For 11,478 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
52% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | Oppenheimer | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Dolittle |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 6,014 out of 11478
-
Mixed: 3,069 out of 11478
-
Negative: 2,395 out of 11478
11478
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
It's a glossified, cluttered parody of itself. Almodovar is no longer a burlesque auteur. He's a repeat offender.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
The picture is not a social satire. It’s a mess.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
THERE'S Big Trouble in Little China all right, as Kurt Russell wrestles his way through this kung-fu comedy adventure. It might have been a Raiders of the Lost Wok, but instead it's a bad marriage of martial arts and action spoofery, bungled by director John Carpenter working from the world's worst screenplay. [04 July 1986, p.N29]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Paul Attanasio
The kids are uniformly godawful, particularly the lamentably named Phoenix; their wooden line readings play in long, flat scenes that look like some 12-year-olds' school project. And talking about the movie's sense of pace is like talking about Pikes Peak's sense of pace. Explorers is a veritable jungle of thematic and story threads that are never picked up. [12 July 1985, p.D6]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
All the modest virtues of the original film have been discarded in favor of lurid excess. What was once unpretentious, suggestive, implicit and erotically tragic has become bombastic, literal-minded, explicit and erotically stupefying.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Paul Attanasio
In Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome, a great deal of engine noise and clanking iron is drowned out by the audience's resounding ho-hum. It's comic books in a Cuisinart, all costumes and cute monikers and no story, a sort of case history of just what's wrong with sequelitis. [10 July 1985]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
1941 represents an appalling waste of filmmaking and performing resources. As one would expect, Spielberg, who directed "Jaws" and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," sustains a high energy level. But the energy is expended on material that is pointless at best and occasionally hateful. [15 Dec 1979, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Ironically, the stars didn't get it together either. The Blues Brothers offers the melancholy spectacle of them sinking deeper and deeper into a comic grave.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Hal Hinson
An ugly commingling of old Westerns, Zen chic and kung fu movies...Full of gratuitous mayhem, head-bashing, gay-bashing and woman-bashing, Road House has a malicious, almost putrid tone.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
The Bodyguard is a classic of show-business hubris, a wondrously trashy belly-flop, proving that no amount of glittering sets and star power can save a story that should have been buried with McQueen.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Producer-for-Life George Lucas puts his awesome creative machinery to work in Willow, a would-be adventure of little people, big people, good guys and bad. But the fantasy wheels grind to a halt, bogged down in Lucas' flat, derivative story, and not helped in the least by director Ron Howard's clumsy steering.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
With the exception of Carrie and The Shining, the novels of Stephen King have not made the transition to film particularly well, so it should be little surprise that Pet Sematary is another DOA -- Dog on Arrival.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
You want to know if The Running Man is a good-time macho show, right? Stay at home and watch professional wrestling. Or Miami Vice (same director -- Paul Michael Glaser). Sure there's blood spattering and bullets riddling and Big Boys Banging Biceps. But through the dry-ice haze, Running Man is surprisingly boring.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
King and Romero -- the horror genre's equivalent of the daily double -- are back on the storyboard for 2, but with director Michael Gornick in charge, 2 goes nowhere slowly. Part of the problem is that King's short stories simply work better in print.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Although the material is conventionally manipulated to provoke terror by exploiting Cujo as a mad dog--a four-footed Jaws as a shameless matter of fact--moviegoers are likely to feel too appalled at the way a sick animal is systematically neglected.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Memoirs of an Invisible Man isn't a movie. It's an identity crisis. The previews would have you believe it's a zany comedy. But the jokes are too far and few between. And if it's a comedy, why is John Carpenter directing it?- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
PSTwo feels like an elongated Tales From the Crypt, though the annoying heavy-metal soundtrack sounds like seepage from Headbanger's Ball. The first time around, Lambert went for terror; this time, it's mostly hardy-har-horror.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Has John Carpenter lost his mind or just his talent? On the heels of In the Mouth of Madness comes the director's rehash of the 1960 classic, Village of the Damned. Unfortunately, Carpenter simply makes a hash of it.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Stephen King is a novelist, not a screenwriter. Which may be worth remembering on the admittedly slender chance that you go to see Needful Things for its dialogue, which is by turns cheap, cute, histrionic, profane and derivative.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Doubling duties as director and cinematographer, Peter Hyams seems to have tossed the former for the latter. The Presidio, purported cop thriller, looks great. It is, in fact, less filling. The maker of "Outland" and "2010" infuses a San Francisco setting with evocative misty grays, but screenwriter Larry Ferguson's dull doings hang thicker than smog.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
All in all, this is not a Jobe well done.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
A didactic collegiate farce -- "Animal House" with pan-African politics, and an enormously embarrassing encore. Tell an inexperienced director he's a genius, and you create Dr. Frankenstein. School Daze, with its pompous patchwork plot, is an arrogant, humorless, sexist mess.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The best reason to see The Rose is to be in a position to relish the inevitable parody on "Saturday Night Live." Here's a sitting turkey that virtually sits up and begs to be plucked. [8 Nov 1979, p.F1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Robin Hood: Men in Tights is a pointless and untimely lampoon of Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves from the increasingly creaky spoofmeister Mel Brooks. A predictable onslaught of bad taste and worse jokes, it mostly targets not the conventions of action-adventures but the sexual preferences of the merry men, who are variously referred to as pansies, fagalas and fruits. Brooks fills in the spaces with broadsides derogatory to women and the one interest group you can readily afford to offend on film -- blind folks.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It's depressing to see director Herbert Ross strain to fabricate an atmosphere of urgency around such perfunctory characters, events and crises. A minimal lyric can be finessed by stylish orchestration much easier than a minimal script can be finessed by streamlined composition and emphatic cutting. [18 Feb 1984, p.G1]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Paul Attanasio
The script of Three Amigos (Martin's collaborators were producer Lorne Michaels and singer Randy Newman) plays like it was slapped together by a few friends with a tape recorder enjoying a charming weekend at the beach. You can't tell one amigo from another, the gags are silly (a "singing bush") and far between, the dialogue full of inane wordplay. Sample: "We could take a walk and you could kiss me on the veranda." "The lips would be fine."- Washington Post
- Posted Jun 29, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Paul Attanasio
There is some magnificent stunt work, which only underscores how inadequate Moore has become. Moore isn't just long in the tooth -- he's got tusks, and what looks like an eye job has given him the pie-eyed blankness of a zombie. He's not believable anymore in the action sequences, even less so in the romantic scenes.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Body Double twists and turns miserably between the comic and the macabre; it's definitely not dressed to kill.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Downey's direction is so flat that about 20 rock songs have been inserted to cover the dithering continuity with a semblance of rhythm. Like the flatulent and shattering noises, the score functions a distracting sound effect, camouflaging tattered swatches of "comedy." [10 June 1980, p.B2]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by