The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,481 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3481
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3481
-
Negative: 198 out of 3481
3481
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
As suspense craftsmanship, the picture is trim, brutal and exciting; it was directed in the sleekest style by the veteran urban-action director Don Siegel, and Lalo Schifrin's pulsating, jazzy electronic trickery drives the picture forward. It's also a remarkably single-minded attack on liberal values, with each prejudicial detail in place - a kind of hardhat The Fountainhead.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Despite Peckinpah’s artistry, there’s something basically grim and crude in Straw Dogs. It’s no news that men are capable of violence, but while most of us want to find ways to control that violence, Sam Peckinpah wants us to know that that’s all hypocrisy.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There's no motivating idea visible in this version, produced abroad by Hal B. Wallis, and the leaden script, by John Hale, lacks romantic spirit and dramatic sense.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Cassavetes built this movie on a small conceit--a love affair between two people who are wildly unsuited to each other--and it doesn't work.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The message is not very different from that of Hello, Dolly! or Mame, but Harold's flaccid asexuality (he's like a sickly infant, a limp, earthbound Peter Pan) and Maude's advanced stage of pixiness give that message a special freaky quality. And the film has been made with considerable wit and skill.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Unimaginative Bond picture that is often noisy when it means to be exciting.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture strains for seriousness now and then, but even when it makes a fool of itself it's still funny.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This whole production is a mixture of wizardry and ineptitude; the picture has enjoyable moments but it's as uncertain of itself as the title indicates.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
As obsequiously respectful as if it had been made about living monarchs who might reward the producer with a command performance. Viewers are put in the position of celebrity-lovers eager to partake of the home life of the dullest of the Czars.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This joyously square musical succeeds in telling one of the root stories of American Life.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It’s plain and uncondescending in its re-creation of what it means to be a high-school athlete, of what a country dance hall is like, of the necking in cars and movie houses, and of the desolation that follows high-school graduation.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A hugely successful slam-bang thriller that zaps the audience with noise, speed, and brutality. It's certainly exciting, bu that excitement isn't necessarily a pleasure. The ominous music keeps tightening the screws and heating things up; the movie is like an aggravated case of New York.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Lighthearted and charming story of a black and white team of con artists in the Old South. Very enjoyable.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Despite its heroic energy and impulsive youth, it’s a bleak philosophical work of its time, a bitterly terrifying vision of no exit.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The New York-set movie doesn't tell you much you don't know. Worthy, but a drag--despite the many incidents, it feels undramatic.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
In Hellman’s film, Taylor and Wilson exert a negative charisma: their presence is both powerful and blank, deeply expressive in its neutrality. They offer one of the few original post-sixties reconfigurations of the movie star. Their manner is a perfect match for the story, and for the mythic, symbolic landscape in which it’s set.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A fantasy with music for children that never finds an appropriate style; it's stilted and frenetic, like Prussians at play.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
As Mike Nichols has directed the material, the effects are almost all achieved through the line readings, and the cleverness is unpleasant -- it's all surface and whacking emphasis.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by