For 20,335 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,412 out of 20335
-
Mixed: 8,455 out of 20335
-
Negative: 2,468 out of 20335
20335
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Jarecki forcefully, if not with wholesale persuasiveness, argues that our business is specifically war.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
Jake Wade Wall's screenplay does deserve a word of praise. It has managed to incorporate the advent of cellphones, the *69 command and caller ID, which could have easily made the entire story impossible.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
When put into the mouths of American actors with no feel for Wilde's high-toned repartee, they simply hang in the air and die.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The message about race relations in America conveyed by The Tenants, a small, serious, but choppy and psychologically cauterized screen adaptation of Bernard Malamud's 1971 novel, is dire.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Manages to entertain mildly only because it traffics in all the familiar action-movie clichés, giving moviegoers ample opportunity to test their action-movie I.Q.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Like Mr. Lee's hit-and-miss effort ("Bamboozled"), Mr. Willmott's alternative history takes its inspiration and its rage from an America that has come both a long way and not nearly far enough. But while the filmmaker's anger is palpable it's not very inspired.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The film may be a mess - narratively muddled and crammed with many more vampires, shape-shifters and sorcerers than one movie can handle, but it bursts with a sick, carnivorous glee in its own fiendish games.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Its familiar story of an embittered child's homecoming and confrontation with a parent throws off dramatic sparks, but they never flare into a blaze.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
Both Ms. Angelou and Ms. Tyson deliver powerful, touching messages. Just as they're sinking in, the film turns into an unabashed chick flick with a painfully gaudy wedding that includes live angels hanging on wires from the ceiling.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Even a talented lead couldn't save Mr. Kramer from himself. As a writer, he may have fashioned a genre-busting screenplay, one that has its postmodern cake and eats it, too, but as a director he proves himself as blood simple, if generally less adept, as any Hollywood hire.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Home accumulates a blurry, on-the-fly atmosphere spiked with moments of unexpected sweetness. The movie, though, is most successful when the dialogue mutes and our attention is focused on Jonathan Wolff's gliding camera; in those moments, the brownstone is the most interesting character of all.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
If the film's sentiments about the madness of war are impeccably high-minded, why then does Joyeux Noël, an Oscar nominee for best foreign-language film, feel as squishy and vague as a handsome greeting card declaring peace on earth?- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
A tale of one man's meltdown that ought to have an expiration date of Oct. 27, 2004, stamped on every frame.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
Suffering its own split personality, The Neighbor No. Thirteen is an art house exploitation film neither arty nor exploitative enough.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
This berserk little B-movie is obviously the greatest zombie flick ever set in an experimental women's prison, easily the underground treat of the season, and totally off its rocker.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
If American Gun avoids the most obvious kinds of sensationalism, it has the flaw common to many editorial broadsides of overstuffing its episodes with melodrama and symbolism.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
The animation is uninspired (with so much ice, the creatures need to be twice as good-looking), and the story is humdrum. (The saber-toothed tiger learns to swim!)- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
It's all so seamy, sordid, lurid and shocking! And dull, despite a noirish gloss of wide-angle cinematography and a jaundiced, smoggy color scheme.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
As for the authorial conceit - assembling the movie from giddy, spastic, amateur photography captured from every part of the arena - at best it yields energetic perspectives on the show, at worst it looks like a cellphone video camera having an epileptic seizure.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Take the Lead, despite its nifty concept and fiery leading man, feels sloppy and rushed.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
The fun of Scary Movie 4 is that it isn't a movie at all. Organized on the principle of parody, not plot, driven by gags and cultural feedback, it's an exercise in lowbrow postmodernism, a movie-movie contraption more nuts than Charlie Kaufman's gnarliest fever dream. It's cleverly stupid.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Bogged down by the stylistic gimmickry of bustling montages and jarring animated segments, Look Both Ways aims for existential drama but succeeds only in reminding us that misery loves company.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Dunn and his colleagues dig up some interesting information during their inquiry, like the origins of the devil-horns hand signal, metal's signature salute, but their insider love of the music finally proves as big an obstacle to the film as their ploddingly pedagogic approach.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Hoffman enlivens Mission: Impossible III, which otherwise droops, done in both by the maudlin romance and by Mr. Abrams's inability to adapt his small-screen talent -- evident in his capacity as the television auteur behind "Alias" and "Lost" -- to a larger canvas.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
I certainly can't support any calls for boycotting or protesting this busy, trivial, inoffensive film. Which is not to say I'm recommending you go see it.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
In its groggy way The Lost City holds your attention. Incoherent, but splendidly panoramic and drenched in wonderful Cuban music, it has the texture of a vivid, intoxicating dream that seems to mean something until you wake up and feel it slipping away. All that remains are feelings and impressions connected by a mood.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
This sweet-natured but plodding adaptation of a young-adult novel by Carl Hiaasen could have used a little less broad satire of corporate greed and a few more, well, owls.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Shrewdly divided against itself. What begins as a small, cleareyed drama about a teenager with terminal cancer morphs into a gauzy tear-jerker.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by