The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
McCarey plays the shipboard courtship for generous and tender laughs—the wryly staged first kiss is one of the sweetest in all cinema—but the comedy that follows on dry land is mostly inadvertent.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Lucky Number Slevin is a bag of nerves. Everything here is too much. The older the actors, the saltier the ham of their performances.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The movie, with spiderlike timidity, scuttles into a corner and freezes. [13 May 2002, p. 96]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
This impersonal exaltation of heroic exploits leaves an unexplored dilemma at the foundation of the film.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 19, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Forest Whitaker directed with a slow, sugary touch -- and, one suspects, an eye toward the home-video market.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Nicholson's fatuous leering performance dominates the movie, and because his prankishness also comes out in the casting and directing, the movie hasn't any stabilizing force; there's nothing to balance what he's doing--no one with a strait jacket. An actor-director who prances about the screen manically can easily fool himself into thinking that his film is jumping; Nicholson jumps, all right, but the movie is inert.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Tavernier seems to be enshrining his own idolatry. The music itself has none of the mysterious teeming vitality of great bebop--it's lifeless.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The trouble with Mendes’s film is in the effort to combine the pieces in a way that feels natural, in an artifice that’s devised to be nearly invisible. It’s a synthetic that presents itself as organic. In the process, the film smothers its authentic parts, never lets its drama take root and grow, never lets its characters come to life.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 14, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The supporting cast of yokels commit plenty of redneck faux pas, but the witty script is weighed down by the director David Dobkin's heavy hand.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
There are many scenes of mock-lucha wrestling, which become as boring as actual wrestling. Nacho Libre, naïvely made kids’ stuff, lacks such minor attributes as a decent script and supporting cast.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The audience decided to sell Snakes to itself, and that became the event--the actual movie could never have been more than another exploitation picture.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Instead of the roots of Shakespeare’s play, The Northman merely serves up its raw material both half-baked and overcooked.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 25, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
For anyone who was transfixed by the first movie, watching the new one is a little like being unplugged from the Matrix: What was I experiencing all that time? Could it have been . . . all a dream? [19 May 2003, p.68]- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The film's nostalgic fixation on the ambiance of the war years seems to exclude any real interest in the lives of the women workers; this feminist fairy tale sees the characters as precursors of the women's movement of the 60s and 70s rather than as people.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
With Arthur hiller in charge, much of the dialogue turns into squawking, and the movie is flattened out and rackety, with Midler doing her damnedest to pump sass and energy into it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
It’s a miniseries’ worth of action that’s crammed into the procrustean bounds of a near-two-hour feature, without the compensating dimensions of symbol and implication.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 1, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
In trying to do too much in its mere eighty-seven-minute span, “Kim’s Video” does too little. For all Redmon’s self-described passion for movies and obsession with the Kim’s Video trove, the film has little to say about a wider view of video-store life and its relationship to the movie-viewing experience.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 10, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There are funny moments, but they don't add up to enough.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There are startling effects and good revue touches here and there, but the picture goes on and on, as if it were determined to impress us. It goes on so long that it cancels itself out, even out of people's memories; it was long awaited and then forgotten almost instantly.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Everybody in and around this movie is trying too hard...After half an hour, we realized that, instead of enjoying a funny film, we were being lightly bullied into finding fun where precious little exists. [5 April 2004, p. 89]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Cheesy low farce, with Danny DeVito as a thieving millionaire who wants to kill his heiress wife (Bette Miler) and is overjoyed when she's kidnapped.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Wilson and the director, Steven Shainberg, draw on Arbus's family and on many elements from her life and her art, only to turn the material into feeble nonsense.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Now the mush has taken over, and Columbus has slowed his pace in nervous deference to the solemnity of his plot (not to mention the opulence of his characters' lives).- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
In short, Dark Blue suffers from a problem that, however niggling, is likely to hobble any thriller: no thrills. [17 & 24 February 2003, p.204]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Reed, a comedic wizard, generates some moments of giddy wonder, but the earlier film’s freewheeling, low-key loopiness is replaced by a dull and dutiful plot that, with its forced references to other Marvel installments, squeezes the action to fit the franchise.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 2, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Picture my disappointment as I realized that, for all the pizzazz of Superman Returns, its global weapon of choice would not be terrorism, or nuclear piracy, or dirty bombs. It would be real estate. What does Warner Bros. have in mind for the next installment? Superman overhauls corporate pension plans? Luthor screws Medicare?- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The glum fact is that Gone Girl lacks clout where it needs it most, at its core.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 29, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's a graceful picture, but it dawdles, and Stephens doesn't seem to have the star presence that Holmes requires.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by