For 11,478 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
52% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | Oppenheimer | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Dolittle |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 6,014 out of 11478
-
Mixed: 3,069 out of 11478
-
Negative: 2,395 out of 11478
11478
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Heavy Metal is one of the worst ideas ever to be translated into a movie. [8 Aug 1981, p.C10]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Hal Hinson
A phenomenally atrocious movieāso bad, in fact, that you might actually manage to squeeze a few laughs out of it.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Atrocious. It's also pretentious, superfluous, superficial, shallow, dated and bilious. I'd pay money not to have seen this jumble of gooey special effects, sappy symbolism and out-of-it animation. [17 Sept 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Tom Shales
Someone must have told Sean Penn and Madonna that people would come to see them in anything -- and poor fools, they believed it. "Anything" in this case amounts to nothing: Shanghai Surprise, a quintessentially misbegotten fiasco even in the year of "Under the Cherry Moon." [24 Sept 1986, p.D2]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Hal Hinson
I doubt if I could stand to be in the same state as anyone who liked the new Anthony Michael Hall film "Johnny Be Good." If Chuck Berry were dead, he'd be spinning in his grave.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Hal Hinson
Nothing but Trouble, which distinguishes itself by being Dan Aykroyd's directorial debut and in no other way, certainly lives up to its name. But you could go far beyond that -- it's nothing but trouble and agony and pain and suffering and obnoxious, toxically unfunny bad taste. It's nothing but miserable.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Its toxic recipe consists of prurient exploitation steeped in dankly pretentious imagery. [01 Jun 1992, p.D4]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Madhouse is excruciating fluff for moviegoing masochists. It's what bad cinephiles can expect in the cineplexes of hell. No, it's probably already on video there.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Car 54, Where Are You? is a stupid movie. Stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid. If you pay money to see it, then you're stupid.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
What makes it so bad is the jokes, a collective of offensive jokes - imagine uncomic Polish jokes applied to every race, religion, form of life and nationality, even including Polish - which are so poorly acted out by a cast including Imogene Coca, Alice Ghostley, George Gobel, Fannie Flagg and Roddy McDowall that they actually sound funnier in the recounting that they are on film.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by