For 20,311 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,399 out of 20311
-
Mixed: 8,446 out of 20311
-
Negative: 2,466 out of 20311
20311
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
The final image - a freeze frame of a pas de deux staged to resemble a triumphal Communist poster - perfectly captures the film's overall effect: it's strenuously brainless.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
Student Bodies just slowly topples over as you watch it, like a stand-up comedian in the act of failing.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The indoor scenes are so dark that you can barely make out the outlines of the bodies, much less distinguish who is who. Because almost half the film is this dim, it makes for a frustrating viewing experience. The jerky cinematography compounds the irritation.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Apparently, because all the good jokes were used up in the first two "Fockers" movies, the wisenheimers behind the latest installment in this unnecessary trilogy decided to bring in some spew, opening a sick toddler's mouth like a fire hydrant and letting it rip.- The New York Times
- Posted Dec 21, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
Unfortunately, the things that can be funny and even liberating in a movie like "American Pie" end up looking coarse and slightly depressing in the scripted pseudoreality of The Virginity Hit.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
This witless installment features the usual ultra-slow-motion mayhem and helpful freeze-frames to allow us to admire the extra dimension. Fans will not be happy, however, to learn that Ms. Jovovich is more decently clothed this time around.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
Mr. Yudin keeps dragging things back to the restaurant and bathroom humor. He sabotages his own story, as well as the creditable work being done by Mr. Qualls and Ms. Reed.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
Some obvious comparables for Skyline are "Independence Day" and Steven Spielberg's "War of the Worlds," but there is nothing here that even approaches the comic-book verve of the first or the churning dread of the second.- The New York Times
- Posted Nov 12, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Inhale is a creepy medical thriller in the tradition of "Coma" that amps up the tension and suspense by slicing up time.- The New York Times
- Posted Oct 21, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Posted Dec 16, 2010
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
A tired mash-up of every men-behaving-badly sitcom ever to grace a third-tier television network, Speed-Dating tries to coax laughs from characters so dated even Eddie Murphy would balk.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
The talented Ms. Fanning gives a capable performance, and Mr. Konchalovsky and his camera and special-effects crews put a few arresting images on screen, including some frightening metal rat-dogs. But even there they fall short of obvious models like Jean-Pierre Jeunet's "City of Lost Children," and the 3-D treatment adds nothing.- The New York Times
- Posted Nov 23, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Jolene's skin may smell like warm milk to Brad, but to the rest of us it has curdled long before she leaves his bed.- The New York Times
- Posted Oct 28, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Filmed in Rwanda, Shake Hands With the Devil is certainly panoramic. But the best that can be said of the film is that it is an honorable dud.- The New York Times
- Posted Nov 11, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The director Alister Grierson, not grasping that bad dialogue is sometimes best delivered quietly, encourages his actors to shout and thrash about, and so they do, like fish out of water and performers out of their depth.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 3, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Spectacularly uninteresting...this dreary Antipodean curiosity is a yob-filled slog of hard-man posturing, all of it bathed in an oppressive testosterone funk. And I haven’t even mentioned the hairy buttocks.- The New York Times
- Posted Aug 4, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
The product - sloppy even by guerrilla filmmaking standards - has no revelations to offer that are worth the slog of watching it.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 3, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
This bizarre sort-of satire featuring insane characters doing incomprehensible things might be forgivable if it were even mildly amusing. It's not.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 6, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
The entire film seems to be happening on the other side of a dirty window - good news for the dreadful computer-generated effects, if not for our eyes.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 6, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 13, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
As it lurches from Act II to Act III, Battle: Loss Angeles reveals itself to be a lousy movie.- The New York Times
- Posted Mar 10, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The resulting film, directed by Paul Johansson, feels rushed, amateurish and clumsy. It's not just the ideologies that feel oddly out of step with the present day, but the clothes, hairstyles and interiors.- The New York Times
- Posted Apr 28, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
A drab combination of science-fiction horror film and conspiracy thriller, accomplishes something the world wasn't really crying out for: it recreates the tedium of watching the later Apollo missions.- The New York Times
- Posted Sep 3, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Teeming with smart American humorists - and a passel of Arquettes - all unconditionally admiring. What's astonishing, then, is that not one of them stepped in to dissuade their friend from participating in such an embarrassingly awful project.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 10, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
About the only honestly funny thing in the movie is Faizon Love's uncredited performance in the Joe E. Brown role, as the school maintenance man who's immediately smitten with Big Momma.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 19, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
It's not outlandish enough to work as slapstick, not intelligent enough to make a comment on the fickleness of immigration policy.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 17, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Green Lantern is bad. This despite Mr. Reynolds's dazzling dentistry, hard-body physique and earnest efforts.- The New York Times
- Posted Jun 16, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
The filmmakers’ aversion to coherent narrative and genuinely suspenseful visuals (not to mention a penchant for having Ms. Moore receive terrible news via cellphone) keep the movie’s mystery stew from hitting the spot.- The New York Times
- Posted Apr 4, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
An attempt to inaugurate a new movie franchise, something that might appeal to women and mystery fans. This is a perfectly sound ambition, but the movie, directed by Julie Anne Robinson from a script by Stacy Sherman, Karen Ray and Liz Brixius, is so weary and uninspired that it feels more like an exhausted end than an energetic beginning.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 27, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The body-swapping premise, which is stale to begin with, isn't explored with any depth, unless you find meaningful Freudian subtext in the movie's relentless anal fixation. But the premise at least sets up a farce that surpasses "The Hangover" in gleeful crudeness and profanity.- The New York Times
- Posted Aug 4, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by