The Seattle Times' Scores

  • Movies
For 1,952 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 63% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 34% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.7 points higher than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 68
Highest review score: 100 Gladiator
Lowest review score: 0 It's Pat: The Movie
Score distribution:
1952 movie reviews
  1. As a summer disaster movie, Twisters works well enough, though other than Powell it lacks the enjoyable goofiness of its predecessor.
  2. The uneasy marriage of clunky psychodrama and overwrought special effects along with the fact that none of these characters are particularly likable make Strange World a chore to sit through.
  3. Ali
    Mann, as he showed two years ago in "The Insider," is a wonderfully idiosyncratic storyteller, sketching out a plot line with quick scenes, jumping into the middle of a story and letting us figure out who's who.
  4. Alice, Darling is a bit of a slow burn, despite what its trailers would have you believe.
  5. Drop gets the job done, and even throws in an excellent cocktail-piano rendition of “Baby Shark.” Go see it on a first date, if you’re brave.
  6. In the midst of all the mayhem it’s sometimes hard to stay awake.
  7. The script by Liu Zhenyun becomes ponderous and redundant, kept on oxygen by its lead actress’s complex performance as a child-woman with enigmatic wisdom.
  8. Filmed in harsh grays and cruel light, interspersed with warm home movies of the family in a happier time, it’s a terribly sad and often mesmerizing story.
  9. There are no safe places in his pictures. And Eddington is dense with multiple levels that stoke the ever-present unease.
  10. Great acting is a con game, of the highest order, and it’s a pleasure to be Moore’s mark.
  11. An all-star farce about backstage melodramatics at a long-running daytime soap opera, Soapdish has some hysterically funny moments. Unfortunately, its creators don't always sustain the big laughs, or make the most of such supporting players as Whoopi Goldberg and Robert Downey Jr., whose proven comic gifts are mostly hidden this time. [31 May 1991, p.25]
    • The Seattle Times
  12. The picture itself is more workmanlike than transcendent. It marches along but doesn’t soar.
  13. It’s heartfelt, action-packed and just plain fun (and comes with an intriguing mid-credit scene you don’t want to miss). Fantastic indeed.
  14. Directors Rob Cannan and Ross Adam have made a picture that’s technically rough-edged but absorbing.
    • 65 Metascore
    • 63 Critic Score
    The wedding of strong actors with a solid script is what makes Plus One worthy of saying “I do” to enjoying it.
  15. This sturdy, solid thriller underscores that at their core, survival stories are always stories of humanity’s best, and the impossible things we can achieve when we work together.
    • 64 Metascore
    • 88 Critic Score
    The movie bristles with an insider's knowledge of the film world. It's wry, intelligent, impassioned. [15 Mar 1991, p.22]
    • The Seattle Times
  16. By showing us the human side of poverty, Where the Day Takes You proves that a society is best judged by the treatment of its least fortunate members. [11 Sep 1992, p.21]
    • The Seattle Times
  17. With its ever-so-earnest desire to shed light on the complex social issues of gang influence in Los Angeles, South Central is a film that's good - or at least, easily recommendable - in spite of itself. [06 Nov 1992, p.27]
    • The Seattle Times
  18. The movie’s unrelenting sensory onslaught is exhausting. It’s torture to sit through.
  19. Directed by Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee (the latter also wrote the screenplay, both directed the original), it’s gorgeous-looking. It’s briskly paced. And it’s tuneful. Uh, about those tunes: They’re blaringly, oppressively, crushingly LOUD! With “Frozen” we got the rousing Oscar-winning “Let It Go.” With Frozen II, someone should have told the songwriters to tone it down.
  20. If there is any problem with Wes Craven's New Nightmare, it's the fact that analyzing the film is potentially more fun than the film itself. But that's OK, because it means Craven has put enough thought into his work to make it worth thinking about. [14 Oct 1994, p.H40]
    • The Seattle Times
  21. In other words: yes, it’s fun.
  22. As usual, the majority of gags are strictly hit or miss, but they don't stop until the movie's completely over, so here's a fair warning: If you're one of the few who still doesn't know secret of "The Crying Game," don't watch the "Part Deux" end credits. [21 May 1993, p.23]
    • The Seattle Times
  23. In channeling his creative resources toward the sound of “Undertone,” Tuason conjures a lot out of a simple concept — a girl in a house. The marriage of this sound design to thoughtful, carefully placed camera movements makes for a horror film that’s a suspenseful slow burn.
  24. The film is over quickly, before I’d seen quite enough of Westwood’s fanciful clothing, or heard quite enough of her voice.
    • 64 Metascore
    • 63 Critic Score
    The Bad Guys 2 is not as fun or slick as it thinks it is — especially in its emotionally underwhelming yet visually dazzling third act — but it still carries just enough charm to warrant a trip to the theater.
  25. Ultimately, the film’s unwillingness to go deeper makes it fall flat.
  26. You don’t really watch Suspiria, you endure it.
  27. Sometimes hilarious, ultimately poignant, Swiss Army Man is a picture like no other.

Top Trailers