Wall Street Journal's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,944 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.7 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 62
| Highest review score: | Les Misérables | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | The Limits of Control |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,102 out of 3944
-
Mixed: 1,197 out of 3944
-
Negative: 645 out of 3944
3944
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Either you buy their Vaseline-lensed visions of the hereafter, or you watch in stony silence, as I did, wondering why there's no one to care about.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Oct 21, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
San Andreas changes all too quickly from satisfyingly foolish to dismayingly dumb to genuinely stupid.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted May 28, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Fly Me to the Moon could have worked beautifully, if only someone had first figured out a coherent story.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Jul 11, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The worst part of Ms. Zellweger's plight is that she, along with others in the cast, has fallen victim to a first-time feature director whose vocabulary doesn't seem to include the word "simplicity."- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
There's no transcending a prosaic plot and several flat performances.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
John Anderson
The action is plentiful, but not particularly well-executed (though lots of extras are), and neither Mr. Evans nor Ms. Armas is really a comedian.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Apr 20, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
If glum were good and bleak were best, Hart's War would be a standout.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Comes on like an overproduced coma, and leaves you comatose by the end. In between are 127 minutes of intermittent chaos that feel like a lifetime.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
A rube's-eye view of Hollywood, but the rube is weary, and those around him seem to be suffering from terminal torpor.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
With so much going on, there’s no time to make any of the action truly engaging, especially given Mr. Fleischer’s rigid determination to be as flashy as possible all of the time.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Nov 14, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Long after lice from her children's school infested Kate's scalp, I was scratching my head about why a 91-minute movie seemed so long. The answer came from reframing the question. Why was a string of sitcom problems stretched to 91 minutes?- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Sep 15, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The production renders totally irrelevant all hopes for a well-made movie. It's one of those ragged, pandemonious studio comedies that hammers at plot points in every contrived scene.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Ms. Buckley quickly becomes the centerpiece of the movie, or rather its central headache. Her overacting meets Ms. Gyllenhaal’s over-filmmaking like the Hindenburg crashing into the Titanic.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Mar 6, 2026
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
The inch-deep approach to history and social issues, the high-concept device, and the trite characters all seem better suited to a different type of movie—such as one of those gee-whiz featurettes shown at the EPCOT theme park.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Nov 1, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Spectacular? I guess, if you’re wowed by soulless CGI chaos. Thrilling? Not really. At the end, I was left feeling the way Kong does at the beginning: tired and bored.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Mar 28, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
John Anderson
Ideas being realized on screen? It’s something Mr. Cahill’s characters accomplish far more effectively than does the director himself.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Feb 4, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Stinker doesn't begin to describe this movie's character -- both frenzied and dispiriting.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
J. Michael Straczynski's disjointed script manages to ring false at almost every significant turn (Collins' psychiatric-hospital stay has grown into a latter-day version of "The Snake Pit") and Clint Eastwood's ponderous direction -- a disheartening departure from his sure touch in "Letters From Iwo Jima" and "The Bridges of Madison County" -- magnifies the flaws.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Mr. Malek is incapable of providing the audience with an emotional hook.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Apr 11, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Oz the Great and Powerful, like so many products of movie studios that have lost their way, is a Tin Man of epic proportions — bright and shiny, with no heart.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Mar 7, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
There's no zest to the general depravity, no coherence to the script or the spectacle -- clarity is missing in some of the camera work -- and, most important, no character to give a Greek fig about.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The movie transforms a dim idea - "Elmer Gantry" lite - into comedy that's dead in the water and as dull as it is broad.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Jul 14, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The performances, under Mike Newell's direction, range from conventional (Ms. Roberts) to dreadful, and the script is as shallow as an old Cosmo cover story.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Mr. Li is a master not only of martial arts, but of composure; no one does nothing better. The film itself is no great shakes.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
It’s thin and flat, the opposite of inventive, surprising, daring or insightful. Though it’s billed as a comedy-drama, nothing in it generates laughs, even of the cringe variety.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Nov 1, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
This new Alfie is earnest -- irony is so last century -- and not angry at all, since working-class anger would mean nothing here, because class means nothing here. Nothing means anything here.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Though Mr. Skarsgård (who played the terrifying Pennywise in “It”) is gravely charismatic and FKA twigs is touching, the dour, depressing dankness of Mr. Sanders’s vision makes The Crow a turkey.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Aug 22, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
I can't find much slack to cut the film, except to say that it's a potboiler cooked in an upscale Teflon pot.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The film suffers, terminally, from joyless direction by Francis Lawrence — no relation — and a monotonous script by Justin Haythe.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Mar 1, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by