For 20,335 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,412 out of 20335
-
Mixed: 8,455 out of 20335
-
Negative: 2,468 out of 20335
20335
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
I don't think Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang is an altogether bad movie. It's just a movie with no particular reason for existing, a flashy, trifling throwaway whose surface cleverness masks a self-infatuated credulity.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
This is a hiss-the-villain, cheer-the-hero kind of movie.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Laura Kern
It's fully apparent that this sequel is more trick than treat and doesn't really compare to its fine predecessor - though it still manages to be eye-opening (and sometimes positively nauseating) in itself.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Mr. Swofford's book has earned a place alongside the classics of military literature, but Mr. Mendes's film is more like a footnote - a minor movie about a minor war, and a film that feels, at the moment, remarkably irrelevant.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
An unusually pure example of American kitchen-sink realism.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
The parts of Get Rich or Die Tryin' that feel most genuine have to do with friendship and family, rather than with criminal intrigue. But the movie ultimately lacks an emotional core. It will certainly make 50 Cent even richer, but it wouldn't have killed him to try a bit harder.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
There is no way a feature-length movie could do justice to such bounty, and Walk the Line settles for the minimum.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
It does have the feel of farce at times, but much of the time it just seems determined to shock.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Entertaining without being especially illuminating. If you must see only one documentary about a Slovene philosopher this year, it might be better to read his books.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
A one-dimensional romantic comedy that feels like an old-fashioned vehicle picture, the kind the big movie studios used to make in the 1930's and 40's just to bring in the fans of a particular actor or actress.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
So snug, airtight and insulated from reality that the nice, well-scrubbed "Cheaper by the Dozen" seems almost rambunctious by comparison.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The rhythms of the dialogue move to the same beat as steadily as a metronome ticks and tocks, while every sentence is polished like stone, absent the jaggedness of real breath and life. You can hear the play in this thing without even knowing it was based on a theatrical production.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Has a knowing, insider quality that could generate a modest cult following.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
Given the material, Seamless can't be faulted a certain star-struck superficiality- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
The Alaskan runs are often spectacular, resembling nothing so much as a controlled plummet down an avalanche. All of which is worth the price of admission if "stoked" is a regular part of your vocabulary.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Marshall can't rescue the film from its embarrassing screenplay or its awkward Chinese-Japanese-Hollywood culture klatch, but Memoirs of a Geisha is one of those bad Hollywood films that by virtue of their production values nonetheless afford a few dividends, in this case, fabulous clothes and three eminently watchable female leads.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The women make The Family Stone, especially Ms. Parker, whose nimble performance is reason alone to see the film: not since Philippe Petit has anyone walked a tightrope with such finesse - and in high heels, no less.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Because The Matador sustains a tone of screwball insouciance and keeps its trump card hidden up its sleeve, it must be counted as a well-made comic thriller. That doesn't mean it has any depth, credibility or artistic value beyond its capacity to divert.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
In casting about for new sources of fear, Marebito achieves its own level of mediocrity.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
Mr. Sibille breaks no sweat under the scrutiny, giving a quiet, concentrated performance that lends heft to less than revelatory material.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
It is startling that a three-hour film dealing largely with the history of the Middle East should find no time to mention either the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or the role of oil in the region. And it is more than a little unsatisfying to see the complex history of American conservatism reduced to the dreams and schemes of a handful of intellectuals.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Like some other contemporary films that try to stitch together a small army of characters into a community of sorts, Happy Here and Now feels like a symptom in search of a cure.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The vogue for retro-horror, particularly the stripped-down shivers of 1970's slasher flicks, continues apace in this nasty little piece of work from Australia.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
At the sweet heart of this silly film is a determination to upend the clichés and assumptions applied to the population we condescendingly label "special."- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
However fascinating the source material, there's something less than cinematic about 90 minutes of watching people read letters in front of windows.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
A slick but silly affair unlikely to appeal to anyone over the age of 15.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
It cheerfully invites the audience to descend to their level, where no joke is too silly or raunchy, and a plot is just a way of passing time between game levels and bong hits.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
There's potential here for an incendiary riff on gentrification and its discontents, but the result is only lukewarm. While the ensemble is as pungent as its assorted clichés will permit, the cruddy video photography and haphazard organization of plot blunt the wry thrust of the material.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
In essence, this is a string of intermittently interesting, occasionally funny, periodically wacky if rarely disturbing, sometimes touching though fairly boring and poorly shot human-interest stories.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by