The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
In Hellman’s film, Taylor and Wilson exert a negative charisma: their presence is both powerful and blank, deeply expressive in its neutrality. They offer one of the few original post-sixties reconfigurations of the movie star. Their manner is a perfect match for the story, and for the mythic, symbolic landscape in which it’s set.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
You feel wiped and blinded by such ravishment, yet a voice within you asks: Come on, guys, can't you just stop for the holidays?- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Minding the Gap is a personal documentary of the highest sort, in which the film’s necessity to the filmmaker—and its obstacles, its resistances, its emotional and moral demands on him—are part of its very existence.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 18, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The film may have dated as a cautionary left-wing tale, yet it has stayed fresh as a study in the minutiae of power. [1 Oct. 2012, p.85]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
She (Cotillard) is the center of attention throughout, yet what matters is her willingness to conspire in the Dardennes’ plea for justice.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 30, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
There’s a way of looking at this movie, a colossal tale of the sociopathy of American history, that’s a matter of listening to what’s said and what isn’t. The movie raises the idea of silence to a nearly transcendent pitch of passion.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 23, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
There is plenty to inflame in this picture and nothing to corrupt. [18 Mar 2002. p.152]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This Freudian gangster picture, directed by Raoul Walsh, is very obvious, and it's so primitive and outrageous in its flamboyance that it seems to have been made much earlier than it was. But this flamboyance is also what makes some of its scenes stay with you.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
That stance of hers will outrage many viewers, as Verhoeven intends it to, but the question of whether Elle is pernicious nonsense or an excruciating black comedy is brushed aside in Huppert’s demonstration of sangfroid. This, she shows us, is how to stand up for yourself in style. She’s the best.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 14, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It's a pretty shameless outlaw fantasy; the feminist justification that the script provides for the heroines' behavior doesn't make their actions any less preposterous.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is heroic in the delicacy of its craftsmanship.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
It is equipped, like an F-15 Eagle, to engage multiple targets at once.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The narrow and merely illustrative drama is matched, unfortunately, by an impersonal cinematography that fails to suggest texture or intimacy.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 10, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Kubrick suppresses most of the active elements that make movies pleasurable. The film says that people are disgusting but things are lovely. And a narrator (Michael Hordern) tells you what's going to happen before you see it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The movie is compact, coolly heartwarming, and gratifyingly uncute. Be warned, though, it also leaves you starving.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 15, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Though “Marty Supreme” is based (albeit loosely) on the true story of someone else’s life, it’s Safdie’s most personal film to date. It’s one of the very few movies that dramatize—hyperbolically, comedically, even mockingly, yet optimistically—the boldness unto folly of a young fanatic turning ambition into reality.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 19, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The 25-year-old Errol Flynn has the smile and dash to shout "All right my hearties, follow me!" as he leaps from his pirate ship to an enemy vessel.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
When Jody and Fodderwing are together, something quirky and magical seems to be happening on the screen; when Jody and his deer are together the boy's emotion has a fairytale glitter; and when Jody's mother reveals a streak of humor she's so pleased at her dumb joke that you find yourself staring in disbelief--and laughing. Even Peck seems to blend into the atmosphere.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Grandiose, emotionally charged musical version of the 1937 tear-jerker. This updated version is a terrible, fascinating orgy of self-pity and cynicism and mythmaking.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Though the facts in No End in Sight are well known, the movie is still a classic.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Justin Chang
Magellan isn’t an action movie; it’s a consequence movie. But Diaz, within all this meticulous subtraction, adds dramatic heft and political meaning.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 13, 2026
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
He [Bahrani] encloses his two characters in a motel room, but he doesn't make them buddies, as a Hollywood movie would. They are characterized in great detail as separate beings.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Though Cumberbatch, too, can be compelling, and though you constantly wonder what is stored in reserve behind his wintry gaze, he is at heart a master of urbanity, and not everyone will be convinced that he’s truly at home on the range. Still, you should certainly seek out the movie, and relish its central standoff.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 22, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Sturges is more at home in slapstick irony (as in The Lady Eve, earlier in '41) than in the mixed tones of this comedy-melodrama, but it's a memorable film nevertheless.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Deep Red evinces the full extent of Argento’s seductive artistry. The film’s glamorous collection of psychics, dandies, and artists suggestively discuss murder as if they’re speaking of sex. And aren’t they, really?- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Richardson in particular vaults to the forefront of her generation’s actors with this performance, which virtually sings with emotional and intellectual acuity.... Few performances—and few films—glow as brightly with the gemlike fire of precocious genius.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 1, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It would be fun to be able to dismiss this as undoubtedly the best movie ever made in Pittsburgh, but it also happens to be one of the most gruesomely terrifying movies ever made.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Artist is not just about black-and-white silent pictures. It is a black-and-white silent picture. And it's French.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 14, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A big, enjoyable musical biography, well directed by Michael Curtiz.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by