The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,483 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3483
-
Mixed: 1,345 out of 3483
-
Negative: 198 out of 3483
3483
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This movie is terribly uneven -- best when it's gaudy and electric, worst in its more realistically staged melodramatic moments, especially toward the end. Overall, it's an entertaining show.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The central conceit of glorifying progress and moral uplift in a musical comedy set in New Mexico in the 1880s is certainly a strange one, but it worked out surprisingly well--though the charm is mostly heavy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Jerry Schatzberg directs the film with a sleek yet relaxed precision that mirrors Joe’s own breezy confidence.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Justin Chang
Paddington in Peru belongs to Olivia Colman, who, as the Reverend Mother at Aunt Lucy’s retirement home, delivers a performance so rich in winking mischief, and so blissfully untethered to the mechanics of the plot, that she should be billed in the credits as Irreverent Mother.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 13, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The Butler is a lightweight, didactic movie, a kind of well-produced high-school entertainment.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 19, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is, despite its trickery, that plainest and least surprising of artifacts; the work of art that is exactly the sum of its parts, neither more nor less. [19 Nov 2001, p. 78]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Everything in this movie is fudged ever so humanistically, in a perfuctory, low-pressure way. And the picture has its effectiveness: people are crying at it. Of course they're crying at it - it's a piece of wet kitsch. [6 Feb 1989]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Nichols of 1971 was bold and speedy, keeping pace with Jack Nicholson's contempt, whereas the more civilized Nichols of 2004 seems a beat behind the lines, waiting for peace or charity to break out. They never do.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Hal Ashby has the deftness to keep us conscious of the whirring pleasures of the carnal-farce structure and yet to give it free play. This was the most virtuoso example of sophisticated, kaleidoscopic face that American moviemakers had yet come up with; frivolous and funny, it carries a sense of heedless activity, of a craze of dissatisfaction.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Cassavetes captures the gambler’s fatalistic joy in playing out a tragedy of his own making to the bitter end, and, revelling in the romantic solitude of the hunter and the hunted, presents a gun battle as a metal-and-concrete ballet.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
No one could mistake the movie for a documentary, but the picture has some of the rectitude of a good documentary--a tone of plainness without flatness.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
As with Spielberg's "Munich," there is an awkward, irresoluble tension between the movie's urge to thrill and the weighty pull of the historical obligations that it seeks to assume. How much, to be blunt, should we be enjoying ourselves? What do we owe to The Debt? Whatever the sum, it is more than the film itself, gloomy with unease, seems able to repay.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 5, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The dialogue is often painfully hip-cute, but the actors manage to be funny anyway.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Above all, there is Tom Cruise, whose career was in the ascendant, with “Risky Business” (1983) and “Legend” (1985), in the frantic years covered by the second half of American Made. Because he has changed so little in the interim, and mounted so uncanny a resistance to the onslaught of time, we feel, with a jolt, that we are gazing up at a star as he both was and still is. Astronomers may flee the cinema in confusion.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 25, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Susan Sarandon does inspired double-takes - just letting her beautiful dark eyes pop.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Cranston, in Last Flag Flying, seeks out the same terrain, but his crudeness is more of a crotchety act, and the journey concludes on a glum conservative note. Some stories need not be told again. ♦- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 30, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Quite an achievement: the American director Todd Haynes revisits the world of London glam rock and manages to make it look dull.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Kasdan is shrewd and funny about such things as the ease with which powerful people can mimic, when they need to, the forms of sincerity and concern. The satire is unrelenting but not too broad; it stays close to common observation.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
He can follow any train of thought, so he does, and it’s no surprise when the trains run out of steam.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What will divide viewers is the plot; either the ending makes no sense or it forces you to rethink everything that went before.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Caught Stealing is a grand entertainment for a time of shame and guilt and corruption, of treacherous authority and brazen hypocrisy.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 28, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The script, by James Toback, is a grandiloquent, egocentric novel written as a film; it spells everything out, and the director Karel Reisz's literal-minded, proficient style calls attention to how airless and schematic it is.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Uneven and it has unresolved areas, but it also has a 60s charge to it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The Oscar Wilde story has its compelling gimmick and its cheap thrills, and despite the failings of Albert Lewin as writer and director, he has an appetite for decadence and plushy decor.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
[Willis’s] heavy trudge on a game leg suggests weariness of historical dimensions; the harmonious mysteries of the urban landscape are themselves the essence of his art. A brilliant sequence of musicians at work gets away from familiar modes of filmed performance and into the depths of inner experience.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 16, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
It's an expertly made, intentionally minor movie, though when Monroe, doping herself with everything available, lies in bed, confused and hapless, there are depressing intimations of the end to come.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 21, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Mel Ferrer smiles his narcissistic, masochistic smiles as the crippled puppeteer who can speak his love to the 16-year-old orphan girl Lili (Leslie Caron) only through his marionettes. Canon is much too good for him, but the movie doesn't know it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Crystal Skull isn't bad--there are a few dazzling sequences, and a couple of good performances--but the unprecedented blend of comedy and action that made the movies so much more fun than any other adventure series is mostly gone.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie has an air of momentousness, yet most of it is conventional, though well-directed, pop mayhem.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by