For 20,271 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,377 out of 20271
-
Mixed: 8,430 out of 20271
-
Negative: 2,464 out of 20271
20271
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Ben Kenigsberg
The labored screen adaptation shows regrettably few signs of personal fire, and many signs of a work that has been sapped of the intimacy of live theater.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 23, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Brandon Yu
arren uses an assured hand in treating the family melodrama with the tenderness of a tone poem. For most of the film, he avoids painting in broad strokes while ratcheting up the conflict between Porter, a tattooed veteran living on a boat, and the bespectacled, seemingly upright Malcolm.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 23, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Beatrice Loayza
Predictably, their relationship softens up, but the film nevertheless maintains some of its prickly charm, in no small part because of the feisty Rampling, whose ice-queen persona here straddles bone-dry humor and withering tragedy.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 23, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
A House Made of Splinters is made with such aching sensitivity that it’s a marvel a camera was used and not some form of mind-meld.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 22, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Turner
It’s not funny enough to have anything clever to say about its gag, and it’s not exciting enough to be a competent horror movie.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 22, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Building on a series of oppositions — nature and culture, realism and romance, duty and freedom — O’Connor brings Emily the myth to vibrant life, persuasively suggesting that this ostensibly strange and cloistered genius came into being not despite her contradictions but through them.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Pfeiffer, Majors and Douglas (as Hope’s equally big-brained dad) are the truer stars of this show, and each brings something valuable to the mix.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Daniels
In a cinematic landscape where the anxiety of surveillance has been sufficiently explored — with movies like “The Conversation,” “Enemy of the State” and “Kimi” — this simplistically dreary offering doesn’t crack a new code.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Teo Bugbee
Lonesome demonstrates a mature use of sex in cinema, a treatment that communicates narrative purpose without diminishing sex’s animalistic, physical side.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Natalia Winkelman
At once a story of legislative struggle and an admiring profile of a crusader, The First Step sometimes gets bogged down in bromides about community and common ground rather than unpacking the specifics of Jones’s approach and how it differs from his detractors’.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Beatrice Loayza
At points, the contrast between Irene’s joy and the encroaching horrors is jarring and eerie, but A Radiant Girl seldom hits these notes — the rest is deflating and awkward.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
The film’s biggest trick might be casting Moore, Stan and the positively glowing Middleton and still never quite catching fire.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Brandon Yu
The movie doesn’t have enough of a narrative engine to compensate for its lack of world building.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
It suggests John le Carré by way of David Lynch — a feverish and haunting but also wry and meditative rumination on power, secrecy and the color of clouds over water at sunset.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Austin Considine
However crisp and stylishly executed, the parts don’t quite add up to a satisfying whole.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 16, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
At once dryly funny and surprisingly poignant, Jethica uses the paranormal as a metaphor for abusive male behavior. The film’s deadpan perspective and unhurried pacing can diffuse its surprises, but Ohs has an offbeat style that’s fresh and fun.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 15, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
The movie can’t help but function as an apologia for the ruling class.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 15, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The cast is large and the costume and set designers have been kept busy with period details, but “Marlowe” neither dutifully copies nor cleverly updates detective-movie tropes. The dialogue is spiced with profanities and anachronisms, and the plot moves ponderously through a thicket of complications.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 15, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ben Kenigsberg
Barbaro and Boneta’s charm offensive never amounts to much, though. The eagerness this film has to please could never match how pleased Feingold clearly is to be making a movie like it.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 10, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Amy Nicholson
No one in this movie is playing anything near a human being, although Kutcher occasionally resembles one when he lowers his head, crinkles his eyes and chuckles.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
More tingly than terrifying (and more than a smidge off-the-wall), “Dark” has a cheeky boldness. Rea, a prolific independent filmmaker, deploys the gore judiciously and his actors are above reproach.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
This film, relatively modest in scale but broad in ambition, offers three stories of music makers and devotees. It’s a mixed bag, alternating conventional homily with genuine, substantial analysis.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Gently discursive and virtually plotless, The Civil Dead is a walking-and-talking movie that finds uncommon humor in Whit’s need to be seen and Clay’s extreme discomfort with that responsibility.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Teo Bugbee
To the film’s credit, the central relationship remains realistically drawn — a teenage courtship that’s marked by misunderstandings and mood swings. The characters aren’t always sweet, but they never feel phony.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nicolas Rapold
The ticktock horror plotting muffles the romantic spark that brought Maja and Leah together in the first place — the thrill replaced by a lukewarm chill.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Devika Girish
Touzani’s film becomes an ode to the many kinds of love that persist, even in an unforgiving world.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Beatrice Loayza
Rotem’s organic approach steers clear of icky idealism, but its conclusions nevertheless feel worn out. Talking helps, sure, but getting people in the same room is too often the stuff of fiction.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Brandon Yu
The plot, as a result, can’t quite find its momentum; it doesn’t help that most of the film’s scares fall flat on a visual and technical level.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The movie’s greater, intractable problem, though, is that Stolevski has burdened his characters with such obvious narrative instrumentality — Kol is the sensitive naïf while Adam is the appealing, gentle exemplar of an authentic life — that the two simply never come to life as people, either as individuals or as a couple.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 9, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by