The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,481 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3481
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3481
-
Negative: 198 out of 3481
3481
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The romantic star chemistry of Redford and Streisand turns a half-terrible movie into hit entertainment -- maybe even memorable entertainment.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture, written and directed by James Bridges, tries to be thoughtful and provocative, but it has nothing to say.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Martin Scorsese’s Mean Streets is a true original of our period, a triumph of personal filmmaking. It has its own hallucinatory look; the characters live in the darkness of bars, with lighting and color just this side of lurid. It has its own unsettling, episodic rhythm and a high-charged emotional range that is dizzyingly sensual.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Eustache's method resembles the static randomness of the Warhol-Morrissey pictures, but the randomness here is not a matter of indifference; it's a conscious goal.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This baseball weeper was very clumsily directed by John Hancock; everything stops dead for the dialogue scenes.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The slender, swift Bruce Lee was the Fred Astaire of martial arts, and many of the fights that could be merely brutal come across as lighting-fast choreography.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The casting, the acting, and the milieu seem effortlessly, inexplicably right. This movie transcends its genre; it isn't only about stock-car racing, any more than The Hustler was only about shooting pool.- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The elements are all there, and Mitchum, looking appropriately square-headed, tries hard and has some good scenes. But you get the impression that the dialogue is moving faster than the action.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Emotions, identities, and even bodily functions are distorted by the mechanized uniformity, but Tati’s despair is modulated by a sense of wonder.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Probably nobody involved was very happy about the results; Dylan doesn't come off at all.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The facetious dialogue is a wet blanket, and De Palma isn't quite up to his apparent intention -- to provide cheap thrills that are also a parody of old corn.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Altman gracefully kisses off the private-eye form in soft, mellow color and volatile images; the cinematographer Vilmos Zsigmond is responsible for the offhand visual pyrotechnics (the imagery has great vitality). Gould gives a loose and woolly, strikingly original performance.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This rabble-rousing movie appeals to a deep-seated belief in simple, swift, Biblical justice; the visceral impact of the film makes one know how crowds must feel when they're being swayed by demagogues.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Ousmane Sembene's approach is thoughtful and almost reticent; the viewer contemplates a series of tragic dilemmas. Yet for all its intelligence, the movie isn't memorable--partly because the last section is unsatisfying.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
[May] has a knack for defusing the pain without killing the joke.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Sam Peckinpah directed in imitation of Sam Peckinpah; it's a mechanical job, embellished with a vivacious, erotic subplot involving Al Lettieri and Sally Struthers.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Expensive pop disaster epic, manufactured for the market that made Airport a hit. Ronald Neame directed, with dull efficiency.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
As a comic figure, Tati had a nice spare buoyancy in Jour de fete and Hulot's Holiday, but here his whimsical bumbling seems precious and fatuous.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The chemistry of pop vulgarization is all-powerful here; factually, this life of Billie Holiday is a fraud, but emotionally it delivers.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Gaudy black-exploitation film with explicit racism and some that's implicit. Partly slick, partly amateurish.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The film is beautifully acted and directed around the edges, but it also suffers from a tragic tone that has a blurring, antiquing effect. You watch all these losers losing, and you don't know why they're losing or why you're watching them.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Rigid formality leaves much unsaid in Yasujiro Ozu’s 1949 film, but the director reveals the hidden depths of ordinary life with a quiet astonishment and observes his characters with an exacting subtlety of expression.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Yasujiro Ozu’s direction brings emotional depth and philosophical heft to this turbulent and grim family melodrama.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Frenzy, with its piles of peaches and lettuces, its constant drinking, is a masterpiece devoted to appetite in all its varieties—but it is most seriously devoted to the perversion of sexual happiness in murder and to the absence of sexual happiness in “normal” life.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Bogdanovich takes the plot and the externals of the characters but loses the logic. His picture goes every which way; he restages gags from Buster Keaton and Laurel & Hardy and W.C. Fields, plus a lot of cornball devices.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The dialogue is often painfully hip-cute, but the actors manage to be funny anyway.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker