The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Justin Chang
The workplace dramas intended to animate Hind’s story wind up distracting from it.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 16, 2026
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The pictures is an almost total drag, though Agnes Moorehead, as the villainess, has a sensational exit through plate-glass windows.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Sydney Pollack doesn't have a knack for action pulp; he gets some tension going in this expensive spy thriller, but there's no real fun in it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
That is what kids will come away with, together with a dose of wishful thinking: the vague belief that, with good will and a foe from far away, all those feuding parties of the Wild West - the cowboys, the Indians, and the no-good rogues - could have settled their differences and got along just fine. Go tell it to Gary Cooper.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 31, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
I happen to find the result intrusive, presumptuous, and often absurd, but, for anyone who thinks that all formality is a front, and that the only point of a façade is that it should crack, Jackie delivers a gratifying thrill.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 28, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The first third of Aftermath is stripped to emotional basics (one man seized up with grief, another with guilt), and it delivers quite a jolt. Sadly, as the characters converge, the rest of the movie loses force; it slackens and then rushes, and the time frames feel out of joint.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 10, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The movie’s substance remains largely implicit; its pleasures are partial, detached, and superficial. It offers little context, background, personality, or anything that risks distracting from the show.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 7, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Everest, in short, suffers from the same problem as Everest: overcrowding.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 21, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Allied is written by Steven Knight and directed by Robert Zemeckis, who seems uncertain whether to treat the tale as a wrenching saga of split loyalties or as a glamorous jaunt. Having gathered all the ingredients for derring-do, he forgets to turn up the heat, and the derring never does.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 28, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
As a whole, Shattered Glass is carefully constructed, intently played, and shot with creepy calm. It is also, by a considerable margin, the most ridiculous movie I have seen this year. [3 November 2003, p. 104]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Deep and Morton are really flying here (the scene in which the hero instructs the heroine in the passionate possibilities of her art), and they leave the rest of the film looking heavy on its feet. The second half, especially, grows dour and maundering, and by the end the movie seems to flail in desperation, more like a work in progress than like a finished piece.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It takes place in the TV land of predictability -- that plain of dowdy realism where a boy finds his manhood by developing the courage to stick to his principles and stand up to his father.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The film’s overbearing effort to say something serious about society at large seems to force del Toro’s directorial hand. It pushes him to up the razzle-dazzle in order to keep the didactic element entertaining. The result is a movie that is bloated in length, literal in its messaging, and overdecorated, like a cinematic Christmas tree, with dutiful dramatics that leach it of tension, energy, and spontaneity.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 20, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Last of Robin Hood, written and directed by Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland, is often pallid and thin.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 1, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Clooney and company could have used Sturges - or, even better, Clifford Odets - when it came to rewrites. With all the betrayals and gassy ambitions swirling around here, we badly need dialogue to ignite the film, instead of which even the most aggressive spirits keep firing the dampest of lines.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 3, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The only person who wakes the movie from its slumbers is Emily Blunt. She gets a nothing role as a publicist, and makes something both sultry and casual out of it.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
The supporting cast provides centripetal force; too bad the center cannot hold.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The characters never take hold, and the result feels eerily hollow, like a series of charming improvisational bloopers.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
For all its handsomeness and its occasional moments of piercing intelligence, it's a fundamentally depressing piece of work--not because it deals with tragic events and memories but because the characters seem hapless and even stupid, and the writer-director can't, or won't, take control.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Just creepy and unsavory at moments, but pleased to be so.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The result is remarkable, yet it’s still a hairbreadth away from credible.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 24, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Has an oddly amorphous and inconclusive feeling to it. We never do find out who Tony (Jake Gyllenhaal) is, and his best friend, Troy (Peter Sarsgaard), who shifts back and forth between sanity and hysteria, is a mystery, too.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The story moves forward smoothly, but the pace is too even and the course is predictable.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This famous film, high on most lists of the greatest films of all time, seems all wrong - phony when it should ring true. Yet, because of the material, it is often moving in spite of the acting, the directing, and the pseudo-Biblical pore-people talk.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
A minor work, but so menaced by distress that the characters take every opportunity to dance the dark away.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The revelation is Wilde. A slender beauty with high cheekbones, she makes Anna a full-fledged neurotic, candid and demanding and changeable, shifting abruptly from snuggling happiness to angry defiance.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 16, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The Bikeriders displays the cost of noninterventionist direction, of sticking to source material with a self-inhibiting fidelity. These characters are still in search of their auteur.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 20, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Too bad that the director, George Cukor, doesn't have a little more feeling for the loony baroque; the story is treated much too soberly.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by