sep 2002]
User Score
7.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 7 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 7
  2. Negative: 1 out of 7
  1. Dec 3, 2011
    8
    It is very funny and charming despite the of course extremely annoying Dad character. But this is a very good edition to television. And ofIt is very funny and charming despite the of course extremely annoying Dad character. But this is a very good edition to television. And of course it won't be remembered. Full Review »
  2. Dec 3, 2011
    10
    It is very funny and charming despite the of course extremely annoying Dad character. But this is a very good edition to television. And ofIt is very funny and charming despite the of course extremely annoying Dad character. But this is a very good edition to television. And of course it won't be remembered. Full Review »