For 20,280 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,381 out of 20280
-
Mixed: 8,435 out of 20280
-
Negative: 2,464 out of 20280
20280
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Ultimately, Ms Lynch has nowhere to take her erotic parable except to a dead end, but she makes the unfolding of the story a spooky, engrossing process.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
Blue doesn't seduce the viewer into its very complex, musically formal arrangements. The narrative is too precious and absurd. The interpretation it demands seems dilettantish.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
For all its faults, Fortress has an unusually energetic imagination. At its best, it blends "Robocop," "The Handmaid's Tale" and "Brave New World" into something scary, original and grimly amusing.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Though this is by no means the grisliest or most witless film made from one of Mr. King's horrific fantasies, it can lay claim to being the most unpleasant. Why? Because when you strip away the suspenseful buildup to a King story, you're often left with mechanical moralizing and crude, sophomoric small talk. Needful Things has more of both than any film could ever need.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
As the movie accelerates out of control into a series of frantically intercut scenes that lack basic continuity, the fun turns into a collection of abrupt non sequiturs.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
If the central performances in Careful approached the earnest intensity of some of its early-1930's inspirations, the movie would probably be twice as funny.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
The best that can be said about Mr. Gibson as a director -- and this is no mean achievement -- is that it's often possible to forget he was the man behind the camera. Most of this film has a crisp, picturesque look and a believable manner.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
With warmth, wit and none of the usual overlay of nostalgia, King of the Hill presents the scary yet liberating precariousness of life on the edge.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Mr. Woo's obvious gusto and his taste for myth making are readily apparent. But so is his fondness for the slow, lingering death scene coupled with sickening sound effects. Presenting Mr. Van Damme as reverentially as Sergio Leone did the young Clint Eastwood, Mr. Woo displays a real aptitude for malignant mischief, which is this story's stock in trade.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Although Manhattan Murder Mystery struggles with its own contrivances, it achieves a gentle, nostalgic grace and a hint of un-self-conscious wisdom. Those who appreciate the long, daring continuum of Mr. Allen's work will be glad to find him simply carrying on.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A largely incoherent movie that generates little suspense and relies for the majority of its thrills on close-up gore.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Ms. Holland's film of The Secret Garden is elegantly expressive, a discreet and lovely rendering of the children's classic by Frances Hodgson Burnett.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
For those who accept the absurd simulations as realistic, Sex and Zen will have soft-core pornographic appeal. For others, its appeal should be as a cheeky if predictable sendup of erotic obsession and its unhappy consequences.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
When the film announces, halfway through, that it will be devoting the rest of its running time to tying up these loose ends, the audience may as well give up the ghost.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Even though this film may do for chess what "The Red Shoes" did for ballet, it works movingly and most effectively as a family drama.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Walter Goodman
The plots are fairly basic, but the direction by John Carpenter and Tobe Hooper is droll, the effects are all a fan could ask for, and the playing is appropriately agitated. [06 Aug 1993, p.D15]- The New York Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Turns out to be a smashing success, a juggernaut of an action-adventure saga that owes noithing to the past. To put it simply, thi is a home run.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
It is the unusual film comedy in which the humor springs as much from character as from situation.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
The film's mysteriousness is not profound. Anybody who hasn't guessed the killer's identity after 30 minutes should be forced to watch Rising Sun three times a day until Christmas.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
It comes as a welcome surprise that "So I Married an Axe Murderer," which might have been nothing more than a by-the-numbers star vehicle, surrounds Mr. Myers with amusing cameos and gives him a chance to do more than just coast.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
It hits a couple of ecstatically funny high points, only to plummet into a bog of second-rate gags, emerging a long time later to engage the audience by the sheer, unstoppable force of the Brooks chutzpah.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
Although its aspirations are high, the film works only fitfully when Mr. Singleton exercises his gift for vernacular speech, for finding the comic undertow in otherwise tragic situations, and even for parody.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Coneheads falls flat about as often as it turns funny, and displays more amiability than style.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
Another Stakeout is made for the kind of person whom television drives out of the house to the movies but who doesn't want surprises when he arrives at the theater. It's big-screen television fare.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Caryn James
It is a quirky, ambitious, praiseworthy project that somehow becomes a victim of all the cliches it was invented to avoid.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
How each frees the other is the stuff of Free Willy, which is as engaging as such films can be without offering rude surprises.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Apparently too much eye of newt got into the formula for Hocus Pocus, transforming a potentially wicked Bette Midler vehicle into an unholy mess. That's too bad, since Ms. Midler's appearance in a role like the one she has here could have been pure witchcraft.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Vincent Canby
It's movie making of the high, smooth, commercial order that Hollywood prides itself on but achieves with singular infrequency.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A much more high-pitched movie than its forerunner. [10 July 1993, p.15]- The New York Times
-
Reviewed by